Winner of the Spring 2017 StMU History Media Awards for
Best Article in the Category of “Culture”
When entering a Mexican restaurant today, one takes notice of the different aromas, both sweet and savory; one notices the patrons often speaking their language of Spanish; one hears the vibrant tunes of a jukebox; however, one might ask whether the art hanging on the walls of the restaurant isn’t also worthy of the patrons’ attention? One may have seen the famous work of art depicting a woman of colored skin, brown as sugar, contrasting with the white of beautiful calla lilies; or, if not, one might at least be familiar with another work by that same painter.1 The name of this artist, who is known far beyond the Mexican restaurants that hang his famous paintings and murals, is Diego Rivera.
Born in Guanajuato, Mexico, on December 8, 1886, Rivera grew up always seeming to have a hand for creating art. As a child, he had his own studio to work in and later he was granted a scholarship that allowed him to take his talent to Europe, especially to France, where he spent ten years expanding and perfecting his techniques. He is best known for his many influential murals and paintings that illustrate the struggles and lifestyles of the Mexican working class. Among his most famous murals is The History of Mexico from the Conquest to 1930, housed in the National Palace in Mexico City; The Making of a Fresco in San Francisco; and Detroit Industry, located in the city that was home to the American industrial worker in the early twentieth century.2
In the autumn of 1922, Rivera joined the Mexican Communist Party. This organization positively impacted the Mexican community through supporting miners’, factory workers’, and farmers’ rights. With the support of those miners, factory workers, and farmers, Rivera formed the Union of Technical Workers, Painters, and Sculptors. Through the Union, Rivera opened free art schools all over Mexico, through which he was able to spark the Mexican mural movement, enabling his protégés to showcase their art, inspired by Rivera’s own murals. Rivera became well-known in Mexico, and even people from different countries came to his Union to participate.3
In 1929, Rivera began working on a series of frescoes titled History of Mexico from the Conquest to 1930. The art piece took twenty years to complete because of minor adjustments and additions, and he also worked on other pieces in the interim. However, during this time of his busiest artistic activity, he was expelled from the Mexican Communist Party for being “too busy” painting. Despite his expulsion, he continued to favor the working class and always believed he was one of them.4 On February 9, 1934, Nelson Rockefeller was said to have sent workers to destroy a mural located in the Rockefeller Center in New York City, a mural Rivera had spent many weeks painting with smooth precision. The painting was destroyed because of a portrait of Vladimir Lenin painted in the mural, which was not originally in the sketch sent for Rockefeller’s approval. This left Rivera in a state of depression and exhaustion after realizing his hard work was put to waste, without even being given a chance to be named.
Despite the controversies Rivera encountered throughout his career he was still a magnificent painter and influenced much of Mexico’s national art.5 In 1947, another one of Rivera’s murals heated his audience, Dream of a Sunday Afternoon in the Alameda. It was located in the Hotel del Prado across the street from Alameda and the painting covered the history of the park and its peoples (from Rivera’s perspective) all the way from the years of the Spanish Inquisition to the Mexican Revolution. The reason it sparked criticism and caused demonstrators to slash the fresco was because the words “God does not exist” were written in the mural. Rivera, of course, repaired the damages made. In 1956, a year before his death, he announced “I am a Catholic,” and changed the wording on the fresco.6 It was among one of the last great murals he painted. But despite the controversies that Rivera encountered throughout his career, he was still a magnificent painter and influenced much of Mexico’s national art.7
In addition to being a hard worker and a talented painter, Rivera was also great with the ladies. While in Paris he first became engaged to a Russian artist named Angelina Beloff, with whom he had a son, Diego Jr., who unfortunately died at fourteen months from the influenza epidemic of 1919-1920.8 In 1921, he returned to Mexico, where he met a fine beauty from Guadalajara named Lupe Marin. Just a short year later they were married, leaving Angelina in Paris still believing that they were engaged. In the years that followed, Marin bore Diego two daughters, Guadalupe and Ruth.9 However, his infidelity caused their marriage to fall apart, with Marin left raising their daughters on her own. By 1929, Rivera had already remarried, but this time to the famous Frida Kahlo.10
Rivera was working on a painting in the National Palace in Mexico City when Frida approached him; she requested that he get down from the scaffold and give his honest opinion on her own work. After looking at her work, he called it “an unusual energy of expression,” calling her an authentic artist. She invited him to see more of her work at her home in Coyoacán. From there, a friendship blossomed, and soon they fell in love.11 Their marriage was not like any ordinary marriage; it was an emotional roller coaster of a relationship that was well depicted in both of their works, especially in Kahlo’s. She accompanied him everywhere: San Francisco, New York, Detroit, and many other places. They managed for many years, up until Rivera became involved with Frida’s younger sister. They then divorced in 1940.
During this time, Leon Trotsky (Soviet politician) was a target for many agents of Joseph Stalin and was found in his home with a pickaxe jabbed in his head.12 Previously, Rivera and Frida’s home in Coyoacán served as an asylum for Trotsky and his wife as a refuge from these assassins of Stalin’s. While in their home Casa Azul, Kahlo and Trotsky had an amorous affair, and a subsequent quarrel between him and Rivera.13 Rivera cut off any interaction with Trotsky and fled to San Francisco, where he started working on a mural. The police questioned Kahlo about Trotsky’s death, and she later followed Rivera to San Francisco. They remarried that same year, and despite his infidelities, they continued to be passionately in love. However, in 1954, after fourteen more mercurial years of marriage, Kahlo died, and Rivera mourned her death for a year before marrying his third wife, Emma Hurtado. Diego Rivera had a way with women, and his big belly and smelly self did not get in the way of his passion for both art and women.
Rivera was heavily involved in politics at an early stage of his life and continued to be up until his death. In 1955, he was diagnosed with cancer and traveled all the way from Mexico to Moscow to get treatment. Two years later, on November 24th, he passed away in his home in San Angel, Mexico City, Mexico. He wanted his ashes to be spread alongside those of Frida Kahlo in a templo he built; instead, he was buried. Rivera was head of the Anti-Imperialist League and held memberships in the National Peasant League and the Workers’ and Peasants’ Bloc. Also, he rededicated himself to the Mexican Communist Party in 1926 and was a delegate to the Moscow Peasant Congress in 1936.14 Rivera in many ways resembled the indigenous people of the working class illustrated in his works of art. Not only did they share the same native country, but they too were concerned for the political movement and the aftermath of the Mexican Revolution, and they too had the passion and drive to continue working hard, in both sickness and in health.
- Diego Rivera, “Desnudo con Alcatraces,” painting in oil, 1944, original in Private Collection. ↵
- Susan Goldman Rubin, Diego Rivera: An Artist for the People (New York: Abrams Books for Young Readers, 2013), 6. ↵
- Susan Goldman Rubin, Diego Rivera: An Artist for the People (New York: Abrams Books for Young Readers, 2013), 16. ↵
- Susan Goldman Rubin, Diego Rivera: An Artist for the People (New York: Abrams Books for Young Readers, 2013), 22. ↵
- Susan Goldman Rubin, Diego Rivera: An Artist for the People (New York: Abrams Books for Young Readers, 2013), 26. ↵
- William Stockton, “Rivera Mural in Mexico Awaits it New Shelter,” New York Times, January 4, 1987. Accessed April 17, 2017. http://www.nytimes.com/1987/01/04/arts/rivera-mural-in-mexico-awaits-its-new-shelter.html. ↵
- Susan Goldman Rubin, Diego Rivera: An Artist for the People (New York: Abrams Books for Young Readers, 2013), 26. ↵
- Susan Goldman Rubin, Diego Rivera: An Artist for the People (New York: Abrams Books for Young Readers, 2013), 12-13. ↵
- Susan Goldman Rubin, Diego Rivera: An Artist for the People (New York: Abrams Books for Young Readers, 2013), 16-18. ↵
- Frida Kahlo was an iconic revolutionary Mexican artist widely recognized for her disturbing personal self-portraits of the female body and known for her Tehuana style. See Encyclopedia of Activism and Social Justice, 2007, s.v. “Kahlo, Frida (1907–1954),” by Gary L. Anderson and Kathryn G. Herr. ↵
- Susan Goldman Rubin, Diego Rivera: An Artist for the People (New York: Abrams Books for Young Readers, 2013), 18-21. ↵
- Encyclopedia of Activism and Social Justice, 2007, s.v. “Trotsky, Leon (1879–1940),” by Gary L. Anderson and Kathryn G. Herr. ↵
- Encyclopedia of Sex and Gender, 2007, s.v. “Kahlo, Frida (1907–1954),” by Fedwa Malti-Douglas. ↵
- Encyclopedia of Activism and Social Justice, 2007, s.v. “Rivera, Diego (1886–1957),” by Gary L. Anderson and Kathryn G. Herr. ↵
127 comments
Danielle Slaughter
Although I do not agree with Diego Rivera’s politics nor morality regarding marriage in the slightest, that is not to say that I do not respect his art. No one’s works should ever he destroyed for petty political reasons, as they are the pure and unbridled displays of the passions held by the artist. I remember seeing his mural in the National Palace on a travel documentary, and in my opinion, it reminded me of Da Vinci’s masterpiece that decorates the Sistine Chapel.
Sarah Uhlig
Diego Riveras story seems, in multiple ways, very complicated and yet his artwork kind of resembles the kind of complicated that he bleeds out. His artwork is very classical and inspiring because of the detail and uniqueness of the pictures. The one with the flowers at the beginning of the article is one of my favorite pieces from him. I am glad he was able to share some of these pieces with the world before the end.
Eric Ortega Rodriguez
I remember in high school Spanish class when we looked into different popular artist and Diego Rivera’s artwork was one of the artists which stood out. The thing that shocked me as I read this article was that his mural was destroyed just for having Vladimir Lenin painted on it. In addition to this, another thing that was surprising was that he was disloyal to his wives which is something I would have not expected from one of Mexico’s well-renowned artist. Overall, great topic selection with a great selection of images.
Sharriah Martinez
So call me crazy but I only knew of Diego Rivera through Frida Kahlo. I had never seen his artworks or murlas. You can tell by his extremely detailed paintings and artworks just how wild and complex his mind was. By all of the detail he placed in his work you can tell his brain would have been something interesting to explore. There is so much to this man it amazes me all that he did.
Ava Rodriguez
I always had a an idea of what kind of person Diego Rivera was but had no idea that he was this complicated. He is one of my favorite artists and I actually have a copy of one his paintings that happens to be my favorite painting ever. This article was really interesting and mentions his unfaithful marriage to Kahlo, which everyone seems to know about.
Oscar Ortega
Diego Rivera left behind many, many, many legacies when he passed. He was from beginning to end a saga of a man, and this is reflected beautifully in this article, from the incredible nods to his famous works to the acknowledgement of his less than glamorous tendencies to his compassion for the working class, and how it, like many other aspects of his personal life, bled into his work. Diego Rivera left his mark on the world, whether it be considered more good or more bad, and this article tells the story of one of Mexico’s most famous in impressive detail.
Julissa Cantu
Diego Rivera was definitely a complex man, from his political standings and his love life to the amazing work he published as an artist. Medrano completed a beautifully put together article of the work of the man as well as a hilarious contrast to his other infidelities in his life. This article almost seems to take on a sardonic tone of Rivera as Campos describes his physical appearance. There is also the last line, almost as if it was bringing Rivera’s life accomplishments back to his marriage to Khalo and his infidelities within the marriage. Overall, this article was great to read.
Montserrat Moreno Ramirez
Diego Rivera is one of the most known artists in Mexico and his story with Frida Kahlo one of the most interesting. Both of them were very recognized artists and have lots of their work in different museums. Rivera has always been a contradictory icon with a questionable moral but with great talent. It was cool to read this story and very interesting!
Eloisa Sanchez Urrea
I first heard of Diego Rivera through Frida Kahlo. I knew of his infidelity and that was all I ever focused on. After reading this article and seeing his works of art I realized that he was a truly talented man. It is amazing that through his art he was telling stories that otherwise may have gone unnoticed. His work in making a difference in the community was also amazing.
Dylan Sanchez
Such a huge influence Diego Rivera was on Mexican culture even though it was just so recent. I have seen many paintings from him and it truly makes you think like no other painting does, it triggers something in the mind. I find it odd how he considered himself working class despite being a famous painter. Also, he was said to be a catholic…. yet a communist? Odd.