One of the most famous and well known of the ancient Roman games, second only to the chariot races in terms of popularity, were the fights of the Gladiatorial Arena, a combination of blood, steal, and strange looking armor. The tradition of the gladiator fights began in Campania, southern Italy, in 264 BCE, to honor the death of Junius Brutus Pera as part of the funeral celebration.1 The sons of Brutus staged a fight between three pairs of gladiators to honor the loss of their father by the spilling of human blood, and to show his importance to the community with a lavish sacrifice.2 The idea of such a spectacle grew in popularity among the people, especially with the aristocrats that could afford to have such a fight at their own funerals. Over the next few centuries, this spectacle became a munus, or obligation to the dead, at aristocratic funerals, and out of them emerged the Gladiator Schools.
Imagine a prison-like environment full of men in peak physical condition training in various techniques of battle, weaponry, and ways to kill opponents. The person that slept next to you in the cells could well be the very man that would end your life, or take a win away from your record, keeping you a slave before the spectators that watched you fight. To win freedom a gladiator-slave would need twenty-five wins under his name, otherwise his status would never change. There were three ways one might become a gladiator: by being a slave sold to the school or as a punishment to the slave; by being captured by the Roman empire as a prisoner; or by being a convicted criminal. On some occasions, one might sell oneself into slavery to a gladiator school for the potential reward money if one earned freedom through fighting, or if one just loved the feel of danger.3 Along with hand to hand combat training, gladiators would also need to train for fighting on horseback, and learn to fight exotic animals from areas outside of Italy, such as lions, elephants, tigers, crocodiles, bulls, and many other animals the Romans thought would make for good combat entertainment.4
With so many spectacles to see, a trip to the arena was a full-day event, fully free for the public to enjoy involving the entire community. Most often, the entire town population would attend the games, closing most of the city. One of the most famous of the arenas was the Flavian Amphitheater, more commonly known as the Colosseum, built to accommodate fifty thousand sitting spectators with room to stand. The floor of the arena was made of wood, covering a network of animal cages with elevators to raise the animals to floor level.5 During the late Roman Republic and even when it began to fall to the monarchy of the Empire, the games became more of a political strategy for elections and less of a sports tradition being sponsored by the government.6 Being the host paying for the full event was the easiest way for your name to reach the Roman citizens. The more games and events one would host, the more your popularity would grow. The people would vote for someone that had the best intentions for Rome, and who else but the man who paid out of their own pocket for a event of the masses. Come election day your odds would be better to be either a part of or move up on the Senate. To not miss out on the chance of gaining popularity among the public, the editor, or host of the days games, would pay for any expense, including food and drinks. By late first century C.E., military generals, senators, and even emperors spent fortunes subsidizing public festivals and games. Appeasing the masses with entertainment and food would come to be known as the strategy “panem et circenses” or “bread and circus.”7
The day would begin with a hunt or fight between the captured exotic animals and the “hunter” inside the arena. For the animals that did not get killed, they would be trained and do tricks in the arenas.8 Then, when that match had concluded, there would be a type of intermission between the fights around noon, but instead of the crowd leaving for a short break, there would be the public execution of a criminal sentenced to death.9 To keep the events interesting, sometimes the execution would involve a creative death, by having the criminal be forced into the arena and hacked to pieces by the fully armed gladiators, or even crucified. Some would be tied to planks of wood to be thrown to the half-starved animals to be devoured.10 Then the closing events would be the Gladiator fights themselves, where broken men would fight to stay alive.
Beginning life in the gladiator schools is what many would call a version of hell on earth to endure. With the gladiators being made up of mostly slaves, prisoners of war, and criminals condemned to fight in the arena, the physical training was the only way to keep going, sleeping inside cells, living in a prison environment with real no companions, because there was no way of knowing who would be your next opponent. Even for the volunteer gladiators, Roman citizens, who entered for the prize money or wanted the danger in their lives, they became nothing less than slaves to their new master. The volunteer had to freely and willingly take the terrifying oath “sacramentum gladiatorum,” or the Sacraments of the Gladiator.11 With this oath, gladiators swore to endure being burned, bound, beaten, and slain by the sword. Then, one would forswear any desire for retribution for the state one would be in, and finally forswear life itself. Using this oath, one would accept the cruel life of a gladiator, live a life of honor, and to refuse to endure any of the sacraments that would be dishonorable, binding oneself with conviction to a master with what is left of ones honor at stake. One would be a loathsome man without dignity and almost without humanity.12 Being a gladiator, one would be treated however the Lanista, the man that buys and looks after the gladiators, sees fit without any recourse to legal appeal. It was also considered disgraceful for any Roman citizen to debase himself and choose to fight in the arena.13
However, not all Romans share this disdain toward gladiators. If one were successful in the bouts, one could become a crowd favorite, like today’s modern athletes.14 These warriors were also seen as a type of sex symbol, because of their perfect physique, being a perfect physical specimen. Many Roman women would even lust after the gladiators for the very same reasons, which explains why Roman citizens, even those from aristocratic families, chose to join the gladiatorial ranks. Taking more of a philosophical approach for citizens joining the gladiatorial ranks, Roman writers such as Seneca addressed the actual visual spectacle seen by the audience. The witnessing of such bravery while facing death in the arena filled with screaming fans. Even when seen as shameful by the Romans to debase yourself, many citizens would still become gladiators.
When it came to actual combat, the gladiators were no pushovers, although the fighting style was designed to be both deadly and visibly appealing for the fans. There were multiple types and categories of gladiator, but there were four main types that had evolved by the early Empire.15 There were the heavily-armed Samnites, or later to be divided as the Hoplomachus, carrying a spear and a small knife with a round shield, and the Secutors, carrying a gladius and large rectangular shield, both outfitted with helpmates and heavy armor. The second is the Thracian, with less armor and wielding a curved knife, the sica, and a small circular shield, the parma. There were Murmillos, identical to the Secutors except for the fish shaped crest on the helmet. Lastly, there were the Retiarius, who lacked all armor and wore a belt with a loincloth, wielding a trident, a fishing net to snare the opponent, and a knife attached to the belt. When chosen for a fight, the editor would rent the gladiators need from the school in preparation for the event. On the day of the games, the gladiators would enter the amphitheater in a colorful parade, drawing lots to decide the parings. Then an official would inspect that all the weaponry was sound and well sharpened. Finally, all gladiators would raise their weapons to the highest-ranking official in the stadium and recite “Morituri te salutamus,” “We who are about to die solute you!” then the savagery of a no rules fight would begin.16
After a savage and bloody battle, many gladiators would have died, and others would surrender, accepting their defeat from the victor. For the ones defeated, they would wait for the editor, or emperor if present, to pass judgment on them, based on how well the gladiator had fought. If the gladiator was to live to fight another day, the editor would point his thumb down, signaling their fate to live. If, however, the editor pointed his thumb to his chest, it symbolized the piercing of a sword through the heart of that gladiator. If a gladiator was able to win back his freedom after twenty-five victories, then for the rest of his life he would be extremely comfortable, with the money given to the newly free man from the Gladiatorial School as reward money. All oaths taken from ones time as a gladiator would be lifted and the Romans citizenship would be returned for those who volunteered. Being once a slave, gladiators would not be allowed to hold any political status or title in the government. Unfortunately for the gladiators loved by the crowd, the school would rig the fights to keep them from leaving the arena. Keeping them trapped as a slave until another gladiator finally ends their life.
- World History Encyclopedia, 2011, s.v. “Classical Traditions.” ↵
- World History Encyclopedia, 2011, s.v. “Classical Traditions.” ↵
- The Greenhaven Encyclopedia of Ancient Rome, 2002, s.v. “Public Games,” by Don Nardo. ↵
- The Greenhaven Encyclopedia of Ancient Rome, 2002, s.v. “Public Games,” by Don Nardo. ↵
- World Eras, 2001, s.v. “Roman Republic Empire, 264 BCE-476 CE,” John T. Kirby. ↵
- The Greenhaven Encyclopedia of Ancient Rome, 2002, s.v. “Public Games,” by Don Nardo. ↵
- The Greenhaven Encyclopedia of Ancient Rome, 2002, s.v. “Public Games,” by Don Nardo. ↵
- World Eras, 2001, s.v. “Roman Republic Empire, 264 BCE-476 CE,” John T. Kirby. ↵
- New Catholic Encyclopedia, 2003, s.v. “Ad Bestias,” by M.R.P. McGuire. ↵
- The Greenhaven Encyclopedia of Ancient Rome, 2002, s.v. “Public Games,” by Don Nardo. ↵
- Carlin A. Barton, “The Scandal of the Arena,” Representations, no. 27 (Summer 1989): 3-6. ↵
- Carlin A. Barton, “The Scandal of the Arena,” Representations, no. 27 (Summer 1989): 3-6. ↵
- World History Encyclopedia, 2011, s.v. “Classical Traditions.” ↵
- World History Encyclopedia, 2011, s.v. “Classical Traditions.” ↵
- The Greenhaven Encyclopedia of Ancient Rome, 2002, s.v. “Public Games,” by Don Nardo. ↵
- The Greenhaven Encyclopedia of Ancient Rome, 2002, s.v. “Public Games,” by Don Nardo. ↵
77 comments
Matthew Swaykus
To quote the movie gladiator, “Are you not entertained”! In all seriousness, however, the author displays enough information for the readers to have an interest in how games were originally started. The author also squarely puts the reader in the shoes/rags of these gladiator slaves. Though we as decent human beings oppose killing, winning and possibly killing 25 other people would mean freedom and not being killed by someone else in the arena. It forces the reader to consider what they would do for a free life.
Antonio Coffee
This showed me gladiators in a new light. I had known that they were considered slaves while they were gladiators but I did not know that they had to renounce their citizenship in order to compete. I am saddened to hear that many of the gladiator schools rigged fights so that their most popular gladiators would continue to fight and not win their freedom. I can see the appeal to fighting as a gladiator but I can also see why it was a bad system.
Hali Garcia
This is an interesting and informative article. I learned a little bit about gladiators in my civilizations class and after reading this article I want to learn more. I never knew they had to make an oath. I had always thought that gladiators were someone who fought willingly but now I know that they were slaves, prisoners, or people that were captured. It is fascinating to learn about the different types of gladiators and how they were chosen to fight.
Christopher Hohman
Nice article. The gladiator duels must have been quite a spectacle to watch. I am so glad that we do not have entertainment like that today because these games sounded like they were so violent. I wonder how the ancient Romans stomached such sport. I feel bad for the men who fought these battles. They lived in such terrible conditions and chances were they were not going to get their twenty-five victories for freedom. I thought it was cool that the emperor would personally pay for the entire event if he attended.
Christopher Metta Bexar
I agree with Christopher Hohman. The article was well written but still did not make me more interested in the blood spectacle which was the gladiator fights.
I can not imagine any free man wanting to endure that and give up the opportunities given to free Roman citizens.
I of course have very little interest in motion pictures depicting ancient Rome which rely on gladiator fights to keep the viewers interest( even though I watched the entire series I Claudius).
Ruby Wynn
Excellent article. It is interesting that people thought to celebrate a funeral by having people fight to the death. Life as a gladiator sounds horrible. I could not imagine how terrible it must be to live and train with people who might kill you tomorrow, or to have to kill twenty five people that I have lived and trained with to be free.
Richard Morales
This article does a good job of showing the horrors of being a gladiator and navigating through gladiator school. After reading this passage I found out the true nature of being a gladiator and I learned how terrible it was. It was such a bloody sport it is shocking to believe that it was such a huge form of entertainment. I was also surprised to learn of the gladiators who sold themselves into the practice hoping to be successful in the arena. Very good, gruesome article.
Aneesa Zubair
A lot of this information was new to me and extremely fascinating. The life of a gladiator was harsh and awful, and the chances of earning reward money were slim. It is hard to imagine such huge crowds cheering on a cruel, bloody sport like that. The image you used was very helpful for distinguishing between the types of gladiators, such as murmillo, hoplomachus, and secutor. You did a great job researching this topic!
Belene Cuellar
I never knew this side of being a gladiator was so harsh and inhumane. The whole thing was a way to keep these slaves from being free. The battles they won didn’t matter at all as long as the crowd was pleased and the blood kept spilling. I wonder if any gladiator ever won his freedom from the fights. Did they actually honor the promise or were they forced to keep on fighting.
Luke Lopez
This was a very interesting article on gladiators, and their dealings in gladiator school and other various aspects that accompanies being a gladiator. Most of the gladiators were slaves, but it is also interesting to take in to consideration that some people sold themselves into slavery at a gladiator school so that they would have the chance of receiving a large reward for being successful as a gladiator.
Valeria Perez
I didn’t know that the life of a gladiator would be so horrible! I thought the men were celebrated and honored but in reality they were forced to live lives of pain, death, and distrust. I can’t imagine how normal life must have been back then for the public to enjoy such a series of gruesome events. I was also unaware about the different types of gladiators.