November 10, 2019
“I [Angela Yvonne Davis] now declare publicly before the court, before the people of this country that I am innocent of all charges which have been leveled against me by the State of California. I am innocent and therefore maintain that my presence in this courtroom is unrelated to any criminal act. I stand before this court as a target of political frame up which far from pointing to my culpability implicates the State of California as an agent of political repression.”9
“Members of the jury, we were correct in our understanding of the case of the Soledad Brothers. Monday morning as you sat there listening to the prosecution’s opening statement… the ultimate fruits of our labors were attained. The 12 men and women who for a period of many months had listened to all the evidence which the prosecution could muster against the Brothers, entered a courtroom in San Francisco and pronounced the Soledad Brothers NOT GUILTY. If George Jackson had not been struck down by San Quentin guards in August of last year he too would have been freed from that unjust prosecution…”13The prosecution’s case against Davis was based on motive. Prosecutor Albert Harris had to build a case against her that showed that she had reason to participate in this alleged plot to free the Soledad Brothers. His initial plan was to use her political extremism and her relationship with George Jackson, both supplied with evidence, against her in a way that gave her motive to commit those crimes. However, with the shift in political viewpoints of citizens throughout the country regarding the awareness of the racism and cruelty within the prison system, Harris decided to focus his case against her on the relationship she had with George Jackson, in which he contained the letters she wrote to him, along with her diary, as evidence. Harris claimed that she was not a political prisoner, and that “her basic motive was not to free political prisoners, but to free the one prisoner she loved… [the motive] was not founded… for prison reform. It was founded simply on the passion that she felt for George Jackson…”14 All of the jurors at Angela Davis’ trial were white. The jury selection process had been lengthy, as Davis and her team came across many prospective jurors with different perspectives regarding Angela Davis, politics, and the prison system— some wanting no conflict, some having family ties to police and armed forces, some fearful of serving on this particular jury, some despising Communists, a few liking the ideals of Communism, some professing that they could not be fair at this trial, and many having had no contact with black people.15 On March 14th, the jury was finally accepted. Angela stood before the court and said,
“We have long contended Judge Arnason, that it would be virtually impossible for me to receive a fair trial in Santa Clara County. As you know, we have made a number of change of venue motions challenging the ruling that the case be tried in this county. As I look at the present jury I see that the women and men do reflect the composition of this county. There are no black people sitting on the jury. Although I cannot say that this is a jury of peers, I can say that, after much discussion, we have reached the conclusion that the women and men sitting on the jury will put forth their best efforts to give me a fair trial. I do not think that further delay in the jury selection process will affect in any way the composition of the jury, and because we have confidence in the women and men presently sitting in the jury box, I am happy to say that we accept this jury.”16Albert Harris presented his case against Angela Davis in three different parts. The first was presenting his version of what happened on August 7. He called 39 witnesses to depict what happened that day. He needed to show that Davis was involved in a plan (conspiracy) to free the Soledad Brothers, that with this plan the three San Quentin prisoners kidnapped Judge Haley, assistant district attorney Gary Thomas, and the three jurors, and that Judge Haley was killed during this kidnapping. The most critical witnesses that Harris called were Maria Graham, a juror that was kidnapped and wounded on August 7, James Kean, a reporter and friend of Judge Haley, Captain Harvey Teague of Marin County’s Sherriff’s Department, and Gary Thomas. Each of them testified that they heard specific indications of a plan in place to free the Soledad Brothers. Gary Thomas testified that he saw Ruchell Magee shoot Haley in the face with the shotgun. Harris presented the guns, some books containing Angela Davis’ signature, clothes, photographs, and Jonathan Jackson’s wallet as evidence.17 The next part of Harris’ case focused on Angela Davis’ passion for George Jackson, giving her motivation to be involved. He sought to use Davis’ letters to Jackson, along with her diary, as evidence. Judge Arnason suppressed the use of the diary, which Harris claimed was the heart of his case. Harris read the letters, which expressed Davis’ love for Jackson.18 In the third part of his case, Harris called 43 witnesses to display Angela Davis’ alleged role in the conspiracy. His witnesses testified that Angela Davis had purchased firearms and ammunition and cashed multiple checks, alongside Jonathan Jackson, and that they had been seen at San Quentin prison together on August 5. The young woman alongside Jackson was in fact Diane Robinson, not Angela Davis. Alden Fleming, the Mobil Gas Station owner from which Jackson placed a phone call, testified that he remembered Jackson and that he was accompanied by a “colored girl” whom he identified as Angela Davis. Louis Y. White, a former San Quentin prisoner, testified that he saw Jackson and Angela Davis leaving the San Quentin parking lot in a yellow van. In actuality, Jackson was alone. He also testified that on August 5 he saw them in the van. The van hadn’t been rented until August 6. Based on a telephone number found in Jonathan Jackson’s wallet and a claim from Marcia Lynn Brewer (an airline ticket agent) that Angela Davis was at San Francisco International Airport around 2 p.m. on August 7, Harris had a theory that Angela Davis had been waiting at a phone booth by the airport for a call from Jackson.19 Albert Harris expressed to Judge Arnason that the diary was critical to his case. Two weeks later the judge presented a new version of the diary, which precluded any legally unacceptable material. Harris read the diary, which expressed Angela Davis’ love for George Jackson on a much deeper, vulnerable, and intimate level than the letters. Harris rested his case.20 The defense of Angela Davis understood that Harris’ case was extremely inferential. His case caused confusion in the courtroom; their credibility was negligible and did not prove that there was a plan in place to free the Soledad Brothers. Everything that Harris’ witnesses testified to regarding Davis’ whereabouts were unreliable, and the letters and diary contained nothing incriminating. The defense presented a “pin-point defense,” in which they would attack Harris’ strongest links.21 The defense called twelve witnesses, who were able to refute the testimonies of the witnesses that put Angela Davis and Jonathan Jackson together on August 4th, 5th, and 6th. They were also able to justify Davis’ ownership of the firearms, Jackson’s access to them, and her purchase of the shotgun.22 One of the witnesses called was Soledad Brother Fleeta Drumgo. He entered the courtroom from the basement holding cell, shackled and chained at the feet, waist, and left arm. Fleeta Drumgo said that he knew nothing of a plan to escape and free himself and his fellow Soledad Brothers.23 In the closing argument of the defense, Leo Branton Jr., Angela Davis’ defense attorney, depicted the black American experience to the jury, and made them understand the love that Angela Davis had for George Jackson with regard to her devotion to black people, all while exposing the prosecution’s racist slurs and sexual insinuations. Harris then made his rebuttal and the trial came to a close.24 On Sunday, June 4, the jury had a verdict.25 In the jury trial stage of a criminal case, the judge provides the jury with specific instructions, going over the rules that the jury has to implement in their deliberations. Once the jury is in the jury room, they elect a foreman, a head juror who facilitates the deliberation. Many times the foreman takes a quick poll in order to indicate how close the jury is to an agreement. This gives them an idea of what they need to discuss and consider. If the initial vote is unanimous or close to unanimous, deliberations can be extremely short. If the initial vote is not unanimous, jury deliberations can take days, or even weeks if the jury is evenly split, or if there happens to be one juror who will not agree with the other eleven. If the jury is unable to reach a unanimous decision, the foreman reports to the judge that the jury is deadlocked, also called a hung jury, resulting in a mistrial. If the jury reaches a unanimous decision, the foreman reports to the judge that they have a verdict.26
Judge Arnason: Ms. Timothy, has the jury reached a verdict? Ms. Timothy: Yes, your honor. We have. The clerk: In the case of The People of the State of California vs. Angela Y. Davis, Case Number 52613… Kidnapping in the first degree… The jury finds the defendant Angela Y. Davis, Not Guilty. …Murder in the first degree… The jury finds the defendant… Not Guilty. In the case of the People…vs. Angela Y. Davis… Conspiracy. The jury finds the defendant… Not Guilty.27Angela Davis had been acquitted of all counts by an all-white jury. Cheers and roars filled the courtroom. Angela Davis was sobbing and embracing her loved ones. Angela said,
“This is the happiest day of my life… People all across the country and the world who worked for my freedoms see this as an example of things to come. From this day forward we must work to free every political prisoner and oppressed people everywhere.”28A crowd at a nearby rally began to chant, “POWER OF THE PEOPLE SET ANGELA FREE!”29
Angela Davis
Black Panther Party
prison reform
Soledad Brothers
Camryn Blackmon
Hi Syndey, This article is amazing. I look up to Angela Davis and admire her as an icon, activist, and scholar. I feel like your article really captured her energy and power at the time. The way you structured this piece with the case’s timeline was very informative, descriptive, and engaging. I enjoyed learning from your article.
01/03/2021
2:56 am
Christopher Metta Bexar
Angela Davis was an interesting person from a bygone era. She was idolized by a group of people who wanted to cause trouble in the way that some people in the Black Muslim Party wanted to arouse conflict. The most interesting part of the article is how an all white jury found her not guilty on all three charges when the author states that African Americans were regularly railroaded into jail and prison terms during the period.
23/09/2021
2:56 am
Jadyn Evans
Amazing article., Angela Davis was such an amazing activist. She overcame so many hardships just for this time today were we have more freedom than we had in the past. She is truly an inspiration. It is always sad however hearing about how much black activists have had to go through and still go through to this day but I love to see that Angela will never stop fighting for the rights of all.
30/01/2022
2:56 am
Maggie Trujillo
I have never heard of Angela Davis before reading this article. This article did a great job of describing what Angela Davis went through and ultimately up to her trial. It is unfathomable to read what she went through and how we, as the United States of America, were treating other Americans. Especially how minorities were viewed and treated even in criminal justice proceedings. It was good to see that Angela Davis was invited back to UCLA after being fired for being a “Communist.”
13/04/2023
2:56 am
Danielle Rangel
This article does a great job of explaining the importance of the People vs. Angela Davis. It is crazy but not surprising that people would automatically accuse Angela Davis based on her race. And despite the jury being an all white jury it is good to know that they did not try to put her in jail because of her skin color. Although the jury selection was unfair towards Angela due to lack of diversity I think it is significant that they gave her a fair trial. Overall this was a great article to read.
15/04/2023
2:56 am
Hunter Stiles
Congratulations on your article! Angela Davis is a name I had never heard of until reading this article. This essay does a fantastic job of detailing Angela Davis’ experiences leading up to her trial. Reading about what she went through and how we, as the United States of America, treated other Americans is incomprehensible. particularly the way in which minorities were perceived and handled even throughout criminal justice processes. It was encouraging to see that Angela Davis was welcomed back to UCLA after she was let go for being a “Communist.” Super good read!
16/04/2023
2:56 am
Nnamdi Onwuzurike
This is a riveting read that sheds light on the unjust treatment of a prominent Black intellectual during the Civil Rights era. The author’s vivid descriptions of the trial and its aftermath highlight the systemic racism and prejudice ingrained in our legal system. By exploring the nuances of Davis’s case, the article offers valuable insights into the ongoing struggle for racial justice in America.
16/04/2023
2:56 am
Guiliana Devora
This is an incredibly beautiful story about an amazing woman and what she has done for history. For me it still shocks me every time I read about the injustices that happened to people just because they were a different color. The even crazier part is that it literally happened not too long ago. As human beings I believe we need to learn from our past because if we do not then history will repeat itself and it has been proven before.
16/04/2023
2:56 am
Isabel Soto
I did not know much about Angela Davis until reading this but I am so glad that I do now. I love reading and learning about strong women who stand up for themselves and what they believe in. I hate that she was seen as dangerous simply because of the color of her skin. I think it is amazing that she was supported but many famous artists.
17/04/2023
2:56 am
Victor Rodriguez
Overall, amazing article! It is devastating to see all the injustices that happen in the criminal justice system. I believe that it is terrible to see al the discrimination and prejudice that goes against other racial groups such as African Americans and Latinos. It is very sad to see so many cases where there is bad judgement. We definitely need a reform in the criminal justice system in order to have more equality and better treatment for everyone. I believe it is very inspirational to see someone like Angela Davis fight for her rights and obstacles she faces. Her courage and determination should be admired.
13/10/2020
2:56 am