StMU Research Scholars

Featuring Scholarly Research, Writing, and Media at St. Mary's University
December 1, 2017

From prestigious noble to child serial killer: Gilles de Rais

With so many serial killers sprouting during the twentieth century, the name Gilles de Rais may not ring a bell to many. Rais, however, is an interesting character, as his killings predate most known serial killers. While many serial killers from the twentieth century seem to share some similar backstories—one that involves having an abusive childhood or living with an antisocial behavior—Rais seems to be an exception. Bear in mind that we do not know everything about Rais’ childhood, since we can only find so many things about a man who lived in the early fifteenth century, but from what we do know, Rais was raised well and had a promising life. How does a man growing up having wealth, power, religious faith, nobility, and an honorable soldier status succumb to the vile temptations of sodomy and murder? The life of Gilles de Rais is as fascinating as it is horrific.

Gilles de Rais was born in 1404 and grew up in a wealthy family in northern France. At the age of eleven, he inherited an enormous amount of wealth, and his fortunes drastically increased when he married into another rich family. Given the title Baron and Lord, Rais was described as a handsome man, who was well-mannered and charismatic.1 Furthermore, he became a soldier around the age of sixteen and participated in the Hundred Years’ War as a leader in the French military.2 Later on, the king of France, King Charles VII, gave Rais the prestigious title of Marshal of France. During his time in the French military, he fought alongside the young Joan of Arc, and Rais became her chief lieutenant in the process. Being a devout Christian, Rais’ respect and admiration for Joan was immeasurable. He grew to love her, not romantically, but rather on a spiritual level.3 Having had such an unprecedented reputation up to this point, how does a nobleman like Gilles de Rais stoop to become a sadistic serial killer?

Gilles de Rais in military attire | Courtesy of Wikimedia Commons

This radical change in Rais started when his companion Joan of Arc was burned at the stake by her enemies in 1431. Upon hearing the news, Rais felt betrayed by both God and the Church for abandoning Joan. He truly believed his many years of worship and devotion to God had all amounted to absolutely nothing.4 Soon after Joan of Arc’s death, Rais retired from the military and returned to his castle, where he started to spend all of his wealth on extravaganzas ranging from plays, festivals, banquets and tournaments—all of which was open to the public all day long. Rais’ wealth supplied these events with a large variety of luxuries: choirs, comedians, jugglers, rich clothing for his guests and horses and even animals such as sheep and oxen that fed over 500 people on a daily basis.5 The party could only last for so long, however, as Rais’ wealth was rapidly diminishing.

Once his wealth was depleted, Rais turned to alchemy, which was the attempted practice of transmuting base metals into pure gold. Rais invested heavily into this, as he turned a good chunk of his castle into an enormous laboratory. In the process, he invited many alchemists and sorcerers around Europe to aid him. Despite their hard work, no one was successful in creating gold. One day, an Italian sorcerer by the name of Antonio Francisco Prelati approached Rais. He told Rais that he needed the help of Satan in order to succeed in making gold, which would require doing heinous acts in his name. Willing to do anything for wealth, Rais agreed. In his first act, Rais tricked a peasant boy into his castle and from there he murdered the boy and wrote down formulas and evocations using his blood. In the end, Rais was unable to summon Satan or create gold. It was in this attempted summoning that Rais developed a desire for killing. From here on out, Rais’ need to torture and kill children sadistically was far greater than his need for gold.6 This would be the start of Gilles de Rais’ killing spree—one that would take the lives of over a hundred children.

Gilles de Rais performing sorcery on his victims | Courtesy of Wikimedia Commons

Over the course of eight years, from 1432 to 1440, Gilles de Rais—with the help of several loyal accomplices—would perform erotic torture on his victims, who were all underage children, mostly boys. The causes of death ranged from dismemberment and decapitation, to strangulation.7 One method of attracting children to Rais was to have parents hand their children over to him in exchange for money, clothing, and food. In return, the parents were led to believe that Rais would train their children to be knights or choirboys. Many of Rais’ targets were children beggars who would stop by Rais’ castle asking for food. Whenever the beggars came by, Rais would look out the window of his castle with his servants and point out the children that he wanted brought to him.8

By 1440, rumors had spread throughout the country about children going missing in the area, particularly near the castle of Champtocé: Gilles de Rais’ castle. Many people started to accuse Rais of kidnapping these children, and witnesses also came forward. These accusations became so wide-spread that the Church and authorities started to investigate. What led the Church to take action was the kidnapping of a cleric from the parochial church of Saint-Etienne-de-Mermorte. Rais had had him as a prisoner for several months, until the Church intervened. Rais and his accomplices were then arrested and put on trial.9 There had already been accusations long before Rais’ arrest, but the witnesses had been too intimidated to come forward, for fear that Rais’ men would harm them. After all, Rais was one of the most powerful men in France at the time.10 Many of the witnesses had suspected Rais to be the one responsible for the children disappearances, but had no idea as to what his motives were. One witness described one instance where Rais’ men were seen carrying away roughly forty skeletons from one of Rais’ towers.11 With so many children going missing, Rais was eventually bound to get caught.

Gilles de Rais in trial | Courtesy of Wikimedia Commons

The trial was led by the bishop of Nantes, the chancellor of Brittany, the vicar of the Inquisition, and the president of the provincial parliament.12 At the trial, most if not all of Rais’ atrocities became known to all. He willingly confessed to all of his crimes in horrific details. Rais’ servants, such as Etienne Corrillaut, testified to some of his evil deeds. A document written at the time of the trial says: “…[Corrillaut] testified and said that while he was present and listening, he heard Gilles boast that he took greater pleasure in killing and cutting the throats of these boys and girls, in having them killed and their throats slit, in seeing them languish and die and their heads and limbs cut off one after the other and in the sight of their blood than he did abusing them sexually.13 Furthermore, Corrillaut said that Rais would put the children’s heads and limbs up on display (some of them had already been dead for several days) and show them off to his accomplices. He would even go as far as to have a beauty contest by asking his accomplices which of the deceased children were the most handsome, as he kissed their severed heads and faces. Much of the children’s corpses were later buried or cremated.14

Aside from the murders, Rais confessed to have evoked evil spirits on multiple occasions, and made pacts with demons to obtain knowledge, wealth, and power. Interestingly, Rais would offer anything to these demons with the exception of his soul. In one of these offers, Rais would present the heart, eyes, hand, and blood of a child to a demon named Barron as a sign of tribute. Rais would also visit heretics, sorcerers, and conjurers to learn about the magical arts of geomancy and necromancy—which was forbidden and seen as heresy by the Inquisition.15 Brother Jean Blouyn, vicar of the Inquisitor—present at the trial—wrote: “…Gilles, the accused, has been, was and is a heretic, an apostate, a sorcerer, a sodomite, an evoker of evil spirits, a diviner, a murderer of innocent children, a criminal, a backslider and an idolater who has deviated from the faith and who is illy disposed of it…16

Gilles de Rais and his servants seizing a child | Courtesy of Wikimedia Commons

In total, at least 140 children died at the hands of Gilles de Rais. Some reports even say that the death count reached as high as 800. In the end, Rais was sentenced to death by hanging, followed by burning, on October 26, 1440.17 And so came to an end the life of Gilles de Rais, who was executed at the age of 35. Surprisingly, Antonio Francisco Prelati, the sorcerer who evoked demons for Rais, and several others only served a few months in prison. Their reduced sentences may have been the result of their cooperation in testifying against Rais during the trial.18

It is easy to assume that after getting involved in occult practices, Rais became a full-blown Satanist. However, there is some speculation as to what his exact beliefs were. Despite consulting demons and performing sodomy, two years prior to his trial, Rais showed regret for all of his crimes and swore, vowed, and made a promise to God that he would never commit any more heresy and that he would travel to Jerusalem on a pilgrimage to repent. Not long after, Rais relapsed, as he continued to sodomize and murder.19 There is also the fact that he was unwilling to give up his soul to the devil. Rais may have believed that by confessing to all of his sins, he would have a greater chance at being forgiven by God.20 Near the end of the trial, Rais had gotten down to his knees and begged God for mercy. In a document written at the trial, Rais told people that “as a Christian, he was their brother, and urging them and those among them whose children he had killed, for the love of Our Lord’s suffering to be willing to pray to God for him and to forgive him freely…21 Was Rais truly repenting for all of his crimes, or was this an attempt to manipulate the Inquisition? This is one question that has been left unanswered for centuries.

What remains of Gilles de Rais’ castle: Champtocé | Courtesy of Wikimedia Commons

One might also wonder what exactly caused Rais to commit such blasphemy? One could say that he just didn’t care about God after he blamed Him for betraying Joan of Arc. According to Rais himself, he said that the evil inside of him came from how he was born under a certain constellation and that nobody could ever understand the evil that he did.22 Several people in recent studies have proposed several theories as to what Rais’ motivations were. These theories range from Rais having an identity crisis, which led him to commit violence to ‘affirm his being,’ to him suffering from schizophrenia.23 Just like his supposed redemption, the question of what exactly motivated Rais to commit these heinous crimes remains unsolved.

In a way, Gilles de Rais was a tragic hero: one who had been raised to be well-respected and to achieve high status among the people in France to ultimately become a sadistic killer—one who’s lust for children and gold consumed his mind. Although Rais has been largely forgotten, his actions have inspired the folktale legend of Bluebeard, and is believed to have been the inspiration of Bram Stoker’s Dracula novel in 1897.24

  1. The Gale Encyclopedia of the Unusual and Unexplained, 2003, s.v. “The Rise of Satanism in the Middle Ages.”
  2. Salem Press Biographical Encyclopedia, 2015, s.v. “Gilles de Rais,” by Charles Avinger.
  3. The Gale Encyclopedia of the Unusual and Unexplained, 2003, s.v. “The Rise of Satanism in the Middle Ages.”
  4. The Gale Encyclopedia of the Unusual and Unexplained, 2003, s.v. “The Rise of Satanism in the Middle Ages.”
  5. Encyclopedia of Occultism and Parapsychology, 2001, s.v. “Gilles de Rais (1404-1440).”
  6. Encyclopedia of Occultism and Parapsychology, 2001, s.v. “Gilles de Rais (1404-1440).”
  7. James Penney, The World of Perversion: Psychoanalysis and the Impossible Absolute of Desire (Albany: State University of New York Press, 2006), 35, 36.
  8. Gilles de Rais, R. de Maulge-La-Clavière, Eugène Bossard, Laughter for the Devil: The Trials of Gilles De Rais, Companion-In-Arms of Joan of Arc (1440) (Rutherford: Fairleigh Dickinson University Presses, 1984), 16.
  9. Gilles de Rais, R. de Maulge-La-Clavière, Eugène Bossard, Laughter for the Devil: The Trials of Gilles De Rais, Companion-In-Arms of Joan of Arc (1440) (Rutherford: Fairleigh Dickinson University Presses, 1984), 61.
  10. Encyclopedia of Occultism and Parapsychology, 2001, s.v. “Gilles de Rais (1404-1440).”
  11. Gilles de Rais, R. de Maulge-La-Clavière, Eugène Bossard, Laughter for the Devil: The Trials of Gilles De Rais, Companion-In-Arms of Joan of Arc (1440) (Rutherford: Fairleigh Dickinson University Presses, 1984), 19, 20.
  12. Encyclopedia of Occultism and Parapsychology, 2001, s.v. “Gilles de Rais (1404-1440).”
  13. Gilles de Rais, R. de Maulge-La-Clavière, Eugène Bossard, Laughter for the Devil : The Trials of Gilles De Rais, Companion-In-Arms of Joan of Arc (1440) (Rutherford: Fairleigh Dickinson University Presses, 1984), 87.
  14. Gilles de Rais, R. de Maulge-La-Clavière, Eugène Bossard, Laughter for the Devil : The Trials of Gilles De Rais, Companion-In-Arms of Joan of Arc (1440) (Rutherford: Fairleigh Dickinson University Presses, 1984), 15, 94.
  15. Gilles de Rais, R. de Maulge-La-Clavière, Eugène Bossard, Laughter for the Devil: The Trials of Gilles De Rais, Companion-In-Arms of Joan of Arc (1440) (Rutherford: Fairleigh Dickinson University Presses, 1984), 56, 59, 60.
  16. Gilles de Rais, R. de Maulge-La-Clavière, Eugène Bossard, Laughter for the Devil: The Trials of Gilles De Rais, Companion-In-Arms of Joan of Arc (1440) (Rutherford: Fairleigh Dickinson University Presses, 1984), 62.
  17. Salem Press Biographical Encyclopedia, 2015, s.v. “Gilles de Rais,” by Charles Avinger.
  18. The Gale Encyclopedia of the Unusual and Unexplained, 2003, s.v. “The Rise of Satanism in the Middle Ages.”
  19. Gilles de Rais, R. de Maulge-La-Clavière, Eugène Bossard, Laughter for the Devil: The Trials of Gilles De Rais, Companion-In-Arms of Joan of Arc (1440) (Rutherford: Fairleigh Dickinson University Presses, 1984), 60, 61.
  20. James Penney, The World of Perversion: Psychoanalysis and the Impossible Absolute of Desire (Albany: State University of New York Press, 2006), 40.
  21. James Penney, The World of Perversion: Psychoanalysis and the Impossible Absolute of Desire (Albany: State University of New York Press, 2006), 60, 61.
  22. Gilles de Rais, R. de Maulge-La-Clavière, Eugène Bossard, Laughter for the Devil: The Trials of Gilles De Rais, Companion-In-Arms of Joan of Arc (1440) (Rutherford: Fairleigh Dickinson University Presses, 1984), 96.
  23. Gilles de Rais, R. de Maulge-La-Clavière, Eugène Bossard, Laughter for the Devil: The Trials of Gilles De Rais, Companion-In-Arms of Joan of Arc (1440) (Rutherford: Fairleigh Dickinson University Presses, 1984), 17.
  24. Salem Press Biographical Encyclopedia, 2015, s.v. “Gilles de Rais,” by Charles Avinger.

Tags from the story

Recent Comments

84 comments

  • Andrew Dominguez

    This story was very shocking since Gilles was very respected in life, then in matter of years became a serial killer. Why i think he went without getting caught is he would kill beggars, they wouldn’t have families, therefore no one would be looking for them. Its crazy to imagine the wizard that told him to do so only got a couple months behind bars. This article proves it doesn’t matter the economic background, but what happens in the individuals life.

  • Noah Laing

    Since there’s no clear conclusion of this story with Gilles and his crimes, this story will always hold some date to whether who exactly was guilty. These crimes are horrific and disgusting and this article states that Gilles was a raised right and had good morals essentially, however after the death of a friend he had a moral shift as he started worshipping demons and took place in disturbing actions that brought himself satisfaction.

  • Raymond Davila

    This article is interesting just like the author of this article says since most people only know about serial killers from the twentieth century and a few from the century before. Though unlike the typical backstory we hear about modern day serial killers this man called Gilles de Rais did have a traumatic event happen to him and one that shook his vary believes. As such it’s kind of easier to see how someone of his stature could fall to being such a vile and horrifying person.

  • Nathan Hudson

    I am not one to enjoy old history like this, but the way you told the story was what kept me reading. I enjoyed the personal touch you added with word choice, it made me feel like you were telling a story at lunch or around a campfire. It was very shocking to see that despite his amazing childhood and life, he became a serial killer who invoked demons and the devil. People have a disgusting way of pleasuring themselves.

  • Auroara-Juhl Nikkels

    I thought this article was interesting because I had never heard of him, even when learning about Joan of Arc. This was the first time I had heard of him. I’m not sure if I believe that he is guilty, but I’m also not sure if he is innocent. At the time, so many people hated Joan of Arc and I’m sure that hatred bled over to her general, Rais. The entire trial could have been a set up to get him taken down, with the witnesses bribed. But on the other hand, if this is a true story, this man is truly disgusting. It is horrific to me that he killed about 140 people.

  • Hannah Wilson

    Gille’s story and trial and definitely interesting. He grew up privileged and normal, and seemed to be a respected figure. So, how could he have turned to Satanic worship so quickly after his friends death? He became a totally different person. He could have had a mental breakdown or even a mental illness. Some of the past comments even say that he was framed. It is an interesting story, and the fact that we will never know the real truth makes it that much more captivating.

  • Jasmine Jaramillo

    To hear that over 140 children were kinapped and nobody noticed in the beginning is shocking and sad to read about. As I read this article I had many thoughts. Why did Gilles de Rais target children? What issues of his own was he fighting in his mind? Why did it take so long for someone to catch on and take action? This article was written well in my opinion since I was able to stay focused the whole way through.

  • Elias Garza

    This article had my attention from the start. I always had a soft spot for children simply because they are not able to defend themselves. So, the fact that Gilles De Rais murdered these younglings for a result of gold expresses the cruel mentality he had. As a matter a fact, he decided to train his sons to follow his footsteps. You are suppose to want better for your offsprings, hence the mentality that Rais does not have.

  • Alexandra Lopez

    Before reading this, the name in the title did not seem too familiar with me. As I began reading about Gilles de Rais being raised well, I thought, “what could’ve gone wrong in his childhood that caused something in him to switch?”. I continued reading about how the death of a companion angered him. He hated everything once that tragic incident happened. On top of the immense amount of wealth he’d obtained, he began to drown his feelings in gold. It is truly insane on how fast and quickly he switched his entire personality. All in all, this trial is highly suspicious in every way.

  • Monica Avila

    This article’s attention to detail and exact description of how Gilles tortured the innocent children is extremely impressive. Just reading the events made my stomach turn, Gilles, no matter his motivation, was sick. Whether he was angry at God for betraying Joan of Arc, or just bent on acquiring more wealth, there is not justification for his actions. The fact that he was motivation by Satanism and his sadistic pleasure of severing the limbs of children sounds like it come straight from a fable. He was extremely disturbed, and obviously only trying to manipulate the Church by claiming to repent and beg for forgiveness.

Leave your comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.