Most people know the story of the assassination of Julius Caesar on the 15 March 44 B.C.E. Shakespeare made the event famous in his play Julius Caesar, and has left many saying “Beware the ides of March.”1 However, the assassination of Caesar may never have happened if Marcus Brutus had not agreed with Cassius. To understand the complete story of the assassination of Caesar, one has to understand the role that Marcus Brutus played.
Marcus Junius Brutus the Younger, better known as Brutus, is descended from Lucius Junius Brutus, founder and first consul of the Roman Republic in 509 B.C.E. The political future of Rome was so important to Lucius that he ordered his oldest two sons put to death for their desire to restore Rome to a monarchy. Lucius spared the life of his youngest son and it is through him that Marcus was born.2 Brutus’ own father, Marcus Brutus, was killed by Pompey the Great during a revolt.3
So who was this Brutus? He was a typical Roman, who received the traditional education of the Roman elite and was greatly influenced by the writings of Plato. Upon completion of his education, Brutus was given a position in the government.4 In both his marriage and in his public life, Brutus was expected to align with Caesar, but instead, he made his peace with Pompey the Great, eventually siding with him during the Roman Civil War in 49-48 B.C.E.5
Brutus was captured at the Battle of Pharsalus and spared by Caesar, causing Brutus to switch sides to Caesar.6 It is important to note at this time that Caesar had a special fondness for Brutus, believing Brutus was his son, born out of a love affair Caesar had with Servilia, Brutus’ mother. Out of this fondness, Caesar had instructed his commanders not to harm Brutus should he be captured in battle.7 Caesar pardoned Brutus for his role during the Civil War and gave him a high ranking government job. Brutus in turn convinced Caesar to give a government position to Cassius, Brutus’ brother-in-law.8
It was during this time following the Civil War that Caesar declared himself dictator of Rome, as allowed by the constitution during times of emergency, but not to last more than six months. Caesar wore the robe, crown, and scepter of the general, and called himself imperator. As leader of Rome, he had complete control over the armies. Many senators felt their power being threatened and feared that Caesar would soon appoint himself King of Rome.9
Cassius did not like Caesar, and soon began to plot to end his reign of power. He attempted to recruit his friends and fellow senators, but they refused to go along with Cassius unless he could convince Brutus to join them.10 Brutus had such an honorable reputation that his participation was crucial to the success of the cause. Brutus agreed to participate because of his family history in creating and protecting the Republic at its founding and the ensuing Roman tradition of opposing all forms of tyranny. Both Brutus and Cassius believed that once Caesar was dead, Rome would naturally return to the traditional Republic.11
The group of conspirators had heard that Caesar would be attending a senate meeting on March 15, and they planned the assassination for that day. They knew that it would not look suspicious, since they all had to attend the meeting of the senate and they believed that the Ides of March was a blessed day to make their move, since it was a religious holiday in Rome. Ironically, there was a statue of Pompey the Great, the leader Caesar had killed after the Civil War ended, in the portico where the assassination was to take place as soon as Caesar arrived. The conspirators believed it to be the perfect date and place to make their attempt to restore the Republic.12
However, on the planned day, Caesar was late and the conspirators became worried. When Caesar finally arrived, the senators surrounded him as he took his seat, and the attack began. All the senators attacked at once, creating a frenzy in which many of the them were stabbed in the process; even Brutus was stabbed in the hand. When that attack was over, Caesar was dead.13 The next day, Antonius (also known as Mark Antony), the sole remaining consul, granted all the conspirators amnesty, and distributed provinces to them as rewards. Brutus was given the province of Crete and moved there with his family where he continued to work for the government.14
Meanwhile, Octavian, Caesar’s nephew and heir, was brought to the capital to take Caesar’s place as leader of Rome. Octavian was angry that Antonius had pardoned the conspirators and when the common people of Rome learned of the assassination of Caesar, they too were angry that none of the conspirators had been punished. This rift between the people and the leaders began to cause a rift between Octavian and Antonius. Soon the leaders of Rome began to align themselves between Octavian and Antonius, and another war civil war began. Known as the Post-Caesarian Civil War, this war was between Octavian and his supporters and Antonius and his supporters in order to end the rift that had been growing. It did not take long for Antonius to be defeated by Octavian, resulting in a truce that joined their armies together. This is also when the Second Triumvirate was formed in 43 B.C.E. between Octavian, Antonius, and Marcus Lepidus allowing the three of them to rule Rome together.15
The next civil war in Rome, known as the Liberators’ Civil War, was fought between the Second Triumvirate and the liberators (those who assassinated Caesar and their supporters). Brutus and Cassius were the main targets of the Roman army and separately rallied troops to fight with them. Brutus, according to Plutarch, “was esteemed by the many for his virtues, but loved by his friends, admired by the nobles, and not hated even by his enemies.”16 Because of this, many people in Rome had faith in his motives and believed that while the other senators had murdered Caesar out of hatred and spite for his power, Brutus had participated because he truly wanted to end the tyranny that he believed Caesar had created in Roman government.17 Unable to defeat Octavian’s army, Cassius, fearing being captured, committed suicide.18
Unfortunately for Brutus, his army was not able to defeat the Roman army either, and he admitted defeat at the Battle of Philippi in 42 B.C.E. Also fearing being captured, Brutus fled to the hills with a good friend and fellow soldier. It was there that Brutus convinced his friend to take his sword and hold it upright, Brutus then fell upon his sword, killing himself. Antonius still held much respect for Brutus and had his body wrapped up in the finest purple cloth for the cremation. After he was cremated, his ashes were sent to his mother, since his wife was already dead, another suicide.19
Even after his death, Brutus served as a role model for senators and his story reminded emperors that they served at their own peril if they ignored the senate.20 Brutus did not end tyranny or civil war, with many battles leading to the loss of the Roman Republic. According to Shakespeare, Brutus acted out of honor to protect his home from a tyrant. Dante placed Brutus in the worst level of Hell in the mouth of Satan next to Judas Iscariot.21 Either way one remembers Brutus, one must remember the conspiracy would never have gotten anywhere without the participation of Brutus.
- William Shakespeare, Julius Caesar (Boston: Ginn and Company, 1908), Kindle edition, Act 1 scene 2. ↵
- Salem Press Biographical Encyclopedia, January 2017, s.v. “Marcus Junius Brutus,” by Michael Witsoki. ↵
- Salem Press Encyclopedia, January 2016, s.v. “Brutus,” by Richard Westall. ↵
- Salem Press Biographical Encyclopedia, January 2017, s.v. “Marcus Junius Brutus,” by Michael Witsoki. ↵
- Salem Press Encyclopedia, January 2016, s.v. “Brutus,” by Richard Westall. ↵
- Salem Press Encyclopedia, January 2016, s.v. “Brutus,” by Richard Westall. ↵
- Plutarch, Plutarch’s Lives Volume IV (London: George Bell & Sons, 1892), 402, Project Gutenberg, https://www.gutenberg.org/files/44315/44315-h/44315-h.htm#Page_398 (accessed October 23, 2017). ↵
- Plutarch, Plutarch’s Lives Volume IV (London: George Bell & Sons, 1892), 404-405, Project Gutenberg, https://www.gutenberg.org/files/44315/44315-h/44315-h.htm#Page_398 (accessed October 23, 2017). ↵
- Funk & Wagnalls New World Encyclopedia, 2016, s.v. “Caesar, Gaius Julius.” ↵
- Plutarch, Plutarch’s Lives Volume IV (London: George Bell & Sons, 1892), 407-408, Project Gutenberg, https://www.gutenberg.org/files/44315/44315-h/44315-h.htm#Page_398 (accessed October 23, 2017). ↵
- Salem Press Biographical Encyclopedia, January 2017, s.v. “Marcus Junius Brutus,” by Michael Witsoki ↵
- Plutarch, Plutarch’s Lives Volume IV (London: George Bell & Sons, 1892), 410-412, Project Gutenberg, https://www.gutenberg.org/files/44315/44315-h/44315-h.htm#Page_398 (accessed October 23, 2017). ↵
- Plutarch, Plutarch’s Lives Volume IV (London: George Bell & Sons, 1892), 413, Project Gutenberg, https://www.gutenberg.org/files/44315/44315-h/44315-h.htm#Page_398 (accessed October 23, 2017). ↵
- Plutarch, Plutarch’s Lives Volume IV (London: George Bell & Sons, 1892), 416, Project Gutenberg, https://www.gutenberg.org/files/44315/44315-h/44315-h.htm#Page_398 (accessed October 23, 2017). ↵
- Plutarch, Plutarch’s Lives Volume IV (London: George Bell & Sons, 1892), 418-419, Project Gutenberg, https://www.gutenberg.org/files/44315/44315-h/44315-h.htm#Page_398 (accessed October 23, 2017). ↵
- Plutarch, Plutarch’s Lives Volume IV (London: George Bell & Sons, 1892), 425, Project Gutenberg, https://www.gutenberg.org/files/44315/44315-h/44315-h.htm#Page_398 (accessed October 23, 2017). ↵
- Plutarch, Plutarch’s Lives Volume IV (London: George Bell & Sons, 1892), 425, Project Gutenberg, https://www.gutenberg.org/files/44315/44315-h/44315-h.htm#Page_398 (accessed October 23, 2017). ↵
- Plutarch, Plutarch’s Lives Volume IV (London: George Bell & Sons, 1892), 443-446, Project Gutenberg, https://www.gutenberg.org/files/44315/44315-h/44315-h.htm#Page_398 (accessed October 23, 2017). ↵
- Plutarch, Plutarch’s Lives Volume IV (London: George Bell & Sons, 1892), 449-453, Project Gutenberg, https://www.gutenberg.org/files/44315/44315-h/44315-h.htm#Page_398 (accessed October 23, 2017). ↵
- Salem Press Encyclopedia, January 2016, s.v. “Brutus,” by Richard Westall. ↵
- Kim Zarins, “‘Et tu, Brute?'” Calliope 17, no. 4 (December 2006): 42-44. ↵
83 comments
Abilene Solano
I never really knew much about Marcus Brutus despite him being one of the main leaders in the conspiracy of assassination of Julius Caesar, especially how close the two of them were (considering that Caesar saw Brutus as his son). It was truly a real backstabbing move when Brutus agreed to the conspiracy to get rid of Caesar just for the sake of returning Rome back to its traditional Republic. Reading this article was very interesting! It amazed me how much history was being connected to this one man and what happened in the aftermath of death of Julius Caesar. I wonder if the conspirators knew what would happen to them after the people outside the Senate found out what they had done to Caesar?
Elijiah Logan
After reading this article I do not believe the assassination of Caesar would have taken place; at least not due to Cassius’ fear of Caesar proclaiming himself as king, without Brutus.
Throughout this article, you make it known that friends and senators whom were close to Cassius, would not have joined his allied revolt against Caesar without Brutus. This is an important fact simply due to the following Brutus had. However, it is also important to note that Caesar was the one who forgave Brutus in the first place. He appointed Brutus a government position which allowed him to gain the large following he had. So it makes you wonder if Caesar’s forgiveness of Brutus was his own downfall.
Donna Ainsworth
Before reading this article, I knew very little regarding the role of Brutus in the assassination of Julius Caesar. It has helped me to understand that, not only did he have a significant role in the killing, but the whole plan depended on him and whether or not he would agree to help. If he hadn’t decided to go through with it, it wouldn’t have happened, and subsequently, neither of the following civil wars would have taken place.
Reynaldo Rodriguez
Brutus believed that he was doing what was right for the people of Rome and the Roman empire since it was not meant to be ruled by an emperor for years and not have people enslaved and forced to do labor. He had a good relationship with Caesar and he used that to his advantage.
Max van de Kuilen
This article was interesting, because it showed the different views on the relationship between Brutus and Ceasar. While Ceasar forgave Brutus, Brutus still helped assassinate Ceasar. Because he thought this would help restore the Roman Republic and end the tyranny. It’s interesting to see the way Brutus was viewed, he was loved by a lot of people despite all of his actions.
Jake Faryniarz
I really liked reading this article about how Marcus Brutus was one of the main reasons for Julius Caesar’s assassination. Since Brutus was so well respected by his fellow politicians they would only agree to kill Caesar if Brutus was to agree with them. I can see why they did it because Julius was a tyrant and turning the Roman Empire into a dictatorship. So they killed him to end his tyranny and to possibly change Roman back to a traditional Republic.
Yaniev Ibarra
Prior to reading this article I had very little knowledge on Marcus Brutus and why he did the things he had done. It is important to say he had a great role in the death of Julius Caesar because without his agreement to the conspiracy Caesar would not have died that day. I found shocking that Lucius Brutus had his own blood killed in order to keep monarchy out of Rome. However, Marcus did not die in vain for he is still remembered till this day for his honor to protect the republic of Rome.
Savannah Palmer
Prior to this article, I didn’t fully understand the role that Marcus Brutus had in the death of Caesar and the Roman Empire. This article informed me about the importance that Brutus has on the history of the Roman Empire. His desire to honor his ancestors by killing Caesar shows Brutus’ ability to save a government from tyranny. Although he died in his attempts to prevent tyranny from overruling the Roman government, Brutus’ legacy will be remembered as a role model for governments to come.
Nathan Castillo
I think Brutus did good when it came to assassinating Caesar because Caesar began to make Rome into a dictatorship under his rule, basically enforcing an act of tyranny in Rome. Being one of Caesar’s most trusted men, this made Brutus have a main role in formulating the perfect assassination on Caesar. I found that it was necessary for Brutus to do what he did because it brought an end to a forming dictatorship about to be be ruled by a man whose power got to his head.
Amberlee Flores
I think that this article was interesting because it had different facts on Ceasar’s death. They couldn’t decide if it was a betrayal or suicide. This article made me realize different points that were made for example, the assassinate of Caesar and the trust that was between them. The part that got to me was that people around him loved him and cared for him and he still took his own life.