StMU Research Scholars

Featuring Scholarly Research, Writing, and Media at St. Mary's University
October 8, 2018

Becoming Christine: Ex-GI Becomes Blonde Beauty

On December 1, 1952, the headline Ex-GI Becomes Blonde Beauty dominated the front page of New York’s Daily News.1 This was the first introduction many Americans had to Christine Jorgensen, who twenty-six years earlier was born with male genitalia and named George Jorgensen, Jr.2 A few months after Christine first graced the front page of the Daily News, she returned to the United States, having received sexual realignment surgery and hormone treatments in Copenhagen, Denmark. Upon stepping off her return flight, Christine Jorgensen was greeted by reporters and gawkers alike. Americans were captivated by her, and wanted to learn more. Christine’s open discussion of her gender reassignment surgery forced the American public to question their preconceived notions of gender and sex. “People turn to science, trying to use the biological criteria for male to define a man and the biological criteria for female to define a woman. However, the definition of social rests with society, not science, and social can’t be made to coincide with biological categories.”3 Her embrace of the spotlight and frank nature about what drove her to transition made Christine a trailblazer in the field of Transgender Studies.4 Christine’s public transition also marked a watershed moment in history for transgender people.

Transgender, sometimes referred to as trans, is a term for an individual whose identity or self-expression does not match their assigned gender.5 Christine underwent surgery to realign her physical self with her biological self. She had ongoing hormone treatments to help with that realignment as well.6 Christine knew she was a woman long before she underwent surgery or hormone injections. That is why, when speaking of George—even pre-gender realignment—or Christine-after her return from Denmark—she will be referred to using the pronouns “she” and “her.”

Front Page of the Daily News December 1, 1952 |

Shortly after graduating from high school in 1944, George was drafted into the U.S. Army. The Army stationed George at Fort Dix in New Jersey to help process thousands of Army veterans back into civilian life. In 1946, after her discharge, George spent a year in Hollywood and tried her hand at professional photography. While in Hollywood, she stayed with her old friend, June Jensen, and June’s friend from Denmark, Helen Johnson. Helen Johnson would later play a large part in Christine’s transition. The three of them often stayed up late into the night talking. These talks led George to vocalize her feelings for the first time. She told her two friends about her homoerotic feelings, and, very importantly, of her desire to live as a woman.7 Raised as a boy, Christine recounted for her friends that while growing up, she struggled with what she described as “an ineffable, inexorable, and increasingly unbearable yearning” to live her life as a woman.8 She did her best to articulate her attraction to men as something not akin to the way another man would be, but instead to the way a woman was attracted to a man. George was disgusted by the thought of someone mistaking her for a male homosexual. Not much later, Helen moved back to Denmark and June remarried. George was left feeling hopeless and decided to return to her parents’ house in the Bronx.9

Once there, George enrolled at the New York Academy of Medicine, and worked at the local Throggs Neck Public Library. She did these things to pass the time while fighting feelings of detachment from herself. The monotony of this continued until the day she was re-shelving books at the library, and came across the 1945 book, titled The Male Hormone by Dr. Paul De Kruif.10 This book would change George’s life. The book gave George the push she needed to dive headfirst into research at the New York Academy of Medicine where she read about intersexed conditions and learned of “conversion experiments” being conducted in Sweden.11 There was at least one doctor in the U.S. performing sexual realignment surgeries at the time, but George was unaware of that because the operations were being performed quietly.12

On May 1, 1950, George Jorgensen set off on a ship headed for Denmark. Once George arrived in Denmark she was greeted by her old friend Helen Johnson with whom she would be staying during her trip. George was determined to find out more about the sex change operations she had heard about, but was not sure where to start. Helen urged George to visit her doctor, from whom George received a referral to see Dr. Christian Hamburger, an expert medical researcher in Scandinavia whose focus was endocrinology and the man who would change her life.13  During George and Dr. Hamburger’s initial meeting, George insisted that he was not homosexual and needed to live life as a woman, and that living as a man any longer was not an option. Dr. Hamburger agreed that the solution was for George to undergo a sex change operation. The only problem was, although Dr. Hamburger had extensive knowledge about hormone treatments, he had yet to perform a sexual realignment surgery. He told George that he would be willing to supply George with the necessary hormones and even perform the operation, all free of charge, if George agreed to be a test subject.14 George agreed without hesitation and almost immediately began taking estrogen injections. George attended weekly visits to the clinic, where a urine test and quick exam was given. George’s body reacted to the hormone injections in several ways, including softened facial skin and a more curvaceous body. During this time, she even let her blonde hair grow out. In 1953, after spending nearly three years in Copenhagen, Denmark, and enduring multiple surgeries, Christine decided it was time to return home to New York.15

Christine Returning From Denmark |

In 1950s America, the ideal of gender was a breadwinner-husband and a stay-at-home mother. There was an expectation that one would live within the boundaries set by these ideals regarding gender. The public was wary of anything that threatened this way of life, including homosexuals. In 1950, for example, during the Lavender Scare, there was a prevailing fear that homosexuals had infiltrated the government and that they were spreading their influence throughout the United States. Government workers who were suspected of being homosexual lost their jobs, military status, and social status, and they became isolated.16 It was a tough time to be anything other than a “normal.”

With those societal expectations ringing in her ears, she made her way back to New York. On the crisp, cold morning of February 13, 1953, Christine’s plane touched down at Idlewild Airport in New York, and she descended the stairs of her plane, smiling to the 350 people waiting for her arrival.17 She was draped in a mink coat and held a cigarette between her slim fingers. The reporters surrounded her and clambered for answers as they spit out their questions at full speed. Christine’s only response was “I am very happy to be back, and I don’t have any plans at the moment, and I thank you very much, but I think it’s too much.”18 She was visibly uncomfortable with all of the attention, but that would not last long, because there was no escaping the public spotlight. The press would spend the next few years fascinated with Christine and writing multiple articles about her transition. Historian Genny Beemyn explains Christine’s popularity “in part because she had been a US serviceman, the epitome of masculinity in post-World War II America….and had been reborn into a ‘blonde bombshell,’ the symbol of 1950s white feminine sexuality.”19

While it may seem as if a majority of the public was captivated by Christine, that captivation wasn’t necessarily positive. In their April 1967 edition, a tabloid paper, Uncensored, published an article titled: “Those Legal U.S. Sex Changes: For those who’d rather “switch” than fight, John Hopkins is performing sex change surgery.” The article contained negative stereotypes and misinformation regarding Christine and what it meant to be transgender. The article went on to mention the fact that the John Hopkins Clinic recently started doing sexual realignment surgery and would be the second major American medical institution to do so. The first was the University of California Medical Center in Los Angeles. After public pressure and a district attorney’s threat of prosecution, the UCLA Medical Center was forced to abandon the practice.20 Also, the New York Times ran six highly critical articles in an attempt to persuade readers that Christine Jorgensen was a fraud and argued that because she was unable to bear children, she could not possibly be a real woman.21 There were members of the press who spewed nasty remarks her way, asked if she would be willing to pose nude for them, and making jokes at her expense.22

Christine Jorgensen and Fiancé Howard J. Knox at the Marriage License Bureau in New York |

Christine adjusted quickly, out of necessity, to being in the public eye, and was determined to use her notoriety for good. She began receiving thousands of letters from men and women seeking information about their transsexual feelings. These letters contained heart-wrenching stories that Christine could relate to all too well. Among those letters though, was one from New York physician, Harry Benjamin, who had quietly performed a partial transsexual surgery on a patient. Christine set up a meeting with Dr. Benjamin, and the two met in New York and discussed ways in which they could help other transsexuals obtain the information and medical referrals necessary to live the lives they desired. Together they went through the mountains of mail and responded with help in whatever way they could. Into the 2000s, the ability to transition would be guarded and guided by the “Harry Benjamin Standards of Care,” the same doctor that Christine worked with.23 When Christine was not giving interviews, she performed at multiple clubs, including the Copa Cabana and the Tropicana in Havana, Cuba. In 1959, Christine met and fell in love with Howard J. Knox. He proposed, but when they went down to city hall to acquire a marriage license, they were turned away due to the “male” designation on Ms. Jorgensen’s birth certificate.24 Christine refused to take no for an answer and immediately obtained a letter from Dr. Harry Benjamin, which stated:

This is to certify that I have known Miss Christine Jorgensen for over six years. It is my opinion that she must be considered female. I have examined Miss Jorgensen and have found her in a condition that would fully enable her to have normal marital relations.25

This letter, unfortunately, did not sway the city clerk, and no marriage license was issued. But it is very similar to the letter that would eventually be required under the standards of care to be eligible for hormone therapy and reassignment surgery. Despite her best efforts, Christine was not able to change the law regarding marriage. That would take another fifty-seven years.

We now know that there were a few trans people who underwent surgery and lived healthy lives in their communities. People began to ask Christine why she did not do the same. Why did she put herself in the spotlight, only to face discrimination? Why did she allow reporters and the public to satisfy their curiosities with such invasive questions? Christine finally answered that question by pointing out that “when a question was being asked…It was because the world was ready for this step…the opening of the sexual understanding explosion.”26 Christine was willing to subject herself to undignified questioning and the invasion of her privacy if it meant she could further public education on the topic of sexual realignment surgeries and the trans individuals behind them. That spotlight ultimately cost her the ability to live as a woman in the eyes of many people, who would never see her as anything other than a man once they knew of her transition. That was a great sacrifice to make in order to further education on what it meant to be transgender.

Jorgensen’s transition from male-to-female launched a national discussion about gender identity. She put a name and a face to something that thousands of Americans were silently suffering with, and her story has stood an inspiring example to others.27 Jorgensen’s story and the history of transsexuality are central parts of the reconceptualization of sex in the twentieth century. Joanne Meyerowitz, author of How Sex Changed, eagerly points out that “Jorgensen was more than a media sensation, a stage act, or a cult figure. Her story opened debate on the visibility and mutability of sex.”28 It forced the public to stop and think about how we define a person’s sex. Christine continues to serve as an important historical figure to the transgender community. A symbol of courage to live as her authentic self, that inspired others to do the same.

  1. Ben White, “Ex-GI Becomes Blonde Beauty: Bronx Army vet undergoes first widely known gender reassignment procedure in 1952,” Daily News, December 1952, front page.
  2. Richard Docter, Becoming a Woman, A Biography of Christine Jorgensen (New York: The Haworth Press, 2008), 1.
  3. Nicholas Teich, Transgender 101: A Simple Guide to a Complex Issue (New York: Columbia University Press, 2012), 70-71.
  4. Emily Skidmore, “Constructing the ‘Good Transsexual’: Christine Jorgensen, Whiteness, and Heteronormativity in the Mid-Twentieth-Century Press,” Feminist Studies Inc. 37, no. 2 (Summer 2011): 270.
  5. Funk & Wagnalls New World Encyclopedia, s.v. “Transgender.”
  6. Richard Docter, Becoming a Woman, A Biography of Christine Jorgensen (New York: The Haworth Press, 2008), 76-77.
  7. Richard Docter, Becoming a Woman, A Biography of Christine Jorgensen (New York: The Haworth Press, 2008), 49-51.
  8. Joanne Meyerowitz, How Sex Changed: A History of Transsexuality in the United States (Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 2002), 1.
  9. Richard Docter, Becoming a Woman, A Biography of Christine Jorgensen (New York: The Haworth Press, 2008), 52.
  10. Joanne Meyerowitz, “Transforming Sex: Christine Jorgensen in the Postwar U.S,” OAH Magazine of History no. 2 (2006): 16.
  11. Joanne Meyerowitz, How Sex Changed: A History of Transsexuality in the United States (Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 2002), 56.
  12. Richard Docter, Becoming a Woman, A Biography of Christine Jorgensen (New York: The Haworth Press, 2008), 7.
  13. Richard Docter, Becoming a Woman, A Biography of Christine Jorgensen (New York: The Haworth Press, 2008), 74 .
  14. Richard Docter, Becoming a Woman, A Biography of Christine Jorgensen (New York: The Haworth Press, 2008), 81.
  15. Richard Docter, Becoming a Woman, A Biography of Christine Jorgensen (New York: The Haworth Press, 2008), 83.
  16. Jessica Toops, “The Lavender Scare: Persecution of Lesbianism During the Cold War,” Western Illinois Historical Review 5, (2013): 91,
  17. Richard Docter, Becoming a Woman, A Biography of Christine Jorgensen (New York: The Haworth Press, 2008), 127.
  18. Fred Maness, “Christine Comes Home: Coverage of her arrival at Idlewild Airport,” YouTube video, 56 seconds, June 25, 2007,
  19. Tony Long, “Dec. 1, 1952: Ex-GI Becomes Blonde Beauty,” Wired, December 1, 2010,
  20. Anonymous, “Those Legal U.S. Sex Changes: For those who’d rather “switch” than fight, John Hopkins is performing sex change surgery,” Uncensored, April 1967, 18.
  21. Joanne Meyerowitz, “Transforming Sex: Christine Jorgensen in the Postwar U.S,” OAH Magazine of History no. 2 (2006): 18.
  22. Erin Kelly, “Call Her Christine: The Original American Trans Celebrity,” All That’s Interesting, June 4, 2015,
  23. Richard Docter, Becoming a Woman, A Biography of Christine Jorgensen (New York: The Haworth Press, 2008), 164-165.
  24. Richard Docter, Becoming a Woman, A Biography of Christine Jorgensen (New York: The Haworth Press, 2008), 194.
  25. Nicholas Teich, Transgender 101: A Simple Guide to a Complex Issue (New York: Columbia University Press, 2012), 62.
  26. Joanne Meyerowitz, How Sex Changed: A History of Transsexuality in the United States (Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 2002), 51.
  27. Editors, “Christine Jorgensen Biography,” last modified April 2014,
  28. Joanne Meyerowitz, How Sex Changed: A History of Transsexuality in the United States (Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 2002), 2.

Mariah Cavanaugh

Author Portfolio Page

Recent Comments


  • Patricia Arechiga

    The name and story of Christine was nonexistent prior to reading this article. The LGBTQ community has grown and become more vocal throughout the past decade. Though the stigma around the topic remains and will most likely continue to remain, the fact that there is more acceptance is amazing. However, challenges are still faced within this community today and can not imagine what challenges, both mentally and emotionally, people under this community faced. I respect Christine for coming out regardless of the danger!

  • Vania Gonzalez

    This article is good and very well thought out, it expresses the ideas and the hardships she had to face in America once she came back from Denmark and how she was in the public eye for doing what she felt was right. She endured much hate because at this time people thought of it wrong and it is still like this today but less thought of wrong. Great article.

  • Nelly Perez

    This is the first time that I am learning about Christine and being the first to become transgender. I never knew how it started, but I only knew what it meant. I knew that it meant that someone felt like they were the opposite sex instead of the sex they were assigned at birth. She made an impact through the public eye from being a soldier into a true beauty. She did get asked questions that made her uncomfortable, but she really felt like herself despite the challenges she faced. Also, the fact that people had to lose their jobs because of suspicion of being a homosexual was unfair because they wanted to work to provide for themselves.

  • Audrey Uribe

    This was my first time hearing of Christine Jorgensen. She was a real icon and beacon of hope for the transgender community. I’m glad she was strong enough to fight for who she is and not let society tell her who she was. Its very brave of her to offer herself to be in the spotlight of the world. In the 50s I’m sure it was an every crazier situation due to the fact that the 21st century is more modern.

  • Emily Velazquez

    I had no idea that there was a person who stood for transgender and who was the first to tell the world about it. To people who felt the same way she did, she was iconic and stood for all transgenders. She was the first who the world saw and was able to ask questions about. I think it definitely takes someone special to be able to openly come out and introduce the world to. That takes a lot of courage and guts that clearly, Christine did have.

  • Michael Leary

    I had not heard of this individual before this and found it very surprising that there were instances of this before recent times. However, I think it is always tragic when a society praises a person for being “brave” when they have a psychological issue, in this case gender dysphoria. As a man of science, it does not make sense that the gender of someone can change through a procedure because their chromosomes are the same, if a male cat gets neutered it is not considered a girl.

  • Paola Arellano

    I do believe that the LGBT community is vastly growing and becoming a lot more popular. It could be because society is becoming more accepting of this idea or that they are more comfortable expressing it. I do think that it is a very brave thing to do and to come out to the world and say because it is definitely not what many would consider to be “normal”. I think that this article beautifully described the life of someone that struggled with the unknowing of their identity for far too long and almost all of their young life. I cannot imagine how difficult it must be for someone to be so confused but know so much about themselves. Of course this beauty queen happened to go through it in a much harder time because it was no ta s common to come out as a transgender male or female. However, it showed that despite her experiences in the Army, George/Christine was able to stay true to herself.

  • Katherine Wolf

    This article does a great job with taking a topic that some people are unfamiliar with and presenting it to them in a beautiful, caring way. Christine’s bravery must have been immense and I can’t imagine how life must have been under that microscope, especially in the fifties. It is because of people like her that transgenders today can be their true authentic selves.

  • Leonardo Gallegos

    Interesting Article! I like the topic because it is a sensitive and controversial topic even today so I appreciate the effort. The world we live in today has learned to be more accepting of transgender individuals, not all agree with it but it is certainly significantly more people that accept the concept than people in that period of time. Christine Jorgensen has earned my respect because she really fought for being her authentic self, regardless of what people thought of her.

  • Christopher Metta Bexar

    I love the article . Sensitively written on a sensitive topic ,it shows research as well as compassion for its topic.
    Christine Jorgensen was a pioneer in sexual identity as well as acceptance of human sexuality. Her case forced the United States to look at what really makes a person male or female and consider the concept of gender reassignment for those born in the wrong body.

Leave your comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.