Who was Flavius Josephus? Some would say a moderate, others might say he was a traitor to the Jewish people. Upon examination, the lines between the two become blurred. Josephus was born Josephus ben Matthias in the year 37 CE to a lineage that he claimed was of priestly Judaic origin. So why do so many now refer to him as Flavius Josephus? Why did he bear the first name of a Roman emperor? It appears that Josephus’ identity was much more complex than being simply a Roman or a Jew.
In Josephus’ autobiography, he did not hesitate to sing the praises of his own accomplishments and nobility. He said of himself in his introductory paragraphs that “he was commended by all for his passion for learning,” and that even the high priests themselves would come to ask for his teaching on Judaic law at the mere age of fourteen. 1 According to Josephus, his desire to learn did not end there. At the age of sixteen, Josephus began to study the three major sects of Judaism (the Sadducees, the Pharisees, and the Essenes) in order to become contented with one of the three sect’s philosophies and customs. However, Josephus found himself contented with none of them, but rather was drawn into the Judean desert by a man named Banus.
Banus was an ascetic Jewish philosopher who wandered the desert wearing clothing fashioned from the leaves of plants. He ate nothing but that which he acquired by foraging, bathed with cold water, and preserved his chastity. For reasons not offered by Josephus, he became attracted to Banus’s way of life, and so followed Banus in his ways for three years.2
Upon his return to Jerusalem from the desert, what Josephus began to do exactly has been disputed, at least in the particulars. Some have interpreted his autobiography, The Life of Flavius Josephus, as saying he became a Pharisee, while other scholars, such as Steve Mason, interpret the language simply as meaning that he lived among the Pharisees and worked for them.3 Despite disagreement, it is clear that Josephus was at least allied closely with many of the Pharisees.
Indeed, at age twenty-six, Josephus sailed by ship to Rome to request the release of some priestly acquaintances. According to Josephus, his friends were put into captivity for insignificant causes. On his voyage by sea, however, Josephus reported his first scrape against the threat of death; the ship he was on, holding some six-hundred men, sunk at sea. Josephus survived and was saved, along with around eighty other men, by a friendly ship. They were taken to the Italian city of Puteoli, where he met with his acquaintance, and friend of Emperor Nero, Aliturius. Fortunately, since Aliturius was a friend of Nero’s and his wife, Poppea, Aliturius was able to acquaint Josephus with Poppea, who became so charmed by Josephus that she freed his fellow Pharisees from captivity.4 Thus, Josephus had established himself as a mediator for the Jews to the Romans.
But when Josephus arrived back in Judea from Puteoli, rumors were spreading quickly of the Jews’ desire to revolt against the Romans. At hearing such thoughts, Josephus scolded the supporters of insurrection. Meanwhile, the Syrians, then under the authority of the Romans, were appalled by such a speculation, and they lashed out against the Jews violently. That being said, the Jews were forced to defend themselves against the governing powers.5
When the Jews were victorious in the first counter-assault against the Romans, they were excited by their victory, and thought that they could defeat and conquer the Romans. Around 66 CE, the Jewish Zealots began building up their armed forces in preparation for war. Though Josephus thought this was foolish, he hesitantly accepted his appointment as a commander in Galilee and began fortifying the cities surrounding Galilee. But Josephus eventually met his defeat at the hand of Vespasian, the Roman General, and was captured in the aftermath of the battle for Jotapata.6
Josephus and his troops, who had taken refuge in a cave, were discovered by the Romans. According to Josephus’ History of the Jewish War, Josephus had a close acquaintance under the dictate of Vespasian, who offered clemency from the Romans. However, Josephus was threatened by his Zealot peers that, if he were to take such an offer from the Romans, they, the Zealots, would kill him. But, Josephus argued that there was no reason to die when they could live under the Romans, who offered peace. Josephus’ peers were not convinced, and the only compromise they offered was a pact of collective suicide. It was then decided that, instead of committing suicide, each soldier would draw lots to determine who was to be killed first and last.7 Curiously, Josephus drew the last lot, and so was left alone with one other, who determined with Josephus that they should take the Roman offer of clemency rather than kill each other.
Thus, Josephus returned to Roman society peacefully, and after correctly predicting that Vespasian would succeed Emperor Nero’s throne, he was granted a special position within the Roman government. A deeply Hellenized Jew, Josephus ben Matthias took the family name of Vespasian and became Flavius Josephus. He wrote many histories, including The Antiquities of the Jews, The Jewish War, and The Life of Flavius Josephus. For some time, Josephus pursued a position as mediator between the Romans and Jews, but due to the distrust he had earned from both parties, his attempts were never successful.
Criticized deeply both in his own time and after, Josephus lived a life of leadership in an admittedly difficult time. Pressured politically and religiously to choose one side over another, Josephus found himself drawn to the rich meaning of Jewish tradition and philosophy, as well as to the rationalism of Greco-Roman philosophy. Distressed by the radicalism of the Jewish Zealots and desiring the peace and tolerance of the Romans, Josephus was a model for tolerance in a politically, religiously, and socially polarized Empire.
- Flavius Josephus, Life of Flavius Josephus, §2. translated by William Whiston. ↵
- Josephus, Life of Flavius Josephus, §2. ↵
- Josephus, The Life of Josephus, §21. translated by Steve Mason; See Introduction, §2 ↵
- Josephus, The Life of Flavius Josephus, §3. ↵
- Josephus, The Antiquities of the Jews, 18:1:1:3-10. ↵
- Josephus, The Life of Flavius Josephus, §37. ↵
- Flavius Josephus, “The Wars of the Jews or History of the Destruction of Jerusalem,” in Wars of the Jews 3:8:5. ↵
23 comments
Samuel Ruiz
I found it interesting in this article that Josephus had become torn between the Romans and the Jews. In fact, what surprised me was that he initially had to work against the Jews for the Romans but later became fond of their tradition and philosophy. Similarly, it was interesting that he found favor in the rationalism of the Roman philosophy.
Natalia Flores
Considering he was never really trusted by neither side, I’d say he was leaning more towards a moderate. I feel a little bad for him though since he desired their characteristics and had allies on both sides which makes it even worse since neither side came to trust him. I also found it extremely lucky that he was the last one to draw lots for the collective suicide and was one of the last ones standing and suggested surrender.
Andrew Rodriguez
This article was very interesting, due to the fact that I didn’t know that much about this topic. In my opinion he was a man of survival he knew where to be and what to be. He reminds me a lot of the girl who betrayed the Aztec empire. La malinche in both being very smart and do what ever it takes to look out for themselves first. While also having to pick there people versus the enemy, as we can tell history hasn’t been kind to neither one of them as well. But this was a very interesting story of a man who just knew how to survive.
Mario De Leon
Very fascinating read and a very detailed article. I have never heard of Flavius Josephus before reading this article. The author had a good introduction paragraph that made me very interested and wanting to read more. Josephus had a very interesting life and I found it interesting that he was attracted to the simple life of Banus. His years with Banus probably greatly influenced his life.
Erik Rodriguez
Your intro is very thought provoking! You illosutrated and researched everything very well! You really gave me a true insight on Flavius and his role in history.
Great job!
Mariana Sandoval
Flavius Josephus’ story is a sad, but relatable story. I think it’s important to foster relationships with people that are different from you in order to build strong communities. While the times were different, Josephus was doing something that was way ahead of his time in terms of accepting people that were different from him and not living in an isolationist mindset. I think many people, still, today, want to keep to themselves and keep amongst people that are like them, but in America, with so many different ethnicities, cultures, and thought, it’s important to be true to yourself while acquainting yourself with the diversity of other people.
Jaimie Bennett
This was a very detailed and interesting article! I couldn’t stop reading it and wished it was longer! I used to read many of the Greek Mythology stories but honestly haven’t read this one before! The article really makes me want to find this book and read it! Amazing job with the Article!
Jezel Luna
Great job grabbing the reader’s attention straight off the back. You made me want to continue reading to find out just whom this traitor might have been. I had no prior knowledge about Flavius Josephus but came very familiar with him after reading this article. It can be argued whether he deserved to be called a traitor or not. Personally I just don’t think he should’ve waited so long. Great job getting people to build up assumptions and opinions!
Bryce Cardwell
Your introduction here is very thought-provoking and puts a since of wonder into the reader. This is good because it made me want to continue reading the article and figure out why he is who he is. Overall i thought it was a well-written and organized article.
Rachel White
I had never heard of Josephus before reading this article but I definitely found his story interesting and do not see his as a traitor, but a man trying to save his life. I do think he should have made the decision earlier since he obviously wanted to and I do think he was a coward for waiting until nearly everyone else was dead, but he had no one left to remain loyal to so he should not be hated for his choice. You cannot hate an exboyfriend for starting to date a new girl, that’s life; people move on and should not be seen as evil for doing so. I do think it is a little annoying that he was given a special spot among the Romans, but that was their choice. And it makes me wonder if they knew he only turned over at the last minute when his life hung in the hands of a fellow soldier.