StMU Research Scholars

Featuring Scholarly Research, Writing, and Media at St. Mary's University
December 7, 2017

Gladitorial School: Here is your Diploma and Knife

One of the most famous and well known of the ancient Roman games, second only to the chariot races in terms of popularity, were the fights of the Gladiatorial Arena, a combination of blood, steal, and strange looking armor. The tradition of the gladiator fights began in Campania, southern Italy, in 264 BCE, to honor the death of Junius Brutus Pera as part of the funeral celebration.1  The sons of Brutus staged a fight between three pairs of gladiators to honor the loss of their father by the spilling of human blood, and to show his importance to the community with a lavish sacrifice.2 The idea of such a spectacle grew in popularity among the people, especially with the aristocrats that could afford to have such a fight at their own funerals. Over the next few centuries, this spectacle became a munus, or obligation to the dead, at aristocratic funerals, and out of them emerged the Gladiator Schools.

Imagine a prison-like environment full of men in peak physical condition training in various techniques of battle, weaponry, and ways to kill opponents. The person that slept next to you in the cells could well be the very man that would end your life, or take a win away from your record, keeping you a slave before the spectators that watched you fight. To win freedom a gladiator-slave would need twenty-five wins under his name, otherwise his status would never change. There were three ways one might become a gladiator: by being a slave sold to the school or as a punishment to the slave; by being captured by the Roman empire as a prisoner; or by being a convicted criminal. On some occasions, one might sell oneself into slavery to a gladiator school for the potential reward money if one earned freedom through fighting, or if one just loved the feel of danger.3 Along with hand to hand combat training, gladiators would also need to train for fighting on horseback, and learn to fight exotic animals from areas outside of Italy, such as lions, elephants, tigers, crocodiles, bulls, and many other animals the Romans thought would make for good combat entertainment.4

Roman Gladiators | Courtesy of Pinterest

With so many spectacles to see, a trip to the arena was a full-day event, fully free for the public to enjoy involving the entire community. Most often, the entire town population would attend the games, closing most of the city. One of the most famous of the arenas was the Flavian Amphitheater, more commonly known as the Colosseum, built to accommodate fifty thousand sitting spectators with room to stand. The floor of the arena was made of wood, covering a network of animal cages with elevators to raise the animals to floor level.5 During the late Roman Republic and even when it began to fall to the monarchy of the Empire, the games became more of a political strategy for elections and less of a sports tradition being sponsored by the government.6 Being the host paying for the full event was the easiest way for your name to reach the Roman citizens. The more games and events one would host, the more your popularity would grow. The people would vote for someone that had the best intentions for Rome, and who else but the man who paid out of their own pocket for a event of the masses. Come election day your odds would be better to be either a part of or move up on the Senate. To not miss out on the chance of gaining popularity among the public, the editor, or host of the days games, would pay for any expense, including food and drinks. By late first century C.E., military generals, senators, and even emperors spent fortunes subsidizing public festivals and games. Appeasing the masses with entertainment and food would come to be known as the strategy “panem et circenses” or “bread and circus.”7

The day would begin with a hunt or fight between the captured exotic animals and the “hunter” inside the arena. For the animals that did not get killed, they would be trained and do tricks in the arenas.8 Then, when that match had concluded, there would be a type of intermission between the fights around noon, but instead of the crowd leaving for a short break, there would be the public execution of a criminal sentenced to death.9 To keep the events interesting, sometimes the execution would involve a creative death, by having the criminal be forced into the arena and hacked to pieces by the fully armed gladiators, or even crucified. Some would be tied to planks of wood to be thrown to the half-starved animals to be devoured.10 Then the closing events would be the Gladiator fights themselves, where broken men would fight to stay alive.

Thracian Style Gladiator| Courtesy of Pinterest

Beginning life in the gladiator schools is what many would call a version of hell on earth to endure. With the gladiators being made up of mostly slaves, prisoners of war, and criminals condemned to fight in the arena, the physical training was the only way to keep going, sleeping inside cells, living in a prison environment with real no companions, because there was no way of knowing who would be your next opponent. Even for the volunteer gladiators, Roman citizens, who entered for the prize money or wanted the danger in their lives, they became nothing less than slaves to their new master. The volunteer had to freely and willingly take the terrifying oath “sacramentum gladiatorum,” or the Sacraments of the Gladiator.11 With this oath, gladiators swore to endure being burned, bound, beaten, and slain by the sword. Then, one would forswear any desire for retribution for the state one would be in, and finally forswear life itself. Using this oath, one would accept the cruel life of a gladiator, live a life of honor, and to refuse to endure any of the sacraments that would be dishonorable, binding oneself with conviction to a master with what is left of ones honor at stake. One would be a loathsome man without dignity and almost without humanity.12 Being a gladiator, one would be treated however the Lanista, the man that buys and looks after the gladiators, sees fit without any recourse to legal appeal. It was also considered disgraceful for any Roman citizen to debase himself and choose to fight in the arena.13

However, not all Romans share this disdain toward gladiators. If one were successful in the bouts, one could become a crowd favorite, like today’s modern athletes.14 These warriors were also seen as a type of sex symbol, because of their perfect physique, being a perfect physical specimen. Many Roman women would even lust after the gladiators for the very same reasons, which explains why Roman citizens, even those from aristocratic families, chose to join the gladiatorial ranks. Taking more of a philosophical approach for citizens joining the gladiatorial ranks, Roman writers such as Seneca addressed the actual visual spectacle seen by the audience. The witnessing of such bravery while facing death in the arena filled with screaming fans. Even when seen as shameful by the Romans to debase yourself, many citizens would still become gladiators.

When it came to actual combat, the gladiators were no pushovers, although the fighting style was designed to be both deadly and visibly appealing for the fans. There were multiple types and categories of gladiator, but there were four main types that had evolved by the early Empire.15 There were the heavily-armed Samnites, or later to be divided as the Hoplomachus, carrying a spear and a small knife with a round shield, and the Secutors, carrying a gladius and large rectangular shield, both outfitted with helpmates and heavy armor. The second is the Thracian, with less armor and wielding a curved knife, the sica, and a small circular shield, the parma. There were Murmillos, identical to the Secutors except for the fish shaped crest on the helmet. Lastly, there were the Retiarius, who lacked all armor and wore a belt with a loincloth, wielding a trident, a fishing net to snare the opponent, and a knife attached to the belt. When chosen for a fight, the editor would rent the gladiators need from the school in preparation for the event. On the day of the games, the gladiators would enter the amphitheater in a colorful parade, drawing lots to decide the parings. Then an official would inspect that all the weaponry was sound and well sharpened. Finally, all gladiators would raise their weapons to the highest-ranking official in the stadium and recite “Morituri te salutamus,” “We who are about to die solute you!” then the savagery of a no rules fight would begin.16

Examples of the Types of Roman Gladiators | Courtesy of Pinterest

After a savage and bloody battle, many gladiators would have died, and others would surrender, accepting their defeat from the victor. For the ones defeated, they would wait for the editor, or emperor if present, to pass judgment on them, based on how well the gladiator had fought. If the gladiator was to live to fight another day, the editor would point his thumb down, signaling their fate to live. If, however, the editor pointed his thumb to his chest, it symbolized the piercing of a sword through the heart of that gladiator. If a gladiator was able to win back his freedom after twenty-five victories, then for the rest of his life he would be extremely comfortable, with the money given to the newly free man from the Gladiatorial School as reward money. All oaths taken from ones time as a gladiator would be lifted and the Romans citizenship would be returned for those who volunteered. Being once a slave, gladiators would not be allowed to hold any political status or title in the government. Unfortunately for the gladiators loved by the crowd, the school would rig the fights to keep them from leaving the arena. Keeping them trapped as a slave until another gladiator finally ends their life.

  1. World History Encyclopedia, 2011, s.v. “Classical Traditions.”
  2. World History Encyclopedia, 2011, s.v. “Classical Traditions.”
  3. The Greenhaven Encyclopedia of Ancient Rome, 2002, s.v. “Public Games,” by Don Nardo.
  4. The Greenhaven Encyclopedia of Ancient Rome, 2002, s.v. “Public Games,” by Don Nardo.
  5.  World Eras, 2001, s.v. “Roman Republic Empire, 264 BCE-476 CE,” John T. Kirby.
  6. The Greenhaven Encyclopedia of Ancient Rome, 2002, s.v. “Public Games,” by Don Nardo.
  7. The Greenhaven Encyclopedia of Ancient Rome, 2002, s.v. “Public Games,” by Don Nardo.
  8. World Eras, 2001, s.v. “Roman Republic Empire, 264 BCE-476 CE,” John T. Kirby.
  9. New Catholic Encyclopedia, 2003, s.v. “Ad Bestias,” by M.R.P. McGuire.
  10. The Greenhaven Encyclopedia of Ancient Rome, 2002, s.v. “Public Games,” by Don Nardo.
  11. Carlin A. Barton, “The Scandal of the Arena,” Representations, no. 27 (Summer 1989): 3-6.
  12. Carlin A. Barton, “The Scandal of the Arena,” Representations, no. 27 (Summer 1989): 3-6.
  13. World History Encyclopedia, 2011, s.v. “Classical Traditions.”
  14. World History Encyclopedia, 2011, s.v. “Classical Traditions.”
  15. The Greenhaven Encyclopedia of Ancient Rome, 2002, s.v. “Public Games,” by Don Nardo.
  16. The Greenhaven Encyclopedia of Ancient Rome, 2002, s.v. “Public Games,” by Don Nardo.

Tags from the story

Recent Comments

77 comments

  • Benjamin Arreguin

    This article is very interesting, I had no previous knowledge about gladiators and where they originated. There are four types of gladiators, each with a different base of honor that they would represent, which I found was very surprising, and the standard they were held to was just amazing. They knew what they would sign up for, and they wore that title with the most pride, they were aware that they had to train, suffer, bleed, and die in the name of their superior. Russell Crowe would be proud of this article.

  • Christopher King

    This article is great due to the fact that it goes into detail of who fights in the gladiatorial fights and how they would become gladiators. Everyone gets the mixed conceptions that it is nothing but slaves forced to fight but many were putting themselves into those situations even senators and people of high class status. It went into detail about the typical day of gladiator fights and how they came to be and the differences between the styles. Even Commodus “fought” as a gladiator even though much of his fights were stages. They were seen as celebrities much of the time.

  • Zander Barrera

    I really liked the part where you went in to detail on the specific types of Gladiators, different weapons, different armor and clothing, not to mention the fighting styles. I know that your article was about the warriors as whole and their origins but I would like one describing more in detail about the specifics mentioned before. And the fact that people would willingly sell themselves just to get in on the action, for glory, money, and frame. We do live in a different time so naturally I cannot relate but I guess it is a good thing that this lifestyle and the institution its self are in the past. Excellent article very good source work, thank you for a good read.

  • Isaac Rodriguez

    I found the matter in which prisoners, slaves, and criminals train to become gladiators to be barbaric. The thought of the whole city gathering to watch two people fight to the death is sickening. After reading the article I had a better understanding of the gladiators. Although they have been portrayed as strong fighters in movies, they were vulnerable men in a hopeless situation.

  • Nathan Hudson

    One of my favorite movies of all time is Gladiator, with Russell Crowe. Since I saw that movie I became so interested with the Colosseum and the gladiators themselves. I enjoyed reading this because it went into detail about the gladiators and their lives. I would’ve also enjoyed having the story of one victorious gladiator as the medium for all this information, but I enjoyed the article nonetheless.

  • Thomas Fraire

    Honestly, I do not know really on what being a gladiator is like or like the organs of it. It is really brilliant how they turned these criminals into a warrior. Overal I really enjoyed this article, and it was written very well. I wish there were more of a story in this article though; it would’ve been a lot cooler.

  • Natalie Childs

    This article was incredibly interesting. While I knew that gladiators were most all slaves, the fact that the idea and show of gladiators grew out of a funeral spectacle is strange to me, considering you most likely were following a funeral, with another funeral. More strange than that, is the fact that intermissions were filled with executions, usually of the creative death variety. This spectacle is truly a gruesome, gruesome way that people passed time.

  • Natalia Carroll-Long

    This article is very heart wrenching. It’s very sad to see that people’s lives we’re seen as a game. The gladiators were very brave to be able to risk their lives for every fight. Some might say this is remedied by the fact that they we’re mostly criminals, but nonetheless those were human lives. Aside from that, these pre-olympians are very interesting to read about. It has all the drama people want from fame to betrayal.

  • Constancia Tijerina

    For the longest time while I was younger, I thought as gladiators to be a myth or folklore. Now that I have read a very articulate and greatly informative article, I can now see how being a gladiator truly held some meaning towards the community and society itself. What I found most appreciative of this article is the meaning behind everything in a gladiator’s performance and as to why they would perform such barbaric and insane acts. Its intriguing to read how even uniform signifies you and your power and how money can motivate a person to the extremes such as trying to kill off another human being.

  • Noah Laing

    Before reading this article, the only knowledge I’ve had to form an opinion on gladiators and the fighting in the arenas was based off of a few stories in history class I read about and the movie “Gladiator”. Now that I’ve read this article I feel that I’m much more informed on how gladiators came to be and the lives they lived. I had no idea that having people fight in an arena all started as a tribute to Junius Brutus Pera at his own funeral. I also thought that it was kind of ironic that when a gladiator school would have a good and victorious student, the student who fought to the death and was the last man standing in the arena wasn’t rewarded with freedom, however the school would keep the victorious individual so that they could continue to fight and entertain more people.

Leave your comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.