StMU Research Scholars

Featuring Scholarly Research, Writing, and Media at St. Mary's University
May 10, 2018

Devastation: The Mexico City Earthquake of 1985

“It is 7:19 am with 32 seconds central Mexico Time. It is still shaking a little, but let’s remain calm and wait a second so we can—…” These were the last words the people of Mexico City heard from Lourdes Guerrero, the face of Televisa’s morning news before their televisions cut to static. The next ninety seconds would not only change Mexico City forever but it would define a whole generation’s governmental standards.1

For the people of the Mexican capital, Thursday September 19, 1985 began like any other day. It was 53 degrees; the sky was clear, and at just a little after 7:00 am, children were arriving at schools, adults were going to work, and the city was beginning to wake up for another day.2 Suddenly at 7:19 am, the worst earthquake to ever strike the city unleashed on the Mexican people, and for ninety seconds, the capital experienced the full force of mother nature. Measuring 8.1 on the Richter scale, the earthquake moved whole concrete buildings and crushed entire apartment complexes, effectively trapping the people inside.3

Rescue volunteer | September 1985 |Courtesy of Owen Franken/ CORBIS

Prior to the arrival of the Spaniards in 1521, the Aztecs had built their capital, Tenochtitlan, over Lake Texcoco. “Over the years, this man-made island has paid the price for building over a lake with soft soil. Every year since its establishment, Mexico City has been steadily sinking into the fragile soil,” and when earthquake waves arrive in the areas around the city, they are amplified by a factor of 100, causing the damage to be worse than it would be in any other soil.4 On the morning that terror struck, Mexico City felt the magnitude of an earthquake that developed off the coast of Michoacán. The earthquake waves reached the capital with a magnitude of 8.1 on the Richter scale, but created much greater damage than any other earthquake before.5

After the earthquake, the citizens began to assess the damage and the long and difficult road towards recovery. Almost instinctively, they started moving rocks and debris from people and liberating some who were trapped.6 Within hours, the citizens noticed the poor response from the government, especially from president Miguel De la Madrid, who had not publicly spoken about the tragedy. As the day went on, the number of people missing increased as well as the impatience of the citizens as police and the military were unable to get organized and froze, leaving the relief efforts completely in the hands of the citizens.7

In the north of the city, the General Hospital had lost its entire OBGYN (obstetrician and Gynecology) wing, trapping mothers who had just given birth as well as their new born babies. Sylvia Reyna, a nurse working at the hospital, gave her testimony about how doctors, nurses, and anyone who was willing to help rushed to start looking for survivors. “Every time someone got out alive, we cheered and celebrated with happiness, but when we pulled a lifeless body, everyone was silent.”8 Scenes like this one were not isolated. All throughout the city there was more than 100,000 homes and buildings destroyed by the earthquake that ultimately trapped people inside. Famous city landmarks, like the famous Regis Hotel and the country’s most important television network headquarters, had been crushed, ultimately cutting the city’s most important form of communication with the outside world. Although the death toll for the first day is still unknown, many believe the number is in the tens of thousands.9

Regis Hotel ruins September 21, 1985 | Courtesy of Derrick Ceyrac/Getty Image

With over 250,000 people left without a home, and no response from the government, the citizens united to take over the search and rescue to find those who were missing.10 Women brought pots and pans and cooked for the volunteers, doctors and nurses created makeshift hospitals to treat the injured, and crime was controlled by the citizens. The first 24 hours after the earthquake put incredible pressure on the government to respond, and as media outlets around the world started spreading the news of the earthquake, the pressure put on the president was raised.

Without the government’s assistance, various groups like the now famous Topos de Tlatelonco formed in order to help dig out people. Although nowadays the Topos are an established organization famous for their heroic assistance all around the world, in 1985 they were just a citizen-based group volunteering to help the people still trapped inside the buildings. During the terrible earthquake in 1985, these men and women earned the nickname “topos,” which means “moles,” for their incredible ability to go into the rubble to help those inside. Today, more than thirty years after the tragedy in Mexico City, this official organization has traveled all across the world to help in disasters, such as the earthquake in Haiti in 2010, and the Tsunami in Indonesia of 2004.11

The progress of the initial day was incredibly inspiring as hundreds of people had been rescued and the city was united to overcome the terrible tragedy. However, they were not prepared for the 7.1 magnitude aftershock that arrived 36 hours after the initial quake. On the evening of September 20, as many citizens dug in the ruins of apartment complexes and wandered around the city looking for their loved ones, the capital was struck with another earthquake that completely halted the recovery and forced many to start over. The aftershock made the buildings that had earlier collapsed settle, which made it much harder to rescue those who were still trapped. Although the damage from the second quake was incalculable, the second earthquake left citizens more afraid and scared than the first one. Citizens once again flooded the streets and dropped to their knees to pray for it to stop.12

With yet another earthquake, and pressure from his people, President Miguel De la Madrid first spoke publicly about the earthquake three entire days after the initial earthquake happened. His response outraged the citizens as De la Madrid downplayed the number of injured and dead in front of the world media and refused to accept aid from countries around the world who offered to help.13 One of his initial responses was also to send the military and police to disrupt the progress citizens had made by blocking off many buildings and restricting access to volunteer groups such as the Topos de Tlatelonco. By doing so, he effectively stopped the search and rescue of hundreds of individuals who were still trapped and injured days after the quake.14 His actions only angered the people more, and many citizens recalled the soldiers actively looting in the ruins of hotels and apartment buildings, taking all the safe boxes and jewels they could find.

Nuevo Leon residential building September 19, 1985 | Courtesy of MexicoNewsDaily.com

Although the exact death toll was never given, some estimate it to be between 10,000-40,000.15 In the aftermath of the historic earthquake, the government was forced to implement building safety codes and regulations as well as an early-earthquake alarm system to ensure people will get out of structures safely. Similarly, after incredible pressure from citizens and other countries, Mexico ultimately accepted help from the United States, insuring that people would receive the much needed help. Nowadays in Mexico City and in the surrounding municipalities, people continue to regularly practice evacuation. Schools and offices hold earthquake drills regularly to ensure the events of 1985 won’t happen again.

The citizens did their best to move on, and return to normalcy as soon as possible. Despite living among the incredible destruction, they went to mass, they returned to work, they began reconstruction and prayed for those who were still missing. Now more than thirty years after the terrible events brought the capital to its knees, the damaged areas show no evidence of the destruction, with only monuments left to remind them of the tragedy that took place.16

  1. Encyclopedia of Latin American History and Culture, June 2008, s.v. “Earthquakes,” by Jürgen Buchenau.
  2. “Weather history for MMMX Thursday September 19, 1985,” Weather underground, Accessed April 12, 2018. https://www.wunderground.com/history/airport/MMMX/1985/9/19/DailyHistory.html?&reqdb.zip=&reqdb.magic=&reqdb.wmo=.
  3. Elena Poniatowska, Nothing nobody: the voices of the Mexico City Earthquake (Philadelphia, Temple University press, 1995), 13.
  4. Michael Kimmelman, “Mexico City, parched and sinking, faces a water crisis,” The New York Times (New York City, NY), February 17, 2017;  Lucy Jones, interview by Judy Woodruff, PBS News Hour: Why Mexico City is vulnerable to earthquakes, September 20,2017.
  5. Historical Dictionary of Mexico, 2008, s.v. “Earthquake of 1985,” by Marvin Alisky.
  6. Alan Riding, “A year after the quake, Mexico City Is on the mend,” The New York Times (New York City, NY), September 20, 1986.
  7. Daniel Hernandez, “The 1985 Mexico City Earthquake, Remembered,” Los Angeles Times, September 20, 2010.
  8. Elena Poniatowska, Nothing nobody: the voices of the Mexico City Earthquake (Philadelphia, Temple University press, 1995), 19.
  9. Encyclopedia of Urban Studies, 2010, s.v. “Mexico City, Mexico: History of the city,” by Adrian Guillermo Aguilar and Ailasa Winton.
  10. Encyclopedia Britannica, September 20, 2017, s.v. “Mexico City earthquake of 1985.”
  11. “Historia,” Brigada de rescate Topos de Tlatelonco, accessed April 10, 2018. http://www.topos.mx/nosotros/historia.
  12. Rosalía Guerrero, interview by Guillermo Guerrero, La replica del 20 de Septiembre de 1985, Chilango, September 18, 2015.
  13. Elena Poniatowska, Nothing nobody: the voices of the Mexico City Earthquake (Philadelphia, Temple University press, 1995), 24. 
  14. “El Universal,” Miguel De La Madrid, El Presidente ‘ausente’ En Tragedia Del 85 | Red Política – El Universal. September 19, 2004. Accessed April 13, 2018. http://www.redpolitica.mx/nacion/miguel-de-la-madrid-el-presidente-ausente-en-tragedia-del-85.
  15. Alan Riding, “A year after the quake, Mexico City Is on the mend,” The New York Times (New York City, NY), September 20, 1986.
  16. David Adler, “The Mexico City earthquake, 30 years on: have lessons been forgotten?,” The Guardian (Mexico City, Mexico), September 18, 2015.

Carlos Vazquez

Author Portfolio Page

Recent Comments

47 comments

  • Mariah Garcia

    An earthquake at the magnitude it was in Mexico 1985 was terrifying. During this tragic time when the citizens in Mexico City needed help, they were left to pick up the pieces on their own. The government, especially the president of Mexico Miguel De la Madrid, didn’t act quickly. How sad is that for the citizens to be the ones to clean up? The death toll could’ve been less but without the quick action of the government, the death toll was more than it should’ve been. But, in the end the citizens of Mexico City were able to stay strong, come together and help one another through this tragic time.

  • Lyzette Flores

    My mom was living in Mexico at the time and she said that this tragic event traumatized the citizens all around the country. She couldn’t imagine that there was not one but two earthquakes back to back. Just reading this article made me very upset because the president did not take action right away. It seemed as he didn’t care. How can he take three days after the first earthquake to speak publicly? I am very glad though that after a while the citizens of Mexico tried their best to move on.

  • Lamont Traylor

    From what I have learned in school, Mexico is prone to getting a lot of earthquakes. This particular one was an 8.1 on the richter scale which is pretty insane. For a comparison, people can look at the Japan earthquake that caused the nuclear plants to fail which was only .9 more points on the scale than this one, coming in at a 9 on the scale.

  • Peter Coons

    I never knew the extent of the governments liability during this disaster. With what the president ordered, it’s almost a human rights violation. The fact that military and police forces prevented civilian and private rescues to, I assume, save face for the governmental response is sickening. The toll of those who died may very well have been reduced if the government acted with the peoples interests in mind. A great article on a terrible event.

  • Alexandra Lujan

    My mom being from Mexico she would tell me about the earthquake that took place in 1985, and it saddens me dearly thinking that 250,000 lost everything they had and did not know what to do, and also sad how the exact death toll was never given. Amazing how they were able to overcome a tragedy like this.

  • Christopher Hohman

    Nice article. I did not know about the famous earthquake that struck mexico city in September of 1985. It is a terrible tragedy that struck at the hearts of all the people of Mexico City. The poor reaction from the government is a think a thing that unfortunately still takes place in Mexico today. There are many instances of corruption in the police force and other government positions. Still the people of Mexico city overcame all this and the structures were rebuilt. The country has a great people

  • Bictor Martinez

    I never heard of this event that took place in Mexico before reading this article. I can not imagine the poor people losing all their homes, work, and family members. Just thinking of an earthquake of that scale hitting me cannot be bearable. My respect for the group Topos de Tlatelonco. These individuals risk their lives in order to save others instead of fleeing. I would be extremely mad at the president if I was a Mexican citizen at the time. The president prevented the citizens of Mexico from saving others, but instead ordered the troops to gather all the jewels that were left from the citizens. That is just horrible.

  • Aneesa Zubair

    The first paragraph of this article captured my attention, and the video of the reporter being cut off was scary, too. The images showed the devastation a magnitude 8.1 earthquake can bring, especially when the buildings aren’t strong enough to withstand them and the government doesn’t step in to help. I thought it was really interesting when you explained how the way Mexico City was built in ancient times made the ground unstable and amplified earthquakes by a factor of 100. My uncle and aunt live in Mexico City, and I remember how terrifying it was when an earthquake hit the area last year – coincidentally, on the 32nd anniversary of the earthquake described in this article. Thankfully, they were safe, but it really brought Mexico City’s vulnerability to earthquakes to my attention, and your article helped my understand why it is so vulnerable.

  • Hailey Rodriguez

    Before reading this article, I had no idea of the severe destruction this earthquake brought to Mexico. I also had no idea that the Mexican government failed to give a response to the tragedy until days later. I don’t understand why the president would refuse help from outside organizations. I truly can’t imagine the damage the people had gone through, many of them searching for missing loved ones and suffering their own injuries.

  • Mariah Cavanaugh

    Amidst the heartbreak and devastation, it is genuinely heartwarming to see how the community banded together to help each other. You referenced the fact that the government was forced to implement building safety codes and install early-earthquake alarm systems. I grew up in California where we dealt with earthquakes on a regular basis, and I had no idea that early-earthquake alarms existed. I’m glad to read that this tragedy was not forgotten, there were changes made to prevent further loss of life if another devastating earthquake hits again.

Leave your comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.