Winner of the Spring 2018 StMU History Media Award for
Best Article in the Category of “Crime”
Article with the Best Introduction
In today’s society, we are taught at a young age to never speak to strangers without our parents around or by ourselves in general. However, in the late 1920s, it was a different time of danger and being more aggressive in hate crimes and violence. Sadly, those “norms” would erupt in a rise of terror and isolation within Brooklyn, New York. On February 11, 1927, two boys, Billy Gaffney and Billy Beaton, were having fun within their apartment, unsupervised. A few hours passed, both boys could not be found, until someone found Billy Beaton alone on the apartment roof. When asked where Billy Gaffney had gone, he responded with, “The boogey man took him.”1
This “boogey man” who took Billy Gaffney was indeed one’s worst nightmare. Calling him a man certainly does not do justice to the true monster that this “boogey man” Albert Fish was. At fifty-six years old, Albert Fish already had quite a life before that February day in 1927. He had been born on May 19, 1870 in Washington D.C. Originally named Hamilton Fish, Albert was the youngest of his three siblings. However, Fish had no clue as to who he would become. He was raised in a family whose members had mental health issues. His family was mostly illiterate, and to make matters worse, his own mother, when he was at the age of five, put him in an orphanage due to financial problems. Albert’s time in St. Johns Orphanage sparked a dangerous set of behaviors. He was frequently abused and beaten at the orphanage, but he soon developed something of an enjoyment of the feeling of physical pain, often giving him erections.1 In 1879, Albert’s mother was back on her feet financially and able to support Fish again. But Fish went from the abusive environment of the orphanage to a crowd of neighborhood youths who introduced the nine-year-old Fish to the practices of drinking urine, as well as to coprophagia (the act of eating feces or dung). He also started visiting public bath houses to watch young boys undress. Poor Fish’s mother had no idea that in her absence, her son was developing disturbing behaviors.
By 1890, twenty-year-old Fish had moved to New York City. In this part of Fish’s life, his behaviors escalated to rape, sodomy, and then to castration, mostly on male individuals of lower social status, such as African-American males and disadvantage males whom he believed would not be missed.3 He continued his acts of complete horror even after being arranged into a marriage in 1898 with his wife.4
During his marriage, he and his wife had six children together. He never abused his own children in any way, but he did became a house painter and usually targeted homes with young boys aged around six and continued with molestation and a morbid and horrid interest in castration.5 He was then incarcerated in 1903 for embezzlement, which then led to Fish regularly having sex with men in prison. However, his actions led to his divorce from his wife in 1917, who left him for a handyman named John Straube, and taking all of their children. That only made Fish become more sunk into a hole of obsession and terror.6 He began having morbid and frightening thoughts, and developing cravings such as cannibalism in which he enacted upon his victims in murdering them. Surprisingly, he had never been caught committing any of these murders, and if he were ever close to getting caught, he would flee the city. That is, up until Fish made a big mistake, which later helped solve the mysterious disappearance and murder of Billy Gaffney. This was possible through the unfortunately more famous case of the murder of a young girl, Grace Budd.
Grace Budd was an eleven-year-old girl who lived in a farmhouse with her brother, mother, and father. In a newspaper advertisement, Albert Fish found a man by the name of Edward Budd looking for a job. Fish then marked Edward Budd to be his next victim.7 Soon after, Fish responded to the newspaper ad by posing as a wealthy farmer named Frank Howard in need of help on his farm, and he began to be friendly with the Budd family.8 Fish’s plans, however, had switched after he discovered Edward Budd had a younger sister Grace, who seemed to be far more vulnerable than Edward had been. This is when Fish began to create a disgusting and horrible scheme to capture the young Grace Budd. Fish convinced the parents to let Grace accompany him to his sisters’ birthday party, which he completely fabricated.9 Fish took Grace and she never returned home after that day. Only after seven years, on November 11, 1934, were the details to what had happened to innocent Grace discovered. Fish sent a letter to the parents of Grace Budd detailing what he had done to her.8 To their horror, he confessed that he cooked parts of her to taste her flesh. He detailed her last moments, describing the torture and truly horrid acts Fish had committed upon her before Grace Budds’ final moments on earth. One would hope that Fish would end the letter on that horrifying and heart breaking note; however, he then described the process of preparing her body to feast upon, the parts of the body he had used, the taste of their daughters’ flesh and how he found her taste so satisfying. He then included at the end of the letter how he left her a virgin, as if that would lighten the terrible acts that he had committed on the young and innocent Grace Budd and her family.11
It was only through this tragic incident that justice came about for Albert Fish’s horrendous act of murder. Fish’s letter to the Budd family was just enough evidence to find and capture him. Detective William King helped track down and arrest Albert Fish using symbols on the stationary he used to write to the Budd family, “N.Y.P.C.B.A.” standing for “New York Private Chauffeur’s Benevolent Association.” King successfully located where it had come from, tracing it back to a room at 200 East 52nd Street from a janitor who had moved from there. This location was the exact place where Fish came frequently to receive his mail. Finally, this helped investigator William F. King pinpoint exactly where Albert Fish would be; waiting right outside of his room.12
Fish was captured and taken in for questioning. During questioning, Fish admitted to murdering Grace Budd and confessed to the investigators exactly where he had buried the remains of Grace Budd. They were able to locate Grace Budd’s bones, which were located behind Wisteria Cottage, an abandoned house in Westchester County. Fish then confessed to eating parts of Budd’s body, as well as to the murder of Billy Gaffney, including the torment he had done to Billy.8 After Fish’s arrest, he did not care for the consequences and looked very much forward to having his penalty be death. In March 1935, Fish pleaded sane but guilty.14 The court decided that he was sane, and accepted his plea of guilt.15.
Fish was executed on January 16, 1938 in the electric chair in Sing Sing Prison. Even to his death he continued his bizarre behavior, exclaiming that being electrocuted would be “the supreme thrill” of his life.9. Therefore, Albert Fish had never really suffered any consequences. Even to his death, Albert Fish took pleasure in his morbid thoughts and ultimately met the peak of his horrid obsession.
- Murderpedia: The Encyclopedia of Murderers, June 2017, s.v. “Albert Fish,” by Juan Ignacio Blanco. ↵
- Murderpedia: The Encyclopedia of Murderers, June 2017, s.v. “Albert Fish,” by Juan Ignacio Blanco. ↵
- Martin Fido, True Crime: The Infamous Villains of Modern History and Their Hideous Crimes (United Kingdom: Carlton Publishing Group, 2013), 186. ↵
- Murderpedia: The Encyclopedia of Murderers, June 2017, s.v. “Albert Fish,” by Juan Ignacio Blanco. ↵
- “Evil serial killer known as the Brooklyn Vampire who kidnapped children and cut them up and ATE them, known as the Gray Man and the Werewolf of Wisteria murderer Albert Fish was one of the most twisted serial killers,” Daily Mirror, The: Web Edition Articles (September 2017): 9. ↵
- Murderpedia: The Encyclopedia of Murderers, June 2017, s.v. “Albert Fish” by Juan Ignacio Blanco. ↵
- Murderpedia: The Encyclopedia of Murderers, June 2017, s.v. “Albert Fish,” by Juan Ignacio Blanco. ↵
- Salem Press Biographical Encyclopedia, 2017, s.v. “Albert Fish,” by Bernadette L. Bosky. ↵
- Murderpedia: The Encyclopedia of Murderers, June 2017, s.v. “Albert Fish” by Juan Ignacio Blanco. ↵
- Salem Press Biographical Encyclopedia, 2017, s.v. “Albert Fish,” by Bernadette L. Bosky. ↵
- Salem Press Biographical Encyclopedia, 2017, s.v. “Albert Fish,” by Bernadette L. Bosky. ↵
- Salem Press Biographical Encyclopedia, 2017, s.v. “Albert Fish,” by Bernadette L. Bosky. ↵
- Salem Press Biographical Encyclopedia, 2017, s.v. “Albert Fish,” by Bernadette L. Bosky. ↵
- Salem Press Biographical Encyclopedia, 2017, s.v. “Albert Fish,” by Bernadette L. Bosky. ↵
- Salem Press Encyclopedia of Science, 2013, s.v. “Irresistible impulse rule.” By Mario Morelli. ↵
- Murderpedia: The Encyclopedia of Murderers, June 2017, s.v. “Albert Fish” by Juan Ignacio Blanco. ↵
202 comments
Hailey Stewart
This article acknowledges that Albert Fish never suffered consequences, keyword being suffered. I hate this for the sake of those who were tortured and murdered by him and their families. Fish had such a troubled upbringing, however that is just a reason for why he turned out the way he did, not an excuse for his actions. It makes logical sense, though it is strange, that he did not act this way towards his own children and family, though I would like to hear a professional analysis. I briefly studied Fish in my psychology class and he was by far the most demented and disturbing serial killer I know of.
Martina Rodriguez
Very disturbing to see the childhood circumstances that contributed to the actions of Fish in his adult years. Shocking to hear about the arranged marriage to his poor wife. I wasn’t aware such practices were happening in this not too distant time period. I cannot believe the sheer amount of crimes he managed to commit without being caught, but more so just how long he was doing all of this without getting arrested. I had read about the Grace Budd case before, but I had no idea the connection it had to the case of Billy Gaffney.
Tyanne Pearcy
I’ve always been fascinated with the psyche of serial killers and sociopaths, so I immediately gravitated to this article. It is hard to believe that Albert Fish had a family that he did not harm but continued these heinous acts upon innocent people. The most interesting thing to me is how his childhood had such a big contribution to his adult life behavior. At such a young age he was subjected to corrupted thoughts and feelings, this most likely having to do with the family’s history of mental illness. The act upon the innocent Grace just proves how far Albert was from the norm.
Tessa Bodukoglu
Even though I have not read many articles on this website, I can see as to why it was named best article in crime for the spring. I have personally always been fascinated with crimes and serial killers and studying their behaviors and what causes them to react the way that they do. The crimes that were committed by Fish are horrifying to even think about and morbid. But the detail and the layout of the whole article is incredible. the author kept me entertained and wanting to read more even though it was disturbing.
Alexandria Zapata
This article just blows my mind how there are people out there in the world that do this type of thing. To not only kidnap the little girl, but to also send a letter to her family saying in full detail of what you did. That is just a shock. I love how the article is written though. It provided a good background to understand where Albert’s character might have come from.
Marina Castro
As someone who is highly interested in crime articles, reading about the crimes Albert Fish committed was by far one of the most horrifying experiences ever. It goes beyond my understanding how someone could be able to be so cruel and inhumane. Reading about his childhood trauma gives us the readers a glimpse of why he acted the way he did. However, it certainly does not justify the actions he committed.
Alexandra Lujan
Everything about Serial killers and Crimes interest me, this article was just like watching an episode of criminal minds but with that being said it’s scary how people like Fish exist in our world, I can’t imagine what Grace’s poor family must have gone through after receiving that awful letter about how he ate the poor girl. Fish was definitely a sick man, he was a rapist, a Cannibal, and a abuser, and truly did deserve the name “the boggey man”.
Sofia Andrade
Upon reading the title of this article I initially thought of a criminal minds episode where the serial killer is a cannibal that cooked his victims in different ways. As I read the article I discovered that this was not the case. At the end of the article, I could only think of all of the other victims he had tortured over the spam of over 30 years.
Kaitlyn Killebrew
I love reading about serial killers, as weird as it sounds. This is by far one of the most disgusting people I’ve read about. There is a difference between sociopaths and psychopaths. Psychopaths are the more extreme version of sociopaths and can be labeled with their detachment of emotions. Yet he was able to form a loving connection with with wife and family which they only left when he was locked up for embezzlement, not for murder. I don’t know if this is true, but I had a teacher tell me psychopaths are born while sociopaths are made, which would make sense in the beginning because he didn’t appear to be having any irregular actions until he was left in the orphanage that use to beat him. Yet to be able to send a letter to Grace Budd’s family of the torment he made her endure almost seems to unreal, like a movie. It’s disgusting that there are people in this world that are like that, but with medicine and technology growing exponentially we may be able to see a future where stories like these become non existent.
Maxx Arizmendi
I have read about serial killers in the past, but I never came across Albert Fish, and now I feel disturbed after reading this article. It was so attention grabbing, and I was interested while reading it despite feeling disgusted. I felt both intrigued and mainly disgusted when reading this article, and now I am shook about what Fish’s victims went through.