StMU Research Scholars

Featuring Scholarly Research, Writing, and Media at St. Mary's University
March 22, 2017

The Mesopotamian Foe: The Assyrians

Courtesy of The New York Public Library

Around the mid-700s through mid-600s BCE, there was a feared empire east of Mesopotamia, reaching from modern-day Iraq to modern-day Turkey and down through Egypt. This empire was the world’s first major political power to adopt an imperial structure government and the first to master iron working. This empire had many foes who succumbed to its brutal and terrifying tactics; they would lay waste to the land, often destroying entire city populations. The empire is considered the greatest of Mesopotamian empires for development of bureaucracy, military strategies, and expanse. This is the Assyrian Empire, which reigned from 1400 BCE through 612 BCE. The empire had its beginnings in 1900 BCE in the Assyrian capital of Ashur. The city grew from trading with the Hittite cities of Anatolia, which provided Ashur with raw materials needed to master the craft of iron working and increase the city’s wealth. With the mastery of iron, Assyrians could make iron weaponry, which helped them to conquer other lands that had merely bronze weaponry. Assyria become a foe in Mesopotamia because of its new weaponry, desire for more land, and cruel tactics.

Assyrian Empire Map | Image courtesy of Flickr

Before Assyria was a great empire, it was a small region that had been conquered by the Akkadians and then the Babylonians. Once the Babylonian empire fell, Assyria attempted to assert control in the areas around Ashur, but were not able to due to the rise of different influences in the region and civil war inside. The Mitanni held power in Mesopotamia until invasion by the Hittites in 1300 BCE, bringing Mesopotamia again under a different influence; the Hittites overthrew the kings of Mitanni and conquered the region. However, during this time, Assyrian King Eriba Adad I was able to gain influence in the areas under Hittite control, and Assyrians finally saw their chance to break free and be independent. Once independent, they began to expand outward from Ashur to areas once controlled by the Mitanni, and the Hittites did not like this. War broke out between Assyria and the Hittites, but the Assyrians were much more powerful. They drove out the Hittites from their major strongholds and conquered their land from the north and south. Assyrians proved to the Mesopotamian world that they were a powerful people and a foe to be feared.1

The Assyrians’ reputation and respect was due to their war machine. The Assyrians were not only masters in iron working but also masters of siege warfare, which was a crucial tactic for attacking cities with walls. They would either light the walls on fire, dig under the infrastructure, build ramps to help soldiers jump over the wall, or use their “ramming tower.” The Assyrians knew that surrounding the city and straining it of supplies could sometimes take years if the city had a good stock of provisions and a good water source. Instead of taking years to conquer a city, they would conquer it in days. Finally, inside the city the men, women, and children would be killed like animals, and those who survived were most likely sold into a lifetime of slavery.2

Courtesy of The New York Public Library
Bas-Relief Showing Assyrians Torturing Prisoners | Courtesy of The New York Public Library | c. Sir Austen Henry Layard

The Assyrians would also introduce psychological warfare to the world. Often commanders would surround a city before besieging it and demand the city surrender or die. This would often work too. Cities’ rulers would rather save themselves and their people than be massacred. Assyrian kings would rather acquire lands through diplomacy, but if diplomacy seemed impossible, they would besiege a weakly fortified city and commit atrocities on its people. They would impale, skin, behead, and roast the unlucky defenders, then save one or two to go back to the capital to tell of the doom of their city. Kings were proud of their feared reputation, and often bragged about their atrocities, introducing an ancient form of propaganda. After committing these massacres, they would make massive stone slab sculptures that had writings and images of their brutality. They would post these on the side of roads, like a billboard today. The Assyrian kings wanted to convey the message that they were to be feared and not stopped. King Ashurnasirpal (c. 668-627 BCE) is an example of how proud these kings were, saying, “The city I destroyed, devastated. I turned into mounds and ruin heaps, the young men and maidens in the fire I burned.”3

Assyria was very disliked in the ancient world because of their brutality, but they were also not liked because of their policy of mass deportation of conquered populations. It was standard policy for Assyria to do this. Kings decided the best way to prevent rebellion was to remove the current occupants and replace them with Assyrians. If you resisted, you were killed or sold into slavery. Deportees were carefully chosen by their talents and labor that might be useful to the empire; so if you were a scribe or scholar, then you would be sent to a populated city to help the bureaucracy of the city or help catalog written works. Though this was a cruel tactic, families were never separated and their culture was assimilated into the Assyrian culture. King Tukulti-Ninurta I (c.1244-1208 BCE) was partially interested in preserving the knowledge and cultures of the peoples he conquered. If you give in to Assyria, you would be treated fairly in the Assyrian government and be considered Assyrian; however, most did not and held onto their identities.4

Courtesy of The New York Public Library
Assyrian and Babylonian warfare | Courtesy of The New York Public Library | c. Friedrich Hottenroth

Assyria’s greedy expansion and war machine led to a major coalition to be formed against them by twelve kingdoms in 853 BCE. These kingdoms first held the Assyrians at the city of Qarqar. The battle could not be won but showed the Mesopotamian world that the Assyrians could be stopped. Assyria continued the invasion and began picking off the kingdoms of the east, taking them kingdom-by-kingdom. The Assyrians were held off for 150 years, delaying their conquest for Mesopotamia for about a century. The Assyrians, after conquering the eastern kingdoms, marched towards the Hebrew kingdom of Israel. At the battle Lachish in 701 BCE, the brave city Lachish stood up to the Assyrian war machine and payed the price. The Assyrian commander besieged and razed the city, and the defenders were brutally murdered. The city was strongly fortified to guard the way to Jerusalem, but once fallen, it gave Assyria a straight path to conquer Jerusalem, which they did. Assyria wreaked havoc throughout Mesopotamia and was held together by their bonds with violence and terror. Assyria conquered land after land, and with it conquered an abundance of natural resources. The Assyrians, however, offered very little to the lands, creating tension between Assyria and the lands governed by them. Especially in Babylon, the Babylonians were unhappy with Assyria and rebelled. Assyria sent their armies to suppress this rebellion, but were unable to, due to their being in an alliance between Babylon and the southern kingdoms. Babylon was able to rally the other kingdoms behind them, marched towards Nineveh, the traditional capital for Assyria, and besieged the city for three months. The Assyrians were now victims to their own tactics, which they pioneered. The city fell and the government fled to Harran to continue the Empire, but it only lasted for another four years. The once great empire had fallen, and by the time of the Persian Empire, a little over a century later, Assyria was just a memory.5

Assyria cultivated a fearsome reputation and is remembered today for many of its endeavors. They are especially remembered for their brutal militarism. Every successful ancient empire would use Assyrian tactics, like the tactics of siege and psychological warfare. The Assyrian engineers were essential for their military; they created ways for armies to siege a city. Even the road system the Assyrians had in place at the time would be emulated in other successful empires. They would have paved roads that connected one end of the empire to the other and made it efficient for armies to move in times of unrest. They even had a corps of messengers to ride the roads for swift communication in the empire. The Assyrians were also the first to systematically collect a library. On clay tablets, they would keep records of their history, mythology, and daily life. It is because of these clay tablets that archaeologists have been able to decode ancient cuneiform writing. Out of all the Assyrians endeavors, their tactics and feared reputation ultimately brought them to their fall. The deportation of large masses made the masses angry at the empire for taking them from their land, but if they did not follow through, they would be killed in a cruel way. The masses had little choice under Assyrian rule, so they chose to rebel. The Assyrian empire is a prime example of what not to do when ruling over a large mass of people from different cultures. Empires like the Romans and Greeks would adopt many aspects from the Assyrians and integrate them into their own empires. The Assyrian empire will go down as the greatest of Mesopotamian Empires but will always be remembered for their brutal and cruel atrocities committed to make a point.6

  1. The Greenhaven Encyclopedia of Ancient Mesopotamia, 2007, s.v. “Assyrian Empire,” by Robert B. Kebric.
  2. The Greenhaven Encyclopedia of Ancient Mesopotamia, 2007, s.v. “Assyrian Empire,” by Robert B. Kebric.
  3. Salem Press Encyclopedia, January 2016, s.v. “Civilians and war,” by Peter K. Benbow.
  4. World History Encyclopedia, 2011, s.v. “Assyrian, Babylonia, and Persian Deportations,” by Alfred J. Andrea and Carolyn Neel.
  5.  The Greenhaven Encyclopedia of Ancient Mesopotamia, 2007, s.v. “Weapons and Warfare, Land,” by Robert B. Kebric.
  6. Gale Encyclopedia of World History: War, 2008, s.v. “The Assyrian Conquests (853 BCE–612 BCE).”

Tags from the story

Alejandro Alcala

Author Portfolio Page

Recent Comments


  • Elliot Avigael

    The Assyrian Empire is perhaps one of the most underrated of the ancient empires. It’s almost as if the key to being feared in the ancient world was to exercise unspeakable brutality on your opponents, leaving only few alive to tell the tale. It’s interesting how they’re not nearly talked about as much as the Babylonians are, likely because they didn’t contribute much to the lands they conquered. Still, I think as far as military prowess goes they’re definitely worth the mention.

    Fascinating article. I knew a thing or two about the Assyrians but not much about the details.

  • Francisco Cruzado

    I liked the synthetic aspects of the article, they were useful when grasping a little of the history of the Assyrians. I am intrigued by their brutality and their way of seeing the world, because it almost seems like if they did not care about unification, but instead, just on conquest after conquest. However, such a point of view does not seem to hold true if I think on both the emperor mentioned in the article who cared about the preservation of others’ cultures and the care for a library in where the texts and myths of the empire’s territory remained. Just as today, one can think on what remains of the people’s culture when they fell under the yoke of oppression and subsequent deportation. It reminds of many pre-Incan cultures in modern Peru, which suffered from forced relocations and forced conversion, to the point of alienation. In those stories lie a mournful aspect of war and greed throughout history: the obliteration of oneself.

  • Amelia Hew

    Even if I enjoy reading about ancient civilizations, this is the first time I read about the Assyrians. I never knew that their society were extremely brutal and tyranny. It’s a miracle for them to even survive for so long despite all the atrocities they committed towards other kingdoms. They even boast their atrocities and put up stone slab that tell their tale of slaughtering and conquering the kingdoms. Despite being know for their barbarian ways, their ways of ruling their people from different cultures were adapted into countries like Rome and Greek.

  • Diego Terrazas

    It is no wonder the Assyrians were as strong as they were… On top of having a large empire, they had a government that prevented rebellions. Their feared reputation also may have led to nobody being able to stand up against them. The Assyrians were brutal but brute force was not all they had going for them. They had good control of the people they conquered and understood that the only way to ensure that a rebellion would not occur, was to incite fear and to deport non-Assyrians.

  • Christopher Vasquez

    In our Foundations of Civilization class with Dr. Whitener, he always mentioned that the Assyrian control was very unpopular; however, I never knew why — that is, until now. I didn’t know that they were so brutal, impaling their victims and skinning them in order to send a message. Also, I wonder if they would have been able to conquer other areas so quickly if it hadn’t been for their usage of iron. All in all, great article!

  • Mia Stahl

    I have always seen psychological warfare as the most intriguing and effective types of warfare. It was interesting to me how Assyrian’s coined this type of warfare and the way in which they did it. To enact this warfare they would show the brutality they had done to other people that they were trying to conquer, this was often very effective for them and this is what really surprised me.

  • Timothy ODekirk

    I am a huge history buff, and love everything about ancient civilizations. I knew a little bit about the Assyrians before reading this article, but nothing to this magnitude. I liked the detail of the article, and how readers were given a glimpse of the absolute brutality of the Assyrians. I also found it intriguing how the Assyrians were the first civilization to use psychological warfare, which I did not know before reading this article. Furthermore, the Assyrians are just plain brutal, and is something that people would see in movies of sorts. This was a great article to take readers back into the past of when the Assyrians ruled Mesopotamia.

  • Timothy O'Dekirk

    I am a huge history buff, and love everything about ancient civilizations. I knew a little bitt about the Assyrians before reading this article, but nothing to this magnitude. I liked the detail of the article, and how readers were given a glisp of the abslotulte brutality of the Assyrians. I also found it intriguing how the Assurians were the first civilization to use phsycological warfare, which I did not know befoire reading this article. Furthermore, the Assyrians are just plain brutal, and is sommething that people would see in movies of sorts. This was a great article to take readers back into the past of when the Assyurians ruled Mesopotamia.

  • Luis Morales

    I am a person who loves history, and this story is one filled with great information. I knew some things about the Assyrians, but never to this extent. What was very interesting was that the Assyrians were the people who introduced psychological warfare. This is amazing because this idea was withstand the test of time. This was a well-written article.

  • Aaiyanna Johnson

    This reminds me of the cliché story of how a weak person, or group of people get revenge on those who hurt them. Assyria was the weak group of people who eventually gained enough power and patience to overthrow the bully. Unfortunately this occurrence was through war. Killing and oppressing people just to upkeep the notion that one is powerful and a force to be reckoned with. This is still going on today.

Leave a Reply to Christopher Vasquez (Cancel Reply)

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.