Winner of the Fall 2017 StMU History Media Award for
Most Captivating & Engaging Article
Two decades ago, on December 26, 1996, JonBenet Ramsey was found murdered in the basement of her home in Boulder, Colorado. Since the date of her murder, the crime is still unsolved. According to a detective who worked on the case, this murder case was, “one of the most perplexing and notorious murders of the decade.”1 This Christmas will mark the 21st year since the death of this poor little girl, and she deserves finally to rest in peace.
On the morning of December 26, Patricia Ramsey woke up to find a ransom note asking for $118,000 in ransom for her precious daughter JonBenet. As soon as she found the note, she called the Boulder Colorado Police Department to report JonBenet missing. When the police arrived at the Ramsey home, they conducted a search, and JonBenet’s father John found her deceased body in the basement of the home. When they found her, her skull had been beaten into, she had been strangled with a cord, and she had been sexually assaulted. The official cause of death was asphyxia by strangulation and the death was deemed a homicide.2
At the time of JonBenet’s murder, forensics weren’t as accurate as they are today, so the detectives on the case had a hard time finding a clear suspect.3 In this case, many people were questioned and put on the suspect list, including JonBenet’s own family members. There were several theories for who could have done such a terrible thing, and one of those theories was that Patricia and John Ramsey, JonBenet’s parents, were somehow involved in their own daughter’s murder.
The evidence found in this terrible murder case was early thought to be incriminating evidence against the Ramsey’s. The first piece of incriminating evidence was the ransom note itself, found in the Ramsey household. In the ransom note, the “kidnapper” asked for $118,000 in ransom for JonBenet. This amount is close to the amount of John Ramsey’s Christmas bonus of that year. The second fact about the ransom note is that it was written using pen and paper from inside the house, leading to the conclusion that JonBenet was killed only after the ransom note had been written. All of this must have been done while the rest of the Ramsey family was fast asleep. Many things were found suspicious in the ransom note. Many words were misspelled but they weren’t difficult words to spell out. Also, pieces of a practice note were found, causing some to believe that the note was a spoof. Other than the ransom note, detectives were looking for signs of intrusion into the Ramsey home to narrow down the suspect list. The detectives came to find no signs of forced entry as well as no footsteps found in the snow from outside the house. Another piece of evidence was a paintbrush from Patricia Ramsey’s hobby kit that was used to tighten the cord that JonBenet was strangled with.4
Of course, all this evidence does not seem to be in favor of the Ramsey’s, but they were exonerated from the case in 2008.5 While the investigation went on, many tests were done to find JonBenet’s mysterious killer, one of which was a handwriting analysis of John and Patricia Ramsey. The test findings were that John Ramsey was not a match and Patricia Ramsey was found inconclusive.6 Other than the handwriting analysis, DNA was found on JonBenet’s long john pajamas as well as on her underwear. The entire Ramsey family was tested, and no one was a match to the DNA found.7
It’s a relief to know the Ramsey’s were not found to be their daughter’s killer, but there were still many other suspects on the list. Some of these suspects include Bill McReynolds and John Mark Karr. Both of these men were on the suspect list for the murder of JonBenet Ramsey due to strange connections police investigators found. Although neither of these men were ever indicted for the murder of JonBenet Ramsey, there are several theories that connect them to the case.
Bill McReynolds was one of the prime suspects due to the connection he had with the Ramsey family. For Christmas parties the Ramsey’s would host, he would dress up as Santa Claus for the kids to enjoy. Because he knew the Ramsey’s and had been inside their house, the investigators on the case decided to obtain more information on this man and any ties he could have to the murder case. He was also looked at as a suspect because John Ramsey had made a statement in police interviews that said McReynolds could be the one behind her death. There was not much evidence found against Bill McReynolds to hold him accountable for the death of JonBenet. However, some still theorize he could have been the killer due to two disconcerting facts. The first fact is that he was said to have a close connection with JonBenet. A neighbor who attended the Christmas parties had said, “The children loved him. It was obvious that JonBenet and Burke loved him a lot.” 8 Other than this, McReynold’s wife supposedly wrote a play in 1974 where in one of the scenes a child was murdered and their body was left in the basement. This was an automatic red flag for people interested in the murder of JonBenet because as stated before, JonBenet Ramsey was found deceased in the basement of her own home. Although these two horrific details make it easy to point the finger, McReynolds had a confirmed alibi the night of JonBenet’s death and was released from the suspect list.
Besides Bill McReynolds, another man was deemed suspicious of being JonBent’s killer. John Mark Karr another suspect of the JonBenet murder case, was not considered a suspect right away. He was not an initial suspect because he had no former ties to the Ramsey family and no DNA evidence was found that could incriminate him. In 2006, John Mark Karr made a confession to killing JonBenet Ramsey. Immediately after this confession Karr was put as the number one suspect in the murder case of JonBenet. On video, Karr is seen saying things like, “I love JonBenet. And she died accidentally.” When asked what happened when JonBenet died, he said, “Her death was an accident.” The most appalling statement heard in this video is, when John Mark Karr is asked if he is an innocent man, his answer was immediately, “No.” After the confession, investigators immediately jumped on Karr and performed many tests to confirm that he in fact was the killer of JonBenet. Although America was wanting justice for this poor little girl and they thought justice was finally going to be served, John Mark Karr’s confession was considered false. Investigators tested the DNA found on JonBenet’s underwear and found that it was not a match to Karr’s DNA. Other than the negative DNA test, police investigators looked into Karr’s location the night of JonBenet’s death. It was found that Karr had not even been in the state of Colorado that night and was instead, several states away in Georgia. This news eliminated John Mark Karr from the suspect list in the murder case of JonBenet Ramsey. This was a tragic moment in the case because, although everyone concerned with the case wanted justice, they would not convict a man who was not guilty especially if that certain man wanted to be guilty of this innocent girl’s murder.9
This case is indeed one of the most “perplexing” cases in American history and it’s a shame we still have not found justice in this case twenty years later. However, recent studies of the DNA found in this case have been looked over by Dr. Henry Lee, a DNA expert, and due to recent findings, the DNA found on JonBenet’s underwear is flawed. These recent findings have reopened the suspect list to the suspects who were counted out because of negative DNA tests. This means that suspects like John and Patricia Ramsey, Bill McReynolds, and John Mark Karr could still possibly be JonBenet’s murderer. Who could it be? Hopefully with newer DNA technology and the right evidence, investigators will find the killer of JonBenet and the justice JonBenet Ramsey is entitled to will be served two decades after her death.
- Steve Thomas and Don Davis, JonBenet: inside the Ramsey murder investigation (United States: Pan Macmillan, 2001), 12. ↵
- Elizabeth Klaver, Sites of Autopsy in Contemporary Culture (SUNY Press, 2012), 1-2. ↵
- Morgan Moffa and Judith Platania, “From Obsession to Confession: A false confession paradigm in the murder of JonBenet Ramsey,” Applied Psychology in Criminal Justice 4, no. 2 (2008): 229. ↵
- Tom Berman, Andre Paparella, and Alexa Valienete, “Grand Juror Who Saw Original Evidence in JonBenet Ramsey Case Speaks Out,” ABC News (December 2016). ↵
- Carol McKinley, “Ex-DA Opens Up About Why She Cleared the Ramsey Family of JonBenet’s Murder,” ABC News (October 2016). ↵
- Lawrence Schiller, Perfect Murder, Perfect Town (Harper Collins, 1999), 461-462. ↵
- Crime Scene Investigations, 2011, s.v. “DNA and Cold Cases,” by Gail B. Stewart. ↵
- Charlotte Wareing, “Did ‘Santa Claus’ kill six-year-old beauty queen?” Mirror, September 2016. ↵
- Jessica Golden, “Looking Inside the Mind of John Mark Karr,” ABC News, October 2006. ↵
222 comments
Dylan Sanchez
A great article to read that not only covered the death but went over the suspects to let the readers choose from the bunch. My only wish for the author was that she should have put the brother as the suspect. The brother was always known as being an aggressive and out of touch boy, which would explain why the parents would cover his murder and thus led to the mother writing the ransom note. Hopefully with the technology, the world may know soon.
Stephanie Silvola
The death of Jonbenet is indeed sad as well as questionable. How can one plead guilty of a crime that proved that individual innocent? What was Karr’s motive? I had watched a documentary of this case before and it is chilling. With so many clues and a list of suspects, not one evidence led to a founding. Of course no one knows the real story so I won’t blame the parents, but my question is, how can a family be asleep when their daughter was probably screaming and kicking? I hope that future forensics can solve this case and let Jonbenet rest peacefully.
Micaela Cruz
Prior to reading this article, I was familiar with the death and murder investigation of JonBenet Ramsey. This article provided a deeper insight to the investigation, along with the difficulties faced by the police. It baffles me how this case has still gone unsolved, how the murderer of an innocent young girl has not been caught. Her death is a true mystery, and it gives me the impression that somebody in the Ramsey household had to have known something about JonBenet’s death if there was no forced entry into the house. As the author stated, hopefully with new DNA technology, this unfortunate death will receive some justice.
Madeline Torres
The story of JonBenet is in fact a tragedy and extremely heartbreaking. It’s insane how someone can commit such a horrible crime and can still possibly be walking free today. JonBenet indeed deserves justice and hopefully with such advanced technology today, her family and herself can finally get the justice they deserve. Every single person involved with this case somehow raises many questions and i believe they should fight to get their questions answered.
Emily Jensen
JonBenet’s story is an awful tragedy known by many. What a beautiful young girl, I am glad that the case is still open. I had not known of the false confession of John Mark Karr before reading this. How strange that he would falsely confess to such a well-known case like this, I can only imagine he was looking for some sort of fast fame or attention.
Daniela Martinez
The case itself has been unsolved for such a long time, but it is still able to capture the interest of many. The details of this case such as the fake confession and the potential involvement of the girl’s family in the case is truly chilling and raise further questions. While the case seems to be one made for a Hollywood movie, it is unsettling that the article continues to remind the reader that in fact, this was something that happened in the real world to a child who deserved no harm. No child deserves to have its life taken away from them let alone in a horrible way. While the case remains unsolved, the only thing one can hope for is that modern technology can bring answers to this case.
Madison Downing
It’s a tragedy when parent’s have to bury their children and that should never be felt by anyone. What is even worse, is when our little baby is not only murdered but sexually assaulted in our own home and the killer asks for money thinking that you wouldn’t find the body. I can’t believe the parents were on the suspect list, I know it’s only the police taking precautions but still it must have been so heartbreaking because they were already going through so much. I truly hope the case gets reopen or that the police are still trying to look because no one should ever get away with not only destroying a family’s life but taking an innocent child’s life.
Megan Copeland
This article was so sad. JonBenet did not deserve what happened to her at all, and it is sad that her family doesn’t have any answers for what happened to her. Hopefully newer technology will be introduced and they will be able to find her killer. This article was very informative and gave us all of the details of the case. One question I have after reading this is why Karr would make a false confession.
Gabriela Ochoa
I have heard briefly of this case but never knew its true details and what had actually happened to her.the things that happened to her were horrible and her life was taken away to soon. The details o her story and hoe someone could admit to killing her and not actually doing it is interesting. Why would someone admit to hurting a young girl without even doing it and not allowing the police to find the real person who killed her? I think that its good that the case is still open and that the investigators in this case are still trying to find her killer and bring her justice.
Martina Rodriguez
Reminding the readers just how long this case has been unsolved was a chilling choice on the authors part that had the effect I believe was intended. The pieces of evidence were awfully suspicious and it is easy to see how the first suspects were the Ramsey’s. Its very chilling to see just how many suspicious people were involved in the young girls life that ended up being reasonable suspects in her murder. Very odd that Karr would confess to a murder he didn’t commit…but what was more odd was that the DNA was “flawed”. The case could have been very close to being solved if only forensics had been more precise.