StMU Research Scholars

Featuring Scholarly Research, Writing, and Media at St. Mary’s University

November 24, 2019

Unethical Study on Triplets

Imagine moving into your dorm for the first time, and as you’re trying to get everything settled, several people you’ve never met greet you and call you by an unfamiliar name. Then suddenly somebody screams out that you have a twin. Well, as strange as that is, this exact scenario happened to Bobby Shafran in 1980. Bobby was moving into his dorm and was unfamiliar with the people at Sullivan Community College, in New York, but many of them greeted him and welcomed him back. However, things got strange when they began to call him “Eddy.” After much confusion, Michael, Eddy’s best friend, stepped in and began to ask him if he was adopted, and convinced him to drive to Eddy’s house. Upon arrival, the two long-lost brothers immediately conversed and hugged as if they had known each other their whole lives. Soon the story hit the New York Times, and everybody was in shock with the impossible situation.1 The story was incredibly hard to believe at the time, and it only got more confusing when David Kellman looked down at the newspaper and realized that he was staring down at two of himself. Immediately he called the other families and soon the three boys were reunited. The three families were so caught up with what seemed like a miracle that it was long until they questioned how these three boys got separated at birth back in 1961 by the Louise Wise Adoption Agency.2

Documentary of the Three Identical Strangers | Courtesy of Wikipedia

Bobby, David, and Eddy at first weren’t occupied in finding out why the agency would separate them. On the other hand, their parents wanted to find out why, so all three families arranged a meeting with those working for the Louise Wise Adoption Agency. The meeting concluded nothing, as the agency only excused the incident by saying that they didn’t believe that a family would take in all three twins. With this simplistic answer, the three brothers continued to flourish in their new fame and seized every opportunity to be together. The boys quickly began to learn how similar their interests were and with the explosion of this news, many shows called them in for live interviews. Everybody was curious about them. They were asked if they had similar taste in food, cars, women, and mannerisms, to which they all answered yes. Bobby, David, and Eddy shared personality traits that amazed all the people watching them on television. In several interviews they revealed how all three had participated in wrestling in junior high and even smoked the same brand of cigarettes.3

When looking at triplets, the genetic makeup is distinctly different from regular siblings and fraternal twins. While fraternal twins only share fifty percent of their DNA code, triplets share one-hundred percent of their DNA code with each other. Identical twins are formed from the exact sperm and egg sharing the same DNA code that predisposes them to a lot of their psychical traits.4

The genetic difference between identical twins and fraternal twins | Courtesy of Wikimedia Commons

In different studies, twins have been proven to be quite similar in both physical and personality traits. Psychologists had believed that this was due to twins being exposed to the same environment, allowing them to develop quite similarly. However, both nature and nurture contribute factors that predispose people to their personality. While nature deals with genetics, nurture focuses on environmental factors as impacts to one’s self. In this specific case, the triplets realized that heredity was influencing their personality. This can answer why Bobby, Eddy, and David looked exactly alike physically, but also shared many of the same interests, thoughts, mannerisms, and ideas. The idea of nurture was of little influence in this case, because the three brothers were identical in personality regardless of the different environments they were placed in at birth.5

Eddy, Bobby, and David had become so involved in each other’s lives, that they decided to open a restaurant called “Triplets” in New York. The brothers even decided to get an apartment together to make up for lost time. They had been getting along so well, and this only created a stronger bond between the three brothers. What used to be a dream quickly turned into a nightmare for the three men as they started to work together. As time passed, the three brother’s work ethics conflicted and they often had similar ideas for the restaurant. They recognized that not growing up together caused them to be unable to adjust to one another. After a lot of conflict, Bobby Shafran decided to leave the business, which caused a divide between the families. The three brothers eventually got married and Eddy relocated to stay near Bobby and David several times. However, the families we’re not as close, with only Eddy and David running the restaurant. Eddy began to act strange and revealed erratic behaviors, and he was admitted to a psychiatric ward. However, Eddy’s bipolar disorder only worsen, and he committed suicide in 1995. This event reveal that all three had once been admitted for psychiatric help, and it made them question more about the circumstances that had surrounded their birth.6

Eddy’s tragic death only fueled Bobby and David more to reach out to the Louise Wise Adoption Agency to figure out why they had been split up. The head psychiatrist Dr. Peter worked for the Louise Wise Adoption Agency and purposefully orchestrated the separation of not only these three brothers, but other set of twins as well. Dr. Peter oversaw a study on Nature vs Nurture in twins, and gathered several assistants to help conduct it.7 Although many records weren’t released, Bobby had gotten in contact with the assistants in the experiment after many attempts to receive the documents that were sealed off in Yale University. Lawrence Perlman, Dr. Peter’s assistant, revealed that the agency had tried to see the impact of the differences in parenting and in social class on twin personalities. Dr. Peter placed Bobby with a wealthy family, Eddy with a middle class family, and David with a blue-collar family. The research assistants had gone to their homes as they grew up to test what heritable traits they shared in their controlled environments. Dr. Peter’s assistants would also test the boys’ intelligence, emotions, and picture descriptions, and as they grew older, the examinations would become more complex. They had also chosen them carefully to all live within a hundred-mile radius from each other in order to follow up with the children for several years. The study made Bobby and David feel like guinea pigs, and it crossed a lot of personal boundaries that should have been illegal at the time. The assistants disagreed, because at the time the boundaries for scientific research were not greatly restricted.8

Explanation of the debriefing process | Courtesy of slide share.

Although psychology had been a respectable discipline since the nineteenth century, Social Psychology was coming into its own in the late 1950s and early 1960s. Many psychologists had conducted experiments regarding human nature and the factors that influence personality. At that time, researchers still didn’t have regulations for their experiments. Over time, the American Psychological Association (APA) has established limits and preventions to avoid unethical experiments after continuous disregard for participant awareness.9 The APA’s ethical guidelines mentions debriefing, which is the first step a researcher must take before he or she can construct experimental groups. Debriefing consists of researchers explaining the nature of their experiment to the participants and then allowing them to choose whether they wish to remain a part of the experiment. After the debriefing process, it is also required that researchers explain the confidentiality of the experiment and the role the participants will take. Once the research is conducted, participants get called in to discuss the results or any deceiving, if any, that took place during the experiment.10

The era when the three brothers were born was a time when scientific research in social psychology was still in its unmonitored and undisciplined stage. The assistants in the research conducted by Dr. Peter didn’t feel regret for what they had participated in, even though they later admitted that it was unethical. There was a lot to uncover about the impact of genetics on personality that was tested without much ethical control during the 1950s and 1960s. Overall, the study had concluded that genetics played a huge role on the development of the three brothers, and that mental illness can also be inherited and displayed, regardless of parental involvement or social class. This was one of many experiments that paved the way for the APA’s implementations of ethic standards for scientific experiments.11 But Bobby, David, and Eddy felt used and didn’t accept the excuse for their treatment. Their whole lives were treated as a huge experiment, and it was only a mere coincidence that the three brothers had crossed paths in 1980. After Eddy’s passing, Bobby and David were able to find closure by receiving all the documents from the agency over the experiment. Bobby and David continued their life’s alongside their families after all the tragic news, but later agreed to make a documentary to bring awareness to the issue.

  1. Emma Shackle, “Three Identical Strangers,” Transpersonal psychology review, (2019): 58-59.
  2. Leon Hoffman, “Three Identical Strangers and The Twinning Reaction,” The Arts and Medicine, (2019): 10-12.
  3. Emma Shackle, “Three Identical Strangers,” Transpersonal psychology review, (2019): 58-59.
  4. Bryanna Moore, “The Strange Tale of Three identical Strangers: Cinematic Lessons in Bioethics,” The Hastings Center Report, (2019): 21.
  5. Victoria Stern, “Roundup: Nature vs Nurture,” Scientific American Mind, (2014): 73.
  6. Charlie Brouillard, “Predictive Links Between Genetic Vulnerability to Depression and Trajectories of Warmth and Conflict in the Mother-Adolescent and Father-Adolescent Relationships,” Developmental Psychology, (2019): 1743-1746.
  7. Emma Shackle, “Three Identical Strangers,” Transpersonal psychology review, (2019): 58-59.
  8. Leon Hoffman, “Three Identical Strangers and The Twinning Reaction,” The Arts and Medicine, (2019): 10-12.
  9. Franklin Miller, “Forgoing Debriefing in Deceptive Research: is it ever ethical?” Ethics and Behavior, (2013): 105.
  10. Malgorzata Oczak, “Debriefing in Deceptive Research: A Proposed New Procedure,” The Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics: An International Journal, (2007): 49-59.
  11. Malgorzata Oczak, “Debriefing in Deceptive Research: A Proposed New Procedure,” The Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics: An International Journal, (2007): 49-59.

Tags from the story

Bobby

David

Eddie

Social Psychology

triplets

unethical experiments

Recent Comments

Jacy Hornsby

This is such an interesting story. Even though the way research on humans has changed and is more restricted, there are still problems like this today. This reminds me of the current news in eugenics or designer babies. A researcher in China a couple years ago conducted the first ever gene editing on human embryos. He successfully edited twin unborn embryos of baby girls that would have been born with HIV. Although the experiment was ‘successful’, it sent the global community of scientists into a frenzy over the ethics of the situation. The debated was going back and forth over wether or not it is ethical to edit unborn children that will be brought into this world because children are a protected class. Another part of the debate asked wether or not it is ethical because there was no consent from the embryos who would be born. Another area asked wether or not it was ethical because there is no previous research to know how this would affect the DNA of the future generations of the twin’s lineage. The parallels between the ethical problems in these two events are fascinating.

reply

11/01/2020

1:02 pm

Amanda Shoemaker

A lot of science can be considered unethical. This article shows how the scientist’s behind the study never really thought that by splitting up the triplets and secretly studying them that they were doing anything wrong. Although, what they did was wrong and obviously had a HUGE impact on the triplet’s lives, I can understand why they targeted orphaned children and felt like just studying them was unethical. This was an interesting read regarding nature vs nurture.

reply

12/01/2020

1:02 pm

Jose Chaman

This has been a really amazing and sad story. It is incredible to think how different science was in past decades and how ethics gradually began to play an important role in it. Before reading this article I completely ignored the experiments on twins and triplets based on separation, it seems to me something quite inhuman and very radical, something that in itself lacks a credible livelihood for future human development. It’s a shame that all his life Eddy, Bobby and David have been part of an experiment.

reply

14/01/2020

1:02 pm

Brandon Torres

The mentioned documentary is actually how I learned about this unethical nightmare of an experiment! It was much tamer in regards to its placement and recognition of this experiment, however, reading it in this unbiased fashion is great! I especially love how the author made the science of social psychology come out as an eventual growth and not as something that has promoted this type of behavior for years before! Finally, the full story portrayal is what also lead me to continue reading, due to the fact that no real part was left out and the entirety of the situation was shown.

reply

26/01/2020

1:02 pm

Savannah Alcazar

I found this to be the most fascinating article I have read on StMU history media to date. It is unbelievable that this was acceptable at a point in the United States. I was born in 1998, so I have only lived in a time heavy restrictions for most things. I think the public should be reminded of events such as this. I had never heard of it. I enjoyed how you included the science behind twins and the DNA involved; it helps the reader understand something they otherwise may not have known. I plan on watching the documentary. Great article.

reply

28/01/2020

1:02 pm

Kendall Guajardo

I loved this article as it was very clear and easy to follow. It is amazing to have a story that looks into the origins of science-based studies and the moral take on them. At this time it was easy to experiment on these boys because there were no solid guidelines to follow. Although the study was only observational, it is problematic to purposefully place children into homes essentially orchestrating any future life they will live. I feel as though the word “ethical” in the scientific community runs a slippery slope and these days we risk pushing the boundaries too much. It is horrific that these boys were separated purposefully and hopefully this will serve as a lesson so that the community doesn’t revert back to its old ways.

reply

29/01/2020

1:02 pm

Melanie Fraire

I was unaware of this unethical experiment, it’s fascinating yet sad to see how these three boys’ lives got treated like a science experiment. I can’t imagine how they might’ve felt upon learning all of this information but I hope scientists learn something from this mistake and will take people’s feelings into consideration and whether or not an experiment is ethical or not.

reply

30/01/2020

1:02 pm

Ana Cravioto Herrero

Great article! I was a little aware of these triplets story (the fact that they found out they were triplets in their later life’s) but I was not aware that one committed suicide and I was definitely not aware that they were separated on purpose. I am aware that it must be hard for triplets to be adopted, but it was astonishing to find out that many people were aware and involved that they were separated for a study. The impacts of nature vs. nurture are very interesting, but the way the doctors and assistants went about it were very unethical and it is sad to hear.

reply

05/02/2020

1:02 pm

David Castaneda Picon

I have never heard about this unethical case before. I think this is an interesting article, but it is sad that this triplet of boys where used as an experiment. I liked how the author addressed the science that is involved in the process of DNA and twins, it really helped me to understand why fraternal twins are different from regular siblings. I agree that studying the triplet is an unethical act, because the scientist were experimenting with humans that did not give their consent on being part of an experiment, and the experiment clearly had an impact on the triplet as they got older.

reply

05/02/2020

1:02 pm

Eliane Castorena

This story is truly sad but also very interesting. It is amazing to learn that even though these three brothers were separated at birth and grew up in different environments, they were so similar, not only in the physical characteristics but also in interests. Although it was a very interesting study, it was not ethical at all. As the brothers mentioned, they felt like they were treated like guinea pigs. Studies like these demonstrate why laws that prevent unethical studies need to be put in place. Very good read!

reply

06/02/2020

1:02 pm

1 2 3 4

Leave a Reply