United States history is filled with dramatic events and time periods correlating to the vast, wild, and sometimes reckless founding and expansion of Europeans fleeing tyranny in search of freedom. When one thinks about duels now, one may recall the Wild West, which was an aggressive time period where expanding territories remained somewhat lawless. But what if I told you the most infamous duel in US history never took place in any of the Wild West territories, where cowboys carried six-shooters on their hip. No, the most infamous duel in US history took place on a sacred dueling ground known as Weehawken, New Jersey, and was conducted by two Founding Fathers.

I think people tend to forget why the Revolutionary War was fought and the fallout the war caused around the world. In retrospect, it wasn’t all that long ago when revolutionaries decided to fight against tyranny and misrepresentation (of which oppressed people still fight against today). However, U.S. history is far more complex than the Declaration of Independence and the Revolutionary War. After freedom was won, the former colonists were faced with the problem of trying to govern themselves freely. For how can a country have both order and freedom? The ideals seemingly contradict each other, and this is the problem early U.S. politicians had to resolve if they were to create a country stable enough to withstand the test of time. The U.S. needed a strong enough government to protect the liberty of its citizens and maintain some sense of order in the new free world, and on June 21, 1788 the Constitution of the United States was ratified and adopted as the framework to allow the U.S. to govern itself. 1 And yet still, the U.S. was barely getting its legs underneath it. With a newly founded Republic of such size, the U.S. tested unknown waters and challenging social systems that emphasized order culminating with one ruler, one ideology, and a single representative to lead the people. The U.S. established a system that allowed the people to choose their leader, while still practicing their own free beliefs and individual ways of life.

To be a scholar and politician during the early Republic meant that one could possibly play a large role in molding the foundation that would become the United States we know today. Alexander Hamilton, the man on the twenty-dollar bill, was one of these exceptional characters who played a role in developing the United States. Hamilton was born in the British West Indies and orphaned as a child, yet he went on to become the United States’ first Secretary of Treasury in George Washington’s cabinet. He, along with James Madison and John Jay, earlier authored a series of essays then published in newspaper articles detailing their interpretation and counter-arguments to the stances of Anti-Federalist critiques of the Constitution.2 Hamilton also fought in the Revolutionary War, was a delegate that signed the Constitution, and worked with George Washington directly during his presidency. Hamilton helped to establish the U.S. National Bank along with many other accomplishments. This is not to say that he was entirely the most liked, especially with his longtime battle against rival Aaron Burr. Much like Hamilton, Burr was also a respected figure, who also fought in the war alongside George Washington.3 He was also a politician, but most importantly, he lived in New York. Why is this important? Because Hamilton’s rival also lived in New York and they shared plenty of encounters leading up to their fateful morning.

Bronze Statue of Alexander Hamilton by James Earle Fraser, dedicated on May 17th, 1923 | Currently located at the U.S. Treasury Building in Washington D.C. | Courtesy of Flickr

One of the most significant instances came during the 1800 Presidential election. Seeing that Burr and his running mate Thomas Jefferson were both awarded the same number of electoral votes—the vote moved to the House of Representatives to elect the next president of the United States. Alexander Hamilton used his immense influence on the representatives voting to elect Jefferson over Burr. This would be a major blow to Aaron Burr as Jefferson would go onto win the Presidency. Three years into Jefferson’s first term, Jefferson decided to drop Vice President Aaron Burr from his ticket when he runs for reelection. After finding this out, Burr looked for other ways to regain political power. Burr saw an opportunity to be potential presidential candidate in the years following—and in order to do so he ran for the position of New York Governor in 1804 to try and remain within the political elite. In the months leading up to election, newspapers had been publishing critiques of Burr’s character, calling him a “dangerous” man. These words came from none other than Alexander Hamilton, who was still quite relevant and respected for his character and honor. The result of his smear campaign was that Burr lost the election for governor by a large margin to a lesser known candidate, Morgan Lewis, causing animosity to spike in Burr’s eyes.4 Burr had fought in the revolutionary war alongside George Washington. Burr was a war hero, a lawyer, and a founding father, but his humiliating loss in the New York Governor race never left him peace. He felt cheated, smeared, and belittled. He was not going to let his character be slandered by Hamilton’s words, which caused him to write a series of letters to Hamilton asking that he publicly recant his statement about Burr.5 Hamilton refused accordingly, and through a series of letters between the two individuals, the stage was set for arguably the most infamous duel in American history. There was no other way to settle their dispute, and when one’s honor was called into question there is only one appropriate way to settle such a case. Duels were illegal at the time, but this did not seem to stop men of honor from participating. Under such pretense, the two men had agreed to an honorable duel on the sacred dueling grounds of Weehawken, New Jersey on July 11, 1804.

On the early morning of July 11, the two men, accompanied by their “seconds” or trusted person responsible for negotiating duels according to Code Duello, rowed across the Hudson River to the soggy marsh of Weehawken, New Jersey. It was there where both parties met, unable to resolve their issues with words, and they went forward with the duel. Each took their pistol, loaded, and marched 10 paces away, then turned to face each other, to which the “Present!” call was given… What is known is that Hamilton fired first, and missed. Burr followed with his shot, striking Hamilton in the abdomen, a fatal wound. It is important to address the speculation regarding Hamilton’s intent on dueling with Aaron Burr. He allegedly foretold that he would purposely miss his shot at Burr. This is not to say that Hamilton believed that the two would both leave alive—with their issues resolved. No, Hamilton drafted his will and wrote letters to his family members, should anything happen to him.6 ­­­Burr’s shot struck Hamilton in the abdomen, piercing his liver, and lodging in Hamilton’s spine. Aaron Burr had won. Regardless of whether Hamilton was attempting to take Burr’s life, Hamilton missed his shot. Burr did not. Hamilton was rowed back across the Hudson and die slowly over the next day, surrounded by his family at his Manhattan residence.7

Some may find it confusing, that one could partake in a duel over mere words. But remember at the time, honor largely fueled credibility. And on the other hand, it was seen as cowardice to refuse a duel. Alexander Hamilton was no coward and subsequently accepted Burr’s challenge. Who knows, there have even been theories stating Hamilton actually wished to die. The site of the Burr-Hamilton duel was also the site where Hamilton’s son died—partaking in a duel one year prior to the Hamilton-Burr Duel. Maybe it was fate. Maybe it was where Hamilton wished to end his life, in the same place and fashion in which he lost his son. But these are only speculative questions raised after the death of Hamilton. And yet, the story does not end there, because this is not entirely a story of life and death, but rather a story about revenge.

Aaron Burr Self Portrait | Oil on Canvas by John Vanderlyn, 1802 | Currently located in the National Gallery of Art in Washington D.C. | Courtesy of Wikimedia Commons

It can be said that Burr was obsessive, driven to such lengths just to be on the receiving end of political power. It was Burr who challenged Hamilton, because to Burr, Hamilton was an enemy preventing Burr from success! Burr refused to accept the subjective comments made by Alexander Hamilton. Burr had climbed the political ladder and was so close to the Presidency. Burr may have seen his own greed as passion, to go down in history as the man whose ambitions were thwarted by his obscure sense of responsibility. Burr may have unknowingly crossed the fine line that divides passion and obsession to the point where he killed the man who preyed on his downfall. But in that same sense, how was a man to act at that time when faced with such an issue? Burr was also a war hero! A man who was willing to die for the sake of freedom, a man who dedicated his life to liberty! A man who believed in free speech, but also the fact that free speech comes with consequences. Burr was not afraid to die for something he believed in. Perhaps if the duel had taken place some ten to fifteen years prior, it may have been less significant in United States history; but the war was over. Freedom had defeated tyranny, and the new age was to live out that freedom, not to continue bloodshed.

Alexander Hamilton Self Portrait | Oil on Canvas by John Trumbull, 1804 | Currently located in the National Portrait Gallery in Washington D.C. | Courtesy of Wikimedia Commons

On the other hand, Hamilton knew politically he had to accept the duel. He would otherwise be seen as a coward if he did not, and he would lose all credibility if he recanted his comments criticizing Burr. But he also knew that Burr would face backlash if he killed Hamilton, and this is exactly what happened. After Burr killed Hamilton, he faced animosity from the public for killing Hamilton, and he fled South to avoid murder charges. This was not the welcoming that Burr expected for defending himself against a man who had made such egregious claims against him. And with the death of Hamilton marks the inevitable death of Burr’s political career. Perhaps Burr made the wrong move by taking this rivalry too far, but one mistake is all it takes to end one’s life, whether it be figuratively or literally. The rivalry that fueled two men to bring forth such passion in hopes of creating a more perfect Union eventually succumbed to the “death” of both men. While Hamilton lost his life, Burr killed his political career—leading towards a downward spiral before his eventual death in 1836.8

Alexander Hamilton let out his final breaths surrounded by his family, dying 36 hours after the duel. He was remembered as a war hero, a scholar, an example of a true American. Born overseas and orphaned, Hamilton worked tirelessly and lived to become a wealthy man— a fine representation of what is now considered the American Dream. Hamilton came from nothing and died a Founding Father whose work was revered and essential to forming the building blocks of the newly founded United States. He was a man who was willing to die for free speech and wound up doing exactly that—a  tragic end to the lives of two honorable men who were essential in establishing the country we now call home. Both men were responsible for conducting a duel, and both would pay for their participation. It is in fact honorable that both men would die for their beliefs and opinions, but at the cost of their own lives is a tragedy indeed. Aaron Burr and Alexander Hamilton, two men who would compete until the very end defending their honor. But in their final battle, both would lose.


“Never do today what you can put off till tomorrow. Delay may give clearer light as to what is best to be done”

-Aaron Burr


“I have thought it my duty to exhibit things as they are, not as they ought to be.”

-Alexander Hamilton

  1. John R. Vile, The Writing and Ratification of the U.S. Constitution: Practical Virtue in Action (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2012) 171-174.
  2. Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, John Jay, The Federalist Papers (New York: Bantam, 1982).
  3. Teri Kanefield, Alexander Hamilton: The Making of America (New York: Abrams Books for Young Readers, 2017).
  4.  Thomas N. Baker, “‘An Attack Well Directed’ Aaron Burr Intrigues for the Presidency,” Journal of the Early Republic 31, no. 4 (Winter 2011): 553-54.
  5. To Alexander Hamilton from Aaron Burr, 22 June 1804, Founders Online, National Archives, https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Hamilton/01-26-02-0001-0212. Original source: The Papers of Alexander Hamilton, vol. 26, 1 May 1802 – 23 October 1804, Additional Documents 1774–1799, Addenda and Errata, ed. Harold C. Syrett (New York: Columbia University Press, 1979),  255–256.
  6. To Alexander Hamilton from Aaron Burr, 22 June 1804, Founders Online, National Archives, https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Hamilton/01-26-02-0001-0212. Original source: The Papers of Alexander Hamilton, vol. 26, 1 May 1802 – 23 October 1804, Additional Documents 1774–1799, Addenda and Errata, ed. Harold C. Syrett (New York: Columbia University Press, 1979),  293.
  7. Thomas Fleming, “Duel,” in Alexander Hamilton, Aaron Burr and the Future of America (New York, NY: Perseus Books, 1999), 333.
  8. Thomas Fleming, “Duel,” in Alexander Hamilton, Aaron Burr and the Future of America (New York, NY: Perseus Books, 1999), 400-406.

Tags from the story

49 Responses

  1. This was a really great article! Like many people, my only exposure to the duel was from the musical, and that doesn’t show the full scope of their relationship like you did here. There was so much build-up to this duel; it was years and years of rivalry and tension. It is really interesting to see that even though Hamilton was the one who, in Burr’s mind, did the unforgivable act of hindering his career, he is the one who is regarded as a “true” American. Burr is often villainized for simply defending himself from what he saw as an attack on his pride and his livelihood. I really like how you tied the events leading up to the duel to the conclusion of them both losing in the end, even though it is in different ways.

  2. When one sees anything about Alexander Hamilton, they automatically think of the musical Hamilton (which is fair, it’s one of the best musicals of all time.) You successfully diverted away from that, and focused on one singular event, and an interesting one at that! There is a lot to be said about this duel, and I think you told the story in a very poignant way. Good job! However, I will say that Hamilton is on the ten-dollar bill, not the twenty. There was something else I saw too, but I forgot. I do like though how you tell Burr’s side too. Most people tend to side with Hamilton because he was the one who was actually killed in the duel, but Burr was just as important of a Founding Father. All in all, good job!

  3. It amazes me how disputes couldn’t be settled with communication during these times. On one hand, Burr did try and ask Hamilton to stop saying such things about him, on the other hand, once Hamilton refused Burr resorted to what he knew best. It confuses me how Burr thought that killing Hamilton would lead to anything other than disgrace since Hamilton was such a well known and loved individual. However, there’s no changing the past. Hamilton and Burr chose their fate by letting their pride and egos get in they way which ultimately lead to both of their down falls.

  4. Overall, I would say that this is a very well thought out, well written article on the famous duel that took place between the two founding fathers. first of all, the way you went into detail about the duel and the events leading up to it were formidable. I do not feel like you skimped out on any details. Furthermore, you gave a good explanation on how both Hamilton and Burr lost that duel. albeit in different ways. Well done.

  5. While the article had minor errors, I would say it had helped explained more of the outcome from the Hamilton-Burr duel that history books have stated from what we knew till now. This kind of behavior is to be expected back in this time period and somewhat holds true today but of course we aren’t doing much of that now in the 21st century to defend one’s position. However given the circumstances between both parties I can agree that neither party was gonna win the duel cleanly, either what happened to Burr or Hamilton’s reception if he decided to just shoot Burr and have him dead. It also explains a bit of how dueling worked back then and where it took place, what happened and the result from it to which we don’t see much or skim in a regular history class. I believe the article was done pretty well in describing this time in history and brought a bit of new knowledge into what the history of the early US was in elections and such between people.

  6. I remember in my History class, during high school, my professor tells us about the duel between Alexander Hamilton and Aaron Burr. It is fascinating how duels were started to being make by individuals long before the Wild West. And more fascinating that one of the first duels was between two founding fathers. Thanks Nathan Alba for writing this article.

  7. My first time watching the Broadway show ‘Hamilton’, was the first time I heard about the Hamilton-Burr duel. What I did not know was how much back story and drive Burr had just to be in a position of power. It is crazy to think somebody would be so obsessed with power to the point to take another man’s life. I also find it interesting how there is so much speculation around the duel. It would be strange to think that Hamilton knew what his goal was going into the duel. Maybe grief struck him so hard that he wanted to die in the same spot his son did.

    Good job!

  8. It’s sad that both of them let their pride lead them to such a bad ending for both of them. They both had consequences of the duel, Hamilton’s life was lost and Burr lost his respect. This article was well written and balanced. Rather than focusing on Hamilton’s side of the story, I appreciated reading Burr’s side as well.

  9. Ive always found Alexander Hamiltons story to be interesting, especially after the release of the musical. Its very weird to think that stubbornness and pride lead to a mans death, especially considering his son defending his pride cost him his life too. This article was captivating and informative. I loved reading it, even though it was about something I already knew about.

  10. This is such a well written engaging article. Very captivating and informative. This historical duel shows such pride, stubbornness, and American leadership. As interesting as it is, it has such an extremely unfortunate ending. Both sides lost in one way or another. I thoroughly enjoyed the perspectives and reasoning behind each of the men’s views that went into such a duel. Job well done! Enjoyed it!

Leave a Reply to Mariah Podwika Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.