StMU Research Scholars

Featuring Scholarly Research, Writing, and Media at St. Mary's University
October 6, 2018

“Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner” Serves Up Racial Equality

Winner of the Fall 2018 StMU History Media Award for

Best Article in the Category of “Year 1968”

The moment of truth was finally at hand for Stanley Kramer. Flashing camera lights could only capture his calm reflection, but underneath his tailored tuxedo, carefully styled hair, and beaming smile, was undeniable nervous anticipation. Tonight he would be in front of all the cameras, instead of instructing from behind them, and everything rode on the outcome of this evening. Stanley Kramer had levied a huge risk in taking on the direction and production of Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner, and as he sat in the audience of the 1968 Academy Awards, he would soon find out whether his gamble had truly paid off. With the country politically fractured and the public divided, could Stanley Kramer realistically expect his movie to win the hearts and minds of the American people?

Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner is the comical drama piece written by William Rose, featuring an upper-class young woman who brings her new fiancé home to meet her parents in order to announce their engagement, after having met each other on a vacation just ten days prior. The older handsome man is quite the catch as an accomplished physician and Nobel Prize candidate. The only problem? He’s a black man intent on marrying their white daughter. The couple cause quite the stir in attempting to overcome interracial bias and be seen as any other couple in love wanting a parent’s blessing for marriage.

Katharine Hepburn and Spencer Tracy | Courtesy of mptvimages.com

Coming together for their ninth film was the universally-loved on-screen couple Spencer Tracy and Katharine Hepburn. The two major actors believed in the project wholeheartedly and agreed to the roles before even setting eyes on the script.1 The natural chemistry between the stars was undeniable, as was the illness rapidly overtaking Spencer Tracy. Almost at once, there was a major hold up in the attempt to start the production. After years of Tracy’s deteriorating health, no insurance company would cover Tracy in his failing condition. What was to become of a project that couldn’t get off the ground? For this movie to stand a chance at the box office, headlining two such profoundly loved actors as Tracy and Hepburn was crucial. An emotional solution was discovered between Stanley Kramer and Katharine Hepburn. They both decided that they would both put their salaries from the film into an escrow account, in the tragic event Spencer Tracy could not continue the movie. With that money as security, another actor could be hired as a last resort to finish the film if need be. With a solution that satisfied the Columbia Pictures production company, filming was finally cleared to begin.2

Obtaining the cast was just the initial problem that Kramer faced. Time was always working against the team, in a race against the clock to finish filming before Tracy became too ill. As a result, the cast members were continuously working with two separate scripts. The original script had the patriarch involved in as many scenes as possible, yet there was always a “back up” script circulating that eliminated Spencer Tracy’s character at any given point.3

Another major obstacle in filming Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner was Sidney Poitier’s intimidation from fellow actors. Despite his own prominent acting career and reputation as a calm and collected professional, Poitier felt humbled to be in the presence of such talent and could never remember his lines. At the time, Spencer Tracy and Katharine Hepburn had both been Hollywood shinning stars for over three decades, and audience members had grown up with these silver screen marvels. Comparatively, Poitier’s acting career had gained more acceptance from his film releases overseas. American audiences had still not fully seen past his African-American ethnicity. This trepidation went on for weeks, frustrating the entire crew with reshoots and wasted film. Finally, Stanley Kramer pulled Sidney Poitier aside for a heart to heart talk in an attempt to get to the bottom of what was causing tempers to rise. The actor simply couldn’t focus in the presence of Tracy and Hepburn. In an attempt to keep Poitier on as a lead character, scenes were then shot as he delivered his lines to two high-back chairs, while stand-in crew delivered his costars’ lines.4

When the movie’s filming began in March 1967, it was still illegal for interracial couples to marry in fourteen states, mostly in the South. If the country could not accept the idea of blacks and whites intermarrying in real life, could Stanley Kramer realistically expect people to be any more agreeable to the idea being portrayed in Hollywood? If the movie was not welcomed by society, future prospects for everyone involved with the project would fall into jeopardy, if not certain ruin.

Coinciding with the film’s production was the Loving v. Virginia Supreme Court case. A white man and a black woman involved in a romantic relationship circumvented the Virginia legislation barring interracial marriages. In 1958, Mildred Jetter and Richard Loving drove to Washington D.C. to say their vows and become legally married. Soon after returning to Virginia, an anonymous tip was given to authorities and the newlyweds were arrested in their home in a late evening police raid. Local prosecution argued that a marriage license from D.C. was not valid in the state of Virginia and the couple were sentenced to a year in prison. The Lovings appealed the judge’s guilty verdict. Monumentally, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of Mr. and Mrs. Loving, just as production on Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner was wrapping up, ruling that marriage is a fundamental human right and effectively ending all anti-miscegenation marriage laws in America.5

Iconic Movie Scene of a Black Man Meeting White Fiancée’s Father | Courtesy of Cineoutsider.com

Tragedy struck just seventeen days after production concluded, when Spencer Tracy died of a heart attack. His passing gravely affected the cast, and overshadowed any joy of the movie’s release. Katharine Hepburn refused to attend any premiers or award ceremonies, let alone see the final movie cut, as the memories of her long-time costar were just too painful.6

Reviews of the movie from audiences and critics alike received an initial mixed response. The initial estimation was one of low attendance of Caucasians, especially in the Southern states. After all, new laws or not, long-standing socially-formed opinions take time to overcome. However, this was not the case, and never again was the race of a lead character a factor in projecting audience film acceptance.7 Written reviews were not so kind. Sidney Poitier took the brunt of criticism, not simply for being an African-American actor, but for being “too perfect” and “too white” in his role portraying a Nobel Prize nominated doctor.8

Stanley Kramer fiercely defended Sidney Poitier’s performance and explained that every character was meant to portray model social and moral perfection; only then could the sole protest land at the couple’s racial divides.9 In an attempt to clarify his intentions with the film, Kramer undertook a nine-university tour to discuss the political and social controversy. For all his efforts, Kramer was met by indifference at best and death threats at worst! The movie seemed to be caught in between an atmosphere of younger students who did not see interracial relationships as controversial, and the older generation who wanted to keep the races forever separate.10

The lights now dimmed on the Academy Awards audience, and the announcements began as everyone took their seats. Spencer Tracy’s widow was in attendance to hear her husband be nominated as Best Actor one final time. Katharine Hepburn was at home still mourning, and the magic of the evening was muted by sadness. But for all the hardships, when Stanley Kramer heard his name read as a nominee for Best Picture, he knew in his heart that the trials and bitter-sweet tribulations were all worth it in the end. Stanley Kramer did not win the award for Best Picture that night. But he had produced the most emotionally important movie of his career, directed award-winning performances, and showed all the Hollywood elite that they did not need to be afraid to take a leap of faith in making controversial films.

Winner of Two Academy Awards | Courtesy of Wikipedia Commons

When all was said and done, Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner became an international box office hit grossing over $70,000,000 and nominated for twenty-two different awards. In 2017, the movie title was entered into the National Film Registry by the Library of Congress for being culturally and historically significant.11

 

  1. Donald Spoto, Stanley Kramer: Film Maker (Putnam, 1978), 280.
  2. James Curtis, Spencer Tracy: A Biography (London: Hutchinson, 2011), 839.
  3. Bill Davidson, Spencer Tracy, Tragic Idol (Dutton Adult, 1988), 206.
  4.  Sidney Poitier, This Life (Alfred A Knopf, Inc, 1980), 286.
  5. Loving v. Virginia, 388 US (1967); Maria Mancha, “The Love Story of the Lovings,” StMU History Media. https://www.stmuhistorymedia.org/the-love-story-of-the-lovings, (accessed Oct 4, 2018).
  6. Katharine Hepburn, Me: Stories of my Life (Alfred A Knopf, Inc, 1991), 402.
  7. Mark Harris, Pictures at a Revolution: Five Movies and the Birth of the New Hollywood (Penguin Press, 2008), 374.
  8. Dolores R. Townek, Letter to the Editor, Ebony, June 1968.
  9. Christopher Andersen, An Affair to Remember: The Remarkable Love Story of Katharine Hepburn and Spencer Tracy (William Morrow and Co, 1997), 295.
  10.  Mark Harris, Pictures at a Revolution: Five Movies and the Birth of the New Hollywood (Penguin Press, 2008), 398.
  11. Sheryl Cannady, “2017 National Film Registry is More Than a ‘Field of Dreams,'” Library of Congress, December 13,2017, https://www.loc.gov/item/prn-17-178/.

Annissa Noblejas

I am a Communication Studies major with a minor in History. My passion falls with research and I love to share new found knowledge with others. I am a military veteran, mother of four great kids, and coffee connoisseur.

Author Portfolio Page

Recent Comments

115 comments

  • Engelbert Madrid

    I’m glad that I chose to read this article, in which really amazed me. It’s very interesting on how a classic movie could make such an impact on the American society due to political and cultural issues. Although the movie received so many negative reviews, the movie did receive the recognition that it deserved for it’s culturally and historically significance for confronting racism in the United States.

  • Andrea Cabrera

    This was a great article. It was adequately well written and factual. I loved learning about the filming process. The inclusion of the clip in the article made it a much more outstanding story. The speech was empowering and relevant to most demographics. It is my first time hearing about the movie “Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner” and it is more shocking and revealing to learn about the struggles it had to go through. You did an excellent job delivering this story.

  • Maisie Favila

    Although I had never seen or heard of this film, this article seemed like it would be an interesting read. I for sure have now put it on my list to watch. I love films that highlight racial discrimination because what people don’t want to hear, they will see. It’s so important for movies like these to be shown in order to spread the message. I liked all the background information this article provided me because I am excited to see this now. Overall, this was a well written article and I enjoyed learning about ‘Guess Who’s Coming To Dinner’.

  • Lamont Traylor

    I personally love interracial relationships. Also, considering that I am a black man who has been in an interracial relationship before, I can really appreciate this article. It is disgusting how people back in those times used to view a white woman with a black men, they looked upon them as if it wasn’t natural and as if it was immoral.

    • Annissa Noblejas

      Lamont,
      This is the unfortunate rhyme of history. Something our present times would judge as a trivial matter, would at an earlier time outrage a population to the point of violence. Our culture is slowly but surely growing in the direction of diversity acceptance, and realizing that something different is not all in the same as something negative. I personally hope this trend continues in respect to the LBGT movement and in another 50 years people will be baffled by that the concept was controversial at one time.

  • Katherine Watson

    Not once did it ever occur to me that interracial on-screen couples were not accepted at one point in time, most likely because I grew up in an age where I did not see racism to be as big of an issue as it was back then (although it still is an issue). Stanley Kramer set the bar high with his performance, not only for people of color who were looking to pursue a career in the arts but for those interracial couples who were scared to go out in public. Those who were scared to be able to display themselves as a couple because they were of two different skin colors. This man became the picture-perfect image for those who wanted to be able to be accepted, and may his role in society’s change of heart always be remembered.

  • Alexis Martinez

    I remember watching this movie my freshman year of high school and I always loved it because it showcased how the times were. I never knew the background of the movie however and the struggle and sacrifice that went into making it. This article did a great job of going into the backstory of such an inspirational piece of work, it was entertaining and kept me wanting to read more.

  • John Smith

    It’s great that a movie like “Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner” came out at such a heated time for civil rights. Despite the fact that the movie did not receive the award for Best Picture, it still said a lot about the time period and what America was going through, at least today we can look at racial inequality and see change.

  • Richard Morales

    It was interesting to read about this controversial film. It is amazing how far society has come in five decades and part of the progress is due to this film. It is amazing that Kramer worked to produce this groundbreaking movie at the same time that interracial marriage wasn’t completely legal in the United States. This film is one of the most important pieces of American cinematography because it promotes tolerance and change. I wasn’t surprised to learn that Kramer received death threats after the making of this movie.

  • Sarah Nguyen

    As soon as I read this article, I couldn’t help but compare the movie to the Loving vs Virginia Case. I am so glad the author brought this up, and related this case to their article. This helped strengthen the background and give the readers an insight on just what was going on in this time period, as well as how people reacted to something so controversial for this time period. This was extremely interesting, great job!

  • Jennifer Salas

    After reading this article I really want to see the movie! I think even to this day representation in films and t.v shows really matter. I really like that despite interracial marriages not being legal in all the sates in America they continued to film this movie. I think that this movie really helped others come to terms with interracial couples and that at the end of the day were all human.

Leave your comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.