President Truman has had it with General MacArthur! Truman has just been informed that a letter written by the respected General has been leaked to the press. MacArthur has provided Truman his last straw.1 Who were these two men, and what led them to this antagonistic event?
General MacArthur came from a military household. Douglas MacArthur was born in Little Rock, Arkansas on January 26, 1880. He was the son of the famous General Arthur MacArthur, a hero of the American Civil War. He attended the U.S. Military Academy and graduated with the highest honors. During World War I, he was promoted to General, and won several honors for heroism and leadership of the 42nd Rainbow Division. He retired from the army in 1935; however, he was called back to duty in July 1941. MacArthur was appointed the supreme leader for the Allied powers, and on September 2, 1945, he accepted the surrender of Japan.2 At the formal surrender ceremony, MacArthur spoke of peace and recollection in contrast to the expected conquest and dominion. The Japanese expected that when they went aboard the Battleship USS Missouri, they would be held to public disgrace, but that did not occur.3
In contrast to General MacArthur’s upbringing, President Truman was born into what can be considered the typical American family. Harry S. Truman was born on May 8, 1884, in Lamar, Missouri. He was the son of a livestock trader and farmer. Harry graduated from high school, held odd jobs, farmed for a time, and served in France during World War I. After the war, he married Bess Wallace and the couple had one daughter. Harry Truman opened a men’s clothing store, although it failed in the postwar depression. In 1922, he entered local Democratic politics and was elected judge of Jackson County. With the help of an influential political leader, Thomas J. Pendergast, he was elected to the U.S. Senate in 1934, where he voted consistently for New Deal legislation. Harry Truman became the 33rd president of the United States, after President Roosevelt’s death on April 12, 1945; he was president from 1945 to 1953.4
Those are the two men. But what brought them together to quarrel was the Korean War. That war was entering its fourth month when the two, MacArthur and Truman, met on Wake Island in the South Pacific to discuss the general situation of the war. MacArthur arrived on October 14, 1950 at 6:10 pm; however, the President did not arrive until October 15 at 6:30 am. The President and General had a separate meeting behind closed doors that lasted approximately forty minutes. It is unknown what they discussed exactly, since no other person was present nor did either party take notes of the meeting. The meeting was said to be casual. Truman removed his jacket due to the humidity and MacArthur smoked his briar pipe. By many observers, the reason for the Wake Island meeting was not to discuss serious policy concerns; there was no conference agenda and no extensive preliminary discussion between Truman and his advisers. MacArthur later observed that, “No new policies, no new strategy of war or international politics, were proposed or discussed.”5 Although some have made more of this meeting than was the actual case, considering what happened next, there does not appear to have been any problems between the two men at this time.
Then, MacArthur wrote a letter, which was sent to Joseph W. Martin (Republican), the Minority Leader in the House of Representatives. The contents of the letter were made public on April 5, 1951. In the letter, MacArthur implied that he agreed with Martin’s idea of using the forces of Chinese Nationalist Chiang Kaishek to invade the Chinese mainland.6 MacArthur objected to the president’s policy towards communism, and toward Chinese communism in particular.7 In the intervening time between the Wake Island meeting and MacArthur’s letter, the war in Korea had gone from virtual US victory to the entry of Chinese troops into the war. MacArthur wanted to expand the war as an opportunity to end communist Chinese rule and restore Chaing Kaishek as the legitimate ruler of China. Truman responded publicly to MacArthur’s veiled demand for the change of strategy through the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff General Omar Bradley, who testified before Congress: “Red China is not the powerful nation seeking to dominate the world. Frankly, in the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, this strategy would involve us in the wrong war, at the wrong place, at the wrong time, and with the wrong enemy.”8
On April 11, 1951, only ten months after he assumed command of the United Nations’ forces in Korea, MacArthur heard through a radio broadcast that he had been relieved of his duty by the Commander in Chief of the United States Military, President Harry S. Truman. Before the broadcast, Truman had a lengthy and painful discussion with his senior advisors, in which they came to the decision to fire General MacArthur as early as March 24, 1951, for insubordination explicit in his letter to Joseph Martin. Two weeks later, he instructed Secretary of Defense George C. Marshall to carry out MacArthur’s relief “with courtesy and dignity.”9
The firing of MacArthur was a huge surprise to the American people, but it was no surprise to the members of Truman’s staff. Tensions had been brewing between President Truman and General MacArthur for some time. MacArthur had feelings of distaste towards politicians.10 Men that were served with MacArthur could attest that he made his own decisions on “what a military situation required.”11 General MacArthur even publicly complained about Truman’s administration’s policies and even went so far as to suggest that Truman’s administration was responsible for military setbacks that were then occurring in Korea.12 MacArthur wrote a letter to Truman that was “definitely crossing the line.”13 Dean Acheson stated that, “nothing further was needed to convince me that the General was incurably recalcitrant and basically disloyal to the purposes of the Commander in Chief.”14 After the letter, the President considered removing MacArthur from his post, but he decided it was not the right time.15
The Korean War had been a conflict between North Korea and South Korea that eventually brought in the involvement of the United States, China, and other countries. It came to the world stage after World War II, and was viewed as a fight between free-world democracy and communism. President Truman stated that, “communist aggression in Korea would not be tolerated…. This act was very obviously inspired by the Soviet Union. If we let Korea down, the Soviets will keep right on going and swallow up one piece of Asia after another. We have to make a stand some time or else let all of Asia go. If we were to let Asia go, the Near East will collapse and no telling what would happen in Europe. Therefore, I have ordered our forces to support Korea as we can—or as long as the Koreans put up a fight and gives us something we can support.”16 Korea became the first major military conflict in what has become known as The Cold War.
The Korean War was fought on the Korean Peninsula from June 25, 1950 to July 27, 1953. It was a contest between the communist North (Democratic People’s Republic of Korea) and the Democratic South (Republic of Korea). The North invaded the South, which led to the United States involvement as well as nineteen other nations. MacArthur, without the authorization from Washington, shipped mortars, artillery, and other equipment to South Korea.17 And on a different occasion he again, without the authorization from Washington, deployed cargo ships filled with ammunition to South Korea.18 The leader of North Korea, Kim II Sung, believed that there was considerable civil strife south of the 38th parallel, the boundary between the two Koreas. And, he also believed that since there was growing opposition to South Korea’s president, Syngman Rhee, then the South Koreans would welcome him as a liberator, intent on overthrowing the Rhee government and reuniting the two Koreas. When the North invaded the South, it was assumed the Soviet Union was the muscle behind the invasion; however, that was incorrect. At the time of the attack, the Soviet Union was boycotting the United Nations (UN); and its ally, the Communist government of China, was hoping to invade the island of Taiwan without having to deal with a military intervention from the U.S.; so, they too were not directly and initially involved. The alliance between the regimes of Communist China and the Soviet Union was based on common ideology and current community interest.19 After fighting for three years, on July 27, 1953, the truce agreement was signed, bringing the fighting of the war to an end, but leaving the Korean peninsula still technically at war.20
After MacArthur’s removal, public outrage erupted. By the afternoon of April 12, the White House had received an estimated 5,000 telegrams; the staff estimated three-quarters were opposing the President. However, the editorial opinions were mixed, some supporting Truman’s decision, while others opposed it. On April 16, MacArthur was given a grand farewell by the Japanese people; he was finally returning to the United States. In the United States, he was greeted by masses of people, and parades were held in his honor. The parades celebrated him, but they were also a protest against President Truman and the policies he pursued.21
Both President Truman and General MacArthur held important roles in history and their legacies will not be forgotten. President Truman was a decisive leader during a period of great importance, and his reputation as president grew in the years following his retirement.22 General MacArthur was characterized as, “a man who inspired extreme emotions among admirers and critics alike.” MacArthur was a,”brilliant soldier who played a crucial role in American military affairs for more than three decades.”23
- Harry J. Manihafer, “Message to MacArthur,” American History 31, issue 2 (1996): 28. ↵
- Funk & Wagnalls New World Encyclopedia, 2016, s.v., “Douglas MacArthur.” ↵
- H. W. Brands, The general vs. the president (New York: Doubleday, 2016), 14. ↵
- Funk & Wagnalls New World Encyclopedia, 2016, s.v., “Harry S. Truman.” ↵
- John Edward Wiltz, “Truman and MacArthur: The Wake Island Meeting,” Military Affairs 42, no. 4 (December 1978): 173. ↵
- Harry J. Manihafer, “Message to MacArthur,” American History 31, issue 2 (1996): 28. ↵
- H. W. Brands, The general vs. the president (New York: Doubleday, 2016), 283. ↵
- “Senate Committees on Armed Services and Foreign Relations,” Military Situation in the Far East, hearings, 82nd Congress, 1st session, part 2, (1951): 732. ↵
- Harry J. Manihafer, “Message to MacArthur,” American History 31, issue 2 (1996): 28. ↵
- H. W. Brands, The general vs. the president (New York: Doubleday, 2016), 62. ↵
- H. W. Brands, The general vs. the president (New York: Doubleday, 2016), 79. ↵
- Harry J. Manihafer, “Message to MacArthur,” American History 31, issue 2 (1996): 28. ↵
- H. W. Brands, The general vs. the president (New York: Doubleday, 2016), 266. ↵
- H. W. Brands, The general vs. the president (New York: Doubleday, 2016), 266. ↵
- H. W. Brands, The general vs. the president (New York: Doubleday, 2016), 267. ↵
- H. W. Brands, The general vs. the president (New York: Doubleday, 2016), 86. ↵
- H. W. Brands, The general vs. the president (New York: Doubleday, 2016), 79. ↵
- H. W. Brands, The general vs. the president (New York: Doubleday, 2016), 94. ↵
- James S. Lay Jr. “Basic National Security Policy,” (A Report to the National Security Council, Washington, 1953. ↵
- Funk & Wagnalls New World Encyclopedia, 2016, s.v., “Korean War.” ↵
- H. W. Brands, The general vs. the president (New York: Doubleday, 2016), 315-321. ↵
- Funk & Wagnalls New World Encyclopedia, 2016, s.v., “Harry S. Truman.” ↵
- Funk & Wagnalls New World Encyclopedia, 2016, s.v., “Douglas MacArthur.” ↵
31 comments
Greyson Addicott
General MacArthur could have easily become an American Caesar, crossing the metaphorical Potomac River by ignoring Truman and declaring war on Maoist China, or by attempting to spark another world war with an attack of his choice. Personally, I almost wish that MacArthur pulled an “Andrew Jackson” and demand that Truman “enforce” his decision. The idea that MacArthur was in the wrong for trying to save millions of Chinese citizens is insane, and Truman is the reason that North Korea even exists today.
Rebecca Campos
I had never known that there was conflict between General MacArthur and President Truman until reading this article. The article was very informative about both men, their accomplishments, and the things that set them apart from one another. My only issue with the article was the opening sentence at the beginning of the paragraph that followed directly behind the description summaries of both men. I believe that Truman knew the situation better than anyone, and so if he felt like relieving him from his duties was the best decision then it was the right thing to do. It’s no surprise that he received just as much backlash as he did support for that decision, but no matter what decision was made, people were going to be enraged either way.
Maxx Arizmendi
I remember reading about Truman and MacArthur in middle school and high school. It was interesting how the two had that private meeting with one another addressing World War II, and that no one knows or better yet will ever know what was said in that meeting. The fact that Truman fired MacArthur was interesting because MacArthur was a general but he was very reckless. This article was enjoyable to read.
Adam Portillo
Prior to reading this article I had no idea there were tensions between Truman and MacArthur. I had no idea MacArthur was even fired at one point because he’s touted as a military hero in our country . The firing cause so much uproar among the American public. For me I think the way MacArthur was fired was interesting because he heard it during a broadcast. I could only imagine his emotions at the time he heard he was fired. Great article that was very informative on the relationship between Truman and MacArthur.
Esperanza Mauricio
MacArthur wanting to expand the war into China to end communism, reminds me of Patton after the end of World War 2. He also implied wanting to extend the war to Russia. I believe both of these generals have some things in common such as doing things that made their respected presidents displeased with them. Although Patton was put on the side lines for a while during WW2 he was never completely dismissed from the campaign and later rejoined it. I feel like MacArthur is like Patton in this sense.
Michael Thomas
I found this article interesting because of how it details the tension between General MacArthur and President Truman. I never knew that Truman fired MacArthur for insubordination during the Korean War. MacArthur had succeeded in pushing back the Communists to China. Although MacArthur was fired, he was still honored for his service. Overall, this article was good and informative.
Luis Morales
Great Article. I have always been interested in the firing of General MacArthur because it is so easy to see both viewpoints of General MacArthur and President Truman. For instance, I understand why General MacArthur decided to send supplies and weapons to Korea in the hopes of speeding up the war and giving South Korea a better chance against North Korea. However MacArthur should have followed the chain of command instead of making those decisions on his own. Truman at the time was the president, and so any decisions about what to do with Korea should have gone through him and discussed between him and his advisors. Despite their differences this was a fantastic article.
Kayla Lopez
I do briefly remember learning about General MacArthur in a history class, however, I did not know a lot of the information in this article prior to reading it. I did not know that he was raised in a military family or that he had retired from the army and was called back to duty shortly after. This was a very well written essay with a lot of information.
Saira Castellanos
I dont think that General MacArthur should have made the decision of sending supplies to Korea. I understand he just wanted the war to go faster, but he should have followed the Presidents orders, as it should be. I did not know that he was fired, and it was pretty interesting to read this story. I don’t think they should have fired him though. I think that maybe in this case the General has more experience in the field than the President, but I don’t know its difficult choice.
Julio Morales
Its easy to see both ways of thinking from General MacArthur and President Truman. I understand General MacArthurs decision of sending supplies and arms to Korea to speed up the war and give the south a better chance against the north, however he should have followed his chain of command instead of making those decisions by himself. President Truman at the time was the commander in chief, so the decisions should have gone through him and discussed between him and his advisors. Despite their differences I was happy to read that the U.S still honored General MacArthur and gave him a good farewell.