For centuries women have fought against numerous injustices forced upon them because of their gender. Some of these injustices include the right to be seen as an equal to men, the right to vote, and the right for equal pay, along with many more. Although women have succeeded in breaking down some of these barriers, there are still many inequalities being fought today. During the seventeenth century, there was one woman in particular who battled in opposition to social injustice: Anne Hutchinson. This article is about the life of a brave woman who opposed an unfair law forbidding men and women from freely practicing their religion, and who also challenged the preposterous roles women were limited to in the religious community.
Anne Hutchinson, maiden name Anne Marbury, was born July 20, 1591, in Alford, England. She was the daughter of a midwife and a Cambridge scholar who published many unorthodox religious texts. In fact, Francis Marbury’s teachings were banned from where he was a teacher, at Saint Wilfred’s School in Alford. After vigorous pleading, Marbury was able to have the ban lifted, and he began teaching again in 1602. 1 Perhaps this is where Anne inherited her tenacious spirit to express her opinion. In 1605, at the young age of fourteen, Anne and her family moved to London for her father’s new position as rector of Saint Martin’s Vintry, leaving behind Anne’s boyfriend, a tailor named William Hutchinson. After the death of Anne’s father in 1611, Hutchinson moved to London to be with Anne; the next year the two were married. That same year, the newlywed bride returned to Alford where her husband continued his tailor business, and Anne followed in her mother’s footsteps as a midwife. Anne and William went on to raise thirteen children together in Alford. 2
In 1612, newly ordained Puritan minister John Cotton began preaching at Saint Botolph’s Church in Boston, Lincolnshire, not far from Alford where Anne Hutchinson resided. His unique approach greatly intrigued Hutchinson. 3 Cotton’s preaching and his understandings of religion reminded Anne of her father’s teachings. Anne enjoyed Cotton’s work so much, that in 1633, when Cotton immigrated to New England, Anne convinced her husband to move there as well. In 1634, Anne and her family made the long transition to Massachusetts. 4
The following year, in 1635, Hutchinson began holding weekly gatherings in her home to discuss minister Cotton’s sermons. Anne and her followers addressed their beliefs of sheer grace as opposed to the Calvinist theological viewpoint of predestination. Hutchinson and her followers believed that God alone grants salvation to whomever He believes is worthy of His grace, without human interaction. The clergy in New England taught that people could gain God’s grace by willingly performing various covenant conditions, such as performing good deeds, reciting prayers, attending church, along with other forms of religious practice. 5 Anne’s critics called her teachings Antinomianism. The Greek word is translated as “hostile to the law.” Anne provoked the colony leaders by proclaiming that members of their clergy who had not undergone a conversion experience had no authority to be held responsible for the spiritual offices of the colony. She also brought attention to the common yet unfair assumptions of women’s roles within Puritan society. 6 Anne’s following continued to grow, and it became so significant that in the 1636 governor’s election, the colony prevented the reelection of the current governor John Winthrop, and elected Sir Henry Vane the Younger into office. Sir Henry was an outspoken supporter of Anne’s movement, and he was a strong supporter of the anti-Winthrop movement.
Anne’s rising popularity caused three major problems for the colonial leaders. First, Anne’s gatherings paralleled preaching, which was strictly limited to those with a licence, and was absolutely forbidden to women. Second, the New England clergy was putting forth great effort in order to establish a unified church. Anne’s teachings contradicted their efforts. Third, Anne’s supporters consisted of both men and women. This act challenged the status quo of men being the only influential figures within society. 7 Never before had a woman caused so much trouble for authority figures, nor had a woman been the leader of a huge support of individuals.
The turning point of Anne’s momentum occurred during the governor election in May 1637, when former governor John Winthrop was reelected to office. It is not difficult to understand why Winthrop put Hutchinson on trial for heresy when he took office in November. 8 Winthrop was desperate to regain social order within the colony. The trial was held publicly to make an example out of Hutchinson, to show what happens to those who oppose the church and therefore oppose the colonial leadership. Anne surprised many with her witty banter and intellectual remarks. She defended herself quite impressively, proving her knowledge of the Bible and religious laws, and also by providing evidence demonstrating that her accused charge was based on more circumstantial evidence than proven facts of illegal activity. For example, the court tried to charge her with sedition, or an action suggesting discontent or rebellious actions against the government. Hutchinson made it clear that expressing opinions and holding conversations within a women’s meeting was not an illegal act. The statements made within those meetings were confidential because they were held in the privacy of her home. The spectacle of a self-educated woman verbally battling a governor who was a Cambridge scholar on an equal level was unheard of. Despite Hutchinson’s efforts, she was still convicted and banished from the colony. Anne was at a disadvantage from the start with civil officers, elected deputies, and clergymen represented as the jury in the trial. 9 After the verdict, Anne, her family, and a few loyal followers migrated to Rhode Island for a short while before settling in the Dutch colony of New Netherlands, which subsequently became New York. In 1643, Anne and her family became victims of an Indian uprising and were killed during the attack.
Anne Hutchinson is seen as one of the first female feminist who fought for religious freedom. Anne’s actions represent a right established to us as Americans in 1791. The first amendment to the Constitution established the freedoms of religion, assembly, speech, press, and petition. Anne’s reasons for refusing to conform to colonial authorities were reasonable and respectable. She was not the only person to fight for individual freedoms; but her courageous start led the way for others to fight against injustices too.
- John R. Holmes, “Anne Hutchinson,” Salem Press Biographical Encyclopedia (January 2016), 1. ↵
- Holmes, “Anne Hutchinson,” 1. ↵
- Francis J. Bremer, “John Cotton,” Salem Press Biographical Encyclopedia (2016), 1. ↵
- Holmes, “Anne Hutchinson,” 1. ↵
- James F. Cooper, Jr., “Anne Hutchinson and the ‘Lay Rebellion’ against the Clergy,” The New England Quarterly, Inc 61, no. 3 (September 1988): 382-383. ↵
- Alan Brinkley, American History, 15th ed., vol. 1: to 1865 (2 Penn Plaza, New York, NY 10121: McGraw Hill Education, 2015), 45. ↵
- Holmes, “Anne Hutchinson,” 1. ↵
- Alan Brinkley, American History, 45. ↵
- Lisa McGunigal, “The Criminal Trial of Anne Hutchinson: Ritual, Religion, and Law,” Mosaic: A Journal for the Interdisciplinary Study of Literature 49, no. 2 (June 2016): 1-8. ↵
133 comments
Elliot Avigael
I didn’t know anything about Ann Hutchinson, outside of assisting a friend on a brief history assignment and perhaps covering her in high school. Just by the way you describe her in your article, I’m almost imagine her to be a sort of Martin Luther King Jr. (for Puritan society). What was surprising to me is that there were so many others in the society around her that felt the same way, considering how much of a following she had. It is disappointing that her life had to end in such an undignified method, but I think the fact that she had the chutzpah to stand up to the rigid social structure imposed by the Church really left its mark on history.
Samuel Vega
This article was very informative. I did not know about Anne Hutchinson and appreciated how the author explained the role of women in the 1600s. I agree Hutchinson was an early feminist. I liked how the author describes Hutchinson and her style, particularly at her trial. The article reminds me of the injustices that women have faced for hundreds of years.
Travis Green
I was not aware of Anne Hutchinson before I read this and I have to say that I admire her for not backing down and standing up for her right to practice religion. I also have to say well done for making this article interesting and engaging. I wasn’t bored while reading and I felt like I actually learned something about this historical figure that I previously knew nothing about.
Claudia Sanchez
Great article that mentions a religious freedom figure that is rarely ever mentioned when learning about the foundations of religious toleration in the United States. Anne Hutchinson was portrayed greatly in this article and I appreciate the author’s look into Anne’s bringing up to explain why she believed in what she did. The photos used by the author illustrate Anne perfectly in her glory as a great orator and add to her characterization.
Carlos Hinojosa
Great article and it brought light to feminism that it’s been fighting since the beginning of America and is still fighting to this day. Honestly I never have heard of her before that I can remember and if I did it was probably a brief sentence on her. So, I thought it was interesting to learn something about feminism and our country’s history. Besides that and I like I said before great article and good read.
Sabrina Drouin
This was such an interesting article, especially since it could’ve been seen as one of the sparks for feminism. I heard her name before, but I never knew that she was a preacher. It’s crazy to think about how courageous that was, especially since she was a woman, if she was in England, it probably would’ve been off with her head. It’s cool to think about how her work influenced some of our documents that we still use today, like the first amendment that was mentioned at the end of the article.
Edgar Cruz
I admire that you used a source that was focused on Ane herself. I think the introduction itself drew me into the article because it clearly addresses an issue present in our modern-day world. I find the strong narrative style quite easy to follow and very comprehensive, as well. The foot notes of the pictures are quite easy to comprehend and keep the reader engaged and entertained. Overall, the article was interesting, and it just seems impossible to believe that women used to live in those social inequalities.
Christopher Metta Bexar
A well written and thought out article. We need more of these in history courses. Even in the 21st century the history of women and their accomplishments is ignored.
Anne Hutchison stood up not only for women but the disenfranchised of her time and religious background, against what might be today considered an intolerant and theocratic society.
As many of us know the New England and North American colonies were formed by those fleeing the Church of England’s intolerance of Catholics and dissenters from the position of the official church of the land. Unfortunately the New England colonies themselves became a theocracy
Martha Nava
I really loved reading your article Mia! I have never heard of Anne Hutchison before, so I learned a lot from you. I think you took a lot of time researching which really shows in your article. I think Anne Hutchinson is a really important figure for women at the time. I also liked the picture of the statue you had because it shows the extent of her importance to this day and her persistence for woman’s equality.
Aaron Onofre
This article really shows the passion and determination of Anne Hutchinson. Her passion led her to immigrate to a new, unknown area for her love for biblical teachings. Though it was her determination that caused to make such a uproar in the name of religious freedom. Her unapologetic attitude towards those in authority to speak the truth is truly inspiring, especially in today’s age.