StMU Research Scholars

Featuring Scholarly Research, Writing, and Media at St. Mary’s University

May 14, 2018

Influenza: How the 1918 Flu Vaccine Contributed to the Death of Millions

Influenza is a well-known viral infection that affects the lungs, nose, and throat. Symptoms of the flu include fever, chills, muscle aches, cough, congestion, runny nose, headaches, and fatigue. The flu is prevented by annual flu shots that build up the immune system by using a dead strain of the infection. However, that was not the case in 1918. In 1918, a flu outbreak emerged, killing millions of people wherever it spread. The flu outbreak affected children and adults. By the end of 1920, the number of flu cases began to drop. Although the flu was able to kill millions of people, this apparent strain, the Spanish flu or H1N1, was able to easily kill healthy individuals. It was lethal to healthy adults ages twenty to twenty-four, as opposed to most flu outbreaks, which kill only the very young, the elderly, and people with weakened immune systems.1 At that time, there were claims that there were vaccines that were effective against the flu, which would allow healthy individuals to fight the flu easily. But in this case, these individuals ended up dying easily, adding to the mortality rate. By the end of 1919, the 1918 flu strain quickly disappeared from the human population and was replaced by other, less virulent strains of the virus.2 At the end of the pandemic, questions arose about how healthy individuals succumbed so easily to the flu. Researchers have looked for the answers to how the healthy were so easily affected. Yet the answer seemed to be closer than they thought. This flu outbreak was able to easily kill healthy individuals because the flu strain was not properly identified, which resulted in the wrong vaccine, making healthy individuals more susceptible to the flu.

Map of the spread of influenza | Courtesy of Ian York

The flu is a contagious respiratory illness that occurs frequently in the winter and early spring. The flu is treatable and can be avoided with an annual flu shot. The flu is identified with the H#N#, in order to set a distinction between different types of flu and its subtypes, like type A flu, examples being the avian flu, H5N1, or swine flu, H2N1. The Spanish flu, or H1N1 strain, began in March of 1918 in Asia. Over the course of two to three months, the flu began to spread from Asia to Europe and to the rest of the world. The 1918 pandemic spread more or less simultaneously in three distinct waves during an approximate twelve-month period in 1918-1919, in Europe, Asia, and North America.3 By the time the flu spread into Asia, the United States, and Europe, between twenty- to forty-million people were killed by the flu, which is more than the number of people who died during WWI.4 The 1918 pandemic virus infected cells in the upper respiratory tract, transmitting easily, but also settling deep in the lungs, damaging tissue and often leading to viral as well as bacterial pneumonia.5 The flu continued to spread, causing hospitals to be overfilled with people infected by the flu. This resulted in hospitals treating patients in schools or other buildings and in tents outside of the hospitals. Near the end of 1919, the spread of the flu began to slow down and people began to recover and return to their normal lives, without the fear of the spread of the flu. Although the pandemic was over, researchers began to question why healthy individuals were easily infected with flu and how were they exposed to the flu. It would take some time before researchers identified the cause of this through a solution that was thought to have prevented the spread of the flu, which was discovered decades later, when technology had improved. Researchers have since learned that the vaccines that were provided in 1918, which were suppose to prevent the spread of the flu and build immunity against it, were ineffective.

Demographic of the Flu epidemic from Sept.14 to Oct. 5 | Courtesy of Pinterest

Vaccines have been essential in fighting illnesses. They induce an immune response in the body, in order to give the body a fighting chance against a live strain. In 1796, Edward Jenner, a British doctor, created the first successful vaccine to prevent the spread of smallpox. He did this by using a strain from cowpox and scratched it onto a boy. The boy recovered quickly from this. Jenner later exposed the same boy to smallpox, but the boy showed no sign of contracting smallpox. Edward Jenner’s discovery revolutionized medicine because it led to prevention of other illnesses that were thought to be unpreventable. Flu vaccines, in this case, help the body fight back against the flu. They are suggested by doctors because it gives the body some time to build some immunity to the flu, allowing the body to fight back against the flu easily. In order for flu vaccines to work, a dead strain of the virus is used in the vaccine because it allows the body to produce the proper immunoglobulin to fight the flu. Immunoglobulin, often referred to as white blood cells, fight antigens, a foreign substance or toxin that induce an immune response.[6. Peter F. Wright, “How Do Influenza Vaccines Work?,” Clinical Infectious Diseases 39, Volume 39, no. 7 (October 2004): 928–929.] Examples of antigens include bacteria, viruses, and foreign substances in the blood. In the case of the flu, the vaccines protect against three strains of the flu: influenza A (H1N1 and H3N2) and influenza B. In the case of the 1918 pandemic, the vaccines must not have used a dead strain or the flu was not classified as a bacteria. If the vaccines did not use the dead strain, then the amount of people who were infected were increased, which would have increased the mortality rate. It would seem likely in the case of the flu, since the mortality rate was high. But, physicians studied Edward Jenner’s work on vaccine, which would scratch this out. Yet, if the vaccine had the wrong strain, then there would be some protection against other illnesses with that strain. This would be the probable case, since there were some technology that would be useful in identifying the flu strain.

People lining up for the flu vaccine | Courtesy of the Steelworks Center of the West

During the pandemic, hospitals were overrun by the sick, soon causing hospitals to reach capacity. This resulted in hospitals creating make-shift treatment areas outside of the hospitals. In order to resolve this issue, researchers decided to look for a cause for the number of people being infected and a possible cure or prevention to the spread of the flu. Researchers theorized that the flu strain had an intrinsically high virulence, tempered only in those patients who had been born before 1889 because of exposure to a then-circulating virus that was capable of providing partial immunoprotection against the 1918 virus strain in people older than 35 years.6 This theory was proven decades later by researchers. In the search for the cure, researchers first assumed that the flu was a bacteria called Bacillus Influenzae, which was discovered by Richard Pfeiffer when he was looking into the lungs of an influenza patient.7 With Pfeiffer’s discovery, the development of the first flu vaccine was underway to deal with the outbreak. When Pfeiffer’s vaccine was released, there was a relief from the medical community because there was a hope that the number of flu patients would decrease. However, that was not the case. People were still coming in with flu symptoms. To make matter’s worse, healthy individuals who had taken the vaccine ended up in hospitals. Decades later, with further analysis and improved technology, scientists began to study why the flu vaccines were ineffective against the flu. They soon discovered that the vaccines from 1918 that were claimed to be effective against the flu, like the Pfeiffer vaccine, contained combinations of different bacterial strains.8 In addition to this discovery, researchers from 1918 did not seem to have properly identified the strain. This would have made the 1918 flu vaccine ineffective in preventing the spread of the flu and building an immunity to the flu strain. Millions of people died from the 1918 Flu Pandemic believing that the flu vaccines would have protected them against the flu.

Although the 1918 flu vaccine was not as effective as it was supposed to be in preventing the spread of infection and building immunity to fight the flu, it did help in the prevention of other illnesses. When Richard Pfeiffer discovered the bacteria that was thought to be the cause of the flu, researchers engineered the vaccine that would have prevented the spread of the flu and build immunity against it. Yet, the vaccines proved ineffective in preventing the spread and building immunity against the flu. But in 2010, an analysis was done over the flu pandemic of 1918. The analysis suggested that the vaccines that were provided reduced the attack rate of pneumonia after viral influenza infection.9 After the flu had run its course in the body, the immune system was strengthened from the fight, thus allowing it to have a temporary build of immunity from the flu until the end of the flu season. In addition, the vaccines would also have a cross protection against other bacteria-related illnesses, like streptococcus. Since the 1918 vaccine contained a strain of bacteria, it would have offered protection and immunity to other bacteria-related illnesses. The vaccines in 1918 may have been a mistake since the flu strain was proven to be not a bacteria, but it has provided more solutions to preventing the spread of bacteria related illnesses. Although the vaccines that were provided in 1918 may not have been effective against the Spanish flu, these vaccines became useful in the prevention of other bacteria-related illnesses.

Vaccines have proven to be useful in preventing illnesses. Although the Flu Pandemic of 1918 continued to kill millions until 1920, it has given insight into how the vaccines should work during flu season. In order for vaccines to be effective, the proper strain of the illness needs to be identified. If the proper strain is not identified, containment of the illness will become impossible, thus leading to more people being infected and spreading uncontrollably. This pandemic must have been a wake up call for researchers, since the flu became uncontrollable and preventing the spread of it would have eased the influx of patients entering the hospitals at that time. If it was not for this pandemic, we would not have the proper flu vaccines that would build immunity against the flu. Decades after the pandemic, flu vaccines have been properly engineered to protect against the flu strain each flu season. But scientists have learned overtime, the flu strain becomes more resistant to treatment each season. The 1918 Flu Pandemic could happen again at some point, if the flu strain is resistant to treatment.

  1. In Environmental Encyclopedia, 2011, s.v. “Flu Pandemic,” by Angela Woodward.
  2. Carlo Caduff, The Pandemic Perhaps: Dramatic Events in a Public Culture of Danger (California: University of California Press, 2015), 10.
  3. Jeffery K. Taubenberger and David M. Morens, “1918 Influenza: The Mother of All Pandemics,” Emerging Infectious Diseases 12, no. 1 (January 2006): 15-22.
  4. Molly Billings, “The 1918 Influenza Pandemic,” Stanford  (2005): 1.
  5. John M. Barry, “How the Horrific 1918 Flu Spread Across America,” Smithsonian Institution, (November 2017): 1.
  6. Jeffery K. Taubenberger and David M. Morens, “1918 Influenza: The Mother of All Pandemics,” Emerging Infectious Diseases 12, no. 1 (January 2006): 16.
  7. Karie Youngdahl, “Spanish Influenza Pandemic and Vaccines,” The College of Physicians of Philadelphia (December 2011): 1.
  8. Darya Nesterova, “Influenza Vaccine History,” Vaccination Research Group (October 2012): 2.
  9. Karie Youngdahl, “Spanish Influenza Pandemic and Vaccines,” The College of Physicians of Philadelphia (December 2011): 1.

Tags from the story

Influenza Pandemic of 1918-1919

Recent Comments

Kacey Diaz

This article was actually really interesting to read. I think the most interesting thing to me was that more people died because of the flu, than those who dies in WWI. This article also reminded me of the importance of getting the flu shot and how one year I didn’t get it and I got really sick. I can only imagine how people affected by the flu in this time period were feeling.

reply

16/09/2018

7:19 am

Maisie Favila

Although I knew about Influenza, I didn’t know about its origins and the outbreak. It was really interesting to learn about its development and how it effected people. I’m glad now modern science has prevented that from happening again, the loss of lives was tragic and the numbers were horrific. I was shocked that there were more deaths totaled then WWI. This article was well written and I liked the information it provided!

reply

21/09/2018

7:19 am

Martina Rodriguez

I actually had no idea that Influenza, Spanish Flu, and H1N1 were all the same strain of the virus. I wonder what goes into the making of a vaccine what could have led to the WRONG vaccine being created. I cannot believe the amount of people who have been killed by the flu is greater than the number of people killed in a World War…what a staggering and shocking statistic.

reply

21/09/2018

7:19 am

Daniela Cardona

It’s crazy to think about how many people can be affected or even killed due to something we view as so ordinary as the flu. The science that goes in to picking vaccines is so crucial and must be so exact and the minds who get it done are so bright. At the same time, they have a lot of weight on their shoulders because they have no room for error or they could cause another outbreak. This article got a little to science-y for me but overall was well written and talked about something huge that I had never even heard about.

reply

23/09/2018

7:19 am

Yadira Chavez

This article is very informative to the tragedies that the influenza outbreak caused in the early 1900s. I know that certain illnesses now cause panic in large areas of the world, so I am sure that the outbreak had people living in fear all the time. It is a good reminder that vaccines are the only protectors against outbreaks of illnesses of the past. I truly don’t understand why parents choose to not vaccinate their children. They are putting billions of lives at risk.

reply

23/09/2018

7:19 am

Lynsey Mott

Yet another article that is sad. The influenza outbreak of 1918, I have heard of this before. I think that fact that knowing it has killed millions of people is so crazier and even crazier knowing how much it is for them to make a vaccine for the sickness. Its weird that we have the flu today and millions of people get vaccinated to avoid this but it still happens. People still die from the flu, although we do know they still die from it.

reply

23/09/2018

7:19 am

Robert Ruiz

This was another informative article. I did not know much about this history of the flu vaccine, and how the outbreak spread which was good. I also like the image used in the article, such as the maps and charts. It is amazing to see how much medicine as advantages over the past century. I did notice one error, with foot note 6, but seems like an easy fix. Great article.

reply

26/09/2018

7:19 am

Gabrien Gregory

One leading point of information or thought I took from this is the importance of public health networks and education on health. When a new virus breaks out in the world today, the World Health Organization and the CDC and their partners work to mitigate spreads, find the source and a cure. It is hard to imagine such a failure of vaccination, but this experience clearly served as a learning curb to those in the medical field for future strains and viruses. My only critique of this article would be that it seemed to be more of an article about vaccines at times rather than a focus on the 1918 outbreak. Overall, I really enjoyed this thought-provoking read on a topic I do not know much about.

reply

26/09/2018

7:19 am

Micaela Cruz

I remember a time when I was younger that the flu was becoming a huge issue, and how it was so important to get a vaccine. It was interesting to learn about how the vaccine is made; using a dead strain of the virus to counter the living strain is smart. It’s unfortunate though that many lives were lost in 1918 because of the simple fact that these individuals did not get the right vaccine. However, with the negative outcome, they were able to find a positive and that was finding out that the vaccine they did receive helped fight against possible pneumonia.

reply

26/09/2018

7:19 am

Karina Cardona Ruiz

Your article was very informative and well researched so I just wanted to say good job. I was not familiar with the history of the flu vaccine and how it came to be nor with the 1918 epidemic. I think it’s interesting how researchers have to be able to identify the strain and then can use that to produce an effective vaccine. I was most shocked by the fact that the number of people that were killed by the flu was more than the number of people who died during WWI.

reply

30/09/2018

7:19 am

1 2 3 4

Leave a Reply