Winner of the Spring 2019 StMU History Media Award for
Best Article in the Category of “African and African-American History”
New York City in the 1930s was a very different city from the sprawling metropolis we know and love today. At the time, Charles “Lucky” Luciano was one of New York’s most notorious mobsters. Under his leadership, his gang killed off any and all competition, reorganizing crime in New York City under a new and empowered criminal empire. With consolidated power, Luciano was able to bring everyone from politicians and judges to the police under his control. At the same time, seemingly in another world from the newly-formed mob that ran New York City, lived one Eunice Carter. Eunice Carter graduated from law school in 1934 and became the first African American woman to pass the New York State Bar.1 As powerful as Luciano was, Eunice ultimately brought his reign over the New York City underworld to an end through her tireless investigation and pursuit of solid leads generated from her experience as an attorney. Yet, as soon as she had collected enough evidence to lead to Lucky Luciano’s arrest, she was excluded from the prosecuting task force that was selected by her boss to secure Luciano’s conviction—relegating her major role in the arrest to the ever-expanding background of history.2
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/446b6/446b63ca6060545ba5fea2661057308fd26dc281" alt=""
Citizens of the Big Apple were getting fed up with the growing criminal activity and the lack of actions taken by their city officials. In 1935, New York City grand jurors took it upon themselves to mobilize public opinion for a thorough investigation of the rackets, which included gambling and the corruption of local police and politicians. It would come to be called the “runaway grand jury” because of their eventual break with then District Attorney William C. Dodge. The grand jury began calling their own witnesses to advance their investigation, and, due to its massive popularity, foreman Lee Thompson Smith eventually took charge of the inquiry and demanded the District Attorney appoint a special prosecutor to the case: one Thomas E. Dewey.4
Dewey took the job, under the condition, namely, that he be allowed to hire his own staff and that his office be separate from the District Attorney’s office. His requests were quickly granted, and his office was set up on the 14th floor of the Woolworth building, and became “an impenetrable fortress with untappable phones, tamper proof filing cabinets, venetian blinds to prevent telescope equipped gangsters from spying on informants, while plainclothes detectives patrolled the lobby 24/7.”5
During his investigation, Dewey received more than his fair share of applicants—many attorneys vied for such an honorable position. Thomas Dewey personally vetted each attorney and conducted each interview himself to prevent any criminal interference in the process. Eunice Carter was one applicant in a line of hundreds, but she had a background that would impress even Dewey. Eunice was a graduate from Smith College and Fordham University Law School, and, in 1934, she was the first African American to gain the Republican Nomination for New York’s 19th district in the State Assembly. Only one year later, she was appointed by Mayor Fiorella LaGuardia as secretary on the “Committee on Conditions” in Harlem.6 Eunice’s extensive credentials appealed to Dewey, who quickly hired her onto his team.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/248dd/248dd7b0b1845757ecdf1b99d414a3d22e90ce9e" alt=""
For weeks, Eunice sat in her office and empathized with concerned citizens while taking down their complaints. During that time, she was visited by everyone from businessmen to female parolees and sex workers. One parolee, who went unnamed, reported to Eunice that she tried repeatedly to get the police to act on information she had supplied about a violent gang that sold narcotics and procured women. Eunice noted in her memorandum that the woman seemed just as scared of the police as she had of the gang. After a while, Eunice noticed a certain air of similarity between the stories that she was hearing.11 She was consistently hearing from New Yorkers who stated that, despite their visits to the police to file multiple complaints, they simply did nothing about the brothels next door. Madams operated houses with impunity, and the police were being paid off to drive competitors out of town. One Madam, Sally Kaplan, generated numerous complaints to Eunice that Kaplan’s brothel was protected by the local police precinct who shut down her competition. She was asking herself how every brothel in the city could be protected.12
Very quickly, Eunice began to see the bigger picture underlying each complaint. There were too many commonalities in the stories she was hearing to excuse. It was at this time that she recalled an oddity from her time as a volunteer assistant in the Women’s Court, where a lawyer by the name of Abe Karp often showed up on behalf of girls being charged with prostitution. Karp was a high-end lawyer, and he repeatedly represented low-end sex workers who were not capable of affording his services.13 As she looked over transcripts, she saw an unsettling pattern—when put on the stand, all of the women being charged with prostitution would say the same thing, that “they were innocent working girls from out of town visiting old friends at houses whose purpose they were unaware of.” The story was told in exactly the same manner so many times that Eunice was sure it couldn’t be true.14
Using the threads of connection between her experiences, Eunice began to investigate further into the patterns she was seeing. As the confidence in her suspicions grew, Eunice eventually confided them in Murray Gurfien, one of Dewey’s top assistants. She laid out her suspicions to him and together they approached Dewey, who met them with skepticism for two reasons: the first was that Dewey was sure of the fact that it would be impossible for prostitution to be under centralized control—there were too many brothels, too many madams and girls in the business for them to all be run by one syndicate; and second, he worried that if he investigated prostitution, he would not be seen as a gangbuster, but as the morality police.15
Eunice appealed to Dewey by laying out the ways in which prostitution had changed over the past two years. It went from being a trade that women took part in on their own or in a group, to usually being run by a madam who paid the girls a salary. Bookers (pimps) were on the rise and worked with 100 or more girls, and they would move the girls between houses, because customers liked variety. The girls paid part of their earnings to the madam and part to the booker. The summer of 1933 was when prostitution took a turn. Eunice uncovered the fact that in addition to paying the booker and the madam, each girl had to make a payment of $10.00 a week as a bonding fee. This guaranteed that if she was arrested, she would not go to jail. Eunice’s research ultimately showed that the high-end lawyers representing these women never lost a case.16
Still, Dewey’s initial response was to tell his investigators to stop following that trail. However, as things grew more desperate, Gurfein successfully persuaded Dewey to allow Eunice to pursue the lead. Gurfien believed in Eunice, because according to him, “she has interviewed and listened to the complaints of a number of girl prostitutes. She has made reports of what she uncovered and turned those reports into me. I have studied them carefully and as a result I’m inclined to agree with her.” Not only was Eunice allowed to follow her leads with the aid of Gurfein, but Dewey also granted them permission to ask Justice McCook for permission to wiretap the offices of the mob bondsmen. Once the transcripts from the wiretap began to trickle in, Eunice delved in and began reading. She began pursuing a great number of leads with only Gurfein’s assistance, and was still expected to meet with concerned citizens and log their complaints.17
As work continued to pile up, her investigation began to reveal some interesting facts. As she poured over the transcripts from the wiretaps, she learned that although attorney Abe Karp was disbarred, he continued doing business for someone they commonly referred to as the “Combination.” She learned plenty about prostitution, but not much more about the mob as a whole. The most important connection she was able to establish was the relationship between the mob and Abe Karp. Although she attempted to take her findings to her Dewey, he was very busy, and wasn’t available to the entire office. His lack of availability led Eunice to draft a letter, stating, “Dear boss, it would seem I can never see you” followed by three pages of what she uncovered from the wiretaps. Eunice had made her point and Dewey took notice of this by immediately scheduling a meeting with her.18
Finally, on January 13, 1936, one of the taps picked up a name—a man nicknamed “Tommy Bull,” who was known to the police as one Thomas Pennochio. Following his arrest, names began slipping out left and right and everything started to come together. Individually, the names didn’t mean much, but thanks to the wiretap, each name was being intertwined with members of the mob. As days turned to weeks, Eunice realized just how far the mob’s reach went. The connection she pioneered had finally provided proof that the “Combination” ran prostitution in the city, and, if the police could arrest the girls, the girls would give them the madams, who, in turn, would give them the bookers who would lead them Luciano. Dewey had the evidence he needed and Eunice and Gurfien knew exactly how to carry it out: all of the brothels would be raided simultaneously. If everyone was taken into custody at the same time, they would not be able to warn one another. Eunice wagered that if they dragged all the girls in and held them without bail, they would turn against the syndicate and start naming names.19
The raids were scheduled for the first week in February and took place on the night of February 1, 1936. The raids were successful, and over 100 girls were arrested. These girls were accustomed to being seen by their bondsman and lawyer and receiving release, but this time was different. The girls foul attitudes were not directed at Eunice, but at the “Combination.” Eunice enthusiastically used their frustration to her advantage.20
Eunice insisted on having them declared material witnesses, and Dewey eventually set their bail so high that even the “Combination” couldn’t pay it. Eunice interviewed many of the women herself, and gathered tons of useful information in only a couple of days. Most excitedly, Eunice had been on the trail of Madam Sally Kaplan for a while, and now she finally had her in an interview room. After a bit of prodding from Eunice, Kaplan ultimately gave up two names. For weeks, the raids and questioning continued, until the bookers who had originally pinned Luciano as “The Boss” were taken into custody.21
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7b590/7b590d4530ce43e5bdfaaf1f66efac05c3491104" alt=""
Thanks to Eunice and all of the information she gathered, the police department arrested Luciano and charge him and eight others with compulsory prostitution. This charge garnered Luciano a guilty verdict with a sentence of 30 to 50 years in state prison.22
Eunice, a black woman in 1930s New York, was the amazing prosecutor who identified Luciano as “The Boss.” If it were not for all of the connections she made initially, her hard work in the investigation, her dedication during the raids, and her determination to pursue the matter, Luciano’s arrest simply wouldn’t have occurred. Despite all of her efforts, when the time came for Dewey to choose an attorney to try the case, he looked elsewhere. Instead of honoring the contributions of Eunice, he granted the highly sought-after position to Barent Ten Eyck, a man who had not even been working the prostitution angle with Eunice. Even when Eyck was ordered to choose four deputies to assist him, Eunice was again passed over. The only recognition Eunice got from Dewey came after Luciano’s guilty verdict on June 7, 1936, when he thanked her at the press conference for her contribution to the case. Although Eunice Carter was the women who brought down the biggest mob boss this country had ever seen, her contribution, like the contributions of so many other black Americans, is today only a small footnote in history.23
- Christie Smith, “Eunice Hunton Carter (1899-1970),” Blackpast.org, November 6 2013, https://www.blackpast.org/african-american-history/eunice-hunton-carter-1899-1970/. ↵
- Stephen L. Carter, Invisible (New York: Henry Holt and Company, 2018), 150. ↵
- Salem Press Biographical Encyclopedia, 2018, s.v. “Lucky Luciano,” by John L. Mclean. ↵
- Richard Younger, “Grand Jury Under Attack, Part III,” Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 46 (1955): 7-9. ↵
- Infamous New York, “Gangbusting at the Woolworth Building,” December 11, 2013, https://infamousnewyork.com/2013/12/11/gangbusting-the-woolworth-building-headquarters-of-special-prosecutor-thomas-e-dewey/. ↵
- Christie Smith, “Eunice Hunton Carter (1899-1970),” Blackpast.org, November 6, 2013, https://www.blackpast.org/african-american-history/eunice-hunton-carter-1899-1970/. ↵
- John Kass, “A Black History Month Story that Shouldn’t be Forgotten,” Chicago Tribune, February 23, 2012. ↵
- Stephen L. Carter, Invisible (New York: Henry Holt and Company, 2018), 110. ↵
- Stephen L. Carter, Invisible (New York: Henry Holt and Company, 2018), 112-113. ↵
- Stephen L. Carter, Invisible (New York: Henry Holt and Company, 2018), 114. ↵
- Stephen L. Carter, Invisible (New York: Henry Holt and Company, 2018), 116. ↵
- Stephen L. Carter, Invisible (New York: Henry Holt and Company, 2018), 117. ↵
- Stephen L. Carter, Invisible (New York: Henry Holt and Company, 2018), 119. ↵
- Stephen L. Carter, Invisible (New York: Henry Holt and Company, 2018), 120. ↵
- Stephen L. Carter, Invisible (New York: Henry Holt and Company, 2018), 120. ↵
- Stephen L. Carter, Invisible (New York: Henry Holt and Company, 2018), 124-125. ↵
- Stephen L. Carter, Invisible (New York: Henry Holt and Company, 2018), 126. ↵
- Stephen L. Carter, Invisible (New York: Henry Holt and Company, 2018), 127. ↵
- Stephen L. Carter, Invisible (New York: Henry Holt and Company, 2018), 128. ↵
- Stephen L. Carter, Invisible (New York: Henry Holt and Company, 2018), 129. ↵
- Stephen L. Carter, Invisible (New York: Henry Holt and Company, 2018), 135. ↵
- Russ Symontowne, “Luciano and Eight Guilty, Face Life as Vice Lords,” Daily News, June 8, 1936. ↵
- Stephen L. Carter, Invisible (New York: Henry Holt and Company, 2018), 145. ↵
89 comments
Alicia Guzman
I really enjoyed this article through its thorough background and analysis of Carter’s work. She is extremely inspiring especially as someone who is thinking about applying to law school soon. Prior to this article, I had never heard of Eunice Carter and quite frankly that is a shame. I admire her hard work and perseverance. Her story should be told far more often. Congratulations on your nomination!
Ruben Basaldu
This was a very solid introduction and just a really good article overall. I did not know who Eunice Carter or anything about the contents of this article but after reading it I feel very informed. Eunice was an amazing woman however she was overlooked primarily due to the time in which this had happened. Women were sadly overlooked and if this had happened today this would be such a huge deal. Great article and deserving of the nomination.
Diamond Davidson
The parts of the article that caught my attention was the the introduction nd the conclusion paragraph because they both tied back to each other. This article was did a good job of all the background information that made the story flow very well. This article was great to read. It so crazy that I never knew of Eunice Carter and how she became the first African American women to become hired at the New York’s District Attorney Office, it was great to read how she was determined to take down Luciano. I never heard of this story before, but it was really good to read, good job.
Sydney Aleman
I have never heard Eunice Carter before and reading this article it was truly a great read. It is sad to see that women of any race and age are so easily overlooked no matter what kind of things they have accomplished, but when it comes to men they are praised by whatever they did even if it was a small act.
Diego Terrazas
Eunice Carter was more than just a lawyer, but an exemplary woman in the mist of racial and gender prejudice. I have little knowledge about mob history in the United States, but the fact that she took down the strongest mob boss the US has ever seen, is impressive to say the least. She is missing the recognition and respect she deserves.
Priscilla Reyes
I agree with my classmates on Mariah’s hard work and dedication. This article is an amazing topic and her nomination is for sure well deserved. Her introduction, just like the entire article, is well written and the images used put a face to the legislation and case that was occurring. The fact that she was a black woman is important as for her to be in office was rare. Still, she made honor to her name and should be talked about more.
Sarah Uhlig
A woman who continued to make a difference in the world as a lawyer who investigated mobs and certain situations. She truly made an impact on the world with her dedication and self motivation to continue making this change in the world. Her intelligence and studies all went together to help her succeed and make a difference among that location. Congratulations on getting your article nominated. I really enjoyed reading it.
Engelbert Madrid
The article was well-written and interesting to read. Before reading this article, I did not know or heard anything about Eunice Carter and how she was an important person of the crime case and proving that Charles “Lucky” Luciano was the criminal. It’s unfortunate that the press and media were giving a negative representation of Carter for being an African American woman. Great work for providing such a great article.
Antonio Coffee
It was great to see such a well-written introduction. It really set up the background of the story while also setting up the protagonist for our article. The article as a whole is incredibly well written and tells a great story of what one woman trying to do the best for her community can do. It is a shame that she was not asked to prosecute the case as she certainly deserved it,
Makenzie Santana
Reading about accomplishments made by women is something that I just love. Women still have struggles to this day when it comes to being seen as equal. I am glad to now know about this remarkable woman named Eunice Carter. To be able to take down the mob must’ve bothered the ones who were unable to do the job she did, and to succeed in front of those who most doubt you is one of my favorite things.