StMU Research Scholars

Featuring Scholarly Research, Writing, and Media at St. Mary's University

Winner of the Fall 2019 StMU History Media Award for

Best Article in the Category of “World History”

In the evening of November 9, 1938, the state-sponsored pogrom on the German-Jewish community occurred throughout Germany that would subsequently be called Kristallnacht. It occurred under the orders of Reinhard Heydrich, the Chief of the Reich Security Main Office, and Heinrich Himmler, the Reichsfuhrer-SS. Heydrich called Gestapo chief Heinrich Muller and put all regional State Police across the Reich on full alert and prepared for the arrest of 20,000 to 30,000 Jews, particularly targeting wealthy Jews. Later that night, Nazi activists destroyed synagogues and Jewish shops throughout Germany. They stole their belongings and forced them out of their homes to abuse, humiliate, and in many cases, murder them.1 Over the next 48 hours, more than 1,000 synagogues were burned and 7,000 businesses were ransacked and windows broken. Some 30,000 Jewish men between the ages of sixteen and sixty were arrested and sent to newly expanded concentration camps. The police stood by as the violence—often committed by neighbors, not strangers—raged on. Firemen were instructed to ensure that the flames did not spread to adjacent Aryan property, but absolutely not to put out the fires at the synagogues. Thus, most of the synagogues left standing were small synagogues that were part of other buildings.2

Interior of Berlin’s Fasanenstrasse Synagogue, destroyed during the Kristallnacht on November 9, 1938, photo taken by Abraham Pisarek | Courtesy of Wikipedia

In 1933, there were approximately 500,000 Jews in Germany; however, after Hitler came to power and became Chancellor of Germany, the discrimination and harassment of the Jews in Germany increased drastically. Throughout Germany, Jewish children were constantly met with hostility from their classmates or teachers with disparaging words scribbled on their school supplies. They were also insulted openly in school, and it even escalated to physical bullying. Jewish shops were vandalized by Nazi Stormtroopers (SA), who daubed paint over the shop windows with the words “Germans do not buy in Jewish shops,” and “The Jews are our misery,” among other such expressions of hate.3 Having harassed the Jews in a physical way, the Nazis turned to the law. On April 7, 1933, Hitler’s government passed its first pieces of anti-Semitic legislation. The Law for the Restoration of the Professional Civil Service called for state officials who were not of Aryan descent to be removed from their positions, and a similar law stated that non-Aryan lawyers were required to cease practicing law. At the end of April, a third law was announced that limited the number of Jewish students in state schools and universities.4 In September 1935, a set of laws called the Protection of German Blood and German Honor, also known as the Nuremberg Laws, was passed by the Reichstag and were promulgated at the annual Nazi Party rally in the Bavarian town of Nuremberg. The laws stated that marriage, as well as sexual relations between Jews and citizens of “German or kindred blood,” was prohibited. Only racially “pure” Germans were entitled to civil and political rights. Jews were reduced to the status of subjects of the state.5 Two basic categories were established by the middle of November 1935, stating that a Jew was anyone who descended from at least three Jewish grandparents. The Nazis considered a Jewish grandparent to be a full blooded Jew if he or she belonged to the Jewish religious community. Thus the Nazis determined race by the religious affiliation of grandparents.6 By the year 1938, only 185,000 Jews remained within Germany. In this first period of Nazi rule in Germany, from 1933 to 1939, their policy toward the Jews was one of harassment, so that Jews would leave Germany voluntarily. And that policy seemed to be working right up to the dawn of the Second World War.

On September 1, 1939, German troops invaded Poland from the west, and in just over two weeks, their ally, the Red Army of the Soviet Union, invaded Poland from the east. As the Wehrmacht crossed into Poland, Reinhard Heydrich arranged with the German Army High Command for more than 2,000 Einsatzgruppen to enter the country immediately behind the army. Heydrich’s orders were for the Einsatzgruppen to make sure that “the higher echelons of the Polish population [were] to be rendered as good as harmless.”7 This resulted in the deaths of about 16,000 Poles, which was a mix of the intelligentsia, Catholic priesthood, Jews, and anyone else they considered hostile. The atrocities committed by the Einsatzgruppen was so outrageous that even some members of the German army were appalled by their actions. However, all this brutality was only a prelude to the infamous Holocaust. Although several thousands of Jews were murdered, Hitler and the Nazi leadership were also targeting the leadership class within Poland, and the overarching German policy toward the Jews remained one of harassment, despite the fact that the Nazis now began to have Jews under its control in the millions, instead of the two hundred thousand they had a month earlier.8

The Einsatzgruppen were units formed by Heydrich under the order of Heinrich Himmler in 1939. The core of the units came from Heydrich’s Security Police (Gestapo and Kripo) as well as his intelligence apparatus, and they were supplied by small units of Waffen-SS, a military branch of Himmler’s SS.9 Their aim was to secure order through each phase of the Nazi empire’s expansion. However, the units underwent a critical change in Poland. Like the Gestapo, they had always used brutal but traditional policing techniques in Germany. But that policy changed in Poland. The security mind-set operating there had already lowered the threshold for violence.10 The invasion of Poland in 1939 brought more than a million Jews under the German’s control. Heydrich and the Nazi leaders were faced with a problem that they had not encountered before the war. How would they deal with so many more Jews with their policy of harassment? In fact, harassment was not even possible in Poland. There was nowhere for them to leave to. Therefore, Heydrich directed the Einsatzgruppen to begin to exterminate Jews throughout the former land of Poland, village by village. The Einsatzgruppen would show up in a town or village, march the Jews into the forest outside of town, sometimes to the edge of a gravel pit. The Jews would face a six-foot drop. Then the Einsatzgruppen would shoot their victims at their necks, and the victims would slump into the pit. The Einsatzgruppen took turns in this grizzly business of murder, in between drinking large quantities of liquor, so as to endure their ordeal of killing. They performed these acts of murder by the hundreds per day, regardless of sex and ages of their victims. The process would be repeated over and over again at the same place, until all Jews of the town or village had been thus liquidated. In this way, the Jews had to look down at the growing number of corpses in the pit who might have been their family or friends before being shot themselves.11 However, the daily shootings also took its toll on the Einsatzgruppen. Such daily acts of sheer murder became a traumatic activity for the members of the killing units, and created alcoholics among them, and many had nervous breakdowns as well. The mass killings of Jews in this way only escalated with the invasion of the Soviet Union in 1941, when the numbers of Jews under Nazi control again rose by millions. Himmler tasked Odilo Globocnik, the SS and Police leader in Lublin, to find a new method for the murder of the Jews that would be less disturbing and much less public. The alternative method was to lead to the deportation of Jews to extermination or death camps to be gassed. However, due to the long consolidation process caused by the ever increasing number of Jews and limited amount of man power, Globocnik finally lost patience and decided that mass execution through shooting would be a better alternative solution for the problem. Therefore, the Einsatzgruppen was tasked to do so and after months of killing, the groups finally evolved into mobile killing units.12

Reinhard Heydrich as SS-Gruppenführer in 1940, photo taken by Heinrich Hoffmann | Courtesy of Blogspot

With Germany’s invasion of Poland in 1939, and subsequently of France, Denmark, Norway, and Greece in 1940, and then of the Soviet Union in 1941, approximately 15 million Jews fell under German control. Due to the extent of the very public mass murders of the Einsatzgruppen in Poland and then in the Soviet Union, a fear came to Heydrich’s mind, which was shared by many of his officers in the field. They believed that the children who survived the ordeal would someday seek revenge. Jewish women would bear more children, and the elderly would tell the tales of the murders of the Einsatzgruppen to future generations. Germany’s past misfortune could end only by means of a terrible final reckoning. Heydrich wanted to ensure that the next generations of Germans would no longer have to deal with any problems related to Jews or future “generations of avengers.” Heydrich left no documents or letters indicating that he felt moral ambiguity about his central role in the murderous escalation of anti-Jewish policies.13

The result of the increased violence was staggering. By the end of 1941, the Einsatzgruppen and their local helpers murdered between 500,000 to 800,000 Jewish men, women, and children in the former Polish and Soviet territories, most of the deaths as a result of shooting at close quarters. By the late summer of 1941, both Himmler and Heydrich became concerned that the face-to-face killings carried out by the Einsatzgruppen threatened the mental health of their men. Himmler worried that it would create sadistic, psychologically deranged killers that would threaten the safety of German society after the war.14 Perhaps there might be a less messy method of murder than the methods of the Einsatzgruppen, one that got the job done, without leaving so much evidence of mass murder lying in hundreds of forest clearings.

One of the earliest proposals for dealing with a less messy method came from Rolf Heinz Hoppner, a local official in the General Government of Poland. He proposed the use of gas to accelerate the murder of the Jews. Inspired by the suggestion, Heydrich instructed his officers to investigate the new means of mass murder. In late October 1941, the proposed solution was tested in the form of mobile gas vans at the Sachsenhausen concentration camp near Berlin. Heydrich considered this means of killing more humane, but the gas vans never caught on. The reason was that asphyxiation by carbon monoxide in medium-sized vans was too slow and ultimately no less disturbing than the Einsatzgruppen shootings. They had to wait for their screaming victims to die inside the vans, which took more than fifteen minutes, before they could remove the bodies from the vehicles. The Nazis then continued the search for more effective extermination methods, which led to experiments with a powerful chemical called Zyklon B in Auschwitz.15 However, that was not the first gas experiment conducted by the Nazis. Back in September 1939, Hitler had established a euthanasia program that played a significant role in the development of the Holocaust. Hitler authorized his personal physician, Karl Brandt, to kill those Germans who were mentally retarded, physically infirm, and chronically ill.16 On January 4, 1940, a gassing experiment was conducted in Brandenburg an der Havel at a prison that was converted into a unit for the euthanasia program. The victims were brought to a pretend shower room with fake water pipes along the ceiling where they were asked to undress, stating that they needed a shower. Once they were secured in the room, gas from bottles of carbon monoxide was released into the room and suffocated the victims. The bodies were then taken away to be burnt after the room was ventilated.17

Since the summer and autumn of 1941, the challenge to find a comprehensive solution to the Jewish question multiplied. Rumors about the atrocities that the Nazis were committing on the Jews in the east soon created anxiety for the Nazi leaders, and Heydrich was forced to urge his men to operate with greater caution and secrecy in their tasks. Heydrich proposed to remove the Jews completely from German-occupied Europe, but the propsal was rejected by Hitler at first, due to the importance of public opinion; however, it was later adopted due to Hitler’s fear of the “Jewish World Conspiracy” after the ever increasing number of Jews that came under German control.18 The deportation of Jews towards the gassing facilities was considered a temporary solution and the gassing or shooting of the Jews in Poland had yet to solve the Jewish question for the millions of Jews throughout Europe. For the purpose of dealing with the magnitude of the problem, Heydrich organized a conference, the Wannsee Conference, which was to be held in a villa on the shores of Berlin’s Lake Wannsee. The meeting was supposed to be held on December 9, 1941, but was postponed to January 20, 1942, due to Germany’s declaration of war on the United States.19 Most of the attendees that Heydrich invited were important and well-educated men, many of whom had equivalent status to Heydrich.20 Heydrich hoped to achieve three goals at the meeting. First, he sought official endorsement from the civil authorities present for the meeting for the deportation process of all Jews throughout Europe, to be rounded up and transported by train in railcars to four main death camps in Poland. This was the planned comprehensive solution to the Jewish question. Second, he wanted to emphasize his sole responsibility for the solution of the Jewish Question against the resistance from civilian authorities, mainly from Wilhelm Stuckart of the Interior Ministry. This would enabled him to establish programs without the interference of the authorities who wanted to protect their waning influence from further invasion of the Reich Main Security Office, an organization established by Himmler. Third, he wanted to reach a consensus with the group of people that would be involved in the deportation process, to establish an understanding that half-Jews (Mischlinge) be deported along with full-Jews (Geltungsjuden).21 If these three goals were achieved, it would mean the annihilation of millions of Jews.

The House of the Wannsee Conference, photo by A.Savin in February 12, 2014 | Courtesy of A.Savin, WikiCommons

The meeting fulfilled the first and second goal and affirmed Heydrich’s overall authority in relation to the Final Solution. However, even with the absence of Hitler, no one, not even Heydrich, had the authority to set these decisions in motion without Hitler’s direct approval. However, there would never be any proof that Hitler gave that approval. Hitler certainly didn’t sign any documents relating to the Final Solution. But that was typical of Hitler’s leadership style, to never leave a paper trail leading back to him. All Hitler had to do was to simply give a nod, and that would have been sufficient to set the Final Solution into motion. The discussion at Wannsee testified to the gradually increasing radicalism with which the central authorities of Nazi Germany viewed the Jewish Question. Hitler’s ultimate approval turned the year 1942 into the most horrifying year of systematic mass killings in the history of humankind, and thus, marked the high water mark of the Holocaust.22

  1. Robert Gerwarth, Hitler’s Hangman: The Life of Heydrich (Yale University Press, 2012), 127-128.
  2. Encyclopedia Judaica, 2nd ed, 2007, s.v. “Holocaust: The Events.”
  3. Laurence Rees, The Holocaust: A New History (New York: Public Affairs, 2017), 60.
  4. Laurence Rees, The Holocaust: A New History (New York: Public Affairs, 2017), 61.
  5. Encyclopedia Judaica, 2nd ed, 2007, s.v. “Holocaust: The Events.”
  6. Laurence Rees, The Holocaust: A New History (New York: Public Affairs, 2017), 90-91.
  7. Laurence Rees, The Holocaust: A New History (New York: Public Affairs, 2017), 151-152.
  8. Laurence Rees, The Holocaust: A New History (New York: Public Affairs, 2017), 152-153.
  9. Christopher R. Browning, Ordinary Men: Reserve Police Battalion 101 and the Final Solution in Poland (Harper Perennial, April 24, 1998), 9.
  10. Europe Since 1914: Encyclopedia of the Age of War and Reconstruction Vol. 2, 2006, s.v. “Einsatzgruppen.”
  11. Christopher R. Browning, Ordinary Men: Reserve Police Battalion 101 and the Final Solution in Poland (Harper Perennial, April 24, 1998), 99-100.
  12. Christopher R. Browning, Ordinary Men: Reserve Police Battalion 101 and the Final Solution in Poland (Harper Perennial, April 24, 1998), 49-50, 54.
  13. Robert Gerwarth, Hitler’s Hangman: The Life of Heydrich (Yale University Press, 2012), 198.
  14. Robert Gerwarth, Hitler’s Hangman: The Life of Heydrich (Yale University Press, 2012), 199.
  15. Robert Gerwarth, Hitler’s Hangman: The Life of Heydrich (Yale University Press, 2012), 200.
  16. Encyclopedia Judaica, 2nd ed, 2007, s.v. “Holocaust: The Events.”
  17. Laurence Rees, The Holocaust: A New History (New York: Public Affairs, 2017), 166.
  18. Robert Gerwarth, Hitler’s Hangman: The Life of Heydrich (Yale University Press, 2012), 201-202.
  19. Robert Gerwarth, Hitler’s Hangman: The Life of Heydrich (Yale University Press, 2012), 209.
  20. Robert Gerwarth, Hitler’s Hangman: The Life of Heydrich (Yale University Press, 2012), 210.
  21. Robert Gerwarth, Hitler’s Hangman: The Life of Heydrich (Yale University Press, 2012), 216.
  22. Robert Gerwarth, Hitler’s Hangman: The Life of Heydrich (Yale University Press, 2012), 217.

Ya Pey Hew

Hello! I am a International Business Marketing major at St Mary's University in San Antonio. I am also an international student from Malaysia. My passion is reading and gaining new knowledge. I enjoy listening to music and spending time with my friends and family.

Author Portfolio Page

Recent Comments


  • Vincent Villanueva

    Hello Ameillia and thank you for this insightful and deep article that you have put together here on the Holocaust given its sensitivity of a topic and what not. There was absolutely no bias in this article and it carried sch a tone of informative and professionalism. Hitler being a sinister leader he was, it was absolutely sad to know a human being was capable of hating a certain type of the human race. All in all, great article.

  • Priscilla Leal

    congratulations on your award for this informative article! no matter how many times i hear about the holocaust, i always learn something new and i just cant believe how far the hatred for jews went. i cant believe how they tricked vulnerable jews into taking a “shower” only to be murdered, its so heartbreaking, words cannot explain the feeling.

  • Adelina Wueste

    This article was very well written. You explained a subject that has so much information tied to it in a very understandable manner. It was interesting to me that Hitler’s antisemitism started with the law. It’s sad how people were able to be legally oppressed and it’s disappointing how that oppression spun completely out of control. Before reading this article, I did not know much about how exactly the holocaust started. I had learned about what led to WWII but not the specifics on the holocaust. This article did a very good job at highlighting various events and people that contributed to beginning and escalation of the holocaust.

  • Sydney Nieto

    Firstly, congratulations on your article. The Holocaust is something that well-known all over. I am surprised at how much I learn from every story. I was surprised to see how they felt about the Einsatzgruppen killing method. I can never understand how much hatred someone could have to kill. Hitler really was a clever man as he “never leave a paper trail leading back to him”, resulting in him not signing documents.

  • Karly West

    First off, congratulations on your best world history article award! This was an unfortunate reality for a majority of Jews in Germany at the time of WWII. I never knew some Jews were exiled out of the country, we never hear of this in modern history. It was truly barbaric of the Nazis to burn and destroy the towns and synagogues before killing the residents. It was a completely awful display of power and hatred that is incredibly saddening to read.

  • Andrea Ramirez

    This is an amazing article but, at the same time, devastating. I really think you wrote everything in perfect order and explanation. I was very surprised by all the atrocities that the Jews had to go through at that time simply for being Jews. From verbal insults to his death. The holocaust is a sample of the most inhuman things that the human being is capable of doing when he does not use reason and allows himself to be dominated by hatred and impulse.
    Many congratulations for your work!

  • Aurora Torres

    Very good article! I love this part of history WWII and reading about the Holocaust. It is very sad to know that Hitler would do this thinking the the Jewish people were to blame for all their problems and my placing them in concentrations camps, and killing them would fix everything. It sad to read that such a thing took place known as Kristallnacht, that so many innocent Jewish people would be killed and kicked out of their own properties and taken away from families never to be seen again. Also, reading that the Nazis were trying to create ways faster ways of killing the Jewish people without evidence. But in the end everything that the Nazis created/did was eventually discovered and the Jewish people that lived were able to tell their stories and hope that this never happens again in generations to come.

  • Victorianna Mejia

    Excellent and horrifying article! I just want to state that the award given to this article is well deserved. The article is informative and terrifying, but many people need to know it. This is something that humanity should never ever forget. This article is beautifully written that went in-depth with information. While being a heavy subject covering the Holocaust that could be tough to read, this article provided information at an appropriate speed to readers that I truly appreciate.

  • Katelyn Canales

    Hello Ms. Hew, I really enjoyed your article! I wanted to first tell you congratulations on receiving an award for your article, and bravo for being brave enough to do an article on the Holocuast since it is such a sensitive topic. I enjoyed the professionalism in your article, it wasn’t biased. But, you gave enough information for the reader to really understand just how much the Jews endured. It is so sad what happened to them, but you gave the story justice by providing excellent detail and kept a compelling narrative throughout your article. Glad I came across your article, I learned a lot of interesting facts about the deportation of Jews during the 1940’s. Excellent work!

  • Daniel Gimena

    It was very interesting, though heart-breaker to read this article. The author does a great job giving great details about how horrible process that we all know the basics about. It allows the reader to learn more about this horrible chapter in human history which, although is not pleasant to read about, I think is necessary to honor the memory of those that suffered and perished during those years.

Leave a Reply to Karly West (Cancel Reply)

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.