What happens if the doctor in charge of your life decides to play God? What happens if the doctor decided to end it? On September 7, 1998, Dr. Harold Shipman was arrested for the murder of Kathleen Grundy. October 5, 1999, his trial began at Preston Crown Court and he was accused of killing fifteen elderly patients. On January 31, 2000, he was sentenced to life in prison for all fifteen counts of murder.1 But this is only the end of Shipman’s career. How does someone become this kind of killer? Was there always this desire lurking within him? Or is this the path that was shaped by his past? This begins the becoming of Dr. Death.
Harold Shipman was born as the middle child into a working-class family on January 14, 1946. He was born from his father, Harold Frederick Shipman, who was a truck driver and his mother Vera Brittan.2 Both of his parents were devout Methodists. Harold would become the favorite child of his domineering mother, which allowed her to instill a sense of superiority in him. This would taint most of his later relationships, leaving him an isolated adolescent with few friends, despite being an accomplished rugby player in youth leagues. However, Shipman’s life would be forever altered at the age of seventeen, when his mother was diagnosed with terminal lung cancer.3 He would willingly look over her well being and would later become fascinated by the observations he made about the effect that the administration of morphine had on his mother’s suffering. She would pass away on June 21, 1963, and devastated by his loss, Shipman would decide to go to medical school. Shipman received a scholarship to medical school and was admitted to Leeds University Medical School after having failed his entrance exams, before serving his hospital internship. On November 5, 1966, at the age of nineteen, he would marry a farmer’s daughter, Primrose May Oxtoby, when she was seventeen and five months pregnant with their first child. Shipman graduated from Leeds University in 1970.4 Then he would begin working at Pontefract General Infirmary in Pontefract, West Riding of Yorkshire. Then in 1974, as a father of two, he took his first position as a general practitioner at the Abraham Ormerod Medical Centre in Todmorden. Initially, Shipman thrived. However, this changed when he developed an addiction to the painkiller Pethidine.
Pethidine (meperidine) is a narcotic that can be used for moderate to severe pain. It was first described by German chemist Otto Eisleb and Austrian pharmacologist Otto Schaumann in 1939 as being a compound derived from a series of potential atropine-like spasmolytic compounds, but having morphine-like analgesic activity.5 Atropine is an involuntary nervous system blocker, and spasmolytic is a drug or treatment that can relieve spasm of smooth muscle.6 Analgesic activity indicates the acting of pain relief.7 Addiction is described as a complex condition that often results in an emotional and physical dependence on the drug, even when met head-on with harmful consequences. Sections of the brain and spinal cord contain cells that have opiate receptors, structures that normally bind to the body’s natural painkilling chemicals. When the natural chemicals bind to the receptors, the pain signals that travel to the brain are diminished. Because the structures of the natural chemicals are very similar, it allows the narcotics to bind to cells’ receptors for natural painkillers. However, the pleasures of narcotics are quickly short. After a short amount of time, a user finds that the small dose that originally produced the effect is no longer effective. This occurs because the presence of narcotics in the brain causes it to stop using its built-in pain-blocking mechanisms, causing the drug to lose some of its effectiveness. As a result, the user needs increasingly larger doses of narcotics to experience the same feeling as before. This condition is called habituation or tolerance. Those who are addicted to narcotics and many other drugs suffer long-term health problems. Users tend to lose appetite, suffer long-term constipation, scarred or collapsed veins, infections of blood vessels and the skin, and hypoxia. Since opiates cause slow, shallow breathing, addicts do not take in enough oxygen to maintain normal levels in their blood. In the brain, lack of adequate oxygen can cause irreversible damage to neurons.8
After being caught forging prescriptions of pethidine, Shipman was fined £600 and briefly attended a drug rehabilitation clinic in York. He became a general practitioner at the Donneybrook Medical Centre in Hyde near Manchester, in 1977.9 He masked himself as a hardworking doctor, who enjoyed the trust of patients, although he had a reputation for arrogance among junior staff. He continued working as a general practitioner throughout the 1980s, and began his surgery in 1993, and became a respected member of the community.10 In 1983, he was interviewed on the Granada television documentary World in Action on how the mentally ill should be treated in the community. A year after his conviction, the interview was re-broadcast on Tonight with Trevor McDonald. However, in March 1998, Linda Reynolds of the Donneybrook Surgery, prompted by Deborah Massey from Frank Massey and Sons’ Funeral Parlour, expressed concerns to John Pollard, the coroner for the South Manchester District, about the high number of deaths among Shipman’s patients. The most concerning was a large number of cremation forms for elderly women that Shipman had needed to be countersigned. The matter was brought to the police. However, they weren’t able to find sufficient evidence to press charges; the police were later blamed for assigning inexperienced officers to the case. On April 7, 1998, the police abandoned the investigation. How did he get away this time?11 By his method of administering lethal doses of diamorphine (pharmaceutical heroin) into his unknowing victims.
![](https://stmuhistorymedia.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/Diamorphine_ampoules-300x225.jpg)
Forensic toxicology is defined as the application of toxicology for the law. Toxicology is a branch of science that surrounds the nature, effects, and detection of poisons. Toxicologic investigations are important in cases such as homicides, where many deaths are drug-related.12 Many of Shipman’s victims’ bodies were cremated. However, they were able to exhume twelve victims. Analysis of the skeletal muscle disclosed that there were significant quantities of morphine, to which the deaths were attributed.13 Julie Evans, the forensic scientist who analyzed the levels of morphine found in some of the victims’ bodies, submitted evidence to the court. A substantial amount of the drug was found in samples taken from the thigh and liver of Kathleen Grundy. Other samples were taken from the bodies of other victims Bianka Pomfret, Winifred Mellor, Joan Melia, Ivy Lomas, Marie Quinn, Irene Turner, Jean Lilley, and Muriel Grimshaw, all of whom also revealed morphine.
![](https://stmuhistorymedia.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/Harold_Shipman_mug_shot.jpg)
Shipman, however, wouldn’t get away with it forever. His last victim was Kathleen Grundy, a former ceremonial Mayor of Hyde and active wealthy 81-year-old widow, who was found dead at her home on June 24, 1998. Shipman was the last person to see her alive and later signed her death certificate. Grundy’s daughter, lawyer Angela Woodruff, became concerned when solicitor Brian Burgess informed her that a will had been made, apparently by her mother. The will excluded Woodruff and her children but left £386,000 to Shipman.14 At Burgess’s urging, Woodruff went to the police, who began an investigation. Grundy’s body was exhumed and examined, was found to contain traces of diamorphine. Shipman claimed that she was an addict, and showed them comments he had written to that effect in his computerized medical journal; however, an examination of his computer showed that they were written after her death. Shipman was arrested on September 7, 1998, and was found to own a typewriter of the kind used to make the forged will.15 Other deaths Shipman had certified were then investigated by the police. They discovered a pattern of his administering lethal doses of diamorphine, signing patients’ death certificates, and then falsifying medical records to indicate that they had been in poor health. Shipman’s trial presided over by Justice Forbes, began on October 5, 1999. Shipman was charged with the murders of Marie West, Irene Turner, Lizzie Adams, Jean Lilley, Ivy Lomas, Muriel Grimshaw, Marie Quinn, Kathleen Wagstaff, Bianka Pomfret, Norah Nuttall, Pamela Hillier, Maureen Ward, Winifred Mellor, Joan Melia, and Kathleen Grundy, all of whom had died between 1995 and 1998.16 On January 31, 2000, after six days of deliberation, the jury found Shipman guilty of killing fifteen patients by lethal injections of diamorphine and forging the will of Kathleen Grundy. The trial judge sentenced him to fifteen consecutive life sentences and recommended that he never be released.
![](https://stmuhistorymedia.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/graphic-shipman.jpg)
The Shipman Inquiry was the report produced by a British governmental investigation into Shipman. The inquiry released its findings in various stages, with its sixth and final report being released on January 27, 2005. It was chaired by Dame Janet Smith DBE.17 While Shipman was convicted of fifteen murders, the inquiry in July 2002 established that he had killed at least 215 people, and may have killed as many as 260, or even more. The inquiry took approximately 2,500 witness statements and analyzed approximately 270,000 pages of evidence. In total, the six reports ran to 5,000 pages and the investigation cost £21 million.18
Shipman’s life ended when he hung himself in his cell at Wakefield Prison on January 13, 2004, on the eve of his 58th birthday.19 A Prison Service statement indicated that Shipman had hanged himself from the window bars of his cell using bed sheets. Today the number of lives that Shipman took from this earth is still unknown. However, we remember the names of the fifteen known victims. Marie West, Irene Turner, Lizzie Adams, Jean Lilley, Ivy Lomas, Muriel Grimshaw, Marie Quinn, Laura Kathleen Wagstaff, Bianka Pomfret, Norah Nuttall, Pamela Marguerite Hillier, Maureen Alice Ward, Winifred Mellor, Joan May Melia, and Kathleen Grundy.
- Alec Samuels, “Doctor Harold Shipman,” Medico-Legal Journal 68, no. 2 (2000): 37. ↵
- Robert M. Kaplan, Medical Murder : Disturbing Cases of Doctors Who Kill (Crows Nest: Allen & Unwin, 2009), 84. ↵
- Robert M. Kaplan, Medical Murder : Disturbing Cases of Doctors Who Kill (Crows Nest: Allen & Unwin, 2009), 84. ↵
- Trevor Jackson and Richard Smith, “Harold Shipman,” British Medical Journal 328, no. 7433 (2004): 231. ↵
- Laurence E. Mather and Peter J. Meffin, “Clinical Pharmacokinetics Pethidine,” Clinical Pharmacokinetics 3, no. 5 (1978): 352, https://doi.org/10.2165/00003088-197803050-00002 ↵
- Neville McBrien, Moghaddam, Reeder “Atropine Reduces Experimental Myopia and Eye Enlargement via a Nonaccommodative Mechanism,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 34, no. 1 (2015): 205. ↵
- Kyoichi Shimomura, “Analgesic Effect of Morphine Glucuronides.” The Tohoku Journal of Experimental Medicine 105, no. 1, (1971): 47, https://doi.org/10.1620/tjem.105.45 ↵
- Drug Education Library, 2003, s.v. “Narcotic Addiction and Abuse.” ↵
- Richard Baker, “Implications of Harold Shipman for General Practice,” Postgraduate Medical Journal 80 (2004): 305. ↵
- Alec Samuels, “Doctor Harold Shipman,” Medico-Legal Journal 68, no. 2 (2000): 37. ↵
- Dame Janet Smith, The Shipman Inquiry (London: The Stationery Office, 2002-2005), 108. ↵
- Barry Levine, Principles of Forensic Toxicology (United States: AACC Press, 2003), 3-4. ↵
- Derrick Pounder, “The Case of Dr. Shipman.” American Journal of Forensic Medicine and Pathology 24 (2003): 219. ↵
- Owen Dyer, “Shipman murdered more than 200 patients, inquiry finds,” BMJ (Clinical research ed.) 325, no. 7357 (2002): 181, doi:10.1136/bmj.325.7357.181/a ↵
- Maxine Frith, GMC strikes Shipman off medical register (London: The Independent, 2000) ↵
- Michael Kennedy, “Dr Shipman, Murder and Forensic Toxicology,” Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences 41, no. 1 (2009): 3-6, https://doi.org/10.1080/00450610902936005. ↵
- Owen Dyer, “Shipman murdered more than 200 patients, inquiry finds,” BMJ (Clinical research ed.) 325, no. 7357 (2002): 181, doi:10.1136/bmj.325.7357.181/a ↵
- Dame Janet Smith, The Shipman Inquiry (London: The Stationery Office, 2002-2005), 5. ↵
- Robert M. Kaplan, Medical Murder : Disturbing Cases of Doctors Who Kill (Crows Nest: Allen & Unwin, 2009), 84. ↵
52 comments
Reba Reyes
I think that it is extremely crazy about the trauma that Shipman experienced in his early childhood times. When people experience any traumas, I know that it comes with some mental abuse. With this, he then committed some very horrible acts. This really is no excuse for it though! It is so sad to think that his victims may never get the proper burial that they deserved.
Kayla Mendez
The amount of trauma Shipman experienced as a child clearly affected his mental development, but that doesn’t excuse the cruel acts he committed. Surprisingly, this story isn’t eerie, but quite sad. A boy who tragically lost his mother, and witnesses the effects of dopamine on her, later reenacted this situation on his victims. It’s heartbreaking knowing that all his victims will never be known, but at least justice was served and Shipman’s ability to take lives was restricted to only his own.
Madeline Chandler
Such an interesting and informative article! Very captivating, I knew this story but not well. It is honestly so devastating that a man that was supposed to be caring for the elderly was killing them over two decades. It should not have taken that long for people to see the increased death rate. It almost makes one think the suspicious people were ignoring the disturbing signs. I loved reading your article! Great job.
Amanda Gutierrez
Interesting article! I found it horrifying with the many murders Shipman was able to get away with. Also, I found it creepy that he used the same drug as the one they gave his mother before she passed away. It was so upsetting to read about the death of elderly patients, and Shipman getting away with it. Overall, I thought this was an intriguing article to read as Halloween is right around the corner. Nice job!
Micheal Baladez
I never quite knew about this man until reading this article, but have always found it quite surprising how individuals like Mr. Shipman can commit so many heinous crimes for so painfully long. Moreover, I also found it the slightest bit horrifying that this man was able to get away with murdering so many people for as long as he did.Despite the fact that the death rate was profoundly high while he was on the loose, it is perplexing that it took over twenty long years for anyone to get a whiff of suspicion that there may be something wrong with Mr. Shipman. Alongside this, the fact that he was actually tried twice for murder but was exempted due to a lack of evidence the very first time just solidifies how premeditated his actions may have been. Overall, with Halloween approaching rather fast, and the spookiest of seasons coming soon, this article is a great read. 10/10 would read again.
Alyssa Ramos
I learned about Shipman during my Forensic class when we were in our toxicology section. So many people were betrayed by their own doctor who is supposed to help them. It is crazy how he used a drug like the one they gave his mom before she passed away. I feel as if he did it as a sign of revenge for his mom’s death. It is upsetting to see how many elderly patients died by his use of narcotics and Diamorphine. It was easier for him to get away with murder, since most people assume it’s natural for an elderly to pass away from natural causes.
Lorena Lujan
I found this article very good and very interesting, to me it shows how we as a society don’t look into deaths of elderly since we assume it was of natural causes. In my opinion, he got away with all those deaths because of people not caring about the victims as they were old. His story shows us that we need to ignore bias and focus on the patterns one could make that could of been stopped earlier.
Donna Ainsworth
I have always found it very surprising and also scary that he was able to get away with murdering so many people for as long as he did. The fact that it took over two decades for people to become suspicious about the high death rate among his patients is insane to me. Another thing that I find to be insane is the fact that the original case against him was dropped due to a lack of evidence, though it was only a few months until they were able to convict him of the charges that he had against him.
Cayden Garcia
Very interesting article Kathryn! I find it surprising that he was able to get away with so many murders without anyone noticing. I also find it interesting how he used the same thing that soothed his mother’s death to kill his patients.
I do have a few questions. First, how did he become a doctor if he failed his entrance exam? And secondly, why do you think it took so long for the police to find out what he was doing?
Great article!!
Reagan Clark
This article was fascinating and perfectly described Harold Shipman as “Dr. Death.” It is unsettling to read about the lack of police effort on this case. You would think that after the first inquiries that the police would be closely examining all of his work to ensure that nobody else died under suspicious circumstances. I wish this article would go into more details about the psyche of “Dr. Death.” I want to understand the thought processes behind why this man decided to murder so many people. What made him decide to forge the will of Kathleen Grundy? What made him expand his crimes from murder to forgery? Did he intend to use the money to supply his addiction? Why did he not forge fake wills for other patients over the years?