StMU Research Scholars

Featuring Scholarly Research, Writing, and Media at St. Mary’s University

December 2, 2020

The Inevitable Fall of Bernie Madoff’s $65 Billion Scheme

The arrest of Benard L. Madoff on December 11, 2008, revealed a scheme that has come to be considered one of the biggest frauds in the history of the United States. Over its twenty-year history, investors lost an estimated $50-$65 billion.1 As it turned out, this amount included the imaginary gains in profits recorded to investor accounts. In terms of scope and scale, it is only outshone by the Enron Corporation Scandal of 2001. At the time of his arrest, Bernie Madoff was the sole proprietor of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities. Over its 48-year history, the investment securities company had a pristine regulatory history. The question of how, why, and when Madoff changed from being a successful and legitimate equities trader into becoming the perpetrator of the most horrific financial fraud remains a mystery.2 While people might know how the Ponzi scheme was conducted, less is known about why Madoff perpetrated the Ponzi scheme. The analysis of how Bernie Madoff managed to execute an unprecedented Ponzi scheme provides a rich case for understanding financial fraud.

Although he was well known as the perpetrator of possibly one of the largest financial fraud schemes, Bernie Madoff had been a successful investment advisor on Wall Street. He founded Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC, a company that grew to become one of the largest wealth management and brokerage firms for penny stocks. Madoff’s business became wildly successful, enabling him and his family to become immensely wealthy. By the 1980s, Madoff’s company handled an estimated 5% of the total trading volume at NYSE. The company’s trading technology helped in the formation of NASDAQ.3 As the majority would argue, the amount of money from his legitimate business was enough to sustain his lifestyle for a lifetime. What still puzzles people are the reasons why he decided to engage in fraud that led to billions of losses in investor wealth.

The Lipstick Building in Manhattan, New York | June 16, 2009 | Courtesy of Dock Druming/Flickr

The company’s wealth management segment facilitated the execution of the Ponzi scheme. The scheme followed the simple and classic Ponzi scheme tactics. By posing as a financial broker, Madoff invited investors to purchase investment packages in bonds, stocks, and other types of financial instruments. He lied about the secretive or vague investment strategies. The rates of returns on these investments were extraordinarily high. In turn, Madoff pocketed deposits from investors and never invested the money, but instead, he used it to expand the scheme. To ensure the sustainability of the Ponzi scheme, Madoff paid “returns” to first or earlier investors using deposits from new investors. He even fabricated the client’s trading statements to allege that the company was making profits. Though actual profits were not being realized at the time, the investments seemed legitimate and profitable. Person A’s profits relied on Person B’s more recent investment. Things started to fall apart in 2008 amidst the financial crisis when a significant number of investors requested to cash out approximately $7 billion in investments.4 At the time, Madoff could not answer the required amount of withdrawals, as he only had less than $300 million. His capture in 2008 marked the end of the scheme. The courts subsequently found him guilty of eleven counts of money laundering, fraud, theft, and perjury.

How the Madoff Ponzi remained undetected for over two decades remains an unsolved riddle. The fact that Madoff managed to perpetrate the fraud for many years adds notoriety to the case. Interestingly enough, nobody is yet to figure out the exact date the Ponzi scheme was started. Despite numerous investigations of Madoff’s business practices over the years, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) failed to detect massive fraudulent practices. Don Nardo argues that a significant number of Wall Street firms had stopped engaging in business activities with Bernie Madoff.5 As an active and well-versed player in the financial industry, Madoff was able to devise strategies that enabled him to fly under the radar for many years despite multiple warnings to the SEC about a suspicious Ponzi scheme. Madoff’s exemplary reputation on Wall Street helped him to attract high-profile investors. The scheme affected victims from Palm Beach to the Persian Gulf, from Brazil to Canada, from a Catholic girl’s school in St. Croix to teachers’ pension plans in South Korea. Madoff even managed to scam reputable pension funds and banks, such as the Royal Bank of Scotland, Banco Santander of Spain, HSBC, and the Korea Teachers Pension.6 His role as the SEC advisor and member of the National Association of Securities Dealers also played a role in enabling him to run the scheme. Such reasons try to explain why a scheme of this magnitude managed to survive without exposure for at least twenty years.

A Fictional depiction of Bernie Madoff asking for help | Taken on September 25, 2008 | Courtesy of Alane Golden/Flickr

The amount of losses to Madoff’s victims is embarrassing and infuriating. From an investor’s point of view, their gullibility and greed were a significant factor in the survival of the Ponzi scheme.7 Their failure to examine the issue closely due to the high rate of expected profit prevented the investors from questioning the legality of their investments. As of April 31, 2014, more than 51,700 investment claims had been submitted to the Department of Justice Madoff Victim Fund. The exact number of victims remains incalculable. Although it is known that Madoff took advantage of thousands of ordinary people, analysis of the profile of victims in the scandal reveals that many victims were family, friends, and relatives. The defrauding of kin contributed to winning the trust of other family members. The involvement of family members and close friends helps to explain the role of social relations in the perpetration of fraud.8

At this point, Bernie Madoff had the world at his feet. With presumably one of the most successful businesses in the world, everyone on Wall Street wanted to be associated with him. But all of this changed in an instant. What followed was a story of one of the largest white-collar crimes in history. Behind it was a trail of devastated families and harrowing tales of lost retirement funds. Anju Beniwal argues that money is the main ingredient for corruption. The thirst for money pushes individuals to act in unimaginable ways. He continues to state that excessive greed increases the desire to acquire more money than desired. With the absence of integrity and honesty, it becomes easier to engage in corrupt activities. Today, a new scandal or scam is being perpetrated and with each scandal, comes frustrations and embarrassment regarding the actions taken in past scandals.9

Occupy Seattle demonstrator holds sign, “I Made Wealthy People Wealthier, I Find Myself Horrified to Be Smiling, B. Madoff” | Westlake Park, Seattle, October 29, 2011 | Courtesy of Eino Sierpe/Flickr

Explaining how and why the scandal became so large calls for the need to explain the ways that Bernie Madoff gained trustworthiness. The fact that he was among the first people to use computer technologies to trade enabled him to earn huge respect among investors.10 The level of respect rose so that he became the chairman of NASDAQ. He had a legitimate company with an excellent trading record. Using this level of trust, he created a secret hedge fund. The details of the hedge fund remained secretive as he claimed that its level of complexity could not be understood by outsiders. The hedge fund remained private as a way of keeping SEC investigators in the dark. In reality, it was a massive bank account where Madoff could withdraw funds at any time and pay off early investors. The returns to investors were theoretical since they were making no investments. The back office on the seventeenth floor of the Lipstick building owned by Madoff was not accessible to everyone. This factor added an element of exclusivity to the entire investment.

The failure of the government to provide proper regulations contributed to the proliferation of the Ponzi. Prior to the exposure of the scandal, a total of eight different SEC investigations had been lodged against Madoff Securities, but no substantial findings were uncovered. Interestingly, the level of investigations enhanced Madoff’s notoriety, a factor that enabled him to land more clients. Even though the Madoff Ponzi scheme sent shock waves through regulatory circles, it later emerged that the Securities and Exchange Commission had been furnished with credible reports raising questions about Madoff’s business undertakings. Investment analysts such as Harry Markopolos identified the investment scam during its early days and issued multiple warning reports to the SEC.11 Markopolos once served as an executive in the security industry and was also an accomplished financial fraud investigator and a forensic accountant. Instead of conducting investigations that could have led to the discovery and prosecution of the crime, the SEC ignored the warnings. If they did send investigators, the investigations conducted failed to conduct due procedure for the purpose and intent of the investigation. Routine and inconsequential audits revealed nothing wrong about Madoff’s business activities. Banks and accounting firms too failed to detect the fraud despite servicing accounts used in the transfer of funds.

Madoff is currently serving a 150-year prison sentence in a maximum-security penitentiary.12 In prison, he is popularly referred to as prisoner #61727-054. Investigations into Madoff’s financial records are still ongoing in an effort to restate and distribute money to defrauded investors. A lot has changed since being imprisoned. Madoff’s wife, Ruth no longer visits him. Mark, the estranged older son, committed suicide in 2010. Andrew died of cancer in 2014.13 He is serving the outcomes of deception, delusion, and manipulation from his criminal activities. His ability to inspire trust and honesty provided a necessary ingredient for inspiring the scheme.

The Madoff Ponzi scheme remains one of the most epic and largest truly global financial frauds. Unfortunately, misguided, and obsolete notions for investments governs much of the conventional thinking and investment practices across society. The aftermath and losses to victims of the Madoff Ponzi scheme provide an interesting case and illumination to the dangers of misinformed and misguided investment practices. The examination of how and why Bernie Madoff managed to execute and elaborate a well-masterminded fraud has provided a wealth of detail regarding the ways of identifying and uncovering concealed fraud. Despite having immense wealth while conducting a legitimate business, the “why” for engaging in fraud still remains a mystery. Judging from the history of the circumstances surrounding his family, Madoff could not admit failure at anything. The fact that he had developed a trading system that made big money for Over-the-counter (OTC) stocks increased his desire for making more money as a middleman. As a trusted Wall Street trader, the reasons Madoff betrayed his investors still defeats conventional wisdom. Lying to victims that he will use discrete strategies to find lucrative but unidentified investment opportunities sounded impressive to gullible victims.

The Madoff case is instructive and fascinating. It illuminates the fundamental challenges of capturing trusted criminals in Ponzi schemes. What Madoff did can still be done. Guaranteed returns, the promise of supernormal returns, tightly controlled companies, common investors, lack of outside audits and transparency, and claims of using a proprietary investment strategy are crucial red flags in the detection of Ponzi schemes.14 The processes, procedures, and policies of handling complaints at the SEC and at the organizational level need to be improved.

I would like to thank Dr. Matthew Gilley for his help in the early stages of this project, particularly in helping me with the approach to take in my research. I am also indebted to Dr. Necia Wolff for her assistance in the editing phase of the project. And I am most grateful to Dr. Bradford Whitener for his encouragement to help me to see the importance of this project for how it could be helpful and useful to others.

  1. Gale Virtual Reference Library, 2011, s.v. “His Scheme Exposed at Last,” by Don Nardo.
  2. Lionel S. Lewis, Bernard Madoff and His Accomplices Anatomy of a Con : Anatomy of a Con (Santa Barbara: Praeger, 2016),  xxiv.
  3. Don Nardo, “The Good Bernie Madoff,” in Bernie Madoff (Detroit, MI: Lucent Books, 2011), 28.
  4. Tom Nevin, “The Gentle Art of Fleecing the Very Rich,” African Business, no. 356 (2009): 28.
  5. Gale Virtual Reference Library, 2011, s.v. “His Scheme Exposed at Last,” by Don Nardo.
  6. “Bernie Madoff,” 2009, New Internationalist, no. 424 (July): 32.
  7. Chelsea Alvarez, “Fyre Festival: Trouble in Paradise.” StMU History Media last modified May 12, 2019,
  8. Sherry B. Ortner, “Capitalism, Kinship, and Fraud The Case of Bernie Madoff,” Social Analysis 63, no. 3 (2019): 3-5.
  9. Anju Beniwal, “Corruption: A Social Disease,” The Indian Journal of Political Science 73, no. 1 (2012): 86.
  10. Diana B. Henriques,  “A Case Study of a Con Man: Bernie Madoff and the Timeless Lessons of History’s Biggest Ponzi Scheme,” Social Research 85, no. 4 (Winter 2018): 755–756.
  11. “DP/30: Chasing Madoff, Subject Harry Markopolos (Pt 1of 2),” Youtube. DP/30: The Oral History Of Hollywood, last modified August 1, 2011,
  12. Colleen Eren, Bernie Madoff and the Crisis: The Public Trial of Capitalism (Stanford, California: Stanford Business Books, an imprint of Stanford University Press, 2017), 3-7.
  13. “Wife Leaves Fraudster Bernie Madoff,” UPI Top News. Last modified August 15, 2011.
  14. Marsha Bertrand, Fraud!: How to Protect Yourself from Schemes, Scams, and Swindles (New York, New York: AMACOM, 2000), 43.

Tags from the story

Benard L. Madoff

ponzi scheme

Nicholas Burch

Hello! I’m Nic Burch, a freshman majoring in Business Marketing at St. Mary’s. I was born and raised in San Antonio and throughout my life, I’ve always been interested in the business world. I’ve enjoyed learning about online businesses, marketing, and business communication. I’m proud to be in the class of 2024 at St. Mary’s University.

Author Portfolio Page

Recent Comments

Andrea Laguna

Engaging article! It is unbelievable what ambition and lack of ethics could do to a man. I personally don’t understand the reasons why Bernard Madoff would want to engage in such a horrifying act, like fraud, being already one of the most successful equities trader. As it is mentioned in the article, it is infuriating seeing the amount of victims caught in his Ponzi scheme. Before reading this article, I have never heard of Bernie Madoff or his fraud, but you did a very good job explaining it!



6:56 am

Faith Chapman

Does Madoff really need a reason for doing a Ponzi scheme other than wanting more money than he has currently, something we’re all taught/suggested to want, especially in capitalist America? Based off Madoff’s previous accomplishments, it sounds like he was some sort of prodigy, and this was well known among people willing to work with him; a Ponzi scheme, or maybe any financial fraud, would have been one of his best options for getting quick money when “everyone on Wall Street wanted to be associated with him” because of the ingenuity he previously demonstrated, and that’s not a reputation just any one has. I dare say, if the 2008 recession hadn’t happened, know one would have known about his Ponzi scheme, assuming he would have quit while he was still ahead.



6:56 am

Shanita Frazier

I really enjoyed this article. I really like that the author can stay on topic. It was shocking to realize that some people were impacted by it. Of course you should do a lot of research before you trust in someone or any company. I also think if people would take more time to trust we would be able to avoid some of the consequences. I was also unaware that there was so much fraud and scam in investing. Very good!



6:56 am

Madeline Chandler

In all honesty, I have heard of Bernie Madoff and his ponzi scheme yet not in this detail. It is so crazy that he was so greedy and needed more and more. And that he got away for along time with such scandal. The horrible recession honestly naturally caught him. It is interesting to think that would he still have his scheme going if the recession did not happen. The recession was such a transitional time for the U.S. economy, yet the recession had a good outcome in catching a greedy man.



6:56 am

Angelo Oliva-Noeggerath

The article detailing the Ponzi scheme that Berni Madoff really details into his wealthy background and the successful business he owned. Madoff’s tactic of using the new investors’ money to satisfy the returns of initial investors managed to work to my surprise. The scheme going on for over two decades is what made me even more confused, because how did not a single person notice any discrepancies? The article displays the greediness that other investors had to fall for the scheme. For a man who pretty much had it all, he had lost it all with such a high-risk illegal task he undertook causing himself to be behind bars in the end.



6:56 am

Lucia Herrera

Wow this article is really interesting it reminds me of the movie The Wolf of Wall Street. Bernie Madoff seems like a heartless genius. With the Ponzi scheme going on for two decades it is crazy he didn’t get caught sooner. Just like Jordan Belfort he seemed unsatisfied with the wealth he already accumulated and continues to rip off investors.



6:56 am

Tyler Pauly

It’s pretty amazing that people are willing to give such large sums of money to investments they really know nothing about. It just goes to show you how many problems could be solved if people just did a little research and tried to do things on their own. Obviously, this is much easier to do now than it was back then. I wonder how many people are still out there waiting to get anything in return from the scam. I’d also be curious to find out what happened to the money Madoff pocketed.



6:56 am

Andres Ruiz

This guy was the original Wolf of Wall Street, The original Ponzi scheme, and is the originator of the Wall Street broker stereotype. It’s amazing how so much trust was placed in this guy, yet he chose to do what he did. I think cases like Madoff are a contributing factor to the general distrust of America, and part of the reason why people are afraid to get into stocks. I hope that in the future, precautions are made to keep things like this from happening again.



6:56 am

Kanum Parker

The article tells how important it is to know where you place your money. It is hard to tell what can happen especially if you don’t know too much about a subject and the other does. There are many loop holes in the United States system making things like this possible causing people to deal with a big loose. If it wasn’t for the market crash then he may have never been found but due to no backup plan he failed to continue his fraud. Always know what you are doing with your money because you never know when you can be a victim like those who invested with Madoff.



6:56 am

Joshua Marroquin

This article was one most informative article I hav4 read in a while. I am truly amazed with how informative it was and how much I learned from reading this passage. Bernie Madoff was a greedy man, he used new investors money to satisfy the initial investors. It was basically a scheme that robbed people their money without them questioning it. It is crazy that the scheme lasted for more than two decades. It was a well written article and I do recommend other to reads this passage.



6:56 am

Leave a Reply