StMU Research Scholars

Featuring Scholarly Research, Writing, and Media at St. Mary's University
April 11, 2020

The Warren Commission Report: Conspiracy Theories Addressed on the Assassination of President John F. Kennedy

It was mid-morning on Friday, November 22, 1963. President John F. Kennedy, along with his wife, the First Lady, Jacqueline Kennedy, and Mr. John Connally, Governor of Texas, and his wife, Nellie, were in a motorcade procession to the Trade Mart in Dallas, Texas. This was the last stop in the Dallas-Ft. Worth area of a two-day fund-raising tour of Texas. As the motorcade preceded along the ten mile route from Dallas Love Field Airport to the Trade Mart, and had just passed the Texas School Book Depository Building, the unthinkable happened. Our 35th President was shot from behind. At approximately 12:30 p.m. a bullet hit the base of his neck and exited through his throat.  A second bullet struck Kennedy in the back of his head. Governor Connally was also seriously injured. Our President was shot in front a crowd of 200,000 lining the streets, and the assassination was witnessed by Americans across the country, since the event was broadcasted live on national television. President Kennedy was rushed to Parkland Memorial Hospital in Dallas, where he was pronounced dead at 1:00 p.m., after receiving last rites. President Kennedy’s body was put into a casket and driven from the hospital to Air Force One. Lyndon Baines Johnson was sworn into office as the 36th President of the United States at 2:38 p.m., just before Air Force One took off from the Love Field airport. Who was behind the assassination? What would the response be?1

Lyndon B. Johnson is sworn in as the 36th President of the United of States of America on Air Force One on November 22, 1963, in Dallas, Texas; following the assassination of President John F. Kennedy. Looking on Mrs. Kennedy still in her blood-stained pink suit. | Courtesy of Wikimedia Commons.

During our history, there have been four U.S. Presidents who have been assassinated: Presidents Lincoln, Garfield, McKinley, and Kennedy. Of these four, most of us are more familiar with the assassinations of Presidents Lincoln and Kennedy. The American people have had a fascination with various conspiracy theories surrounding these presidential assassinations. More than 114 years after the assassination of President Lincoln, there are still requests to investigate evidence into Lincoln’s assassination. At a speech to the Abraham Lincoln Association, in Springfield, Illinois on February 12, 1979, William Webster, a Director at the FBI, discussed a request that the FBI received from the National Parks Service. The Ford Theatre in Washington D.C., where President Lincoln was shot, falls under the jurisdiction of the National Parks Service, which has possession of the artifacts from President Lincoln’s assassination. John Wilkes Booth, the man accused of assassinating President Lincoln, had a diary in which it was believed to have secret writings that might possibly implicate others who were involved in the assassination plan. In 1977, the Laboratory Document Section of the FBI conducted non-destructive tests on the diary and confirmed there were no secret writings. They also confirmed that the writings belonged to Booth. In his speech to the association, Webster outlined how investigations are conducted with the intent at arriving at the truth based on evidence. Webster said, “Even though the assassin might be apprehended on the scene, the most intensive investigation would be instituted to establish, or to lay to rest, the fact or suspicion of conspiracy. The aftermaths of the Lincoln and Kennedy assassinations have indelibly impressed the necessity of exploring every possible lead to its ultimate end.”2

As the Dallas Police and the FBI were investigating the death of Kennedy, President Johnson became concerned about all the theories that were being discussed in the media. Many rumors circulated as to who might also be involved. Was it Cuba, or the Soviet Union? Was it the mob in retaliation against the President’s brother, Robert Kennedy, the Attorney General? Did Lee Harvey Oswald, the identified assassin, act alone? Just one week after Kennedy’s assassination and burial, and after confirming there might be four separate investigations (County of Dallas, the State of Texas, the U.S. Congress, and the U.S. Department of Justice), President Johnson reluctantly established the President’s Commission on the Assassination of President John F. Kennedy on November 29, 1963. The commission was necessary to avoid potential conflicting information from the multiple jurisdictions. Johnson knew the public wanted “professional and non-political examinations of the facts and the various conspiracy allegations that were being so widely publicized around the world.”3 The President’s Executive Order No. 11130 directed the commission “… to evaluate all the facts and circumstances surrounding such assassination, including the subsequent violent death of the man charged with the assassination, and to report to me its findings and conclusions.”4

23rd November 1963: Mugshot of Lee Harvey Oswald (1939 – 1963), alleged assassin of President John F. Kennedy, taken by the Dallas Police department, Dallas, Texas. (Photo by Hulton Archive/Getty Images) | Courtesy of

Johnson was politically astute and knew he must carefully select the members of the commission. Johnson’s selection of Chief Justice Earl Warren to preside over the committee was based on Warren’s position in the Supreme Court and his legal career, having served as a district attorney and state attorney general in California. He was also a Republican, chosen for the necessity to be seen as a bi-partisan committee. Johnson chose four members from Congress: Senator Richard Russell, a Democrat from Georgia; Senator John Sherman Cooper, a Republican from Kentucky; Congressman Hale Boggs, a Democrat and the majority whip from Louisiana; and Congressman Gerald Ford, a Republican from Michigan (and future 38th President of the United States.) The two members from the private sector were Allen W. Dulles, a former CIA director, and John J. McCloy, the former president of the World Bank. The private sector recommendations came from Robert Kennedy due to their previous government experience.5 The commission became known as the Warren Commission, after the Chief Justice who led it. The Commission had support staff assigned by the Department of Justice or the Department of Defense to assist with the investigation and the preparation of the report. The Commission’s first duty was to assess the FBI report that was delivered on December 5—just two weeks after the assassination. The FBI had concerns of delivering a report that, while extensive, was still a first effort at collecting and evaluating evidence. The Commission had concerns on whether to grant the FBI full investigative authority given perception issues on how information might be controlled. The Commission had to precede cautiously to help dismiss the numerous conspiracy theories that were being discussed throughout the country.6

The Warren Report: The Official Report on the Assassination of President John F. Kennedy | Courtesy of Wikimedia Commons

Our history is full of conspiracy theories. One popular theory during World War II was whether or not President Roosevelt knew that Japan was going to attack Pearl Harbor. The conspiracists believe that actions that President Roosevelt took during 1940-1941, such as the revisions of the 1935 Neutrality Act, which allowed sales of arms only to France and Britain, the first ever peace-time draft, the exchange of American destroyers to Britain in “exchange for 99 year leases on British Naval and air bases in the Western Hemisphere,” and the introduction of embargos on Japan, were all measures designed to push America into war.7 The conspiracists all point to Roosevelt’s rhetoric in reelection speeches and his fireside chats as signals of his intention to pull America into war. However, historians believe that Roosevelt knew the American people wanted to stay neutral in the war. He was cautious in protecting America’s interest, while balancing the public favor of neutrality. Roosevelt was determined to prevent a German victory. His actions for the peacetime draft, the arms sale to Britain and France, and the lease of ships were all designed to protect America’s interests. Historians also believe that Roosevelt did everything in his power to maintain relations with Japan. It is well documented that Roosevelt and his advisers knew that some Japanese attack was being planned around December 6 or 7; but the intelligence was not clear whether the target was British, Dutch, or French possession in the Southeast Asia.8 Historians also site the implausibility of Roosevelt knowing of an attack on the Navy and not acting on it. Their argument was that Roosevelt, who was a former assistant secretary of the Navy, would never have exposed the Navy that he loved to the massive destruction to the fleet by Japan at Pearl Harbor.9 Most historians conclude that “American involvement in World War II, was the consequence of the country’s rise to global power and the resulting need to combat aggressive, undemocratic regimes that were hostile to other American institutions and to the survival of the Unites States as a free country.”10 Yet, the conspiracy theories continue to resurface.

Distrust of the FBI continued to grow.  Many did not support the long-time director, J. Edgar Hoover, who served as director from 1924 to 1972.  Hoover was controversial for spying on the American people during the McCarthy era. Hoover felt he needed to defend the country against communism. He authorized spying on government officials, business leaders, entertainers, and the general public, if there was the slightest cause of suspicion. Hoover targeted groups, such as African Americans. Most notable was the profiling of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.11 The FBI was concerned that it would be public information that they neglected to inform the Dallas Office and the Secret Services that Oswald had moved to Dallas. The FBI knew its access to the Commission may be limited. To keep informed on the Commission activities, the FBI relied on Gerald Ford, one of the Commission members. “Ford went to one of Hoover’s top aides, who wrote that Ford told him ‘he would keep me thoroughly advised as the activities of the Commission.’ He stated this would have to be on a confidential basis.”12  Within five days of the discussion, Ford began passing information to the FBI. On January 14, 1964, the FBI delivered two supplemental reports to their initial December report. Unfortunately, the supplemental report did not revisit its earlier conclusion on the number of bullets and how they struck President Kennedy. The report stated “the bullet that entered the president’s back ‘had penetrated to a distance of less than a finger length.'”13 This was at odds with the conclusion of the autopsy doctors at Bethesda National Naval Medical Center. The autopsy doctors and the doctors at Parkland Memorial Hospital had indicated that the bullet entered the president’s back and exited through his neck. The FBI failed to correct this critical error.14

Warren Commission Exhibit 697 – The JFK Presidential limousine moments before the assassination. | Courtesy of Wikimedia Commons

The Warren Report was delivered to President Johnson on September 24, 1964. The nine month investigation was detailed in a 469-page report with 410 pages of appendices, supported by twenty-six volumes of exhibits and other materials.15 There are key findings from the Warren Report. The first was that there were three shots that were fired from a sixth floor window of the Texas School Book Depository building, killing Kennedy and wounding Connally.  The second was that there was only one shooter—it was Lee Harvey Oswald, and he acted alone. The report tried to present the facts and did not address any motives of Oswald’s for why he might have shot the President. The report also addressed the lack of planning by the Secret Service before Kennedy’s trip to Dallas and the lack of their ability to fully protect the President during the open motorcade.16 The Warren Report was met with skepticism when it was released to the American public, three days after it was presented to President Johnson.

Why such skepticism? Jacob Cohen, American Studies Professor at Brandeis University has publicly defended the Warren Commission Report for fifty years. He teaches a course on “The Idea of Conspiracy in American Culture.” His premise is that if you apply the question “what must be true if?” to all conspiracy theories, then you can easily negate the false assumptions from what is true. In his article, “Will We Never Be Free of the Kennedy Assassination?” he dismisses multiple conspiracy theories by using the proposed question. One such example, is an Oswald look-alike, which was sent by the Soviets to kill the president. Applying the premise that a look-alike did the shooting, then you have to consider what happened to the real Oswald, and how could the look-alike assume an identity that Oswald’s wife and family did not detect. One of Cohen’s favorite theories is how a bullet that was confirmed firing from Oswald’s gun was later discovered in the stretcher of the basement of Parkland hospital. Cohen describes other theories and how they are also not valid. Yet, there is still fascination with the multiple theories.17 It is interesting to see the skepticism when the public was so fascinated with the Kennedys and the Camelot years, which was coined by the First Lady, shortly after the assassination. Mrs. Kennedy wanted the legacy of her husband’s 1,000 days to endure. Just four days after her husband’s death, she relayed her story of Camelot to Life Photo Journalists.18 The Camelot reference was referring to a Broadway play that was written by a former classmates of the President. The musical, one of the President’s favorites, was about King Arthur and the Knights of the Roundtable. Mrs. Kennedy said, “There will be great presidents again; but there will never be another Camelot.”19 The popularity of the Kennedy’s continued to grow with the reference to Camelot. As this fascination was growing, the conspiracy theories were gaining traction.

Letter from Warren Commission to President Johnson | Courtesy of Wikimedia Commons

Over time, the American public continued to have discussions on the Warren Report and a debate on whether the findings from the report were accurate. In 1976, the House Select Committee on Assassination (HSCA), investigated President Kennedy’s and Dr. Martin Luther King’s assassinations. The findings on President Kennedy’s assassination were largely aligned to the Warren Report. However, based on new information, the HSCA reported on the possibility of two shooters, while agreeing with the Warren Commission that one of the two was definitely Oswald. The findings also referenced the possibility of a conspiracy theory. Later, the findings of the HCSA were heavily criticized on the reliability of the new evidence, particularly the acoustic recordings. The findings of the HSCA were questioned by the public and those who were associated with the Warren Commission.20 Then in 1991, conspiracy theories were revisited after the release of Oliver Stone’s movie, JFK. In 1992, Congress responded to the new requests for information by passing the President John F. Kennedy Assassination Records Collection Act of 1992 and the creation of a Review Board for the request of information. The 1992 Act required the release of all related documents within twenty-five years. In 2017, President Trump, under pressure from the FBI and CIA, placed more than 300 files under additional classification review.21  It is likely that the questions and conspiracy theories will continue until all documents surrounding the various investigations are release.

  1. Encyclopedia Britannica Online, 2020, s.v., “Assassination of John F. Kennedy.”
  2. William H. Webster, “The Lincoln Assassination and its Investigation,” Vital Speeches of the Day, March 15, 1979, 348-349.
  3. Howard P. Willens, History Will Prove Us Right: Inside the Warren Commission Report on the Assassination of John F. Kennedy (New York: The Overlook Press, 2013), 24.
  4. Howard P. Willens, History Will Prove Us Right: Inside the Warren Commission Report on the Assassination of John F. Kennedy (New York: The Overlook Press, 2013), 25.
  5. Howard P. Willens, History Will Prove Us Right: Inside the Warren Commission Report on the Assassination of John F. Kennedy (New York: The Overlook Press, 2013), 25-26.
  6. Howard P. Willens, History Will Prove Us Right: Inside the Warren Commission Report on the Assassination of John F. Kennedy (New York: The Overlook Press, 2013), 25-26.
  7. Encyclopedia Britannica Online. 2020, s.v., “Pearl Harbor and the ‘Back Door to War’ Theory,”
  8. Encyclopedia Britannica Online. 2020, s.v., “Pearl Harbor and the ‘Back Door to War’ Theory,”
  9. Encyclopedia Britannica Online. 2020, s.v., “Pearl Harbor and the ‘Back Door to War’ Theory,”
  10. Encyclopedia Britannica Online. 2020, s.v., “Pearl Harbor and the ‘Back Door to War’ Theory,”
  11. s.v. “J. Edgar Hoover, Controversial Head of the FBI for Five Decades” (accessed: March 29, 2020.)
  12. Lamar Waldron, The Hidden History of the JFK Assassination: The Definitive Account of the Most Controversial Crime of the  Twentieth Century (Berkeley : Counterpoint, 2013), 434.
  13. Howard P. Willens, History Will Prove Us Right: Inside the Warren Commission Report on the Assassination of John F. Kennedy (New York: The Overlook Press, 2013), 42.
  14. Howard P. Willens, History Will Prove Us Right: Inside the Warren Commission Report on the Assassination of John F. Kennedy (New York: The Overlook Press, 2013), 43.
  15. Howard P. Willens, History Will Prove Us Right: Inside the Warren Commission Report on the Assassination of John F. Kennedy (New York: The Overlook Press, 2013), 25-26.
  16. Encyclopedia Britannica Online. 2020, s.v., “The Warren Commission: President Kennedy is Assassinated.”
  17. Jacob Cohen, “Will We Never Be Free of the Kennedy Assassination? Commentary, December 2013, (accessed: March 2, 2020.)
  18. s.v. “How Jackie Kennedy Invented Camelot One Week After JFK’s Assassination.”(access: March 28, 2020.)
  19. s.v. “Why Were the Kennedy Years Called “Camelot?”(accessed: April 1, 2020.)
  20. Encyclopedia Britannica Online, 2020, s.v., “Assassination of John F. Kennedy,” (accessed: March 2, 2020.)
  21. Encyclopedia Britannica Online, 2020, s.v., “Assassination of John F. Kennedy.”

Samuel Enriqure Vega

Author Portfolio Page

Recent Comments


  • Hunter Stiles

    Congrats on the article! It was very well done!I found that it was well-written, interesting, and instructional. Congratulations on winning the Autumn 2020 in the American History category. Because I’ve been studying President Kennedy’s assassination in history class, I can understand how conspiracy theories and tales of espionage may have been concocted. Even though the two killings occurred 114 years apart, I appreciate that Lincoln’s was also addressed because there was a lot of planning behind each of them. Your post did a great job of explaining and delving into the assassination conspiracy theories, showing that there are plausible explanations for why they may be true. Great job!

  • Lyle Ballesteros

    This article is really interesting and highlights an important subject in America and that is conspiracies and conspiracy theorists. They have been around for decades and are maybe more prevlant than they were probably due to the rise of the internet. I find the fascination with trying to fina a conspiracy theory in eveyrthing interesting. Sometimes people ar epeople and make decisions that may not make sense and it doesn’t always have to be a conspiracy but that’s just me.

  • Griffin Palmer

    I always questioned the conspiracy theory around the assassination of JFK. It seems that conspiracy theories have always been relevant in American history dating as far back as FDR knowing about the attack on pearl harbor. While I do not know enough information to give an opinion on these conspiracy theories, I still find them quite interesting to learn about.

  • Sierra Christa

    I love a good conspiracy theory and this was a great article. I firmly believe that conspiracy theories are still being mentioned and believed because they have proven to be factual a handful of times. It seems that there is enough truth to conspiracy theories to make many people question the event as a whole. For me personally, I do not think it was an inside job but it is fascinating to hear about why people think it was.

  • D'vaughn Duran

    Great title with people like myself clicking on this with the word “conspiracy.” This part of history with people having conspiracy about this moment in history sparks so much. This has everyone having an unexpecting shared interest. The JFK assassination had a heavy moment because the moment that led up to that and the death was very fuzzy to many.

  • Guiliana Devora

    I genuinely like the way the author told the story and talked about the conspiracies of the Kennedy assassination. This truly was an event that shocked America and will always be remembered. As a person that was born in 2004, I know how heavy the impact was and how people felt about it and I was born years after the fact of it happening. For me I think conspiracy theories are pretty interesting, but also at the same time I feel people can fall down rabbit holes of conspiracy theories and then it makes it hard for them to distinguish what they want to believe versus what they actually believe.

  • Iris Reyna

    Good job on the article Samuel, it was informative and educational and was put together nicely. Congrats on winning the Fall 2020 in the category of U.S. History. Learning about President Kennedy’s assassination in history class, I can see how people could come up with theories and conspires about his assassination. I like that Lincoln’s assassination was also mentioned when the two are 114 years apart because there is a lot of conspiring around both assassinations. Your article did a really good job of explaining and going into depth about the conspiracies around the assassination and that there are probable causes that they could be true. I remember coming across a video about Kennedy’s assassination and the conspires theories on social media and I can see how people believe that his assassination could be a communist plot. But we truly would never know because it’s true that the government does hide things from its citizens which is very terrifying.

  • Nathaniel Liveris

    I found the persistence and proliferation of conspiracy theories throughout American history in relation to assassinations to be the most interesting part about the article. The reliance on evidence, yet the distrusting surrounding its sources, creates an interesting air of confusion that only spawns more turmoil in the search for the truth. The confusion among government officials also didn’t help with the matters of investigation, and I thought the turmoil among themselves was somewhat funny. Good article!

  • Nathaniel Liveris

    I found the mystery and suspicion surrounding the assassination to be the most interesting part of the article. The reliance on evidence, yet the distrust of the sources it comes from, creates a complex air of conspiracy and paranoia that the article really puts into perspective. The confusion among government officials also added to the already complex theories about what really happened to Kennedy. Very good article!

  • A dose of reality might come from my 500+ page book with 1000+ footnotes. See JFK Assassination Paradoxes: Essays and Reviews (August 2022), available on Amazon. David W. Mantik, MD, PhD

Leave your comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.