In the early hours of August 24, 1572, all was calm in France until an unexpected chaos struck the Protestant Huguenots gathered at the Louvre Palace in Paris. After attending the wedding festivities between the Protestant Prince Henry of Navarre and the Catholic Margaret of Valois, the Huguenots were resting when a Catholic mob begin to attack those around the palace. The Catholics had planned an attack on the Huguenots, slaughtering as many as they could. Thousands of bodies covered the streets of Paris, and it became painted in red by the execution of the Huguenots. And the slaughter soon spread to nearby towns and cities. This attack on French Protestants by their Catholic countrymen was one of the worst in the age of European religious civil wars. How exactly did this come about?
During the mid-sixteenth century, the Reformation movement had spread from its origins in Lutheran Germany, finally reaching France; and it brought with it violent clashes between France’s Catholic population and its converts to Protestantism known as Huguenots. By 1570, there were Huguenots communities throughout France, and they were subject to numerous rounds of attacks by their Catholic countrymen in a series of religious civil wars, the last of which came to a temporary end with the Peace of Saint Germain in August of 1570. While neither religion had gained the upper hand over the other, both wanted to end the violence. Yet a conflict over whose religion would dominate France persisted between the two religions. The Huguenots, following the teachings of John Calvin, believed that they were the ‘elect’ and were predestined to be saved. The Catholics, who followed Catholicism, were led by the Guise family, who believed that the Huguenots were heretics that should be exterminated.1 The Guise family was a powerful and loyal support for the Catholic church in France. The main purpose of the Guise family was to conserve the Catholic faith and be the dominant religion in France. The Peace of Saint Germain was opposed by the Guise family, who had had nothing to do with the treaty, but who wouldn’t have hesitated to support it, if they had known that it was a trap to get rid of the Huguenots in Paris.2
The St Germain treaty granted the Huguenots control of a number of fortified towns and the right to hold public office, but not including public office in Paris or in the Royal Court. It also led to Admiral Gaspard de Coligny, leader of the Huguenot movement, to be appointed as a member of the King’s council.3 In order to bring about a peace between the two religions, as part of the settlement in the Peace of Saint Germain, Queen Catherine de Medici arranged the marriage between her daughter, Margaret of Valois and the Protestant Henry of Navarre on August 18, 1572. Religious tensions yet remained high, violence continued to flare up between the Catholics and the Protestants, and religious rioting continued to be widespread. Despite the tensions, the union of Margaret and Henry was intended as a reconciliation between the Catholics and Huguenots.4
The plotted assassination of the French Protestants could have been the arrangement of Catherine de Medici. The Queen, continuing to want power over France, decided she would keep a close eye on the Huguenot leader Coligny and his followers, to make sure things were going the way she desired. This is the reason why she arranged the marriage between her daughter to Protestant Henry, who was in line to become a future king of France. But it all backfired with the appointment of Admiral Coligny to her son’s, King Charles IX, council. Coligny’s appointment led to a flourishing relationship between the two men, which was something that the Queen had not planned on.
During his time on the council, the Protestant Dutch were currently under control of Catholic King Philip II of Spain. The admiral wanted to intervene and help the Dutch forces become free of the Spanish, and he received the support of King Charles to aid William of Orange, the leader of the Dutch revolt, to attack Spanish forces in the Netherlands. The Queen did not want to go to war with Catholic Spain, toward which the admiral seemed to be leading them.5 Starting to consider Coligny dangerous, the Queen become jealous of Charles and the admiral’s relationship, so she had to get rid of Coligny. Therefore, she conspired against the admiral. How exactly did she do it? With the help of the Guise family. She persuaded Charles that the admiral was planning to have Protestantism become the dominate religion in France, overthrowing the Catholics. The King, fearing that the Spanish forces now had a motive to invade France and that the Huguenots would take control of the Catholic church, agreed to the assassination of the admiral.6 The young king Charles was a weak leader, easily manipulated and influenced to do what others wanted of him; Charles was the prey of many, including his own mother.
On August 18, 1572, the day of the wedding between Margaret and Henry, the ceremony was performed in the Notre Dame Cathedral in Paris.7 The wedding brought days of festivities; among those attending were noble Huguenots who were in Paris to celebrate with their leader, Henry of Navarre. Queen Catherine, Charles, and the Guise family, however, were planning a different type of celebration. They were planning to get rid of the admiral. The plan was set in motion, and four days after the wedding, on August 22, a man hired by the Guise family was to do the bloody work for them; Maurevert was recruited to assassinate Admiral Coligny.8 Maurevert shot from a window, hitting the admiral with two bullets. One bullet hit a finger on his right hand and the other hit his left arm, leaving him very much alive. The failed murder of Coligny caused great fear in the Guise family, as well as to Catherine and to Charles, who feared that the admiral was aware that they had been the ones behind the shooting. In their moment of fear, Charles commanded a mass slaughter of Coligny and his followers, so that none of them could retaliate against him and his family. Because they knew many Huguenots were in Paris celebrating the wedding festivities, it would be a large number of Huguenots that would be slaughtered. No Huguenot would expect it; therefore, none would be able to fight back. The king gave the order: “Qu’on les rue tous,” meaning that all must be slain.9
Nevertheless, the admiral was unaware of who was behind his attempted assassination. While the admiral was taken to his home to be aided and to recover, he wept: “I think myself blessed to have received these wounds in God’s cause …. I forgive freely and with all my heart, both him that struck me and those who incited him to do it; for I am sure it is not in their power to do me any evil, not even if they kill me.”10
On August 24, two days after the attempted assassination of the admiral, an order was given by King Charles to finally perform the deed and execute Coligny. Finally succeeding, Coligny was stabbed in the chest, his head decapitated and his body severely mutilated, and then his corpse was thrown out the window of his home. The remains of his body were burned and thrown into the river and removed again. Claude Haton, a Catholic priest, described the happening “as unworthy to be food for fish.”11 His head was also said to have been used by Parisian children as a ball for entertainment. What came after Coligny’s killing was massive bloodshed. The Huguenots that had gathered around the Louvre Palace were attacked by hired thugs and criminals to slaughter as many Huguenots as they could find. Soon Parisian Catholics begin to join in on the act. Among the victims of the Saint Bartholomew’s massacre were men, women, and children whose bodies were mutilated and left to rot; and some were thrown into the Seine river. Arms, legs, and heads of the innocent all littered the streets of Paris. One known victim was Peter Ramus, an important French philosopher who reorganized Aristotle’s thinking.12 The event in Paris inspired Catholic citizens to join in on the act, and the murder spread to nearby cities: Lyon, Rouen, Bordeaux, and Toulouse all experienced the violence of the Catholic mob.13
Across Europe, the Protestant community was utterly shocked at the horror of the massacres, while the Catholic community celebrated the murder of the Huguenots. Pope Gregory XIII ordered the bells in Rome to ring in celebration of the St. Bartholomew’s massacre, even issuing a medal celebrating the slaughter of the Huguenots.14 The horror of lives lost at Paris and in its neighboring regions were never confirmed, but it is estimated that about 10,000 innocent individuals lost their lives to the violence of the Catholic mob. Although many historians still question why the massacres transpired and who the leading mastermind behind the assassinations were, one thing that all can agree on is that the Saint Bartholomew’s Massacre was one of the worst atrocities brought about by the hatred and revenge of individuals because of religion tensions. If either the Queen, the Peace of Saint-Germain, or Admiral Coligny’s chapter in the King’s life triggered the massacre, it will continue to be a question that will have differing answers. After the assassination of the Huguenots in France, the fourth war on religion soon begin and the division between the Catholics and Protestants continued. France during the sixteenth century was painted in red, and the event known as “The St. Bartholomew’s Day Massacre” will remain a bold punctuation mark in the heart of that century.
- Edward Wheland, “What was the Impact of the St. Bartholomew’s Day Massacre (1572) on France?,” DailyHistory.org, (May 2017). https://dailyhistory.org/What_was_the_impact_of_the_St_Bartholomew%27s_Day_Massacre_(1572)_on_France%3F. ↵
- Henry White, The Massacre of St. Bartholomew’s (New York: Harper and Brothers Publishers, Franklin Square, 1868), 317. ↵
- World History Encyclopedia, 2011, s.v. “French wars of Religion, 1562-1598.” ↵
- Frank Ardolino, “In Paris? Mass, and Well Remembered,” The Sixteenth Century Journal 21, no. 3 (1990): 401. ↵
- New Catholic Encyclopedia, 2003, s.v. “St. Bartholomew’s Day, Massacre of,” by W.J. Stankiewiez. ↵
- Salem Press Encyclopedia, 2003, s.v. “St. Bartholomew’s Day Massacre,” by James F. Hitchcock. ↵
- Henry White, The Massacre of St. Bartholomew’s (New York: Harper and Brothers Publishers, Franklin Square, 1868), 372. ↵
- James R. Smither, “The St. Bartholomew’s Day Massacre and Images of Kingship France: 1572-1574, “The Sixteenth Century Journal 22, no. 1 (1991): 29. ↵
- New Catholic Encyclopedia, 2003, s.v. “St. Bartholomew’s Day, Massacre of,” by W.J. Stankiewiez. ↵
- Henry White, The Massacre of St. Bartholomew’s (New York: Harper and Brothers Publishers, Franklin Square, 1868, 380-381. ↵
- Henry White, The Massacre of St. Bartholomew’s (New York: Harper and Brothers Publishers, Franklin Square, 1868, 411. ↵
- Salem Press Encyclopedia, 2003, s.v. “St. Bartholomew’s Day Massacre,” by James F. Hitchcock. ↵
- Europe, 1450 to 1789: Encyclopedia of the Early Modern World, 2004, s.v. “St. Bartholomew’s Day Massacre,” by Barbara Diefendorf. ↵
- Edward Wheland, “What was the Impact of the St. Bartholomew’s Day Massacre (1572) on France?,” DailyHistory.org, (May 2017). https://dailyhistory.org/What_was_the_impact_of_the_St_Bartholomew%27s_Day_Massacre_(1572)_on_France%3F. ↵
121 comments
Michael Thomas
I found this article interesting because of how it details the St. Bartholomew’s Massacre of 1572. Around the time of the massacre, Catholic church was beginning to split. Most people were tired of how the Catholic practiced their faith, so people began to break from the church and formed other Christian faiths. I never knew both Catholics and Protestants would actually resort to violence, in order to prove who was right in their faith.
Austin Pena
Great article. Its interesting to say the least on how far religion has come. To read that the cause of this massacre was due to religious beliefs is quite sad, to think that both sides recognized the same religious leader but disagreed on teachings seems foolish. This was the first time I’ve heard of this massacre and i would like to applaud the writer for the for making it easy to follow along with, but not leaving out any details. I learned a lot from reading this
Jose Figueroa
The constant fight between religions is something that I could never understand. Solely based on religious conflict the lives if 10,000 protestants were lost. I think there is alot to say about the character of Admiral Coligny who on his deathbed actively forgave what was going on. Hopefully, we can look to our past and look bad at atrocities like this one and make sure they never happen again.
Hector Garcia
It’s terrible to read about this massacre and how the reason for killing was a religious difference. Overall, I thought this article was really descriptive and I am now interested to see what really transpired and see who the mastermind behind this massacre was. What disturbs me that Pope Gregory XIII celebrated this massacre. I know it was a different time but I can never imagine the head of the Catholic church approving of these actions.
Hanadi Sonouper
This was a very well written descriptive article, I have recently learned about this historical topic. The article does indeed illustrate The St. Bartholomew’s Day Massacre that took place in 1572, it was devastating to read that a Huguenots were killed. The targeted group of assassinations and the catholic mob violence only demonstrates that the cause of conflict arises from differences of religion. Century after century countless of religious prosecutions take place. Converting to a different religion does not make someone better, but instead should make someone different and should be accepted without having to face a surplus of over 10,000 deaths.
Miranda Alamilla
Previously, I had no knowledge of this massacre that took place in France. It’s crazy to think that massacres of this caliber were planned by the Catholic communities. People of faith and who live by the Bible were able to murder a copious amount of innocent people. Not only was the massacre ordered by Catherine, her dedicated assassin, Maurevert and Catherine were both forgiven. Super interesting and very well put together, awesome job Maria!
Samuel Stallcup
I wasn’t aware that Protestantism and Catholicism escalated to this level, I always thought it was just a disagreement that Henry IV had when he originally changed England’s religious status to Protestantism. This massacre shined a lot of light that religion was an important thing during this time period. I think the article gave a lot of good detail on why this was a big deal (because people died) but also how it changed things afterwards.
Rafael Lopez-Rodriguez
When they teach us a little about the history of France this event is never taught and never even mentioned. At least I have never learned about this massacre. it was a shame that the Catholics ended up celebrating an event like this. Sort of ironic for a religion that promotes goodness and will to applaud this. Overall it was a great article and I learned so much from reading this.
Veronica Chavez
I’ve heard this story before though not of the many interesting facts that are given in this piece. I found this article very astounding. This article was eye opening, who would think that these religious wars would cause so much trauma, and thousands of lives in this massacre of 1572 . I have to say great job Maria!
Iris Henderson
I will admit that, even after visiting Paris and the Louvre, I was previously unaware of this horrific story. Unfortunately, roughly 10,000 innocent people lost their lives in this massacre of 1572 by the hands of the Catholic community. This story raises the question, why do so many people in history of religious faiths go to war against each other? Is this not against their religious morals and values? Maybe this is something I will never understand.