Winner of the Fall 2018 StMU History Media Award for
Best Article in the Category of “Human Rights”
Have you ever wanted to make some easy money by selling your old stuff? Thanks to websites like Craigslist and Backpage, you can. Both Craigslist and Backpage are two of the largest classified advertisement websites. They allow you to search for and sell items in and around your local area. They even give you the option to post advertisements for job listings, events and activities. Craigslist was founded in 1995, and Backpage was founded in 2004.1 Craigslist is owned by its founder Craig Alexander Newmark, and Backpage was formerly owned by Village Voice Media and was run by its former CEO Carl Ferrer. Backpage is now owned by a Dutch company called Atlantische Bedrijven CV.2 These websites may seem like a harmless way to look for products and services, but the truth is these websites had a personal ad section that made it easy for young girls and women to be sexually exploited.
The personal ad section on these websites allowed for people to meet men and women in their area. Typically, these ads were used to find someone to date or with whom to have casual sex. Although these personal ad sections were intended for people to connect and interact with other persons, they were misused. These ads turned into the perfect platform for pimps and traffickers to promote the sale of women and children for sex. As shocking as it sounds, research has shown that the internet is a common tool for sex traffickers to use. Using the internet allows traffickers to reach a larger number of potential clients while eluding law enforcement.3 For them, the internet is the safest way to make money. The service providers Craigslist and Backpage, however, did nothing to stop people from using their websites in this way. Instead of preventing the ads from being posted or taking them down, they published them.
Several people filed lawsuits against Craigslist and Backpage because they wanted these websites to be held liable for publishing sex ads.4 After being faced with backlash, Craigslist and Backpage agreed to implement some requirements for their advertisements. In 2008, Craigslist required a fee for those persons posting in the “adult services” part of their personal ad section. The fee ranged between 5-10 U.S. dollars per ad. People would need to use a valid credit card and provide a verifiable phone number. This requirement, however, did not have much of an impact. Many traffickers simply used fake credit cards and phone numbers to pay the fee.5 Through these fees, Craigslist and Backpage made a huge profit. Craigslist made $44.6 million from their adult services advertisements and Backpage made $24 million.6 Their adult section, however, was the only one with a fee attached. To get around the fee, people would simply post their sex ads in other sections. Another attempt made by Craigslist and Backpage to reduce the chances of sex trafficking was removing posts with words such as “sexy” and “young.” This also proved to be ineffective. People would use code words so that their ads would not be removed. For example, pimps and traffickers used words like ‘new’ to indicate that the girl was a minor. Backpage even helped to edit advertisements by changing the words so that they would not get flagged or reported.7 The websites changes were not effective in reducing the number of sex ads posted. Craigslist and Backpage still failed to consistently block ads for illegal activity such as sex trafficking.
Many women and children were trafficked through these websites. In one case, three young women were repeatedly raped while they were minors when they were sold through Backpage’s website. Each of these victims filed a lawsuit against Backpage back in October 2014. This case is known as Doe v. Backpage.com. The lawsuit claimed that the classified ad company had engaged in sex trafficking of minors. They argued that the websites were engaged in trafficking since they did such a poor job in governing the content of the ads being posted. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the First District ruled in favor of Backpage and held that Backpage was protected under U.S. Code Title 7 Section 230, more commonly known as the Communications Decency Act (CDA). 8
] The purpose of the CDA is to regulate interactive computer services. The CDA makes it the policy of the United States “to preserve the vibrant and competitive free market that presently exists for the Internet and other interactive computer services” and “to ensure vigorous enforcement of Federal criminal laws to deter and punish trafficking in obscenity, stalking, and harassment by means of computer.”9
In their decision, the Court of Appeals argued that by claiming that Backpage facilitates sex trafficking through its posting rules, you are treating Backpage as the publisher of the content which the CDA prohibits. Section 230 subsection (c) states, “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.”10 The Court believed that Backpage should not be held responsible for what its customers convey on its website. Just a year prior to this case, another lawsuit was brought against Backpage. This case was Backpage.com, LLC v. Cooper. In this case, just like in Doe v. Backpage.com, Backpage argued that they had no knowledge of the content posted on their website. The Court ruled that their classified ads were protected under the First Amendment of the Constitution. They argued that it is unlawful to censor an entire category of speech on a website. They also stated that it would place “an impossible burden” on Backpage to review the millions of ads posted on its website.11
Just like Backpage, Craigslist was faced with numerous lawsuits. Those who brought lawsuits against Craigslist wanted them to be liable and accountable for allowing such advertisements to be published on their website.12 Many advocates fought hard against these two companies. They wanted the sex advertisements on these websites to be criminalized, and to put an end to the use of online classified ads to exploit both adults and children.
The most recent legislation dealing with online sex trafficking was introduced by the Senate. Earlier this year, it was passed by Congress. This piece of legislation is an anti-sex-trafficking bill known as the Stop Enabling Sex Traffickers Act. This act is an exception to Section 230 of the CDA. This Act states, “section 230 was never intended to provide legal protection to websites that facilitate traffickers in advertising the sale of unlawful sex acts with sex trafficking victims; and that clarification of section 230 is warranted to ensure that that section does not provide such protection to such websites.“13 Essentially, this Act allows for sex trafficking victims to sue the websites through which they were trafficked. As a result from the passing of this bill, Craigslist shut down its personal ad section; however, this website remains active today. Backpage, on the other hand, was seized by the FBI and it remains seized to this day. Although action was taken against these websites, there are still several other active websites similar to Craigslist and Backpage. Those who relied on the two sites for sex trafficking have turned to other places on the internet. Shutting down sex advertisements in these cases have not stopped pimps from trafficking young girls and women online; it has just moved their operations to other providers. Despite efforts to target and censor websites like Craigslist and Backpage, trafficking displacement is an inevitable consequence.14 The FBI, however, is making an effort to monitor different forms of illegal activities online, especially sex trafficking. One way we can help fight online sex trafficking is by going after those websites that allow it to happen. If you go to the FBI website, you will find information on how to report instances of human trafficking. The FBI informs us to call the National Human Trafficking Resource Center (NHTRC) if we believe that we are a victim of a trafficking situation or if we have information on a potential trafficking situation. We can reach the NHTRC at 1-888-373-7888, where we can talk to specialists who answer calls at anytime from anywhere. 15 Do not be afraid to seek out help or to report what you believe may be a trafficking situation. Let’s help put an end to online sex trafficking!
- Shana M. Judge, “The Effect of Measures Taken by Craigslist to Screen Online Ads for Commercial Sex,” Social Science Computer Review 36, no. 3 (June 2018): 298. ↵
- Marie- Helen Maras, “Online Classified Advertisement Sites: Pimps and Facilitators of Prostitution and Sex Trafficking,” Journal of Internet Law 21, no. 5 (2017): 17. ↵
- Erin Heil and Andrea Nichols, “Hot Spot Trafficking: A Theoretical Discussion of the Potential Problems Associated with Targeted Policing and the Eradication of Sex Trafficking in the United States,” Contemporary Justice Review 17, no. 4 (2014): 422. ↵
- Shana M. Judge, “The Effect of Measures Taken by Craigslist to Screen Online Ads for Commercial Sex,” Social Science Computer Review 36, no. 3 (June 2018): 298. ↵
- Shana M. Judge, “The Effect of Measures Taken by Craigslist to Screen Online Ads for Commercial Sex,” Social Science Computer Review 36, no. 3 (June 2018): 299. ↵
- Erin Heil and Andrea Nichols, “Hot Spot Trafficking: A Theoretical Discussion of the Potential Problems Associated with Targeted Policing and the Eradication of Sex Trafficking in the United States,” Contemporary Justice Review 17, no. 4 (2014): 428. ↵
- Erin Heil and Andrea Nichols, “Hot Spot Trafficking: A Theoretical Discussion of the Potential Problems Associated with Targeted Policing and the Eradication of Sex Trafficking in the United States,” Contemporary Justice Review 17, no. 4 (2014): 429. ↵
- Kerianne Strachan, “Doe v. Backpage.com: The United States Court of Appeals Further Extends Immunity for Internet Service Providers Under the Communications Decency Act,” Tulane Journal of Technology & Intellectual Property 19, (2016): 262 and 47 U.S. Code § 230 – Protection for private blocking and screening of offensive material, and S.652 – Telecommunications Act of 1996 enacted by 104th Congress (1995-1996). ↵
- § 230. Protection for private blocking and screening of offensive material, 47 USCS § 230 ( Current through PL 115-253, approved 10/3/18 ). https://advance-lexis-com.blume.stmarytx.edu/api/document?collection=statutes-legislation&id=urn:contentItem:4YF7-GV61-NRF4-44C3-00000-00&context=1516831. ↵
- § 230. Protection for private blocking and screening of offensive material, 47 USCS § 230 ( Current through PL 115-253, approved 10/3/18 ). https://advance-lexis-com.blume.stmarytx.edu/api/document?collection=statutes-legislation&id=urn:contentItem:4YF7-GV61-NRF4-44C3-00000-00&context=1516831. ↵
- Marie-Helen Maras, “Online Classified Advertisement Sites: Pimps and Facilitators of Prostitution and Sex Trafficking,” Journal of Internet Law 21, no. 5 (2017): 18. ↵
- Shana M. Judge, “The Effect of Measures Taken by Craigslist to Screen Online Ads for Commercial Sex,” Social Science Computer Review 36, no. 3 (June 2018): 298. ↵
- S. 1693, 115th Cong. (2018) Stop Enabling Sex Traffickers Act (enacted). ↵
- Erin Heil and Andrea Nichols, “Hot Spot Trafficking: A Theoretical Discussion of the Potential Problems Associated with Targeted Policing and the Eradication of Sex Trafficking in the United States,” Contemporary Justice Review 17, no. 4 (2014): 432. ↵
- “Human Trafficking/Involuntary Servitude.” FBI. May 03, 2016. Accessed October 30, 2018. https://www.fbi.gov/investigate/civil-rights/human-trafficking. ↵
180 comments
Madison Downing
I still can’t believe that Craigslist and Backpage were such a big site used for sex/human trafficking, I think that is just insane because I never heard about it. I can’t believe that the FBI didn’t put a stop to it because apparently the 1st amendment allowed it but I don’t think that’s right. I’m so happy that now we have laws against that but it’s so terrible that Craigslist would help the issue because of they money they made. This was such a great article and I enjoyed reading it!
Lyzette Flores
It is crazy to read and find out that while one is simply using these sources to buy things such as dogs, shoes, jewelry, etc there is sex trafficking being done. I would have never thought that these matters were being done. It is sad that we must take precautions even while online shopping. Today’s world is os cruel and I can’t even imagine what those victims were and are going through. I am glad that as soon as they found out what was going on they shut down that section.
Luisa Ortiz
Before reading “Craigslist and Backpage: The Websites Used for Sex Trafficking” I had no idea that those websites were used for human trafficking, it was a shock to me! Thank you for choosing this topic, we sometimes think that human trafficking does not happen too often or is just in a foreign country but the sad news is that happens more often and it happens here in the U.S. Again thank you for using this platform and showcase this issue, congratulations on being nominated in three different categories!
Luke Lopez
This was a very informative article on Craigslist, and Backpage. I did not know that these websites allow sex trafficking ads in their adult services section. This is a terrible thing that these heinous ads were not taken down or criminalized, but rather these websites looked at these ads as a way that they could make a profit. Overall, this was a great article that detailed the corruption within websites such as Craigslist, and Backpage.
Arieana Martinez
This article was very chilling. I cannot believe the lengths that people go to in order to exploit and literally sell women on the internet as if they were a used purse or laptop. I was very informed after reading this, and learned a lot more about the sex trade industry than I had ever known before. I was disturbed yet intrigued at the same time. Because of this article, I got a glimpse into a very dark side of the world and am made more aware of the dangers that plague women every day.
Alejandra Chavez
Personally, I too would want the platforms of the advertisements to be held accountable for not having policies or restrictions implemented to stop criminal activity from happening on their sites. It’s shocking how the government would stand by them instead of holding them liable but then again, there’s a lot of corruption in the system so I’m not surprised. I feel that the government should have shut down their sites if they found it too “tedious” to go back and check each advertisement. This was a very well written article. I’m glad a topic like this was brought to light.
Julissa Cantu
This article does well to explain the complicated issue of sex trafficking. I, personally, really enjoyed the use of case law as well legislation that was passed at the national level to combat sex trafficking. Though some may conclude that the effort is shallow and may be done as a showcase for their constituents, one main issue with such claim that is proven with Rodriguez’s article is that nobody likes sex trafficking unless they stand to make a profit. There would not be as many foundations as there are nor would there be legislation at every level of government regarding the issue. The only recommendation I would have for the author would be to have a more in-depth category of case law however that is not totally necessary as everyone knows sex trafficking is an important issue around the world and in the United States.
Luis Magana
I like how the article begins with a sentence that makes you question weather you have done or thought about selling some old stuff. It just shows how common something like that would be. Sex traffickers can use the internet the stay anonymous and help obtain what is necessary for their illegal business to grow. Im glad the FBI is making an extra effort in order to ensure that sex trafficking doesn’t keep happening but this article definently made me more aware.
Harashang Gajjar
They charged for advertisements cause otherwise the morality police politicians would come after them for not otherwise having age and ID verification in posting ads. There is indeed exploitation, including of minors, in sex work. But you don’t force everybody in America to go barefoot cause some sweatshop in Burma was found to have 15 year-old kids in squalid conditions sewing them together. In part as it only goes to show that you don’t care about the kids to begin with since they’d just go back under the radar as well such a drastic Draconian measured as banning all shoes would only hurt the economic livelihood of far more people and come far harder back down again upon those kids it’s nothing but a showboating politician’s rug sweeping ruse.
Daniel Reyes
Looking at this article first hand I thought it would be a cautionary tale to stay off the internet, but I could not be farther from the truth, especially considering that Ms. Rodriguez a dutiful Political science wrote this piece! I enjoyed the balancing act between careful analytics and critical constitutional issues. The piece’s flow effortlessly from analytics of careful FBI investigations to valid criticism of the constitutional problems dealing with sex crimes and communications indecency. It was sad to hear that the ruling was in favor of big money once again, but American cannot do without the trading of good I suppose. My criticism is minor, and albeit insignificant in comparison to other, I suppose. I noticed there is a closing bracket at the beginning of your 5th paragraph.