StMU Research Scholars

Featuring Scholarly Research, Writing, and Media at St. Mary’s University

November 24, 2019

Unethical Study on Triplets

Imagine moving into your dorm for the first time, and as you’re trying to get everything settled, several people you’ve never met greet you and call you by an unfamiliar name. Then suddenly somebody screams out that you have a twin. Well, as strange as that is, this exact scenario happened to Bobby Shafran in 1980. Bobby was moving into his dorm and was unfamiliar with the people at Sullivan Community College, in New York, but many of them greeted him and welcomed him back. However, things got strange when they began to call him “Eddy.” After much confusion, Michael, Eddy’s best friend, stepped in and began to ask him if he was adopted, and convinced him to drive to Eddy’s house. Upon arrival, the two long-lost brothers immediately conversed and hugged as if they had known each other their whole lives. Soon the story hit the New York Times, and everybody was in shock with the impossible situation.1 The story was incredibly hard to believe at the time, and it only got more confusing when David Kellman looked down at the newspaper and realized that he was staring down at two of himself. Immediately he called the other families and soon the three boys were reunited. The three families were so caught up with what seemed like a miracle that it was long until they questioned how these three boys got separated at birth back in 1961 by the Louise Wise Adoption Agency.2

Documentary of the Three Identical Strangers | Courtesy of Wikipedia

Bobby, David, and Eddy at first weren’t occupied in finding out why the agency would separate them. On the other hand, their parents wanted to find out why, so all three families arranged a meeting with those working for the Louise Wise Adoption Agency. The meeting concluded nothing, as the agency only excused the incident by saying that they didn’t believe that a family would take in all three twins. With this simplistic answer, the three brothers continued to flourish in their new fame and seized every opportunity to be together. The boys quickly began to learn how similar their interests were and with the explosion of this news, many shows called them in for live interviews. Everybody was curious about them. They were asked if they had similar taste in food, cars, women, and mannerisms, to which they all answered yes. Bobby, David, and Eddy shared personality traits that amazed all the people watching them on television. In several interviews they revealed how all three had participated in wrestling in junior high and even smoked the same brand of cigarettes.3

When looking at triplets, the genetic makeup is distinctly different from regular siblings and fraternal twins. While fraternal twins only share fifty percent of their DNA code, triplets share one-hundred percent of their DNA code with each other. Identical twins are formed from the exact sperm and egg sharing the same DNA code that predisposes them to a lot of their psychical traits.4

The genetic difference between identical twins and fraternal twins | Courtesy of Wikimedia Commons

In different studies, twins have been proven to be quite similar in both physical and personality traits. Psychologists had believed that this was due to twins being exposed to the same environment, allowing them to develop quite similarly. However, both nature and nurture contribute factors that predispose people to their personality. While nature deals with genetics, nurture focuses on environmental factors as impacts to one’s self. In this specific case, the triplets realized that heredity was influencing their personality. This can answer why Bobby, Eddy, and David looked exactly alike physically, but also shared many of the same interests, thoughts, mannerisms, and ideas. The idea of nurture was of little influence in this case, because the three brothers were identical in personality regardless of the different environments they were placed in at birth.5

Eddy, Bobby, and David had become so involved in each other’s lives, that they decided to open a restaurant called “Triplets” in New York. The brothers even decided to get an apartment together to make up for lost time. They had been getting along so well, and this only created a stronger bond between the three brothers. What used to be a dream quickly turned into a nightmare for the three men as they started to work together. As time passed, the three brother’s work ethics conflicted and they often had similar ideas for the restaurant. They recognized that not growing up together caused them to be unable to adjust to one another. After a lot of conflict, Bobby Shafran decided to leave the business, which caused a divide between the families. The three brothers eventually got married and Eddy relocated to stay near Bobby and David several times. However, the families we’re not as close, with only Eddy and David running the restaurant. Eddy began to act strange and revealed erratic behaviors, and he was admitted to a psychiatric ward. However, Eddy’s bipolar disorder only worsen, and he committed suicide in 1995. This event reveal that all three had once been admitted for psychiatric help, and it made them question more about the circumstances that had surrounded their birth.6

Eddy’s tragic death only fueled Bobby and David more to reach out to the Louise Wise Adoption Agency to figure out why they had been split up. The head psychiatrist Dr. Peter worked for the Louise Wise Adoption Agency and purposefully orchestrated the separation of not only these three brothers, but other set of twins as well. Dr. Peter oversaw a study on Nature vs Nurture in twins, and gathered several assistants to help conduct it.7 Although many records weren’t released, Bobby had gotten in contact with the assistants in the experiment after many attempts to receive the documents that were sealed off in Yale University. Lawrence Perlman, Dr. Peter’s assistant, revealed that the agency had tried to see the impact of the differences in parenting and in social class on twin personalities. Dr. Peter placed Bobby with a wealthy family, Eddy with a middle class family, and David with a blue-collar family. The research assistants had gone to their homes as they grew up to test what heritable traits they shared in their controlled environments. Dr. Peter’s assistants would also test the boys’ intelligence, emotions, and picture descriptions, and as they grew older, the examinations would become more complex. They had also chosen them carefully to all live within a hundred-mile radius from each other in order to follow up with the children for several years. The study made Bobby and David feel like guinea pigs, and it crossed a lot of personal boundaries that should have been illegal at the time. The assistants disagreed, because at the time the boundaries for scientific research were not greatly restricted.8

Explanation of the debriefing process | Courtesy of slide share.

Although psychology had been a respectable discipline since the nineteenth century, Social Psychology was coming into its own in the late 1950s and early 1960s. Many psychologists had conducted experiments regarding human nature and the factors that influence personality. At that time, researchers still didn’t have regulations for their experiments. Over time, the American Psychological Association (APA) has established limits and preventions to avoid unethical experiments after continuous disregard for participant awareness.9 The APA’s ethical guidelines mentions debriefing, which is the first step a researcher must take before he or she can construct experimental groups. Debriefing consists of researchers explaining the nature of their experiment to the participants and then allowing them to choose whether they wish to remain a part of the experiment. After the debriefing process, it is also required that researchers explain the confidentiality of the experiment and the role the participants will take. Once the research is conducted, participants get called in to discuss the results or any deceiving, if any, that took place during the experiment.10

The era when the three brothers were born was a time when scientific research in social psychology was still in its unmonitored and undisciplined stage. The assistants in the research conducted by Dr. Peter didn’t feel regret for what they had participated in, even though they later admitted that it was unethical. There was a lot to uncover about the impact of genetics on personality that was tested without much ethical control during the 1950s and 1960s. Overall, the study had concluded that genetics played a huge role on the development of the three brothers, and that mental illness can also be inherited and displayed, regardless of parental involvement or social class. This was one of many experiments that paved the way for the APA’s implementations of ethic standards for scientific experiments.11 But Bobby, David, and Eddy felt used and didn’t accept the excuse for their treatment. Their whole lives were treated as a huge experiment, and it was only a mere coincidence that the three brothers had crossed paths in 1980. After Eddy’s passing, Bobby and David were able to find closure by receiving all the documents from the agency over the experiment. Bobby and David continued their life’s alongside their families after all the tragic news, but later agreed to make a documentary to bring awareness to the issue.

  1. Emma Shackle, “Three Identical Strangers,” Transpersonal psychology review, (2019): 58-59.
  2. Leon Hoffman, “Three Identical Strangers and The Twinning Reaction,” The Arts and Medicine, (2019): 10-12.
  3. Emma Shackle, “Three Identical Strangers,” Transpersonal psychology review, (2019): 58-59.
  4. Bryanna Moore, “The Strange Tale of Three identical Strangers: Cinematic Lessons in Bioethics,” The Hastings Center Report, (2019): 21.
  5. Victoria Stern, “Roundup: Nature vs Nurture,” Scientific American Mind, (2014): 73.
  6. Charlie Brouillard, “Predictive Links Between Genetic Vulnerability to Depression and Trajectories of Warmth and Conflict in the Mother-Adolescent and Father-Adolescent Relationships,” Developmental Psychology, (2019): 1743-1746.
  7. Emma Shackle, “Three Identical Strangers,” Transpersonal psychology review, (2019): 58-59.
  8. Leon Hoffman, “Three Identical Strangers and The Twinning Reaction,” The Arts and Medicine, (2019): 10-12.
  9. Franklin Miller, “Forgoing Debriefing in Deceptive Research: is it ever ethical?” Ethics and Behavior, (2013): 105.
  10. Malgorzata Oczak, “Debriefing in Deceptive Research: A Proposed New Procedure,” The Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics: An International Journal, (2007): 49-59.
  11. Malgorzata Oczak, “Debriefing in Deceptive Research: A Proposed New Procedure,” The Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics: An International Journal, (2007): 49-59.

Tags from the story

Bobby

David

Eddie

Social Psychology

triplets

unethical experiments

Recent Comments

Berenice Alvarado

This article is really fascinating I really enjoyed reading it. It is crazy how these triplets were separated at birth. I love how they were reunited like in the movies. Except, that Eddy wasn’t able to live a long life next to his brothers because of his metal illness. However, it was bad that the doctor used them as guinea pigs and never introduced them to each other. They had to find out they were triplets all on their own.

reply

24/02/2020

1:02 pm

Kacey Diaz

Wow, this article was crazy. I think its so crazy that these triples were separated and eventually found each other. Overall this article was really good. I like how it told the stories of the triplets, explained to us the science behind how triplets are born and developed, the adoption agency and that whole situation and the study that happened with the triplets.

reply

27/02/2020

1:02 pm

Luis Jaen

Although the experiment itself was unethical, the thought behind it is very interesting. Since taking a psychology class back in High School I have always loved to talk about the influence of nature vs nurture when discussing twin. Being that I am a twin, I have always thought what would happen if something like this happened to us, would we be similar like these triplets were? Overall, this article was a great read about this improbable story. I have sparked an interest in this due to this author so thank you!

reply

29/02/2020

1:02 pm

Sara Guerrero

I’ve heard of this story but this publication went beyond into their lives and what really was the truth behind their separation at birth. It was definitely unethical that these men had to be separated into different social classes just to see how each one of them developed. It definitely is upsetting that one of them went to a mental institution and commited suicide and the other two brothers brought justice to Eddy’s death and awareness to their situation. To have their lives be treated like an experiment must have been traumatizing enough, and i’m glad they found closure. What an emotional article.

reply

01/03/2020

1:02 pm

Kennedy Arcos

Wow this was such an interesting read! I have never heard of this story before this article. I think it’s so crazy how these boys were separated at birth and it sounds like something straight out of a movie! It’s sad how these boys were treated like an experiment and I find it upsetting how Eddy wasn’t able to live as long as his brothers due to his illness. Overall it was an interesting and emotional story! Worth the read.

reply

08/03/2020

1:02 pm

Hali Garcia

This is a very interesting article, I was hooked from the beginning!!! I have heard of stories where identical twins are separated and end up reuniting but not triplets. I feel so sorry for them because they were separated for an experiment and it was not what they wanted and only found out after their brother, Eddy committed suicide. I like how you explained the DNA of triplets because I did know that twins share 50% of their DNA, but I did not know that triplets share 100% of their DNA codes.

reply

29/03/2020

1:02 pm

Stephen Talik

This is a really interesting article. I can’t imagine waking up one morning and running into two other doppelgangers of myself. It’s unfortunate that they ended up going their separate ways at the end due to mental illness. This also did a great job detailing the less than strenuous ethical guidelines at the time – which, while thankfully much stricter than then, still needs work.

reply

01/04/2020

1:02 pm

Andrew Gallegos

I’m so amazed how these triplets had no idea of each other. The adopted agency should of still let the parents know that there was triplets so when they grew up they can know. It’s a good thing that everything was falling into place by them being together. It’s sad how Eddy took his life because of his disorder. It wasn’t right how everyone just treated them different and just kept asking questions. I didn’t like how the doctors were just using them as an expirement. They should of been treated different they just wanted to be together not examed.

reply

22/08/2020

1:02 pm

Yamel Herrera

I can only imagine the pain they must have felt discovering that they were separated from family all because of some scientific curiosity. I find it quite disturbing, as you mentioned, that the scientist Dr. Peter still felt no regret for his actions even after admitting that he knew his research experiment was unethical. I think this article would benefit from also mentioning other unethical research like the controversial Milgram experiment of 1961. Overall, I think it’s great that there now are certain ethical guidelines for scientific research experiments.

reply

26/08/2020

1:02 pm

Aleea Costilla

This was an eye-opening article of the reason for scientific ethical standards. I was honestly not expecting the outcome their lives had and how the psychologists tried to seem justified. I appreciated the inclusion of the difference in the genetic makeup of twins compared to triplets as it carried the story well and the actions that took place. I’m shocked how well the study itself was set up because there were so many external factors that could have limited much of the experiment. While the outcome was beneficial knowledge, it was horribly unethical the extensive measures the researchers took.

reply

29/08/2020

1:02 pm

1 2 3 4

Leave a Reply