StMU Research Scholars

Featuring Scholarly Research, Writing, and Media at St. Mary's University

February 13, 1633 was the final day of the trial led by the Holy Office. Galileo once again walked into the same dim, candle-lit room in one of the beautiful churches of Rome. The eyes of the paintings, statues, and members of the Holy Office judge him as he entered. He alone was the center of attention. Guards watched over his shoulder, ensuring that he would have to face his fate one way or another. Seeing Cardinal Francesco, Galileo knew there might just be a sliver of hope.1 If he was fortunate, he would be a free man and would finally be allowed to publish his work. But hope was slim for those who speak against the teachings of the Church and expect to get away with it. Galileo was now facing trial for heresy against the Catholic Church, as he was spreading “false” information about the center of our universe with his heliocentric theory.

Astronomer, mathematician, and physicist, Galileo Galilei had quite the knack for stirring up trouble. Born February 15, 1564 in Pisa, Italy, he was not afraid to proudly speak up for what he believed in.2 Just like other scientists, he was passionate about his work. Galileo had become a fierce opponent of the Aristotelian philosophy that dominated the universities, and he openly criticized Aristotle. Since he had never finished college, those who were educated and champions of Aristotle’s philosophy often looked down on him and thought of him as a buffoon.3 This treatment would continue even when Galileo became a professor (without finishing college still). Although it was one of his first experiences being looked down upon, it would not be his last.

Andreas Cellarius’s depiction of a heliocentric solar system (1708) | Courtesy of Wikimedia Commons

First introduced in the sixth century BCE, heliocentric theory claimed that the sun was the center of our universe, directly contrary to the geocentric view that claimed that the earth was its center.4 This heliocentric idea had been discussed among astronomers and philosophers for centuries, but was simply dismissed because of the reigning geocentric view, based on the work of the ancient astronomer Ptolemy. It was not until Nicholas Copernicus published his book De revolutionibus in 1543 that there was a mathematical way to propose this new way of observing our place in the universe. Knowing the dangers of Copernicus’ work, Andreas Osiander included a preface that implied the new system was merely a hypothesis and nothing more.5

So, when Galileo openly claimed to believe in Copernicus’ ideas in 1604, he immediately put himself on the radar of the church.6 Thankfully, he had deep relationships and important friends within the church, especially among various cardinals and priests. More specifically, he was good friends with Cardinal Maffeo Barberini, who often vouched for him with the Holy Office and with Pope Paul V himself.7 Galileo would get away with speaking and teaching the ideas of heliocentrism for now. This time, his relationships kept him from facing condemnation by the church.

Under the motivation from fellow astronomer Johannes Kepler, Galileo decided he would begin to push back at the church.8 Although he was a Catholic himself, he was tired of the church always having the final word.9 He was tired of having to conform his celestial observations to a literal interpretation of the Bible. As a philosopher, he began to think of just how he could find a way around geocentric interpretations of Biblical passages without being seen as attacking God Himself. Knowing he would have to dig deep into the Bible to build a valid argument, he used his contacts in the church to help him once again. With the help of Monsignor Piero Dini and Father Bendetto Castelli, he was able to write various essays in which he essentially argued that the scriptures are meant to teach lessons. The scriptures were true, but oftentimes the imagery of scripture was used simply to convey spiritual meaning, not actually to describe the physical world scientifically.10 Galileo claimed that the Bible, in its entirety, was not meant to be interpreted literally in all places at all times. With his patience running thin, Pope Paul V ordered the Holy Office to begin investigating Galileo. Not even Cardinal Maffeo Barberini could convince the pope otherwise. Galileo would no longer be stirring up trouble, as on February 19, 1616, Copernicus’ De revolutionibus would be banned, and Galileo would secretly be ordered to stop teaching and defending Copernicus in anyway.11 Once again, the church shut down ideas contrary to theirs.

Galileo decided to let his case rest, following the 1616 trial. As much as he had a fire in him to prove his ideas right, he was unable. While he was not formally charged, he was constantly under a microscope. Galileo had to be careful of what he taught and wrote.12 Especially with Pope Paul in charge, there was not much he could do. Being as smart as he was, Galileo knew that hope was not lost. Since he was not formally punished, all he had to do was play the waiting game. Eventually, Pope Paul would have to step down or pass away, and Galileo would then be in the clear. Anxiously, he waited until he could finally begin working on his ideas again.

Portrait of Galileo painted by Peter Paul Rubens c. 1630 | Courtesy of Wikimedia Commons

After waiting seven years, Pope Gregory XV died and his old friend Cardinal Maffeo Barberini was elected Pope in 1623. The waiting game had finally paid off for Galileo, or so it seemed. Knowing Galileo’s troublesome nature, Pope Urban VIII (Maffeo) called Galileo to Rome to have a few meetings with him. Ecstatic over his new-found opportunity, Galileo rushed to Rome to get the green light from him. He would then have six different meetings in which Galileo would try to get a pass, but Pope Urban would not give him one. Despite this, Pope Urban told Galileo that as long he kept his work theoretical, as Copernicus had, he would not have issues with the church any longer.13

With his motivation back, Galileo decided to ignore the warnings of his friend. He would spend the following six years working on the mathematical proof demonstrating that the earth was not the center of the universe. After being silenced for what was an eternity, Galileo refused to be silenced any longer. In January of 1630, his hard work paid off as his book was finally completed.14 Titled Dialagoue of the Two Chief World Systems, publication was the only step left. While the final copy was being worked on, Father Castelli informed Galileo of an old conversation he had with Pope Urban. During the 1616 trial, Pope Urban (then a cardinal) told Father Castelli that if he were pope, Copernicanism would never have been banned. The recent conversations Galileo had had with the pope ran fresh in his head and to him, this was a sign that he would be able to get away with publishing his work. On top of this, he also learned he was also well liked by the Pope’s theologian Nicolò Riccardi.15 Everything was finally falling into place for the hard-headed astronomer.

Yet, publishing his book would be troublesome on his own. Even though he was only informally punished back in 1616, his troublesome reputation stuck with him. Printing Galileo’s findings would be risky even for the most reputable printer. To get his book printed, Galileo would include a “submission clause” giving the illusion that he was in line with the church’s orders in the introduction and conclusion. It took another two long years to finally get his book published.16

Statue of Galileo located at Uffizi, Florence | Courtesy of Pixabay

Galileo had finally accomplished his goal of circulating his work. His already household name now guaranteed himself a place in history books. As beloved as he was by many of the high church members, a few were set to get him to quit his actions. Someone had convinced Galileo’s dear friend Maffeo that he was trying to embarrass him by publishing his work.17 Once again, he found himself in Rome facing trial. Already let off with a warning, hope was beginning to look bleak for the astronomer. His friends could no longer help him as a prominent subgroup of the church were out for Galileo’s head. Not even Cardinal Francesco (nephew of the pope) who wanted Galileo to once again be free, could change a thing. Anything less than condemnation would not be tolerated.

His enemies’ success came on February 13, 1633, as Galileo was officially condemned.18 His work would be placed on the list of banned reading. On top of this, he was sentenced to house arrest for the rest of his life. Here he continued to accept secret visitors against the orders of the church and further his scientific work. He passed away in Florence, Italy on January 8, 1642. The church had finally silenced the cunning astronomer.

As much as it seemed that the church got the last laugh, Galileo had the last laugh up in the heavens. Nearly 300 years later, in 1983, Pope John Paul II declared that the church had made an error in condemning Galileo. He essentially used Galileo’s original argument that the Bible does not always describe the physical world, and that the Bible holds both literal and figurative interpretations.19 Galileo never wanted the church to look bad or go against it. He was simply seeking the truth of the nature of our universe. According to Galileo, the truths of scripture, when properly understood, do not conflict with the truths of science.

  1. Ernan McMullin, The Church and Galileo (Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 2005), 63.
  2. Encyclopedia of Science and Religion, 2003, s.v. “Galileo Galilei,” by William R. Shea, 349.
  3. New Catholic Encyclopedia, 2003, s.v. “Galilei, Galileo,” by J.J. Langford, 59.
  4.  The Gale Encyclopedia of Science, 2008, s.v. “Heliocentric Theory,” by K. Lee Lerner and Brenda Wilmoth Lerner, 2096.
  5. New Catholic Encyclopedia, 2003, s.v. “Galilei, Galileo,” by J.J. Langford, 59.
  6. Encyclopedia of European Social History, 2011, s.v. “Galileo Galilei (1564-1642).”
  7. New Catholic Encyclopedia, 2003, s.v. “Galilei, Galileo,” by J.J. Langford, 62.
  8. J.L. Heilbron, Galileo (New York: Oxford University Press, 2020), 112.
  9. Encyclopedia of European Social History, 2011, s.v. “Galileo Galilei (1564-1642),” 113.
  10. Joseph D. Bryne and Arthur R. Sienburg, “Galileo Willfully Violated the Injections of the Inquisition and was thus Guilty at his 1622 Trial,” The High Middle Ages to the Modern World, no. 3 (2011): 241.
  11. New Catholic Encyclopedia, 2003, s.v. “Galilei, Galileo,” by J.J. Langford, 61.
  12. Joseph D. Bryne and Arthur R. Sienburg, “Galileo Willfully Violated the Injections of the Inquisition and was thus Guilty at his 1622 Trial,” The High Middle Ages to the Modern World, no. 3 (2011): 225.
  13. Encyclopedia of Science and Religion, 2003, s.v. “Galileo Galilei,” by William R. Shea, 62.
  14. Encyclopedia of Science and Religion, 2003, s.v. “Galileo Galilei,” by William R. Shea, 351.
  15. Encyclopedia of European Social History, 2011, s.v. “Galileo Galilei (1564-1642),” 113-114.
  16. New Catholic Encyclopedia, 2003, s.v. “Galilei, Galileo,” by J.J. Langford, 62.
  17. New Catholic Encyclopedia, 2003, s.v. “Galilei, Galileo,” by J.J. Langford, 62.
  18. Encyclopedia of Science and Religion, 2003, s.v. “Galileo Galilei,” by William R. Shea, 351.
  19. Encyclopedia of Science and Religion, 2003, s.v. “Galileo Galilei,” by William R. Shea, 351.

Recent Comments

137 comments

  • Michael Thompson

    Galileo in the end got what he wanted, even though he wasn’t alive to see it. I think he probably knew deep down that eventually he would be proven right, even if it was years later, and that in order for people to see his work, he had to publish it and face the consequences. He probably knew as well since he was well connected and had friends in the church he wasn’t going to be killed for his work, so he really didn’t have too much to lose. So what he did set ways for future astronomers and physicists to prove him right, which again he probably knew he eventually would.

  • Patricia Arechiga

    As I have stated before, religion is something that sustains my respect. However, it is deeply upsetting how there has always and will continue to be a a fight towards keeping the ways of the bible superior to all other thoughts and beliefs. I don’t believe Galileo ever meant any type of harm and or threat, thus making this article even more upsetting. Galileo was a misunderstood man who never wanted any conflict other than simply just wanting his perspective noticed and understood.

  • Alexander Avina

    This is a great article about Galileo’s struggle to get his theory accepted by the Catholic Church. It really shows the genius and persistence of Galileo. I think that the article was masterfully written and that it was captivating all throughout its entirety. It was great to learn more about how ahead of his time Galileo was and that how sometimes new ideas have a hard time being accepted. I really enjoyed the detail in which you discuss the long and intense battle between the Catholic Church and Galileo. Overall, it was a very well-written article.

  • Kasandra Ramirez Ferrer

    I found sad the Galileo’s life story because just like in today’s society, Galileo was a misunderstood brilliant man just like several people today that society does not accept them because they are different or we don’t understand them. Galileo was a gifted man who only was trying to find an answer to his questions, questions that people at those times were too scared to ask or even knew they weren’t supposed to ask them because it was “like” going against God. Galileo was a man of science, a man that was just too much for the time he was born in, sadly judge by an ignorant society than instead of supporting his studies was almost diagnosed as a psychopath. Galileo never meant for the church to look bad or minimize it in any sort of way but Galileo lived in a time where people saw new and different as evil and dangerous.

  • Jose Chaman

    When I was in high school, a science teacher came up with the story of Galileo and his relationship with the Church and his work on Heliocentrism. Reading this article I could discover that Galileo studied the Bible to be able to produce his research without attacking the image of God and the Church! A fact that amazed me a lot and ennobled much more the image I had of him. However, as many of us know, the paths of history are often ineffable, and small misunderstandings can create great rivalries and anger. Pope Urban (Maffeo) having known Galileo, must have assumed that his intentions were merely scientific. Although Galileo Galilei still proved to be right, and to his glory in posterity, thanks to his confidence and vehemence, science has reached discoveries that not only support Galileo’s theories but magnify God’s Creation.

  • Michael Leary

    Very interesting article about the trials of Galileo. This event has been so misinterpreted ever since occurring and has often been used to accuse the Church of preventing scientific progression and even not believing in science. The truth of the matter is the Church had nothing against Galileo and is evident in a lecture he gave in the Vatican about Heliocentrism, the real problem came when he tried to publish his theory as fact, not the theory that it was at the time.

  • Ruby Wynn

    I found this to be a fascinating and inspiring article. I admire Galileo’s perseverance and dedication to making the truth known, even if it was an unpopular opinion or he could be punished for saying it. It is amazing that he was able to discover so much and develop a formula that proved Heliocentrism when he had not even finished college.

  • I had no idea that Galileo never finished college, yet still became a professor and was able to explore his ideas and hypotheses with such detail and vigor. It’s such a travesty that Pope Urban III, his very own friend, didn’t do much of anything to prevent Galileo from being condemned. Still, to know that he was right all along and that he was vindicated centuries later does him some justice. Great article!

    • Christopher Metta Bexar

      I like Danielle’s analysis of the article. But I am also a fan of church history to some extent as well as an education geek.
      Formal education did not happen for any but the most wealthy prior to the 19th century or perhaps the 20th. Reading was only for the clerics and the upper social classes.
      As for the papal position the Pope was a political actor himself throughout a lot of history. Many popes from the 14th, 15th and 16th centuries were from prominent families like Borgia and de Medici (powerful and influential families in the world of politics themselves.) The Pope would have been protecting his own authority over the safety of his friend or even his relative.

  • Engelbert Madrid

    During the medieval period, the history of the Catholic Church and science is interesting because there has been new scientific discoveries that contradict the teachings of the Church at that time. Thanks to Galileo’s discoveries, the world now has physical evidence and understanding that Earth and the planets of the Solar System revolve around the Sun. Galileo deserves a lot of respect for having the courage to confront the Church and their theory of geocentrism.

  • Maggie Amador

    Galileo has always been a famous name belonging to the famous astronomer that I knew nothing of. I am glad to say that this article has changed that. I didn’t realize Galileo is the reason behind heliocentrism. I also did not realize the struggles a scientist had to go through in a time where religion dominated the beliefs of people.

Leave your comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.