StMU Research Scholars

Featuring Scholarly Research, Writing, and Media at St. Mary's University
October 6, 2018

“Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner” Serves Up Racial Equality

Winner of the Fall 2018 StMU History Media Award for

Best Article in the Category of “Year 1968”

The moment of truth was finally at hand for Stanley Kramer. Flashing camera lights could only capture his calm reflection, but underneath his tailored tuxedo, carefully styled hair, and beaming smile, was undeniable nervous anticipation. Tonight he would be in front of all the cameras, instead of instructing from behind them, and everything rode on the outcome of this evening. Stanley Kramer had levied a huge risk in taking on the direction and production of Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner, and as he sat in the audience of the 1968 Academy Awards, he would soon find out whether his gamble had truly paid off. With the country politically fractured and the public divided, could Stanley Kramer realistically expect his movie to win the hearts and minds of the American people?

Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner is the comical drama piece written by William Rose, featuring an upper-class young woman who brings her new fiancé home to meet her parents in order to announce their engagement, after having met each other on a vacation just ten days prior. The older handsome man is quite the catch as an accomplished physician and Nobel Prize candidate. The only problem? He’s a black man intent on marrying their white daughter. The couple cause quite the stir in attempting to overcome interracial bias and be seen as any other couple in love wanting a parent’s blessing for marriage.

Katharine Hepburn and Spencer Tracy | Courtesy of mptvimages.com

Coming together for their ninth film was the universally-loved on-screen couple Spencer Tracy and Katharine Hepburn. The two major actors believed in the project wholeheartedly and agreed to the roles before even setting eyes on the script.1 The natural chemistry between the stars was undeniable, as was the illness rapidly overtaking Spencer Tracy. Almost at once, there was a major hold up in the attempt to start the production. After years of Tracy’s deteriorating health, no insurance company would cover Tracy in his failing condition. What was to become of a project that couldn’t get off the ground? For this movie to stand a chance at the box office, headlining two such profoundly loved actors as Tracy and Hepburn was crucial. An emotional solution was discovered between Stanley Kramer and Katharine Hepburn. They both decided that they would both put their salaries from the film into an escrow account, in the tragic event Spencer Tracy could not continue the movie. With that money as security, another actor could be hired as a last resort to finish the film if need be. With a solution that satisfied the Columbia Pictures production company, filming was finally cleared to begin.2

Obtaining the cast was just the initial problem that Kramer faced. Time was always working against the team, in a race against the clock to finish filming before Tracy became too ill. As a result, the cast members were continuously working with two separate scripts. The original script had the patriarch involved in as many scenes as possible, yet there was always a “back up” script circulating that eliminated Spencer Tracy’s character at any given point.3

Another major obstacle in filming Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner was Sidney Poitier’s intimidation from fellow actors. Despite his own prominent acting career and reputation as a calm and collected professional, Poitier felt humbled to be in the presence of such talent and could never remember his lines. At the time, Spencer Tracy and Katharine Hepburn had both been Hollywood shinning stars for over three decades, and audience members had grown up with these silver screen marvels. Comparatively, Poitier’s acting career had gained more acceptance from his film releases overseas. American audiences had still not fully seen past his African-American ethnicity. This trepidation went on for weeks, frustrating the entire crew with reshoots and wasted film. Finally, Stanley Kramer pulled Sidney Poitier aside for a heart to heart talk in an attempt to get to the bottom of what was causing tempers to rise. The actor simply couldn’t focus in the presence of Tracy and Hepburn. In an attempt to keep Poitier on as a lead character, scenes were then shot as he delivered his lines to two high-back chairs, while stand-in crew delivered his costars’ lines.4

When the movie’s filming began in March 1967, it was still illegal for interracial couples to marry in fourteen states, mostly in the South. If the country could not accept the idea of blacks and whites intermarrying in real life, could Stanley Kramer realistically expect people to be any more agreeable to the idea being portrayed in Hollywood? If the movie was not welcomed by society, future prospects for everyone involved with the project would fall into jeopardy, if not certain ruin.

Coinciding with the film’s production was the Loving v. Virginia Supreme Court case. A white man and a black woman involved in a romantic relationship circumvented the Virginia legislation barring interracial marriages. In 1958, Mildred Jetter and Richard Loving drove to Washington D.C. to say their vows and become legally married. Soon after returning to Virginia, an anonymous tip was given to authorities and the newlyweds were arrested in their home in a late evening police raid. Local prosecution argued that a marriage license from D.C. was not valid in the state of Virginia and the couple were sentenced to a year in prison. The Lovings appealed the judge’s guilty verdict. Monumentally, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of Mr. and Mrs. Loving, just as production on Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner was wrapping up, ruling that marriage is a fundamental human right and effectively ending all anti-miscegenation marriage laws in America.5

Iconic Movie Scene of a Black Man Meeting White Fiancée’s Father | Courtesy of Cineoutsider.com

Tragedy struck just seventeen days after production concluded, when Spencer Tracy died of a heart attack. His passing gravely affected the cast, and overshadowed any joy of the movie’s release. Katharine Hepburn refused to attend any premiers or award ceremonies, let alone see the final movie cut, as the memories of her long-time costar were just too painful.6

Reviews of the movie from audiences and critics alike received an initial mixed response. The initial estimation was one of low attendance of Caucasians, especially in the Southern states. After all, new laws or not, long-standing socially-formed opinions take time to overcome. However, this was not the case, and never again was the race of a lead character a factor in projecting audience film acceptance.7 Written reviews were not so kind. Sidney Poitier took the brunt of criticism, not simply for being an African-American actor, but for being “too perfect” and “too white” in his role portraying a Nobel Prize nominated doctor.8

Stanley Kramer fiercely defended Sidney Poitier’s performance and explained that every character was meant to portray model social and moral perfection; only then could the sole protest land at the couple’s racial divides.9 In an attempt to clarify his intentions with the film, Kramer undertook a nine-university tour to discuss the political and social controversy. For all his efforts, Kramer was met by indifference at best and death threats at worst! The movie seemed to be caught in between an atmosphere of younger students who did not see interracial relationships as controversial, and the older generation who wanted to keep the races forever separate.10

The lights now dimmed on the Academy Awards audience, and the announcements began as everyone took their seats. Spencer Tracy’s widow was in attendance to hear her husband be nominated as Best Actor one final time. Katharine Hepburn was at home still mourning, and the magic of the evening was muted by sadness. But for all the hardships, when Stanley Kramer heard his name read as a nominee for Best Picture, he knew in his heart that the trials and bitter-sweet tribulations were all worth it in the end. Stanley Kramer did not win the award for Best Picture that night. But he had produced the most emotionally important movie of his career, directed award-winning performances, and showed all the Hollywood elite that they did not need to be afraid to take a leap of faith in making controversial films.

Winner of Two Academy Awards | Courtesy of Wikipedia Commons

When all was said and done, Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner became an international box office hit grossing over $70,000,000 and nominated for twenty-two different awards. In 2017, the movie title was entered into the National Film Registry by the Library of Congress for being culturally and historically significant.11

 

  1. Donald Spoto, Stanley Kramer: Film Maker (Putnam, 1978), 280.
  2. James Curtis, Spencer Tracy: A Biography (London: Hutchinson, 2011), 839.
  3. Bill Davidson, Spencer Tracy, Tragic Idol (Dutton Adult, 1988), 206.
  4.  Sidney Poitier, This Life (Alfred A Knopf, Inc, 1980), 286.
  5. Loving v. Virginia, 388 US (1967); Maria Mancha, “The Love Story of the Lovings,” StMU History Media. https://www.stmuhistorymedia.org/the-love-story-of-the-lovings, (accessed Oct 4, 2018).
  6. Katharine Hepburn, Me: Stories of my Life (Alfred A Knopf, Inc, 1991), 402.
  7. Mark Harris, Pictures at a Revolution: Five Movies and the Birth of the New Hollywood (Penguin Press, 2008), 374.
  8. Dolores R. Townek, Letter to the Editor, Ebony, June 1968.
  9. Christopher Andersen, An Affair to Remember: The Remarkable Love Story of Katharine Hepburn and Spencer Tracy (William Morrow and Co, 1997), 295.
  10.  Mark Harris, Pictures at a Revolution: Five Movies and the Birth of the New Hollywood (Penguin Press, 2008), 398.
  11. Sheryl Cannady, “2017 National Film Registry is More Than a ‘Field of Dreams,'” Library of Congress, December 13,2017, https://www.loc.gov/item/prn-17-178/.

Annissa Noblejas

I am a Communication Studies major with a minor in History. My passion falls with research and I love to share new found knowledge with others. I am a military veteran, mother of four great kids, and coffee connoisseur.

Author Portfolio Page

Recent Comments

115 comments

  • Engelbert Madrid

    Although I never seen Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner, I think the movie highlights important concepts and themes of relationships that not all Americans were accepting. I enjoyed reading this article, because I think it is important to evaluate people’s perspectives on how it affects American societies. I’m glad this movie has won awards, which is important to recognize that racism is an issue in societies.

  • Adrian Cook

    I have never heard of this movie before but the article portrays a good breakdown of the before and after in the film making process. This was a very risky movie to make but I’m glad it reached exceptional movie numbers. Many people believed marrying or even being with a different race was unacceptable but I’m sure this movie gives good reasoning behind why it’s okay to overlook what’s on the outside and accept what’s on the inside. Racism was a very sensitive topic and still very could be today to some people but overall a very good article and I enjoyed reading.

  • Luis Magana

    I really like the title of this article “guess who’s coming to dinner” it immediately grabbed my attention. I have never really heard of the movie but after reading the article I gained more information on what its about. I like how the movie made it seem as if everyone accepted and had love for each other. The color of the skin didn’t really matter. More people show pay attention to movies like this that have a good message and is positive.

  • Gabrien Gregory

    Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner is one of my favorite films. It is hard to believe the amount of time it took for there to be a movie of this plot, and then to think about the impact The Bodyguard had in 1991 when Kevin Costner kissed Whitney Houston. I learned a few new things about the filming and process of the film. I did not know this was Spencer Tracy’s last film. In my opinion, Sydney Poitier is one of the most imprtant people of this time-period simply for doing this role (and the other roles he played). Stanley Kramer clearly had the audacity to push forward with the project amidst all of the racism in the country. It is interesting to me that Poitier got nervous in front of Tracy and Hepburn, as he was an accomplished actor as well.

  • Sienna Guerra

    I have never heard of this movie before and found this article very interesting. I really liked how this thread of the flow of the movie went. I appreciate the persistence of the people who took the chances to even create a film that would cause blacks and whites. The movie portrayed that love should be accepted despite the color of their skin. This movie sounds interesting and I would love to set time aside to see it one day!

  • Luis Magana

    The really like the first picture it gives the article a good start. I have never hear of this movie but I am more informed on what its about after reading this article. The movie tried to portray how skin color doesn’t matter and that everyone is the same and can be treated the same. The producers went against what the normal was in that day. They took a risk and maybe didn’t receive the credit they deserve at the beginning but now it has the credit it deserves.

  • Alexandra Lopez

    I have never seen this movie before, but I am familiar with Stanley Kramer’s work throughout his career. He has always pushed boundaries beyond his own limits and “Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner” is no different. This article reflects the social norms that Kramer broke with this film and how outstanding this movie has continued to be regarded as a great film today.

  • Christopher Hohman

    Nice article. What the movie production crew and actors involved did was so important. Hollywood has always been at the front of promoting social change, as controversial as that may be. In this case this film was so important because interracial marriage was something that was seen as taboo at the time. Hollywood made it less taboo, and helped people see it in a different light. In that sense I think of “The Danish Girl” starring Eddie Redmayne. That movie too has tried to make an important social issue less taboo

  • Harashang Gajjar

    It would appear from across the Atlantic Sea that Barack Obama has become a darling of majority of the young and intelligent Americans but not of the thick skull, die-hard, fear-mongering, war-mongering and white racists who still live with the sluggish and deformed mentality and logic of superiority of their white skin.
    I wish that these racists come out from their dirty shells and look around that the world is changing for better and genetic superior complex is aberration of their mind and intelligence.Obama is a gifted man with exhorbitant intellect, maturity and decency of mind and that has attracted people of every colour and race into his camp. I am certain that millions of families in America would be delighted to have him as a guest at their dinner tables

  • Madeline Torres

    This article was very well written and detailed! I have never thought of watching the move until now. It’s great how a film brought so much attention to the situation between the two races. The movie most definitely deserved the awards it got and the amount of acceptance it received as well. The amount of effect a film causes in society is just so crazy and I hope movies continue to raise awareness like the way this one did. Great article!

Leave your comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.