Going to school for the first time is always rough. It’s every child’s annoyance and even disdain when it comes to school. Carlisle seemed like any ordinary school. It had classrooms, teachers, libraries, things that any school would have. Only this school had a unique purpose. This school was not for everyone; in fact, it was only for one group of people: Native American children. The purpose of this school was to strip these Native American children of every native tradition and custom they ever had. Their traditional clothing made of soft leather and Mulberry and redwood bark were replaced with uniforms.1 These childrens’ names were officially changed to Christian names, and they were forbidden to speak their native languages while on school premises; all teaching instruction was in English.2 Additionally, both boys and girls had to have their hair cut to an appropriate length, which was based on Anglo-Saxon cultural norms. After the students had their hair cut and their Native garb removed, they would have to choose a Christian denomination.3 The one connection the students had to their culture was one ritual dance that was performed by the students for the comic entertainment for visitors. Any other traditional dances or rituals were prohibited.4 How did this school come about?
After multiple failures of the United States government to suppress Native Americans though the use of brutal military campaigns, Thaddeus Pound, a third-term US congressman, promoted the idea of assimilation. In 1881, he proposed that it would be cheaper and easier to assimilate Native Americans rather than to continue fighting them. Stressing the civilizing of Native peoples, Pound pressured Congress that this had to be done for humanitarian purposes. The real purpose, however, was to sever the children culturally and psychologically from their culture, thus saving the Indian but at the same time destroying them by destroying their culture.5 Through this debate came the notion of educating Native children into white culture and erasing their culture through the use of forced assimilation.
The Carlisle Indian Industrial School opened in 1879 in Carlisle, Pennsylvania, by Lieutenant Richard Henry Pratt with 136 Native American Children.6 However, at the turn of the decade, the federal government acknowledged assimilation practices as Indian Policy. Carlisle then became approved as a role model for other off-reservation schools, which led to the creation of twenty-three other similar schools.7 By 1902, the number of such schools had jumped to ninety-two schools managed by the Federal government nation-wide.8 The Carlisle Indian Industrial School focused mostly on teaching low level skills to children, training them for jobs as servants and manual laborers. Education at Carlisle only lasted three years with a focus on basic English, math, writing, and labor skills.
Over time, classes grew to include students who graduated from the eighth grade and higher levels of education. After graduating, most students returned to the reservation to do small jobs such as shoe making, printing, or tailoring. Unfortunately, most of these trades proved useless on the reservations.9 Carlisle, along with other off-reservation schools across the US, held large celebrations and parades dedicated to showing the transition of students from Natives to Anglo-Saxon Americans through the use of parades, floats, and the occasional play. Most of these carried offensive and racist messages, such as “Anglo-Saxons rule the world, we submit” and “wise statesmanship demands a homogeneous population,” which were used to promote and prove the power of assimilation over Native-American populations. This led to the belief that Native culture was just a dream and not something that will grow into the Anglo-Saxon culture.10
Carlisle also sponsored extracurricular activities, which included a music program, a student-run newspaper, and a library. Most of these programs were unintended by the federal government and were created mostly by donors, teachers, and the students themselves. For instance, the library was created through the efforts of O.H. Bakeless and Pratt, who wanted Native children to have access to encyclopedias, medieval stories, and Greek and Roman history. Along with that, they added classics such as Little Women, Black Beauty and religious texts. Teachers and sponsors also played a key roles in growing the school and encouraging pupils to grow outside of the low level jobs the federal government intended for them, by providing additional funds and resources.11
The Carlisle experience had lasting repercussions for these children. Some children were able to leave reservations and find substantial employment, but unfortunately, the overall effects leaned towards the negative rather than the positive spectrum. Children experienced cultural isolation, which led to homesickness, and in extreme cases, to alienation and depression when they returned to reservations. Families that were reluctant to send their children to federal schools faced threats from the government that included removing federal funding and welfare from the family. Hence, even if the child or the family didn’t want to attend Carlisle or other schools, they had no choice. 12 Gertrude Bonnin, also known as Zitkala-sa, was a former student from Carlisle and went on to become a teacher at the school. She, like many students, had been scouted out by missionaries prior to attending Carlisle Indian Industrial School. In her case, she was recruited by the Manual Labor Institute, a Quaker mission school in Indiana. She was recruited at the age of eight, and she recalled the traumatic experiences she and others faced when going through the assimilation process. In her essay, School Days, she recalls how she hid from teachers when they told her they were going to cut her long, traditional braids. They ended up dragging her out from under a bed, tying her to a chair, and then cutting her braids with a pair of scissors. She describes this moment as the moment she lost her spirit. After Carlisle, she found herself alienated from her traditional mother and struggled to reconnect with her family for the rest of her life. She became a teacher at Carlisle for two years before going on to found the National Council of American Indians in 1926, where she served until her death in 1938. She was a prominent Native-American rights activist.13
After years of forced assimilation, the connection between the Native Americans and the Federal government became extremely fragile. With that, Native Americans decided to create laws that only effected Native Americans. The federal government agreed to this in order to reconcile with the Native peoples and let these special laws pass. The major laws were aimed towards Native-American children with the most famous one being the creation of ICWA or the Indian Child Welfare Act.14
Out of the 10,000 that went into Carlisle, 186 children from nearly fifty different tribes died, most dying of illnesses such as tuberculosis, influenza, and trachoma, an infectious eye disease. Tuberculosis, however, was the deadliest of the three. Families of the deceased children could not claim the bodies of the children, so the children’s bodies were never returned to the tribe. The children instead were given Christian burials and were buried in the Carlisle cemetery. It wasn’t until the year 2000 that the children were given proper Native burial rites, but unfortunately, the correct identification of each body had been lost due to time, loss of accurate documentation, and several relocation projects on the Carlisle Cemetery. The school is now an active military base with the cemetery located right behind the army barracks known as the Carlisle Barracks.15
- Fashion, Costume, and Culture: Clothing, Headwear, Body Decoration, and Foot wear through the Ages, 2013, s.v. “Clothing of Native American Cultures,” by Sara Pendergast, Tom Pendergast, Drew D. Johnson, and Julie L. Carnagie. ↵
- Encyclopedia of Genocide and Crimes against Humanity, 2005, s.v. “Native Americans,” by Stacie E. Martin. ↵
- Mary A. Stout, Native American Boarding Schools (Santa Barbara: ABC-CLIO LLC, 2012), 32, 34, 36. ↵
- American Eras: Primary Sources, 2013, s.v. “The Indian School at Carlisle Barracks,” by Rebecca Parks. ↵
- Scott Laderman, “‘It is cheaper and better to teach a young Indian Than to Fight an Old One’: Thaddeus Pound and the Logic of Assimilation,” American Indian Culture And Research Journal 26, no.3 (2002): 9-10. ↵
- Encyclopedia of Race and Racism, 2013, s.v. “American Indian Boarding Schools,” by Jon Reyhner. ↵
- Mary A. Stout, Native American Boarding Schools (Santa Barbara: ABC-CLIO LLC, 2012), 42. ↵
- American Eras: Primary Sources, 2013, s.v. “The Indian School at Carlisle Barracks,” by Rebecca Parks. ↵
- Mary A. Stout, Native American Boarding Schools (Santa Barbara: ABC-CLIO LLC, 2012), 38, 42. ↵
- John R. Gram, “Acting out Assimilation: playing Indian and becoming American in the federal Indian boarding schools,” The American Indian Quarterly 40, no. 3 (2016): 1-5. ↵
- Bernadette A. Lear, “Libraries and Reading Culture at the Carlisle Indian Industrial School,” Book History 18, (2015): 168, 173. ↵
- Encyclopedia of Race and Racism, 2013, s.v. “American Indian Boarding Schools,” by Jon Reyhner. ↵
- Mary A. Stout, Native American Boarding Schools (Santa Barbara: ABC-CLIO LLC, 2012), 36-37. ↵
- Timothy Sandefur, “Suffer the Little Children: US laws treats Native American Children very different from Other Children,” Regulation 40, no. 4 (2017): 1-3, 5. ↵
- Jacqueline Fear-Segal, “Institutional Death and Ceremonial Healing far from Home: The Carlisle Indian School Cemetery” Museum Anthropology 33, no. 2 (September 2010): 157-159, 164-165. ↵
53 comments
Auroara-Juhl Nikkels
It is so sad to think of all of the wrong doings done by the American government to the Native Americans, even just individual people. I had heard just a little about this school before reading your article, but I did not know much. Your article was very informative and comprehensive. It was sad to learn all the details and how desperate people were to try to eliminate an entire race of people like this.
Suvesh Vasal
I’ve always respected native American people just because of all of the hardships their people have gone through. The United States government has pretty much tried to wipe out their culture completely leaving them as a thing of the past. I had never heard this story and it was really interesting and fueled my fire. This was just another terrible thing that Native Americans had to endure. Very interesting article.
Jasmine Jaramillo
I feel like the relationship between the United States and Native Americans have always been fragile. Reading about the assimilation of Native American children at Carlisle is sad and angers me. I’m glad that activist rose out of this event to stand up for Native American rights. I also think it’s sad that the children then passed away at the school had to be buried on site.
Cheyanne Redman
It is very sad to me that the Native Americans faced so much hardship for just being themselves. Throughout the years of school, I have learned about the treatment the Native Americans faced and how terrible it really was for them, they were pushed out of their own land by people who weren’t originally there and that truly is terrible. However, I didn’t know about the Carlisle school. I think the author did a good job at showing the pain the Native Americans went through.
Vanessa Tombo
The brutality that many cultures and groups of people have faced in the hands of those with great powers such as America is completely unfathomable. Not only were native Americans killed for their land during the Great Western Expansion. They were treated with the utmost disdain for human life. Ripping a child from his/her parents and placing the child in schools where they would be stripped of all their roots and formed into “civilized” Amerians. The more I read about the history of America the more I question “how can people be so un-empathetic? Who wants their child to be ripped from them? Should those who lack empathy be considered metal?
Cristina Cabello
This article is a very informative description of the Native Americans. The government tried to push them out of their land. Just like how people destroy land in order to save themselves. People are selfish. We only look after ourselves, especially in our hardest times. By doing so the government has only been looking after themselves. They tried to suppress the Native’s culture in expanding their own teachings. This was a great article.
Miranda Alamilla
I hate so much hearing about the way that the Native Americans were – and have been treated throughout history. Still, to these days, so many people of Native American descent have to live on reserves that provide very little in the livelihood of their day to day activities. The creation of the school, Carlisle, is just one of many examples of how the government has forced Native Americans to suppress their cultures and ways of life. It hurts to read that the Native American children were stripped of their culture being that I am Mexican and I live out more culture so vividly. Great article overall.
Jose Figueroa
This article reminds me of the equally terrible Trail of Tears carried out by the United States. It sad to see how they stripped them of their culture by forcing them to cut there hair and humiliate them by “submitting” to the Anglo-Saxons. Natives have largely been mistreated and the author did an excellent job of highlighting this and its repercussions, great job!
Caroline Bush
Interesting article! Its sad to hear about how the government treated the Native American people on their own land. I cant believe that the government would force these children into schools just to tell them to throw away their beloved heritage. No one should be forced to be something there not and its ridiculous that on top of stealing their land the us also makes them throw away their heritage. Overall I really enjoyed this article and found it to be very well detailed and researched.
Fumei P.
This is an interesting read, I never knew that there were schools for Native American children run by the federal government. The purpose of these school was to sever the children’s cultural relationship with their tribe, which I think is the opposite of what we the federal government should’ve done. Even though the federal government felt like it was helping these kids by teaching them basic English, math and trade skills. It still didn’t benefit them, because they lost their sense of identity. Establishing a new Christian identity hindered them when they returned back to the reservation, and again disease killed many Native American children as well.