StMU Research Scholars

Featuring Scholarly Research, Writing, and Media at St. Mary's University
October 3, 2019

Fraudulent Forensics: The False Conviction of Amanda Knox

Imagine being a twenty-year-old American college student coming back to your dorm room in Italy after spending the night at your significant other’s house. You’re ready to get back to studying and hanging out with your roommates. However, upon entering your dorm room, you see several suspicious things. The door is open but no one is supposed to be home. You see unflushed feces in the toilet and blood droplets on the floor between you and your roommate’s shared bathroom. You also notice that your roommate’s bedroom door is locked. Worried that someone broke into your dorm, you go back to your significant other’s house and explain everything you had seen to them. Your significant other decides to go back to your dorm with you to check out the area. To your surprise, you notice that the feces in the toilet you had seen earlier had been flushed. Someone had been hiding in your dorm when you had first walked in. Your significant other quickly calls the cops. Your other roommate arrives with her boyfriend, and he kicks in the door only to find your roommate’s dead body laying on the floor, stripped naked from the waist down, and covered in stab wounds. Now, imagine that after being interrogated by Italian police officers, you are arrested on the spot and accused of murdering your roommate. This is exactly what happened to Amanda Knox – an American college student who was judged and wrongfully convicted of murdering her roommate, Meredith Kercher, in an Italian court.

A crime scene composite of the apartment in Perugia, Via della Pergola 7, where Meredith Kercher was murdered | Originally created by Maximilian Schönherr | October 5, 2011 | Courtesy of Wikipedia Commons

Amanda Knox was a junior at the University of Washington when she decided to study abroad in Perugia, Italy, to learn the Italian language at the Universita per Stranieri. Little did she know that she would spend the rest of her life associating the Italian language with pain and suffering.1

On November 2nd, 2007, the body of Meredith Kercher was discovered in her bedroom by Knox, her boyfriend Raffaele Sollecito, and her fellow roommates. Once the police arrived at the crime scene, they took Knox, Sollecito, the other roommates, and a group of Kercher’s friends to the police station for questioning. Knox was questioned from November 2nd to November 6th. Late in the evening on November 6th, after being bombarded with questions from interrogators, Knox’s memory became frazzled and she was told to sign a paper written in Italian that interrogators claimed was a translation of her account of what happened. Exhausted and wanting a break from all of the questioning, Knox signed the papers without knowing that it was actually a written confession that stated that she was there while the murder occurred and that the killer was her boss, Patrick Lumumba. This seems to be problematic with the language barrier; since Knox wasn’t fluent in Italian, she wasn’t able to completely comprehend what she was signing. The police then arrested Knox and Lumumba, but he was released on November 20th after they had confirmed his alibi. After her interrogation, Knox claimed that the Italian officers refused to provide her food and water for a long period of time, told her that she would never be able to see her family again, and even hit her twice on the head.2 In December of 2007, police officers charged Rudy Guede, a drug dealer, with first-degree murder after finding his bloody fingerprint on a pillow at the crime scene. In 2008, Guede was sentenced to sixteen years in prison; however, this did not stop the Italian court from still thinking that Knox was somehow involved.3

A headshot of Amanda Knox in Seattle | July 6, 2011 | Geraldbostrum | Courtesy of Wikipedia Commons

Knox’s very long trial began in January of 2009. During her trial, the Italian court used character evidence – evidence of a person’s character trait to prove that the person acted in accordance with their trait at a certain point in time – against her. They used her Myspace username “Foxy-Knoxy” as evidence to prove that she was narcissistic and addicted to sex. According to the prosecutors, Knox had slit Kercher’s throat in a sex game involving her boyfriend, Raffaele, on the first of November. Since U.S. courts prohibit this type of character evidence, many Americans viewed this as unjust. They also thought it was unfair since Knox was an American citizen and had to face punishment by an Italian court. However, this did not eliminate Italy’s negative perception of her, as the Italian court used the fact that Knox was kissing Raffaele while at the police station as a sign of her selfishness and sexual desires.4 However, Knox claims that she and Raffaele weren’t making out and that his kisses comforted and reassured her that everything was going to be okay during the worst time of her life. Despite her claims of innocence, on December 4th, 2009, Knox was convicted of murder and sentenced to twenty-six years in prison while her boyfriend was sentenced to twenty-five years.5

Knox was stunned that she was found guilty of murdering Kercher. During her trial, she took notes of what the witnesses testified and compiled a long list of false information that was said and gave it to her lawyers in hopes of supporting her innocence. Although she knew that many people thought she was guilty, she thought that there wasn’t enough evidence for her to be convicted of the crime. Knox kept in frequent contact with her lawyers, and whenever the trial was brought up, she remained hopeful that she would be found not guilty. According to Knox, she was naive to believe that she had a chance of being found innocent. Despite all of her attempts to prove that she was innocent, Knox ended up spending 1,427 nights in prison for a crime she did not commit.6

During Knox’s appeal trial in November of 2010, experts reviewed the DNA samples gathered at the crime scene and concluded that there were many errors in the gathering of the DNA. For example, the experts had found that there were no traces of Kercher’s DNA on the alleged murder weapon they had obtained from Raffaele’s kitchen. The experts also found the DNA of multiple males on the bra clasp of Kercher, which had been lost for 47 days. Because the bra clasp had been lost for so long, the experts claimed that the evidence was most likely contaminated and that it shouldn’t be used against either Knox or Raffaele. Although the Italian forensic team did an inaccurate job at gathering and using the evidence in court, the forensic experts were able to disprove their theories of what happened the day of the murder and help Knox and Raffaele become acquitted and released on October 3rd, 2011.7

Amanda Knox leaving the prison in Perugia inside a car | October 11, 2011 | AK for the Italy-USA Foundation | Courtesy of Wikipedia Commons

Just when Knox thought she was finally free and could put all of this behind her, the highest court of Italy demanded a retrial on March 25, 2013, after finding a note that was written by her that confirmed that both she and Rudy Guede were present during the time that Kercher was attacked.8 Knox stayed in the United States and was represented in the Italian court. Once again, on January 30th, 2014, both Knox and Sollecito were found guilty because the court concluded that the murder weapon had been cleaned and rid of Kercher’s DNA. More than a year later, on March 27th, 2015, the Supreme Court of Cassation, the highest court of appeal in Italy, heard the case and concluded that this was a case that lacked a solid foundation. Based on this conclusion, both Knox and Raffaele were acquitted for the murder – this time, for good.9

Although Amanda Knox was released from prison, many people still believe that she was, in fact, the murderer of Meredith Kercher since Raffaele had changed his story after being interrogated by the Italian police. On November 2nd, Raffaele claimed that Knox was with him the night before the body was found. However, on November 5th, the Italian police claimed that he no longer had an alibi for Knox, which suggests that he was trying to cover up for her. In addition, the fact that Knox had pointed the finger at her boss, Patrick Lumumba, for murdering Kercher even though he had an alibi shows that Knox could’ve possibly had something to hide. Despite this, however, Knox has written her own book about the situation and speaks her truth.10 Knox is also the host of her own podcast titled, “The Truth About True Crime with Amanda Knox,” in which she explores and analyzes different stories of vigilante justice. An Emmy-nominated Netflix documentary, Amanda Knox, also sheds light on Knox’s perspective of the situation.11 Now, eight years after being released from prison, Amanda Knox is happily married and continues to voice her opinion about injustices in the courtroom.

  1. Sandra Sobieraj Westfall, “Amanda Knox 6 Years After Prison ‘”I Have My Life Back,'” People, August 2017, 57.
  2. Danielle Lenth, “Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Justice: A comparative Legal study of the Amanda Knox Case,” McGeorge Law Review 45, no. 2 (2013): 359.
  3. Danielle Lenth, “Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Justice: A Comparative Legal Study of the Amanda Knox Case,” McGeorge Law Review 45, no. 2 (2013): 351.
  4. Nina Burleigh, The Fatal Gift of Beauty: The Trials of Amanda Knox (New York: Broadway Books, 2011), 6.
  5. Amanda Knox, Waiting to be Heard: A Memoir (New York: Harper, 2013), 243.
  6. Amanda Knox, Waiting to be Heard: A Memoir (New York: Harper, 2013), 142.
  7. Danielle Lenth, “Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Justice: A Comparative Legal Study of the Amanda Knox Case,” McGeorge Law Review 45, no. 2 (2013): 355.
  8. Danielle Lenth, “Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Justice: A Comparative Legal Study of the Amanda Knox Case,” McGeorge Law Review 45, no. 2 (2013): 355.
  9. Amanda Knox, Waiting to be Heard: A Memoir (New York: Harper, 2013), 482.
  10. Amanda Knox, Waiting to be Heard: A Memoir (New York: Harper, 2013) 26-27, 34-35.
  11. Blackhurst, Rod, and Brian McGinn, dirs. Amanda Knox. Plus Pictures, 2016.

Tags from the story

Cristianna Tovar

Author Portfolio Page

Recent Comments

85 comments

  • Melanie Fraire

    This story was very hard to get through due to how unfair she was treated and how unfortunate the situation was overall. This was my first time hearing about this case but I found it to be very interesting and informative. It was nice to read about her being able to finally put this all behind her and move forward with her life but it’s extremely unfair that she’ll never get back the time they took away from her.

  • Samantha Zamorano

    I had never heard of Amanda Knox or about this case before. The sentence that really sunk in for me was when you wrote that Amanda had spent 1,427 nights in Italian jail; a place that she was unfamiliar with, with the exception of a few months of studying abroad. I’m minoring in Portuguese, and I cannot even fathom spending a night alone in a Brazilian jail, or having to defend myself in their court rooms for a crime I did not commit.

  • Kennedy Arcos

    This was such an interesting article. I have heard about this story in the past, but I never really knew any of the details. It is strange to me that she went to her boyfriend first, instead of calling the authorities. I also think that it’s crazy how a language barrier caused this whole mess, and it’s unfortunate that she signed a confession unaware of what it was.

  • Mia Hernandez

    I had first heard of Amanda Knox when I watched a docuseries on her and the events that transpired in Italy that would ultimately affect her life. I believe that the language barrier between Knox and the Italian authorities played a role in her be accused of her roommates’ murder. I also believe that a complete injustice was done to Amanda for being placed into prison for over 1000 days for a murder that she is likely to not have committed.

  • Micheala Whitfield

    The justice system has been corrupt for quite some time. The Italian police used their power in an ego, “we are in charge”, kind of way. I have a hunch it was also on the fact that this person was American. In sad truth it definitely had a factor involved. Even though a career came out of what this girl experienced, she still had to endure the long days in prison, she still had to endure the long legal process of having her named cleared. False accusations are no joke and there are people out there who use these accusations to get back at people who they dislike, who they feel they did them wrong, or to get out of what they did themselves. There is some suspicious actions done on both sides. For her, why not call the police right away and for them why was there not an interpreter provided? Pretty great article, well put together.

  • Lesley Martinez

    This is such a shocking story. I had seen parts of the Netflix documentary but was not aware of all the details. It’s tragic to know that Amanda Knox, as an American student, just wanted to study abroad and learn Italian and ended up being charged for murder and having to spend 1,427 nights in prison. It’s difficult to determine if she was or was not guilty, however, if she did, I wonder what her motive was to do so. This was a very interesting article!

  • Kristina Tijerina

    After reading this article I can’t tell whether or not Knox was guilty. It seems like she wasn’t and like she was tried unfairly due to the language barrier, but the information towards the end of the article makes it seem like there’s a chance she might have taken part in the murder. The part where it says that Knox’s boyfriend switched up his story leaves me feeling unsure about the outcome. However, I mostly feel like she was innocent due to the fact that she still speaks about what she faced in her trial, and why she was wrongfully convicted of the murder of her roommate.

  • Todd Brauckmiller Jr.

    This is what I try to explain to people about false allegations, it really does ruin people’s lives. Though in this case it seems it was very difficult to find out the truth of what actually happened that night. To me Knox sounds innocent based on who was with her and where she was. If anything I would say she got the short end of the stick and faced unlucky odds. This was a very interesting story, great job.

  • Rosa Robledo Martinez

    I never heard of this case before but I am honestly glad that I read the article! In my opinion I do not think that she killed her roommate, because some of the evidence doesn’t really add up. But it’s sad to hear that she was studying in a foreign country and she was accused of the death of her colleague. I feel that language was a key component of the accusation, because the language can cause a the case to be considered harder to solve.

  • Charli Delmonico

    This case is very interesting, and I’m curious to know more about Knox’s life now. I can’t believe that she was found guilty simply for being the first to find her dead friend. That is absolutely terrifying. It’s also scary that she signed a document that she didn’t fully understand and that it was completely held against her in court. She spent a long time in jail for something she wasn’t guilty of, and I can only imagine the grief that her family must have felt.

Leave your comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.