StMU Research Scholars

Featuring Scholarly Research, Writing, and Media at St. Mary's University

In 58 BCE, Roman proconsul Julius Caesar, a member of the first Triumvirate and an important political figure in the Roman Government, was forced to flee the very city he helped rule. As debts from his political aspirations and a general souring of relations among members of the senate began to catch up with him, an opportunity presented itself.1 To the north of Italy, the massive frontier of modern day France and Belgium provided a persistent thorn in the republic’s side. For years, the tribes of Gaul had descended on Italy, raiding and pillaging. As a land ripe with spoils and slaves, acting hostile to Rome, no better opportunity could be offered to Caesar. If he stayed in Rome, his debts would be called in. Unable to pay them, he’d be cast out of Rome, and his family name would be sullied. But in Gaul, glory in combat and vast new territory awaited him, should he survive.

Bust depicting Julius Caesar | Courtesy of the Metropolitan Museum of Art

When Caesar departed for Gaul in March of 58 BCE, he had under his command four veteran legions, all of which had served under him through previous conquests. These men were the best the Roman military could offer, and they pledged themselves and their lives to Caesar.2 As proconsul, Caesar had the ability to raise additional troops should the need arise, and in Gaul, he was able to do so, with the aid of tribes friendly to Rome.3

As the legions moved into Gaul, they faced very unorganized resistance. The tribes of the Gauls were nomadic and proud peoples, with long and complex histories. Facing invasion from an enemy much more organized and well trained, the tribes would not organize to form any sort of coalition against the Romans. This gave Caesar several victories early into the conquest at little cost to his own forces. Supply trains ran unhindered to the front line, since there was no one left alive to harass them. The Romans, under Caesar, conducted total war on the peoples of the Gaul. Villages burned. Men killed. Women and children, enslaved. This was the fate that awaited any tribe proud enough to stand against the might of Rome. As news spread of Caesar’s victories, some tribes pledged fealty to Rome in return for being spared by the legions. The divisions among the tribes, whether they were long standing or trivial disagreements, made subjugating Gaul a task that was much easier than expected.4

Statue depicting Vercingetorix above the battlefield of Alesia | Courtesy of Ancient History Encyclopedia

By 52 BCE, a fair swath of Gaul had been brought under Roman control. As complete and total domination loomed over the remaining tribes, one among them finally sought to organize a revolt against Caesar. Vercingetorix, chieftain of the Arverni people, began to reach out to the tribes who were still unconquered. Through these alliances, Vercingetorix became the supreme commander of the united Gaulic forces, leading some of his men to refer to him as their king. Vercingetorix began a scorched earth campaign against Caesar. What the Gauls lacked in military tactics, they made up for in knowledge of the land. As the legions moved forward, expanding the front of the war, the Gauls would burn their own fields and villages, leaving no prize to be taken by Caesar, and more importantly, no food or supplies to sustain his legions.5

As supply lines with Rome became longer and longer the deeper he progressed into Gaul, and with every tribe either destroyed or subjugated and having all their supplies seized to fuel the war, Caesar was put in a situation he had not anticipated. However, he did not have many options. If he returned to Rome now, then Vercingetorix and his united forces would reclaim all the land Caesar had conquered thus far, rendering the conquest a complete failure, which would make Caesar look incompetent. If he continued to push forward, he risked alienating his legionaries by forcing them to endure conditions and rations they could not continue on. A gambit was placed in front of Caesar, and he chose to evoke the latter option.6

The Roman war machine marched on. In its path lied the capital of Vercingetorix’s tribe, Avaricum. Following his tactics thus far, Vercingetorix intended to raze the city to prevent the Romans from resupplying from it. The citizens pleaded with Vercingetorix to spare the city, and since the city had strong defenses and a decent garrison, he decided to leave the city to defend itself.7 This would prove to be a fatal mistake. For a grueling twenty-five days, Caesar’s men besieged the city, building siege towers and artillery to breach the city. The legionaries, starving from a lack of supplies, used their situation as motivation to take the city. Their lives, and Caesar’s conquest, quite literally depended on taking Avaricum.8

Victorious from the siege, Caesar next marched his resupplied and fed legion to the city of Gregoria. However, Vercingetorix was lying in wait. Using the days Caesar spent sieging Avaricum, he was able to burn every bridge in the area as well as raise a cavalry to use against the legions. The Romans were not prepared for this level of organized resistance. The Gauls held the high ground surrounding the city and could easily survive a siege if Caesar ordered it. Rather than retreat and muster more troops with more supplies, Caesar ordered his forces to push forward, thinking the brute force of his legions would frighten the Gauls into a retreat. This miscalculation and resulting blood bath left Caesar’s legions in disarray. In his commentaries on the battle, Caesar states that he lost at least forty-six centurions and some seven hundred legionaries, though these numbers are likely much higher.9 Caesar regrouped the surviving legionaries and retreated into friendly territory. Although the victory was a huge moral boost to the Gauls, it would not be enough to stop Caesar.

Following the disaster at Gregoria, Caesar regrouped with his Gaulic allies to resupply and levy more soldiers to fight for him, including a cavalry composed of Gauls from loyal tribes.10 With his legions’ strength brought back up, Vercingetorix faced fighting Caesar at a major disadvantage in open combat. Roman legions alone were quite fearsome, but reinforced with a fully equipped cavalry made them the dominant force on the battlefield. Rather than continue his scorched earth campaign, he decided to garrison his troops in the fortified city of Alesia. From here, Vercingetorix called out to his remaining allies to muster a relief army to reinforce him. When Caesar later arrived to meet the enemy, his options were limited. Rather than chance a direct assault, he ordered his men to encamp around the city and blockade Alesia. The legionaries built a massive wall around Alesia known as a circumvallation to prevent any reinforcements or supplies to be delivered to the city. Vercingetorix was effectively cut off from the rest of the world and was forced to immediately issue rationing orders to his men and the civilians in Alesia if they had any hope of outlasting the siege.11

Map detailing the battlefield at Alesia. | Courtesy of Wikipedia Commons

As completion of Roman defenses were completed, captured scouts and deserters of Vercingetorix’s army informed the Romans that a massive relief army was marching towards Alesia. Knowing that his troops faced an insurmountable disadvantage being encamped against a wall in open combat against a larger force, Caesar ordered the construction of another wall. This wall, a contravallation, was built to withstand a siege from the approaching relief army.12 Essentially, the besiegers had now become the besieged. With the contravallation completely encasing the Romans, they cut themselves off from resupply and were forced into one of the most curious military engagements in history.13

Finally, the day had come for the Battle of Alesia. Once the relief army had appeared, Vercingetorix ordered his men to attack Caesar’s fortifications at the inner wall. As they attacked one wall, the relief army mounted an assault on the other wall. The legions were ordered to hold weak points and rain arrows down on the assaulting relief forces. In preparation of the relief army being larger than his own forces, Caesar ordered his Gaulic cavalry to encamp away from the main body of legionaries on another portion of the Roman encampment, in the rear flank of the Gauls. As the fighting grew closer into the Roman lines, with parts of the outer wall beginning to falter, Caesar himself joined the fray. He issued an order for the cavalry to attack the relief army as a diversion to give the legionaries an opportunity to push back the Gauls. The cavalry caught the Gauls off guard and from behind, decimating the relief army, and breaking their ranks in a hasty retreat, fearing a larger Roman relief army to arrive at any moment. Caesar’s gambit paid off and is remembered today as one of the most daring military maneuvers in all of military history. If it had failed, Caesar and his men would have surely been defeated at Alesia.14

Artists depiction of Alesia (On top of the hill) surrounded by Roman fortifications | Courtesy of Rome Across Europe

With the relief army dispersed, Vercingetorix had no options left. During the siege, all their supplies had been consumed. They did not anticipate Caesar to actually survive the relief army’s push. Faced with starvation if they continued to hold out and facing grim retribution if they pushed against the Romans in an effort to hold Alesia, capitulation was the only resort. Caesar issued demands for the leaders of Alesia and the Gaulic army to surrender themselves or face his wrath. The Gauls complied, and Vercingetorix surrendered to Caesar, thus ending the Conquest of Gaul.15

Following the victory at Alesia, those who opposed Caesar were killed or made slaves. Many women were given to legionaries as wives for their service. Vercingetorix was imprisoned for years following his defeat, until his death during Caesar’s triumph in a public execution. Caesar himself would be talked of with both praise and contempt in Rome. To the citizens, he was the conquering hero who tamed the wild Gaul and brought Roman civilization to the frontier. To the senate, he was a threat to the very existence of the republic. A man with that much popularity with the people and his legionaries, coupled with a vendetta with those who forced him to conquer Gaul in the first place was not something the senators could not allow. They ordered Caesar back to Rome to face trial for engaging in a conquest raised with Roman soldiers and the Roman banner illegally–alone. Caesar, rather, defied the senate instead, and crossed the Rubicon River with his soldiers two years after the Battle of Alesia. This act signaled the start of the Second Roman Civil War, marking the beginning of the end of the Roman Republic.16

  1.  Encyclopedia of World Biography, 2004, s.v. “Julius Caesar.”
  2. Gaius Julius Caesar, The Conquest of Gaul (Penguin Classics, 1983), Book 1, Chapters 40 and 41
  3. Encyclopedia of World Biography, 2004, s.v. “Julius Caesar.”
  4. The Greenhaven Encyclopedia of Ancient Rome. 2002, s.v. “Gaul,” by Don Nardo.
  5. Encyclopedia of World Biography, 2004, s.v. “Vercingetorix.”
  6. Gaius Julius Caesar, The Conquest of Gaul (Penguin Classics, 1983), Book 7, Chapter 10.
  7. Encyclopedia of World Biography, 2004, s.v. “Vercingetorix.”
  8. Gaius Julius Caesar, The Conquest of Gaul (Penguin Classics, 1983), Book 7, Chapters 16-28.
  9. Gaius Julius Caesar, The Conquest of Gaul (Penguin Classics, 1983), Book 7, Chapter 51.
  10. Gaius Julius Caesar, The Conquest of Gaul (Penguin Classics, 1983), Book 7, Chapter 56.
  11. The Greenhaven Encyclopedia of Ancient Rome, 2002, s.v. “Siege of Alesia,” by Don Nardo; The Greenhaven Encyclopedia of Ancient Rome, 2002, s.v. “Battlefield Tactics,” by Don Nardo.
  12. The Greenhaven Encyclopedia of Ancient Rome, 2002, s.v. “Battlefield Tactics,” by Don Nardo.
  13. The Greenhaven Encyclopedia of Ancient Rome, 2002, s.v. “Siege of Alesia,” by Don Nardo.
  14. The Greenhaven Encyclopedia of Ancient Rome, 2002, s.v. “Siege of Alesia,” by Don Nardo.
  15. Encyclopedia of World Biography, 2004, s.v. “Vercingetorix;” The Greenhaven Encyclopedia of Ancient Rome, 2002, s.v. “Siege of Alesia,” by Don Nardo.
  16. Encyclopedia of World Biography, 2004, s.v. “Julius Caesar.”

Recent Comments

88 comments

  • Mohammed Hani Shaik

    A fascinating and engaging read that highlights the brilliant warfront mind of possibly one of the greatest conqueror of all time, Julius Caesar. This article here leaves us with a lot of knowledge about the man himself but also has a moral value message hidden within. It shows that overconfidence can most certainly hurt and cause a lot of damage. This further provides insight into the assassination of Julius Caesar and why the senate was willing to carry it out.

  • Faith Chapman

    I had always heard that Caesar was an especially great military man, but I never understood why; I figured that he got this title because the squad he led had won most of their battles, or that he was known for successfully conquering other lands and people. When I read this article, I thought there were other squads fighting alongside him and the article was just focusing on Caesar, but then I got to the part where it said he had fought alone, and I was amazed. Now I better understand why historians called him a notable strategist.

  • Maria Moreno

    I’m not the biggest history fan, but I really enjoy some well written articles and this is one of them. reading history is like reading a book, especially when it comes to history as old as this because the way they were back then compared to now it truly fictional, its so cool for me to imagine all these things happening. In simple words, Caesar was a jerk. He had no respect for anyone and his tactics with war were awful, he just killed everything and everyone. He was no leader, he just wanted power and thats what led him to his death. He didn’t really think things through either, like when the besiegers became the besieged, I believe that victory was pure luck.

  • Azariel Del Carmen

    The article told me something new about the past of Julius Caesar and put me into the point of view of someone who was able to view the conquests and point of view of Caesar and the defenses of the Gaul. I didn’t know he had debts on him that needed to repay and decided to head to due his conquest in order to avoid serving time for it. Apart from that, I was surprised by how the Gaul’s acted towards Caesar and themselves with few being with him for fear and others going against him and their other tribes to protect their lands. This was something interesting to know and would like to learn more of Caesar as time goes on by,.,,.

  • Vivian Urrutia

    This article was very detailed and made me imagine the whole thing. Caesar was a very brave man, he was not afraid at all to take risks that high because of his confidence. Even though Vercingetorix gathered an army with the intention of taking Julius Caesar and his Roman legion down he couldn’t make it. Caesar’s strategy were incredibly strategic and intelligent and if it was not for that he would have never managed to win. Nevertheless, the people of Rome were happy seeing him as a hero but the senate was not. Again, he took another risk by disagreeing again with an army. He was a man with a very strong personality and like that favored him, it also stabbed him in the back. Extremely interesting article!

  • Marshall Durham

    In both the video and this article the author’s relay key information that is needed throughout the story. The video uses more in-depth and personal connections while the article explains the more direct and factual statement of the battle. Both of the sources use the same key points to explain the events that occurred while the video told the why, when, where, what, and how. I have great confidence that I know understand the full story of the events that happened during this time period. The in depth explanation of how Julius Caesar conquered the Gauls once again. It is hard to determine the entire truth of what occurred due to the bias story telling that could be told. While using secondary sources, it is hard to find the full truth due to words being passed on that can be misinterpreted, mixed up, or added.

  • James Clark

    This article was extremely easy to understand and follow. The sectioning off in paragraphs to represent the different battles or struggles Ceasar faced made the read easy and digestible. Before reading the article I thought Julius Ceasar was just someone who had a lot of sway in the republic of Rome due to his family. However, the article showed how Julius Ceasar earns the respect that he was given in Rome. While at the time he did things for his own image he was smart and resourceful which lead to many victories. It is because of this that not only does he receive respect from his soldiers but most likely their families back in Rome as well. This also explains why those who sat in the Senate of Rome were willing to assassinate Ceasar. A man with great influence, respect, and in a position of power in the military could be dangerous to a society that is built on the ideas of a Republic. Overall, great article!

  • Paula Salinas Gonzalez

    I really appreciate how this article was written and broken up because it makes it easy to understand the main and key points. Before reading this, I had a fair idea of who Julius Caesar was but now I actually have more detail as to why he is thought of as a great military leader. He was really determined and confident and that’s what made him so successful in battle. However, he can also be a clear example of how overconfidence can be bad.

  • Eva Lizarraga

    This article explained the breakdown of the battle very well in my opinion-it felt like I was reading the plot of a modern-day movie. I’ve never known anything about this battle, but now am amazed at how advanced and innovative the strategies of Caesar were. The Romans were truly a force not to be messed with, especially with a strategic leader who has pride issues. That being said, it does seem ironic that the Romans went through all of this only to have their era ended soon after…

  • Aaron Sandoval

    This article was very well written and did a good job of detailing the events of the Battle of Alesia and the events leading up to the battle. I do not know a lot about ancient Rome and other than Caesar, I was not aware of the Battle of Alesia, I found it interesting that Caesar had two options and rather than allow himself to be viewed as incompetent he chose to push forward knowing that rations were running low, and the possibility of resupplying as they moved forward was not an option.

Leave your comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.