Winner of the Fall 2018 StMU History Media Award for
Best Article in the Category of “Year 1968”
The moment of truth was finally at hand for Stanley Kramer. Flashing camera lights could only capture his calm reflection, but underneath his tailored tuxedo, carefully styled hair, and beaming smile, was undeniable nervous anticipation. Tonight he would be in front of all the cameras, instead of instructing from behind them, and everything rode on the outcome of this evening. Stanley Kramer had levied a huge risk in taking on the direction and production of Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner, and as he sat in the audience of the 1968 Academy Awards, he would soon find out whether his gamble had truly paid off. With the country politically fractured and the public divided, could Stanley Kramer realistically expect his movie to win the hearts and minds of the American people?
Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner is the comical drama piece written by William Rose, featuring an upper-class young woman who brings her new fiancé home to meet her parents in order to announce their engagement, after having met each other on a vacation just ten days prior. The older handsome man is quite the catch as an accomplished physician and Nobel Prize candidate. The only problem? He’s a black man intent on marrying their white daughter. The couple cause quite the stir in attempting to overcome interracial bias and be seen as any other couple in love wanting a parent’s blessing for marriage.
Coming together for their ninth film was the universally-loved on-screen couple Spencer Tracy and Katharine Hepburn. The two major actors believed in the project wholeheartedly and agreed to the roles before even setting eyes on the script.1 The natural chemistry between the stars was undeniable, as was the illness rapidly overtaking Spencer Tracy. Almost at once, there was a major hold up in the attempt to start the production. After years of Tracy’s deteriorating health, no insurance company would cover Tracy in his failing condition. What was to become of a project that couldn’t get off the ground? For this movie to stand a chance at the box office, headlining two such profoundly loved actors as Tracy and Hepburn was crucial. An emotional solution was discovered between Stanley Kramer and Katharine Hepburn. They both decided that they would both put their salaries from the film into an escrow account, in the tragic event Spencer Tracy could not continue the movie. With that money as security, another actor could be hired as a last resort to finish the film if need be. With a solution that satisfied the Columbia Pictures production company, filming was finally cleared to begin.2
Obtaining the cast was just the initial problem that Kramer faced. Time was always working against the team, in a race against the clock to finish filming before Tracy became too ill. As a result, the cast members were continuously working with two separate scripts. The original script had the patriarch involved in as many scenes as possible, yet there was always a “back up” script circulating that eliminated Spencer Tracy’s character at any given point.3
Another major obstacle in filming Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner was Sidney Poitier’s intimidation from fellow actors. Despite his own prominent acting career and reputation as a calm and collected professional, Poitier felt humbled to be in the presence of such talent and could never remember his lines. At the time, Spencer Tracy and Katharine Hepburn had both been Hollywood shinning stars for over three decades, and audience members had grown up with these silver screen marvels. Comparatively, Poitier’s acting career had gained more acceptance from his film releases overseas. American audiences had still not fully seen past his African-American ethnicity. This trepidation went on for weeks, frustrating the entire crew with reshoots and wasted film. Finally, Stanley Kramer pulled Sidney Poitier aside for a heart to heart talk in an attempt to get to the bottom of what was causing tempers to rise. The actor simply couldn’t focus in the presence of Tracy and Hepburn. In an attempt to keep Poitier on as a lead character, scenes were then shot as he delivered his lines to two high-back chairs, while stand-in crew delivered his costars’ lines.4
When the movie’s filming began in March 1967, it was still illegal for interracial couples to marry in fourteen states, mostly in the South. If the country could not accept the idea of blacks and whites intermarrying in real life, could Stanley Kramer realistically expect people to be any more agreeable to the idea being portrayed in Hollywood? If the movie was not welcomed by society, future prospects for everyone involved with the project would fall into jeopardy, if not certain ruin.
Coinciding with the film’s production was the Loving v. Virginia Supreme Court case. A white man and a black woman involved in a romantic relationship circumvented the Virginia legislation barring interracial marriages. In 1958, Mildred Jetter and Richard Loving drove to Washington D.C. to say their vows and become legally married. Soon after returning to Virginia, an anonymous tip was given to authorities and the newlyweds were arrested in their home in a late evening police raid. Local prosecution argued that a marriage license from D.C. was not valid in the state of Virginia and the couple were sentenced to a year in prison. The Lovings appealed the judge’s guilty verdict. Monumentally, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of Mr. and Mrs. Loving, just as production on Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner was wrapping up, ruling that marriage is a fundamental human right and effectively ending all anti-miscegenation marriage laws in America.5
Tragedy struck just seventeen days after production concluded, when Spencer Tracy died of a heart attack. His passing gravely affected the cast, and overshadowed any joy of the movie’s release. Katharine Hepburn refused to attend any premiers or award ceremonies, let alone see the final movie cut, as the memories of her long-time costar were just too painful.6
Reviews of the movie from audiences and critics alike received an initial mixed response. The initial estimation was one of low attendance of Caucasians, especially in the Southern states. After all, new laws or not, long-standing socially-formed opinions take time to overcome. However, this was not the case, and never again was the race of a lead character a factor in projecting audience film acceptance.7 Written reviews were not so kind. Sidney Poitier took the brunt of criticism, not simply for being an African-American actor, but for being “too perfect” and “too white” in his role portraying a Nobel Prize nominated doctor.8
Stanley Kramer fiercely defended Sidney Poitier’s performance and explained that every character was meant to portray model social and moral perfection; only then could the sole protest land at the couple’s racial divides.9 In an attempt to clarify his intentions with the film, Kramer undertook a nine-university tour to discuss the political and social controversy. For all his efforts, Kramer was met by indifference at best and death threats at worst! The movie seemed to be caught in between an atmosphere of younger students who did not see interracial relationships as controversial, and the older generation who wanted to keep the races forever separate.10
The lights now dimmed on the Academy Awards audience, and the announcements began as everyone took their seats. Spencer Tracy’s widow was in attendance to hear her husband be nominated as Best Actor one final time. Katharine Hepburn was at home still mourning, and the magic of the evening was muted by sadness. But for all the hardships, when Stanley Kramer heard his name read as a nominee for Best Picture, he knew in his heart that the trials and bitter-sweet tribulations were all worth it in the end. Stanley Kramer did not win the award for Best Picture that night. But he had produced the most emotionally important movie of his career, directed award-winning performances, and showed all the Hollywood elite that they did not need to be afraid to take a leap of faith in making controversial films.
When all was said and done, Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner became an international box office hit grossing over $70,000,000 and nominated for twenty-two different awards. In 2017, the movie title was entered into the National Film Registry by the Library of Congress for being culturally and historically significant.11
- Donald Spoto, Stanley Kramer: Film Maker (Putnam, 1978), 280. ↵
- James Curtis, Spencer Tracy: A Biography (London: Hutchinson, 2011), 839. ↵
- Bill Davidson, Spencer Tracy, Tragic Idol (Dutton Adult, 1988), 206. ↵
- Sidney Poitier, This Life (Alfred A Knopf, Inc, 1980), 286. ↵
- Loving v. Virginia, 388 US (1967); Maria Mancha, “The Love Story of the Lovings,” StMU History Media. https://www.stmuhistorymedia.org/the-love-story-of-the-lovings, (accessed Oct 4, 2018). ↵
- Katharine Hepburn, Me: Stories of my Life (Alfred A Knopf, Inc, 1991), 402. ↵
- Mark Harris, Pictures at a Revolution: Five Movies and the Birth of the New Hollywood (Penguin Press, 2008), 374. ↵
- Dolores R. Townek, Letter to the Editor, Ebony, June 1968. ↵
- Christopher Andersen, An Affair to Remember: The Remarkable Love Story of Katharine Hepburn and Spencer Tracy (William Morrow and Co, 1997), 295. ↵
- Mark Harris, Pictures at a Revolution: Five Movies and the Birth of the New Hollywood (Penguin Press, 2008), 398. ↵
- Sheryl Cannady, “2017 National Film Registry is More Than a ‘Field of Dreams,'” Library of Congress, December 13,2017, https://www.loc.gov/item/prn-17-178/. ↵
115 comments
Megan Copeland
I have never seen the movie “guess who’s coming to dinner” before, but after reading this article, I think it would be cool to watch! This title is very strong and it captured my attention. I think it is well deserving of the article with the best title award nomination. I didn’t know that when the movie began filming, it was illegal for interracial couples to marry in 14 states. I think it is cool that this movie was released during a time like that to bring attention to problems with racism.
Mariah Garcia
I applaud this movie for the main reason of being one of the first movies to have a biracial marriage. Unfortunately, to this day biracial marriage isn’t fully accepted in some families. But, Stanley bravely faced this role head on as being the director for the movie. I am glad that this article was nominated because of the major issue that the film faced during the 60’s.
Crystal Baeza
I knew this article would be nominated. The title definitely catches the eye and the article does it justice! Biracial marriages was such a major issue at this time of the film and it was needed to welcome the acceptance of loving one apart of their skin color. I’m glad this movie was a big hit and nominated for over twenty awards! This was a neat article and I enjoyed reading it. Congratulations on your nomination!
Madison Downing
Because of your article I totally want to check out the movie! It was so brave of Stanley to face this role head on and do his best. I find it adorable that he couldn’t act in front of Spencer Tracy and Katherine because he admired them so much, I think that is such a beautiful thing. It was terrible that Spencer couldn’t live to see it on the big screen but it is amazing that he did everything in his power to see it finished. This was a beautiful article and I’m glad you were nominated!
Sienna Guerra
First of all, congrats on being nominated for an award this semester and I hope that your article wins! I have never seen the film “Guess Who’s Coming to dinner” but after this article, I will! I like how the movie made it seem as if everyone accepted and had love for each other. The color of the skin didn’t really matter. Racism was a very sensitive topic and still very could be today to some people but overall a very good article and I enjoyed reading.
Marina Castro
Very interesting article! Congratulations Annissa Noblejas for having another article nominated and this time on the category of Article with the Best Title. Every article that you have written has being truly good because of the amount of effort you make on them. This article discusses a topic that is so important to talk about, which is racism. I have never seen that movie, but the article did a great job at explaining it and the historical context around it.
Micaela Cruz
Prior to reading this article, I had never heard of the film Guess Who’s Coming To Dinner, but it certainly does seem like an interesting one. I learned quite a bit of new information by reading this article such as the names of Sydney Poitier and Stanley Kramer; Kramer made a bold move by directing this film, especially during the specific time period in which the movie was released. Regarding Poitier, I can understand why he would be starstruck in a sense when he was in front of Stanley Tracy and Katherine Hepburn, they’re accomplished stars in Hollywood, who wouldn’t be nervous? Overall, the author did a great job with this article as it kept me interested from beginning to end.
William Rittenhouse
This was a great article and also sad at the same time. It was a huge advancement for civil rights as well as sad because of his sickness. Also congratulations on being nominated for an award at the 5th ever award ceremony for this class. It is definetely an article that deserves an award and I hope it wins. The title was great as well as the whole story and content of it. The description and word choice was great as well.
Cynthia Rodriguez
This was my first time even hearing of this movie, and of director Stanley Kramer. I like that he took the risk of producing a movie about an interracial relationship at a time when the country was so divided and a time when interracial marriages were still illegal. I think the production team and the actors worked hard for the movie. It is so interesting that they used two scripts in case Tracy could not go on with the movie. It is sad that he did not make it. Although the movie initially got mixed reviews, it still managed to be nominated for 22 awards. That’s awesome! This was a very good article. It was descriptive and engaging, and informative too.
Christopher Hohman
Nice article. Guess who’s coming to dinner was a revolutionary movie. To bring together two of Hollywood’s biggest stars and to have them be in this movie about racial equality. It is so sad that Spencer Tracy died before the movie came out, that must have really hit the cast and crew of the movie really hard. It is a great thing that they were trying to do. I feel like Hollywood has always tried to push social equality in a lot of its programming which I feel is a really good thing because a place as influential as Hollywood can make people change their minds and hearts