Winner of the Spring 2018 StMU History Media Award for
Article with the Best Use of Images
Best Article in the Category of “International Relations”
Rothschild, Rosenberg, and Schloss, all upper class European families who collected art masterpieces by the thousands over several generations. Theirs were some of the most important collections plundered by Hitler’s Nazi regime during the Holocaust. Until the 1920s, these Jewish families had lived as integral parts of German society. By 1925, Jewish people accounted for 0.9 percent of the 62 million German population. There were about 522,000 Jews, many of whom were self employed and included scholars, art collectors, aristocrats, and rabbis.1 By the end of January 1933, the SS (SchutzStaffel or protective elite forces of the Nazi Regime) began to seize, sometimes by force, government and institutional property. In March of 1933, Hitler passed the Enabling Act, an Amendment to the Weimar Constitution. The Enabling Act gave the government absolute power by no longer requiring the involvement of the Reichstag or Congress for future legislation. The creation of this law abolished almost all liberties of non Jewish and Jewish people alike.2 As the German Empire grew so did its systematic application of new oppressive powers. After the annexation of Austria on March 12, 1938, the Third Reich passed new laws which abolished legal recognition of all Jewish peoples. This made it easier for the Third Reich to confiscate Jewish property. On April 26, Jewish property had to be registered with the government. Then, the systematic imprisoning of Jews in concentration camps gave German authorities free reigns to pillage at will. This began the “Aryanization” of property, a process by which Nazis evicted Jews from their businesses and homes and transferred all property titles to their own ethnic group.3 These laws were a way to systematically document property, but also to identify Jewish families, making it easier for the Nazi regime to persecute them. Many art pieces of lesser importance were sold to create profit that funded Germany’s war machine and the concentration camps throughout Germany and in the annexed territories. This set the stage for the large scale genocide of the Jewish population. Germany institutionalized the theft of artwork, religious artifacts, and books during the Holocaust to concentrate the wealth in the hands of Hitler. As a mediocre painter who failed to get into art school twice, Hitler had a deep fascination for the arts. Thus, he spared the artwork (primarily for his personal collection) instead of destroying it, as was done to most other non-valuable possessions in Jewish businesses and homes. A conservative estimate suggests that during that time over 300,000 stolen artwork and antiques along with more than 2 million manuscripts and books were removed from their rightful owners. Most of these artworks came from France since France had the biggest collection of artwork in Europe with over 100,000 artworks out of the 300,000 stolen. In order to persuade his followers and soldiers, Hitler created the Einsatzstab Reichsleiters Rosenberg (ERR), a cultural appropriation task force and justified it in a memorandum on November 3, 1941 that provided the legal and moral basis for the theft of artworks across Europe.4
Nazis created a systematic way of removing all artwork from across Europe. The Nazi regime coordinated the transfer of art from art dealers. The art taken was moved out of the country through a system of railways to the storage facilities or caches. Here, each collection taken from art dealers and was coded with a letter that corresponds and a number. For example, the Rothschild Collection, stolen from the Rothschild family, was coded with an R and then a number like so “R1400”. Along with the Rothschild, the Goodman, Rosenberg, Schloss, and Kann Collections were also looted primarily during the invasion of France.5 When France was invaded, under the order of Hitler, the ERR sent out a message to the French people over Jewish art. The art in France was moved to the Louvre, from there, Hitler’s high ranking men would decide which pieces were sent to Berlin and which would stay in France. If a piece was selected, it would “immediately be inventoried, packed and transported to Germany by the ERR”. Art that did not make the cut was sold at auction with funds claiming to benefit the French state or dependents of war casualties. The now “owner-less” property was sent to a salvage location, usually a town in the southern part of Germany near the border of Austria called Neuschwanstein. The castle of Neuschwanstein was a prime location since it was close to the border of Austria and is a fairly isolated location. The train consisted of 25 express baggage cars that would carry art, antiques, furniture, and ornaments. On March 15, 1941, this train would carry some of the most important art collections including Seligmann, Rothschils, Halphen, Kann, and others.6 Prior to invading the Netherlands, Austria, and France, Hitler would send in elite teams to identify important works of art and collections. This led to the theft of many important and highly valued pieces, such as the Ghent Altarpiece and Michelangelo’s Bruges Madonna.7
The Ghent Altarpiece of 1432, also known as the “Adoration of the Mystic Lamb”, by Jan and Hubert van Eyck is considered one of Europe’s most significant works of art. The painting was housed in Paris, originally as a war trophy before moving it to Saint Bavo’s Cathedral in Belgium. The painting has two wings that open outwardly while the center does not move with 20 individual panels in total.8 The painting stood at almost 12 feet high and 16 feet wide. In May 1940, German forces had captured Belgium. At first, Belgians sent their most beloved artworks to the Vatican. But once Italy declared war and it sent the painting back to Paris. The reason why Hitler went after this piece is that 6 of the 20 panels belonged to the German state prior to 1919. The treaty of Versailles had forced the German State to give those panels to Belgium as reparations. In July of 1942, a secret delegation was sent to negotiate with the French to hand over the piece. When the French refused, German forces stole the painting. Michelangelo’s Bruges Madonna was housed in the Cathedral of Notre Dame and is another one of Europe’s most significant pieces. Made of the richest white marble in Italy, the Bruges Madonna is a life size creation of the Virgin Mary holding the Christ child. On September 7, 1944, German forces removed the Bruges Madonna from the church.9
As the Allied forces moved closer and closer, Hitler ordered the paintings and artworks to be scattered across Europe. One of hiding places was a salt mine known as the Steinberg mine in the Sandling Mountain in Austria. In the winter of 1943-1945, German forces began to move the art into this small rural area. From May 1944-April 1945, more than 1,687 paintings arrived. In the fall of 1944, the Ghent Altarpiece arrived from the salvage point of Neuschwanstein and Michelangelo’s Madonna of Bruges arrived shortly afterwards by boat in October of 1944. Along with the close of the war, a small group of men dispatched by the US government were hunting all across Europe for stolen art work. Unlike the army, the majority of the group were not soldiers, but rather professors specializing in art. In 1945, the Monuments Men recovered both Michelangelo’s Madonna of Bruges and the Ghent Altarpiece. By the end of WWII, the Monuments Men would end up recovering thousands of artworks and sculptures.10
The are other sources of stolen art inside the US as well. Most recently, a lawsuit brought about in 2015. It is against the descendants of Jewish victims of the Holocaust and the Norton Simon Museum in Pasadena, California and the Fred Jones Jr. Museum at the University of Oklahoma. In the wake of World War II, museums and art collectors rushed to buy art without checking how these pieces ended up in the auction. Thus, most purchased stolen works of art by accident. Most museums who are in legal battles such as this, claim that the descendants have waited too long to claim the artwork and usually fight under technical terms.11
During the Holocaust, thousands upon thousands of refugees fled their country to other countries around the world. When the Holocaust ended and Nazi Germany fell, many Jewish and non-Jewish peoples began to make claims for their property or art stolen during the war. They claimed governments, especially the US and Germany, as a whole took part in stealing artwork and property. On these grounds, the governments claimed immunity due to an agreement titled the Termination of the Occupied Regime in the Federal Republic of Germany. This waved any German made claims against the US for property theft during WWII by US government officials or US soldiers.12 The US also has laws in place that prevent US citizens from suing foreign governments which was brought into question by the Altmann vs. Austria case. During WWII, Altmann and her family owned the famous painting of her Aunt known as the Lady in Gold. Painted by Gustav Klimt, the family owned 5 paintings from him which were taken by Nazis during WWII. Even though she had accurate claims and documentation, she could not sue the Austrian government on part because of the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FISA) of 1976. She sued in 2000 after a new Austrian law passed in 1996 declared all Nazi transactions void.13 She won the case and received the paintings, later handing them over to a museum in New York. This case was a major victory for victims of art looting since it opened a small clause in the FSIA which states that “lawsuits regarding Holocaust era looted art and other stolen property can be brought against foreign governments in US courts”.14
Even though thousands of pieces of art have been found and returned, thousands still have no identifiable owner. 400 paintings hang in the Louvre that are unclaimed paintings, 100 are at the Musee d’Orsay, and 40 others reside in at the Pompidou Center. All together, there are about 2000 unclaimed paintings that are currently in French museums alone. Unclaimed sculptures are placed in the Elysee Presidential Palace.15 As of 2015, hundreds of millions of dollars worth of artworks have been recovered with large art caches still being discovered inside Germany. The most recent in 2013 with 1500 pieces of art with paintings by Picasso, Matisse, and Chagall were found. In March 2015, the El Greco Portrait of a Man was found after 70 years missing.
- Ronald M. Smelser, Learning about the Holocaust: A Student’s Guide (New York: Macmillan Reference, 2001), 48-51. ↵
- Ronald M. Smelser, Learning about the Holocaust: A Student’s Guide (New York: Macmillan Reference, 2001), 48-51, 54. ↵
- Macmillan Encyclopedia of Death and Dying, 2002, s,v, “Genocide,” by Stephen C. Feinstein. ↵
- Encyclopedia of Genocide and Crimes Against Humanity, 2005, s.v. “Art, Stolen,” by Hector Feliciano. ↵
- Hector Feliciano, “The Aftermath of Nazi Art Looting in the United States and Europe: The Quest to Recover Stolen Collections,” Depaul-Lca Journal of Art and Entertainment Law 10, no. 1, (1999): 1-8. ↵
- Robert M. Edsel and Bret Witter, The Monuments Men (New York: Hachette Book Group, 2010), 31, 42 ↵
- Sara Constantakis, World of Forensic Science (Michigan: Farmington Hills, 2016), 361. ↵
- Randy Kennedy, “Ghent Altarpiece to undergo Restoration”, New York Times, May 14, 2010. Accessed March 7, 2018. http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/05/arts/design/05getty.html ↵
- Robert M. Edsel and Bret Witter, The Monuments Men (New York: Hachette Book Group, 2010), 97, 99, 116-119. ↵
- Robert M. Edsel and Bret Witter, The Monuments Men (New York: Hachette Book Group, 2010), 304-306. ↵
- Geoff Edgers, “Why two American museums are fighting to keep art stolen by the Nazis,” The Washington Post, June 30, 2015. Accessed February 10, 2018. https://www.washingtonpost.com/entertainment/museums/why-two-american-museums-are-fighting-to-keep-art-stolen-by-the-nazis/2015/06/30/16aef5ae-1bad-11e5-bd7f-4611a60dd8e5_story.html?utm_term=.26c14a2a62e7. ↵
- Andrew Baker, “Pleasant Scenes or Nazi Icons?,” UMKC Law Review 71, no. 4, (2002-2003): 844-845. ↵
- David J. Correira, “The Lady in Gold: One hundred years of social, political, and legal intrigue,” Trusts and Estates 155, no. 3, (March 2016): 1-2,4. ↵
- “AJC Hails Supreme Court Decision in Republic of Austria v. Altmann” PR Newswire, June 7, 2004. Accessed January 31, 2018. https://advance.lexis.com/document/?pdmfid=1516831&crid=e754d7fa-9c4d-496b-a932-da8ce409bb41&pddocfullpath=%2Fshared%2Fdocument%2Fnews%2Furn%3AcontentItem%3A4CK4-TY10-010D-R190-00000-00&pddocid=urn%3AcontentItem3A4CK4-TY10-010D-R190-00000-00&pdcontentcomponentid=8054&pdteaserkey=sr0&pditab=allpods&ecomp=dy_k&earg=sr0&prid=07f28ac9-3cb8-4f89-9883-a30d2a794937. ↵
- Hector Feliciano, “The Aftermath of Nazi Art Looting in the United States and Europe: The Quest to Recover Stolen Collections,” Depaul-Lca Journal of Art and Entertainment Law 10, no. 1, (1999): 9. ↵
166 comments
Erin Vento
I honestly think that this is one of my favorite (if not my favorite) article on here! Anytime I’m bored I think of this whole event. Something like not getting into art school influenced Hitler so much that when he invaded France and other areas of Europe he stole hundreds and hundreds of painting, and it took so long for some of these families and people to recieve their art back.
Gloria Baca
I have always had knowledge about precious artwork being stolen during times of war, but not to this extent. World War II was such a pivotal war its amazing to think that some of the artwork stolen in that time is still being searched for. To see things of such great value being stolen from individuals in time of horror is sad. This article made me realize about the effects of World War II and how not only did it steal lives, but artwork too. I enjoyed reading this article as it was incredibly descriptive and great overall.
Matthew Wyatt
This article reminds us that people don’t only lose their lives during times of war. It is heartbreaking to imagine Jewish Europeans managing to survive the Holocaust against all odds, only to find that their most prized possessions have been either stolen or destroyed. I have two main critiques with this article. First, the opening paragraph is very long and deals with many different topics. It would be easy to divide it into multiple paragraphs to make it more palatable for the reader. Second, the piece seems to end a bit abruptly. Perhaps one more paragraph summarizing and ruminating on the effects of all these works of art being stolen and lost would give the piece a more satisfying conclusion. That being said, the article is still very well written and moving.
Esperanza Mauricio
We rarely see history in such a vivid way. Art being stolen during World War 2 was never known to me until my later half of high school and even then I didn’t know the pieces or from where. This article has shined some light on this mystery I have always had with stolen art. I like how you also included the cases such as the one that won back the Lady in Gold back to Altmann and her family. This was wonderful to read and I enjoyed it.
Saira Castellanos
I knew that the Nazis stole so many things during world war II. What is surprising to me is that some artworks are still being hunted down by men in order to retrieve them. I knew about the Altarpiece, but i did not know it was stolen by the Nazis. I think I read somewhere in the comments that they were reminded about the movie, “the woman in gold,” because i thought the exact same thing when i read this article. Good luck in the awards i really liked this article! hopefully it wins.
Rafael López-Rodírguez
Whenever we study wars like this and of this magnitude schools do not focus or do not give much attention to any other thing that went on in the political side of things. I did not know that laws were passed in order to attack the Jews in such a negative way when they are not even one percent of the population at the time. It was very interesting to read about the effects of this and the paintings that the author mentions that were a very important piece of European culture. Great job!
Julio Morales
I never knew that the Nazis stole art from different countries during WW2. Its hard to think that many people had their personal possessions stolen from their own home. Thankfully the U.S sent the Monument men to Europe to look for the stolen art works. If it wasn’t for them, their would be a lot more than 2,000 pieces of art unclaimed.
Johnanthony Hernandez
Great article, for as long as I can remember I have been interested in the stolen art that the Nazis had taken from occupied areas. When I was in school, I remember we briefly talked about the art and they were to sell some off to fund the military in during the war. As well as how some would be given to officers for their service to the Reich.
Samire Adam
I am very happy that someone decides to write about this topic. Not many people are well aware of the role Nazi played in the way we see and understand art pieces today. As an art historian fanatic, it gives me pleasure to know that others will have the opportunity to be enlightened about the Nazi-stolen arts during the Second World War. Personally speaking, I was curious as to why the writer chose to focus on the three-art works. Aside from Klimt’s painting, the other two are considered to be religious, more specifically Christian art because both works have Jesus as the central figure and include saints. Michelangelo sculpture shows Jesus as a child held by Mary and the altarpiece by van Eyck is about the crucifixion where various saints are present. This is thought-provoking because Judaism does not approve of worship of saints as well as Jesus being more than just a teacher.
Noah Laing
I noticed this article was up for several nominations and I believe that it’s well deserving of that. Reading this article again, I still found it cool to have made a connection to a movie I watched about this story, which to me made the article that much more intriguing. This tactic the Nazis used to hide art is certainly different and wouldn’t be what I would think of as a priority given all the other fighting and tragic events that were going on at the time, but it certainly made for a good story.