StMU Research Scholars

Featuring Scholarly Research, Writing, and Media at St. Mary's University
March 26, 2017

The Disappearance of Walter Collins: A Mother’s Undying Hope & the Wineville Chicken Coop Case

The disappearance of nine year old Walter Collins in 1928 in Los Angeles set in motion one of the most incredible series of events of the decade. The disappearance not only included child endangerment, but also brought to light female disempowerment, corruption, and flagrant mistreatment of those involved in the case.

On March 10, 1928, Christine Collins discovered every parent’s worse fear: her son Walter was nowhere to be found. While the police suspected that Walter had simply run away, Christine feared the worst. She refused to believe that her young boy would run off, so she came to the dreaded conclusion that he had been kidnapped. Now with the suspicion that Walter had been taken, the police began to scan the Collins’ street and the neighborhood of Lincoln Heights in Los Angeles. Local thugs were targeted, questioned, and interrogated on the whereabouts of Walter, but the search turned up nothing. It was not until witnesses were sought out that a neighbor, Mrs. A. Baker, claimed that she saw Walter in an automobile, begging to be released, in the company of two foreign-looking people.1

Column released once Walter went missing | Courtesy of the Deranged LA Crimes

Other neighbors gave information as well. They said that days prior to Walter’s abduction, an Italian-looking man, along with a woman, were asking for Walter’s address. All information and all leads led to nothing. There was simply no trace of Walter that led the police to finding him or finding out who had taken him. After searching the Lincoln Park Lake for Walter’s body, and after a massive search of the northeastern part of the city, neither Walter nor any trace of him was found. Walter had now been missing without a trace for over a month.2

Christine Collins was devastated, but she remained hopeful that each day she would hear news of her young son. Months passed, and she had to work daily with the racing thoughts of Walter’s fate constantly in her head. Losing sleep and having little motivation to continue her normal life, she did not surrender to the thought that Walter was gone forever. Five months after Walter’s disappearance, a miracle happened. Walter had been found. It was now August, and Christine received the confirming news that Walter was alive in De Kalb, Illinois. It is hard to imagine how much joy, love, and excitement Christine experienced when she heard this news. Her persistent hoping seemed to have worked.3

Walter was immediately put on a train to Los Angeles to be returned to Christine. The reuniting of mother and son was to be celebrated as a massive success of the police force. But as the approaching train came to a stop, with the anticipation of a happy reunion after five agonizing months, Christine immediately exclaimed that the boy who descended from the train was not her son. What Christine thought was the answer to her prayers, the miracle of a lifetime, proved not to be the case. The boy standing in front of her was not her son. Captain J. J. Jones of the LAPD could not believe what Christine was insisting. Jones explained to Christine that Walter simply seemed to change because of the duration of the months and the traumatic experiences that he had encountered. Christine rejected Jones’ explanation. Christine insisted that she would know her own son, no matter the circumstances. Captain Jones would not take Christine’s word for it, and would under no circumstances let it be known that the Los Angeles Police Department had made a mistake. Trying to avoid humiliation, Jones told Christine to take “Walter” home and try him out for a while, to see if her memory would clear to see that this was indeed her boy.4

An image taken at the reunion of Walter and Christine | Courtesy of Cool Interesting Stuff

Christine, feeling the pressure from both the public and the police about the reunion, agreed to take the boy home. Subsequently, the police began to question “Walter” in hopes of finding his abductor. He was questioned on how he had escaped the kidnapper, and the police wanted to know how he had ended up in Illinois. Police and doctors were unable to get straight answers from the boy. He said little to nothing. It was as if he was keeping a secret, and no one could get the boy to say anything that he knew. Christine knew that the boy was not Walter, but she agreed to house and care for him. But she still sought to prove that she was right. She did not want the police to stop looking for the true Walter because she knew that he was still out there. Christine used Walter’s dental records to prove the difference in Walter and the boy who now lived with her. Those records did indeed demonstrate marked differences in the two boys’ teeth. Christine then took the dental records to Captain J. J. Jones.5

But the dental records proved to be no help. Not only did Jones not believe Christine even with the records, he concluded that Christine was only trying to humiliate the Los Angeles Police Department. Captain Jones would not stand for this slander, especially by a woman. So Jones took immediate action. Jones had Christine Collins committed to the psychopathic ward of the General Hospital to be placed under observation under Code 12 internment, which was intended to jail anyone who was proving to be difficult.6

Christine Collins remained in the hospital under harsh circumstances. She was treated inhumanely and fell victim to different forms of medicine to try and bring her to her senses, and for her to admit to this boy being the true Walter. Ten days passed, and then good news came that released Christine. The believed “Walter” had confessed to not being the real Walter. The boy was really Arthur Hutchins, Jr. His true name was discovered even after he provided another fake name of Billy Fields. When questioned as to why Arthur would pose as Walter, Arthur admitted that when he saw a picture of Walter and saw their resemblance, he saw an opportunity. He knew that if he pretended to be Walter, he would have a one way ticket to Los Angeles and an increased chance of making it in the movies, and even meet some of his favorite stars. The disappearance of Walter Collins would now resume, and would now resume from the very beginning. With no leads. Christine returned to her job, and was back to where she had been for nearly half of a year. Her daily routine remained: she would work, go home, and hope to hear about Walter.7

Gordon Stewart Northcott | Courtesy of Murderpedia

Meanwhile, in Wineville, California, unthinkable events were occurring. It all began to unravel when Jessie Clark was eager to check up on her younger brother, Sanford Clark, who had moved to California two years prior with their uncle Gordon Stewart Northcott and his mother Sarah Louise. Jessie had become increasingly concerned for Sanford’s safety and his situation with their uncle Gordon. She decided to travel down to find out what exactly was taking place. Jessie’s fears of abuse and torment coming to Sanford from Gordon became clear during her visit. And not only was terror being brought upon Sanford, but Gordon even became violent towards Jessie herself. Jessie quickly took action. She returned home to Canada and told everything to her mother who had no hesitation in informing the police of the abuse.8

Sanford Clark identifying the missing boys | Courtesy of Murderpedia

When U.S. authorities got the information of Gordon Northcott’s actions, they made an immediate visit to his residence in Wineville, to a ranch out in the middle of nowhere. When Northcott saw the authorities driving up, he demanded that Sanford stall them for as long as he possibly could. Sanford did as he was told due to his own fear of Gordon. Gordon and his mother Sarah Louis fled, and were not captured until they were found in British Columbia. Their capture was crucial thanks to what Sanford had told the police about Gordon and Sarah Louise. Sanford Clark informed the police that Gordon Stewart Northcott and Sarah Louis had murdered the missing boy, Walter Collins. Sanford also admitted that Walter was not the only boy who fell victim to the Northcott’s hand, but other boys remained at the farm as well. Sanford Clark told everything to the police about what took place. He said that the boys were killed by an ax, and that quicklime was poured over their bodies before disposing them.

In shock and disbelief, the police, with Sanford by their side, returned to Wineville to dig up the remains that Sanford claimed were there.9

The Northcott Ranch and the discoveries | Courtesy of Murderpedia

Physical remains were found on the farm proving that boys had been there, including the Winslow brothers who had gone missing only 30 miles away from where Walter had been taken. Library books belonging to the boys and clothes had been found in the chicken coop, where the Northcotts kept the boys locked in. A note written by the Winslow bothers was even discovered, simply saying, “Don’t worry, we are fine.”10 When Sanford took the authorities to the graves, the bodies no longer remained; only pieces of bodies were found. Gordon Northcott and his mother had emptied them and burned the bodies and remains in the desert before Jessie Clark informed the authorities about the negative conditions Sanford faced. Some human bones and a blood-soaked mattress did turn up, and it proved that Nelson and Lewis Winslow, Walter, and a ranch hand, Alvin Gothea, had all been tragically murdered.11

Sarah Louise Northcott | Courtesy of Shoggoth

It was December 3 when Gordon Stewart Northcott confessed to the murders of the Winslow brothers and Alvin Gothea. Sarah Louis Northcott confessed to the murder of Walter Collins. Gordon Northcott hinted that there were more than four boys that fell victim to his murderous activities. It is believed that the Northcotts may have been guilty of killing at least twenty. Gordon Stewart Northcott was found guilty of having committed three murders, and was sentenced to hang. His mother, Sarah Louise, was also found guilty of the murder of Walter Collins and sentenced to life in prison.12

Christine Collins meeting Gordon Stewart Northcott | Courtesy of Pinterest

This did not please Christine Collins. Walter’s entire body had not been found, so she still held out hope that her son might still be alive. She decided to go meet the man who was said to have taken Walter, Gordon Stewart Northcott. Collins met with Northcott to discuss whether or not he and his mother had truly killed her son. Although Northcott had previously admitted to the killings being done by them, he told Christine that they did not kill Walter. Christine believed Northcott. She chose to believe that this man did not take part in killing her son so that she could hold out hope that he may one day return.

These slayings have become known as The Wineville Chicken Coop Case Murders, and Gordon Stewart Northcott was hanged on October 2, 1930 at San Quentin, California. Christine Collins was granted $10,800 against Captain J. J. Jones for his sending her to a psychiatric ward, and for his denial at believing her claims that the boy returned to her was not Walter. But Jones never paid her, and was only given a four month suspension for what he had done against her.13 Christine never gave up hope that Walter remained alive, but he remained unfound for the remainder of her life.

  1.  The Encyclopedia of Kidnappings, March 2002, s.v. “Collins,” by Michael Newton.
  2.  The Encyclopedia of Kidnappings, March 2002, s.v. “Collins,” by Michael Newton.
  3. The Encyclopedia of Kidnappings, March 2002, s.v. “Collins,” by Michael Newton.
  4. The Encyclopedia of Kidnappings, March 2002, s.v. “Collins,” by Michael Newton.
  5. The Encyclopedia of Kidnappings, March 2002, s.v. “Collins,” by Michael Newton.
  6. The Encyclopedia of Kidnappings, March 2002, s.v. “Collins,” by Michael Newton.
  7. The Encyclopedia of Kidnappings, March 2002, s.v. “Collins,” by Michael Newton.
  8. James Jeffrey Paul, Nothing is Strange With You (Indiana: Xilibris, 2008), 75-86.
  9. James Jeffrey Paul, Nothing is Strange With You (Indiana: Xilibris, 2008), 86-90.
  10.  James Jeffrey Paul, Nothing is Strange With You (Indiana: Xilibris, 2008), 61.
  11. James Jeffrey Paul, Nothing is Strange With You (Indiana: Xilibris, 2008), 105- 134.
  12. James Jeffrey Paul, Nothing is Strange With You (Indiana: Xilibris, 2008), 242.
  13. The Encyclopedia of Kidnappings, March 2002, s.v. “Collins,” by Michael Newton.

Gabriela Serrato

Author Portfolio Page

Recent Comments


  • I’ve just watched the movie changeling and i decided to make a small research about the story of walter and hus mother.i discovered this article and it showed me what happened exactly many thanks

  • Micheala Whitfield

    I love this article due to the fact I have watched the movie Changeling. I knew how accurate it was and I’ve heard of this story and the details about it. I really wish this story were more important to people than it is. There was police corruption, a cover up to make them look good, mistreatment of someone who was in the right, and not even a spec of doubt on compensation for the women they have done wrong. Even in proof, that poor women was not given anything for her suffering. The society we live in has come a long way, but corruption has been in place longer than anyone can imagine. Change will not happen anytime soon until the denial of forgery of people becomes well known and people change the mindset of many generations.

  • Nelly Perez

    It’s scary to lose a child to strangers and it still is today. Collins was waiting for her son to come back everyday. She had patience until a fake child pretended to be Walter, even though the signs clearly showed that the boy pretending to be Walter, was not Walter. It’s sad that once mothers receive news of their child, the child would be dead or still not found.

  • Vanessa Quetzeri

    I find this story kind of ridiculous, I do realize that this was at a different time, but the fact that the police insisted the kid was Christine’s when she claimed it wasn’t is disgusting. This tells the sad story of not only a missing child, the mourning of a mother, and the corruption of the police. The LAPD made the case all about them instead of the actual child and his mother; due to desperation for closing this case and avoid humiliation from the public.

  • Audrey Uribe

    I cannot even imagine the devastation this mother must have felt. Its almost crazy that this is a true story. A mother knows her own child. I want to believe that police take every accusation or reference seriously but this breaks my spirt in the fact that they did not take her seriously. Its sad to think if they had put more focus on finding the boy then fighting with his mother that he could have been safely returned home. There is so many wrong things that happened and this strong women still took care of a child that wasn’t hers. Amazing article.

  • Susan Sheldon

    I saw this on Buzzfeed Unsolved true crimes. So many of these cold cases show incompetence or corruption by police. It is no wonder so many are unsolved.

    • JesusIsLove

      Yes they are almost-all or all masons and they don’t have empathy. They are very sick. Pray for them!

  • Maria Garcia

    This article is completely heartbreaking because I have so much sympathy for the mother. Anyone who has children KNOW their children, and it’s disgusting that the police basically forced her to have “her child” back home, when in reality, it wasn’t even her son. It’s even more disgusting that the police cared for nothing more than their self image.

  • Bianca-Rhae Jacquez

    This is one of the most scariest cases ive ever heard of. Walter’s mother really wanted to believe her son was alive . It was probably completely heartbreaking for her to have found out that the boy wasn’t hers. She didn’t want to give up hope but I think finally she had to accepted that the police weren’t going to give this case the appropriate amount of time and effort.

  • Leonardo Gallegos

    I can only imagine the heart drop and impotency she experienced when she found out that the boy was not her son, let alone I can only imagine how she felt when the police didn’t believe that it wasn’t her son, so the pressure she was feeling was intense because she felt bad for the boy and also felt that she had no other choice. But I also admire her action because she knew the boy was also in need so even though she was living a nightmare she still managed to shelter the child. Great article!

  • Paola Arellano

    This case truly gives me the chills. My heart feels heavy at the mother of Walter because she truly wanted to keep the idea that her son was alive. The fact that her child was taken away from her and then she had to endure in the unfairness of the law. A man who was supposed to do his job and find her son desperately just wanted to get over the case. He was feeling okay with whatever the outcome of the case was, wether the kid was found or not, wether he was killed or not, he did not care. All he wanted was his reputation to look good and this is how the police system failed this desperate mother. The fact that she had to take care of a complete stranger. How does a child make this story up and pretend to be someone else completely? It is a sick story. Why would these people kill the boys? Was that ever revealed?

Leave a Reply to Nelly Perez (Cancel Reply)

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.