StMU Research Scholars

Featuring Scholarly Research, Writing, and Media at St. Mary’s University

October 1, 2017

Menes: Unification King of Egypt

At the dawn of civilization, the Egyptian Nile Valley cradled the richest, most fertile land in the ancient world. Called “the gift of the Nile,” civilizations formed around the rich silt that the Nile carried north to her banks, providing a way of living as the cultivation of crops began to thrive. The delta in the north was the gate to the Mediterranean, allowing for trade and commerce. It was the delta of the mouth of the river that had the most prosperous and fertile land, the crown jewel of the Nile.1 Because of the Nile’s northern current, the southern kingdom is referred to as Upper Egypt and the northern kingdom as Lower Egypt. This soil allowed the people that lived in “Lower Egypt” to cultivate a civilization and accumulate wealth, making them as rich as the soil the Nile provided. It was this rich and beautiful land that Menes established the first dynasty of Egypt, uniting the Nile River valley’s Upper and Lower Egypt.

Map of Ancient Egypt | Courtesy of Wikimedia Commons

Around 3100 BCE, the “Horus” people of Upper Egypt in the south set out on an expedition north to face the “Set” people. These hawk people took their name from their patron god of kingship and the sky. According to Egyptian mythological tradition, Horus warred with the usurper god Set, his younger brother, for his inheritance. Horus was the god of the sky and of kingship with the head of a hawk, while the center of the cult of Set was centered in the north.2 Like the gods, the northern people set out to conquer what was rightfully theirs. Menes led the Horus people into battle as a powerful military figure against the Set people. Menes emerged victorious. He married the northern princess, Netihotpe, thereby legally binding the two lands and giving him rightful claim to having united the two kingdoms of Egypt.3

Menes turned out to be just as charismatic a political figure as he was a skilled and powerful general. He allowed the Northern people to keep their religious customs, including festivals celebrating Set. The gesture was welcomed as a sign from the gods that the southern people meant no harm to the northerners. They only meant to take their place as the rightful kings of a unified Egypt and establish discipline and order.4 To centralize the two kingdoms, Menes established a new city between the two kingdoms, founding the city of Memphis. By establishing a city in the floodplain of the Nile, the city grew prosperous with surpluses of food and a clear path to trade, advancing the civilization at the seat of the government.5 This city also became the place where the north and south could meet culturally. During the rule of Menes, the combined crown of Upper and Lower Egypt became the symbol of a unified Egypt, the white symbolic of Upper Egypt and the red of Lower Egypt.6 This symbolizes the establishment of the first dynasty in Egypt, making Menes the first pharaoh. By the time of his death, Menes had established a civilization that allowed Egyptians to continue to develop a complex social hierarchy, political system, commercial center, and powerful economy.7 In his death, Menes was granted two tombs, one at Theni, the capital in the north, and one at Memphis, the seat of unified Egypt.8

The Crown of Unified Egypt | Courtesy of Wikimedia Commons

Egyptian scholars largely agree that the southern people of Upper Egypt conquered the northern people of Lower Egypt through military conquest.9 However, it is hard for scholars to distinguish the king and conqueror that united the kingdoms. Egyptian tradition holds that it was King Menes that unified the kingdoms. However, this unification occurred during the prehistoric period of Egyptian civilization, called the Pre-Dynastic Era. Therefore, there is no evidence that Menes was the conqueror of the Egyptian kingdoms. The most well-known surviving piece of evidence from the dawn of Egyptian civilization is the Palette of Narmer, pictured above.10 In this earliest depiction of pharaoh, a leader with the southern crown is pictured with a mace raised above his head, as he holds the king with the northern crown down.11 The image of Narmer is the dominant figure in the palette, declaring his victory over the ancient Egyptians. According to archaeological evidence, the era from which the palette was made corresponds with the time that the southern people conquered the northern people. This is evident, based on the movement of the art shifting to where parts of the body are in front view while others remain in side view. In the palette, Narmer’s chest is in front view, while the rest of his body is in side view. In addition, the main figure, Narmer, is showcased by his size in comparison to the rest of the figures, another development in art during this time period.12 The era that followed marked the flourishing of social and political hierarchy, a strong economy, and a powerful role in commerce.13

Detail on the Throne of Sesostris I of Horus and Set with the Symbol of Unity, 12th dynasty | Wikimedia Commons

If Menes was the king that conquered, why is this palette named for Narmer? The answer is far from simple. It is Egyptian tradition that holds that the king that unified Egypt was named Menes. However, there are many historical debates about the name for the unification king and the date in which he united Egypt. Historians believe that it is possible that the king answered to both Menes and Narmer, but this explanation conflicts with archaeological findings near Thebes. The most popular theory is that Narmer led the military conquest of Lower Egypt, while his son, Menes, was the charismatic leader that united the cultures of the south and north, solidifying the unification through marriage. Through his marriage to Netihotpe, the heir to the southern kingdom, Menes became the king of the south legally, which is why he is held up as the unification king in tradition. Some say that Narmer and his son, Aha, took the title “Meni,” meaning “the established,” to consolidate the kingdoms. Aha is again mentioned as the name for the king of the Horus people. When the kingdom was united, historians speculate that he took the name Menes, to solidify his dynasty to include the Set people.14 But, because there is no written record of the dynasty of Menes, none of these explanations can be confirmed. In fact, it was Manetho under Ptolemy II Philadelphus who named Menes the earliest of the pharaohs. So, Menes remains as a legendary figure in Egyptian history.15

Despite historical and archaeological conflicts with legend, the influence of the unification of Upper and Lower Egypt is clear. No matter what the name of the king was, he unified Egypt and strengthened Egyptian civilization as a whole, becoming the first pharaoh. He established the seat of government at Memphis as a cultural, political, and economic center. Most importantly, he is an important cultural and traditional figure. He fulfilled the destiny of Horus and reclaimed the rightful place of the southern people. For these accomplishments, it is Menes that is recognized as the unification king.

  1. Robert J. Wenke, “Egypt: Origins of Complex Societies,” Annual Review of Anthropology, Vol. 18 (1989): 144-148.
  2. Arts and Humanities Through the Eras, 2005, s.v. “Myths of Horus, Seth, and Amun,” by Edward I. Beilberg, James Allan Evans, Kristen Mossler Figg, Philip M. Soergel, and John Block Friedman.
  3. Encyclopedia of World Biography, 2004, s.v. “King Menes” by Paula K. Byers and Suzanne Michele Bourgoin.
  4. Valentin Müller, “The Origin of the Early Dynastic Style: (Studies in Oriental Archaeology II),”  Journal of the American Oriental Society, Vol. 58, No. 1 (March 1938): 143-147.
  5. Encyclopedia of World Biography, 2004, s.v. “King Menes” by Paula K. Byers and Suzanne Michele Bourgoin.
  6. Ancient Civilizations Reference Library, 2000, s.v. “Egypt” by Judson Knight and Stacy A. McConnell.
  7. Robert J. Wenke, “Egypt: Origins of Complex Societies,” Annual Review of Anthropology, Vol. 18 (1989): 144-148.
  8. Encyclopedia of World Biography, 2004, s.v. “King Menes” by Paula K. Byers and Suzanne Michele Bourgoin.
  9. World History Encyclopedia, 2011, s.v. “Rise of the Egyptian State,” by Alfred J. Andrea and Carolyn Neel.
  10. Richard Bussmann, Petrie Museum of Egyptian Archaeology: Characters and Collections (London: UCL Press, 2015), 42-43.
  11. World History Encyclopedia, 2011, s.v. “Rise of the Egyptian State,” by Alfred J. Andrea and Carolyn Neel.
  12. Valentin Müller, “The Origin of the Early Dynastic Style: (Studies in Oriental Archaeology II),”  Journal of the American Oriental Society, Vol. 58, No. 1 (March 1938): 143-147.
  13. Robert J. Wenke, “Egypt: Origins of Complex Societies,” Annual Review of Anthropology, Vol. 18 (1989): 144-148.
  14. Encyclopedia of World Biography, 2004, s.v. “King Menes” by Paula K. Byers and Suzanne Michele Bourgoin.
  15. Ancient Civilizations Reference Library, 2000, s.v. “Egypt,” by Judson Knight and Stacy A. McConnell.

Tags from the story

Egyptian Pharoahs

Menes

Narmer

Recent Comments

Alexandria Martinez

It is always hard to know for sure what could have happened in the past, especially if there was no form of writing at that time. In this case, it is no different. There is confusion on who really unified Egypt because of the lack of writing and it seems like the artwork did not help very much either. This article offered good insight into the trouble that historians are facing on figuring out who was the actual one to unify all of Egypt.

reply

15/10/2017

1:40 pm

Evelin Joseph

Since we had recently learned about Egypt and, the “the gift of the Nile,” the Nile River Valley, this article was one that I could understand and really follow along with. Menes, the pharaoh of unified Egypt, turned out to be a great leader as he allowed for the people to keep their customs and traditions. I had never before heard of Narmer and did not know that Menes was probably not who led the military conquest before reading this article. The many different possibilities that Menes could have been Narmer’s son or could have even gone by both names truly emphasizes the lack of knowledge we have on the truth. I hope one day we are able to figure it out though.

reply

19/10/2017

1:40 pm

Luke Willis

This was a very interesting article. i have always wanted to visit Egypt and have always been fascinated with the history of Egypt and yet i have never really learned a lot about their history. I had heard about the unification of Egypt however, i did not know it was Menes who did it nor did i know that the basis for the conquest of upper Egypt was so deeply rooted in their religious believes. This was a great article and it gave a lot of insight into early Egypt.

reply

20/10/2017

1:40 pm

Mario Sosa

Menes was most definitely a well respected pharaoh, since I do not know anyone else who has two tombs. Menes unifying North and South Egypt after his conquest is unique for his time, as other leaders like the Babylonians and Assyrians would have wanted complete domination and control over their conquered territories. Great job on the article; keep up the good work!

reply

03/11/2017

1:40 pm

Tyler Sleeter

Great article with lots of information. It still surprises me whenever I read about a folk-legend that might be historically accurate but it might not really be true because of a lack of archaeological evidence. That seems to be the case in this situation. Menes is given credit for being the Egyptian leader that unified Egypt, but there is not a whole lot of evidence to support this claim. Even so, it seems that Menes was a great leader, able to bring two sides together by establishing a middle ground in Memphis. He also combined the two sides by changing the crown to contain both Upper and Lower Egypt. Menes must have been a charismatic person as well as a good leader to be able to accomplish the things he is given credit for doing.

reply

03/11/2017

1:40 pm

Natalia Carroll-Long

I’m ecstatic that I found your article because I just read an article that described the life of one of Set’s brothers, Osiris and I needed closure. I needed to know that Set had justice, no matter how late, dealt to him. Now that that side comment is over I really liked this article. It’s like you got me invested in the Egyptian lore and then derailed it’s certainty at the end. Was it Menes or his father that united Egypt and ultimately sparked their civilization? No one may ever know.

reply

28/01/2018

1:40 pm

Johnanthony Hernandez

Great article, I had known that Egypt had been split into two kingdoms early in its history, but I didn’t know around what time the two kingdoms were unified into one until reading your article. Also, I didn’t who had unified the two powers and while it is only speculated that Menes was the one who did so. It’s still interesting to see the debate between the lack of historical evidence and tradition that has been passed on by Egyptians since the unification.

reply

03/02/2018

1:40 pm

Samuel Ruiz

Very interesting article. I have always been confused about the location and definition of upper and lower Egyptian kingdoms. I found Menes’ strategy to be interesting and his way of uniting both kingdoms to be smart. His accomplishments of keeping everyone happy are quite remarkable. It is unfortunate though that it has not yet been figured whether it was Menes who actually unified the kingdoms.

reply

17/02/2018

1:40 pm

Hector Garcia

I thought that this was a great article that was able to show the readers the story of the unification of the Lower and Upper Egypt. It is important to notice that Menes was the one who brought both Egyptian cultures but the writer brings up an interesting question. I thought this question of how Menes wasn’t the man in charge but a puzzle piece. The author was also able to provide some evidence for his argument. Overall, I thought this was a well-written article.

reply

04/03/2018

1:40 pm

Natalia Flores

This article was very interesting, especially the question the author poses about Namer and Menes.Was it really Menes or was it his father Narmer who fought the war? It’s interesting that the people of Horus and the people of Set were set (no pun intended) to fight each other. Menes himself seemed like a very honorable man since even though he conquered the Northern people, he allowed them to keep their traditions and ceremonies.

reply

08/04/2018

1:40 pm

1 2

Leave a Reply