Jefferson, Adams, and the “Revolution” of 1800

Notable Men of the Election of 1800.

After watching the current events of this 2016 election, the American people can agree as a whole that this Presidential race has been significantly different than ones we have seen before. The two candidates take and give personal blows to each other, and the electorate watches as what seems as the most personal election in recent history. With careful consideration of previous American Presidential Elections, one might be reminded of another election just as personal, maybe even more so, than our current one. The Election of 1800, or as Thomas Jefferson put it: the “Revolution of 1800.”1

This gruesome election was between Federalist and incumbent John Adams with his running mate Charles C. Pinckney and Democratic-Republican and principal author of the Declaration of Independence Thomas Jefferson with his running mate Aaron Burr. In this story we have an interesting cast of characters, all of which are very prominent figures in the history of the early Republic. The men involved had intricate personal relationships that acted as a catalyst in the crucible that would become the Election of 1800. 

All men involved came from some form of political or military merit. John Adams was a prominent voice in declaring America’s Independence. Thomas Jefferson had been the United States Minister to France (he had spent a majority of the war and its aftermath in France). Aaron Burr had been a colonel in the Continental Army. Most of the men were quite fond of each other due to the fact that they had worked with each other before, although all had one thing in common: their distaste for Alexander Hamilton, Chief de Aide for General George Washington during the Revolutionary War and Senior Officer in the Continental Army. Hamilton was a stubborn man. Years before the election Hamilton had attempted to destroy Adams in his Adams’ Pamphlet, 2. He continuously bashed heads with Jefferson, while both he and Jefferson served in George Washington’s Presidential Cabinet in the early 1790s; and Hamilton was very vocal in his distaste of Aaron Burr. 

(From Left to Right: Adams, Hamilton, Burr, Jefferson)
(From Left to Right: Adams, Hamilton, Burr, Jefferson) | Courtesy of

At the beginning of the race, much of the American population was not too fond of President Adams’s Administration. With the implementation of the highly unpopular Alien and Sedition Acts, which was an act of law signed by Adams himself in 1798 that allowed the deportation of foreigners, the Federalist party itself seemed to fall apart. Only some truly supported Adams. With the relative unity of the Democratic-Republican Party and the particular favoritism of Jefferson in the South and Aaron Burr in New York, the Federalists feared that their opponents would win the presidency. In November of 1800 the election began, and as the ballots came in, the results only surprised a few. Adams received sixty-five votes while Jefferson received seventy-three. The election seemed to have been won, but something went wrong. The members of the electoral college failed to hold back one of their votes for Burr, which caused a vote count tie of seventy-three votes for each Jefferson and Burr, and thus propelled the two into a one on one race for presidency. 3

Alexander Hamilton, seeing both of his enemies with the potential to become president, felt himself in a sticky situation. Adams seeing this, laughed at Hamilton, saying,“The very man—the very two men—of all the world that he was most jealous of are now placed above him.”4 Hamilton had to put his pride aside and place his support behind one of these men for the betterment of the country.

Aaron Burr, being Jefferson’s running mate, was also put in an uncomfortable situation. He came into the race as just a Vice Presidential candidate; now he had to go against Jefferson for the presidential seat. Most people believed that Burr should just give Jefferson the position, even if Burr might have won by a landslide in the coming vote in the House, where the tie would be decided. This was not Burr’s intention. After being Jefferson’s running mate in the previous election, the Election of 1796, Burr had been left with a bitter taste in his mouth after Jefferson himself won the Vice Presidency and left him with nothing in fourth place. Burr even went so far as to say “As to my Jeff, what happened at the last election (Et tu Brute!).” 5 Burr was in it to win it.

The Democratic-Republicans (From Left: Burr, Jefferson) | Courtesy of
The Democratic-Republicans (From Left: Burr, Jefferson) | Courtesy of

Now that Adams, the Federalist Presidential Nominee, was out of the picture, the Federalists were in a scattered frenzy over whom they should pick: Jefferson or Burr. Most contemplated giving their votes to Burr due to the fact that most Federalists saw Jefferson as unfit to run for such an office, or as Robert G. Harper, a Federalist, put it: Jefferson was possibly able to be “a professor in a college or a president of a philosophy society,” but definitely not the head of our nation. 6  Others that were in favor of Jefferson were known to be quite violent in their advocacy, some even stating that if Burr were elected in place of Jefferson “we will march and dethrone him as an usurper.” 7

Finally, in February of 1801, the voting went to the House of Representatives. All sixteen states were allowed a single vote, and the winner only needed a majority of nine votes. The voting went on for five days. Tensions rose, state militas threatened to rise if a president was not elected. The House went through thirty-five votes, and each time they reached the same result: a tie. Then men grew restless and began to seek out an easy way out, and this is when Hamilton seized any opportunity he could to write to each of his Federalists colleagues in the electoral college to either withdraw their vote or place it for Jefferson.

James A. Bayard, a Federalist from Delaware, began to listen to Hamilton’s plea. For all thirty-five previous votes, Bayard had voted for Burr, but after reading Hamilton’s letters, Bayard began to weaken his support for Burr. Finally on the thirty-sixth vote, Bayard inserted a blank vote and abstained Delaware’s vote. At the same time two other representatives gave in as well and also withdrew their votes, allowing Jefferson to win ten votes, and thus win the presidency.

The general confusion of the Election of 1800 led the next Congress to pass the Twelfth Amendment, which revised the way the electoral college elected the President and Vice President. In addition to the passing of the Twelfth Amendment, personal feuds came to fruition after Burr’s lost. Burr believed Hamilton was the greatest impediment in his path for success and challenged him to a duel. In 1804, both left to New Jersey and Burr shot down Hamilton.

  1. Alan Brinkley, American History: Connecting with the Past. Volume 1: to 1865 (New York: McGraw-Hill Education, 2015), 177.
  2. Ron Chernow, Alexander Hamilton (New York : Penguin Press, 2004), 619.
  3. Brinkley, American History: Connecting with the Past, 178.
  4. Chernow, Alexander Hamilton, 632.
  5. Chernow, Alexander Hamilton, 634.
  6. Chernow, Alexander Hamilton, 634.
  7. Chernow, Alexander Hamilton, 635.

Share this post

Share on facebook
Share on google
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on pinterest
Share on print
Share on email

70 Responses

  1. This article demonstrates the importance of the electoral college and how it was challenged early on in our history. The article is also a good reminder that parties are not always in agreement and that the foundation of our government serves to guide us in our political struggles. Can we now draw similarities between Hamilton’s and Burr’s duel to the insurrection of January 6, 2021?

  2. This article demonstrates the importance of the electoral college and how it was challenged early on in our history. The article is also a good reminder that parties are not always in agreement and that the foundation of our government serves to guide us in our political struggles. Can we now draw similarities between Hamilton’s and Burr’s duel to the insurrection of January 6, 2021?

  3. This is a great article that covers the events of the Revolution. I definitely think that in American History they do not cover every person that was involved in the revoltion and the freedom of America. People like Alexander Hamilton and Aaron Burr had a lot to play in what happened and I believe it is important for students to lean what really happened for the fight of independence in their country. I really like how this article stated well written factual stories and left the audience with a shock with the blunt ending of Alexander Hamiltons death.

  4. This article was well written and did a good of covering the events of the 1800 presidential election, I like many others who have commented note the importance of this election, the events of the 1800 election greatly changed how America would move forward, and it brought issues to light that were not taken into account previously, and I would say we are in a better position for it.

  5. I find it interesting how the tensions between federalists and democratic-republicans are similar to what we see today with the republican and democrat parties. I think that this election left a profound mark on history by determining how a presidential election would be decided in case of a tie. A similar situation could occur in the nation’s future.

  6. This article is very interesting in the way that it explains the election of 1800’s. The two parties have always had a rough time and the transitions have caused many problems in history so the fact that this transition was not as rough as the past or even today. Hamilton was an important role in this election and he really determined the outcome of this election so for him to really think about who could be the better president is really amazing.

  7. I think it’s interesting that the Election of 1800 was able to create an amendment and change the way candidates can be voted into presidency. The fact that Jefferson and Burr went into the election in hopes of being a team, then getting pinned against each other and eventually running against each other is really weird to think about happening in today’s time. Also many of the Federalists idea of Jefferson is harsh because they thought of him as a mere teacher and not powerful enough to run the country. This article does a really good job at mapping out all the events, opinions and ideas that occurred during this election.

  8. The election of 1800 was an important of history. I think it was great the Alexander Hamilton was able to put his feelings aside his personal conflicts to support the candidate that he felt would be the best president for the United States. I was enlightening that the founding fathers didn’t always agree with each other since most people believe they always were in agreement.

  9. This is a very interesting article. I have read about the Election of 1800 before, but never knew that congress tied for thirty-five votes. Alexander Hamilton was able to put aside personal issues with the candidates to be able to support the man who he felt would be the best leader for the country. It is unfortunate that his support for Jefferson in this election ultimately led to his death.

  10. Nice article. The election of 1800 was a significant event not just in the history of the United States, but also in the history of the world. Despite the bitterly contested election this was the first time that there was ever a peaceful transition of power between two parties. It is quite funny to think that some of our founding fathers were not always in agreement about everything. Ultimately, Jefferson won the election and thus began a new era in American history.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.