Since its origins, the infamous Ku Klux Klan has influenced the attitudes and views of many Americans. The KKK will forever be recognized as the largest political hate group in United States history. Despite the rise and fall of the Klan, it wasn’t until the 1920s that it rose to its highest peak in prominence. During this time period, there was exponential growth in both membership in and support for this notorious cult. The KKK was a growing cult in the 1920s because it instilled religious beliefs, terror, and a skewed view of a better America into the minds of its members through its propaganda of racial superiority.
The original KKK arose during the Reconstruction era of the 1860s and 1870s, and was primarily aimed at restoring the antebellum racial hierarchy to the South. However, it declined in the 1870s due to the passing of legislation aimed at stopping Klansmen’s voter intimidation activities and associated hate crimes. With the end of Reconstruction in 1877, and the passage of Jim Crow laws throughout the South, Klan activity and Klan membership declined. But the cult began a strong resurgence in 1915, with membership skyrocketing to nearly four million by the year 1920.1 This time, the focus of their efforts was aimed at “Americanizing” people by promoting the Constitution, the flag, and the Bible.2 This white supremacist organization lashed out at any group whose ideals conflicted with their own, especially that of African Americans, Catholics, and Jews.
The revival of the Klan was led by its notorious second Grand Wizard (the KKK’s primary leader), William J. Simmons, who was a preacher, a veteran, and an extreme white supremacist.3 He was inspired to reorganize the Klan after watching the silent movie Birth of a Nation, which depicted the Klan as a saving grace, defending the birthright of white southerners and greatly enhancing the public opinion of the cult.4 The religious implications of the KKK stemmed from the teachings of Simmons. Not only were his sermons effective at grasping the hateful minds of Klan members, but he truly convinced them that they were doing the work of God; his credibility led him to a position of power. In fact, one could not join the Klan unless one practiced “militant Christianity,” living in such a way as to be an example to others by following laws, abstaining from drinking, gambling, infidelity, and by not neglecting one’s family. Members were to attend church services regularly, always adhering to the foundations of the Christian faith.5 In addition to this, the KKK burned crosses, often arguing that it was to symbolize the spread of Jesus’ light; it was a symbol aimed to “drive away darkness and gloom.”6 The heavily emphasized morals and negative attitudes toward others are what drove the cult’s frame of thought. Often interpreted in a hateful manner, the religious implications instilled by the KKK’s leaders too often brewed inaccurate thoughts in the minds of its followers; thus, many assumed that the answer to their problem was to commit radical acts of terror.
In addition to their cloaking themselves in the trappings of Christianity, the Klan also used terror tactics to instill fear into both its own members and to those it targeted. The members saw themselves as vigilantes in the restoration of justice—using intimidation, violence, and terror to prevent people of color from attaining any sort of social status or political power. They burned crosses, led beatings, committed assassinations, lynchings, and much more.7 While the symbol of the KKK, the burning cross, held religious connotations for its own members, it was also used as a form of intimidation. They used this symbol of a burning cross to terrorize African Americans.8 In addition to intimidating African Americans, the Klan also targeted Catholics, and had a particularly strong concern with this group due to the fact that they practiced a “different religion” from their own. The motivation for this anti-Catholicism is deeply rooted in American history, going all the way back to colonial times. And with the dramatic increase of Catholics immigrating from Ireland, Italy, and Germany in the nineteenth century, anti-Catholicism was a mainstay throughout American life in the early decades of the twentieth century.9 With the ethnic, social, and racial diversity of American life, tensions continued to heighten among the opposing whites who sought to rid America of these many “outsiders” — a long-held notion in American society. In using both verbal and physical threats, the terror inflicted by the cult caused people to fear the power of the invisible empire that was the KKK.
The idea of creating a better America was yet another reason for the Klan’s rise to prominence in the 1920s. The KKK fought for stricter enforcement of prohibition laws, sought to eliminate political corruption, and wanted to eradicate any form of immigration. Any seemingly “foreign-born” citizen that crossed the path of a klansman was deemed un-American. The Klan assumed they were doing the nation its due diligence in suppressing these “outsiders.” At its peak, the Klan even managed to get political leaders to seek their support and endorsement, since many Americans at this time sympathized with the Klan and its mission.10 And as membership grew, so did their influence. Their opposition to non-whites and to immigration helped to secure the passage of strict quotas on those seeking to come to America.11 The KKK was influential in more ways than one — their power reigning heavily on American society. Even today, white supremacists seek to have their voices heard and their views seen as legitimate. The fight for racial toleration is certainly far from over.
On the other hand, some say that the resurgence of the KKK in the 1920s was due primarily to the effects of industrialization, urbanization, and immigration on society. White Americans became uneasy about immigration and “outsiders” taking American jobs. Many could not stand the idea of “those people” diluting the “racial purity” of American society. But the idea of racial purity is a myth–yet a strong one that many white racists wish to be true. The original soil of America was populated by immigrants and natives alike; whites simply claimed it as their own, as they were to be the guardians of a “city on a hill” and as part of their “manifest destiny” to be the bearers of a supreme culture and society.12 Those that looked to this cult to justify their own beliefs do not parallel with what it means to be an independent individual in American society. The people they were trying to drive out had just as much freedom to be in the United States as they did. Others in support of the Klan also claimed that Simmons was, in fact, preaching for the betterment of society, and that he never resorted to violence to solve problems; though this may seem true, Simmons was actually insinuating his own, twisted version of the word of God, often emphasizing ideas of white supremacy and racial segregation as if that was God’s will. In a pamphlet he wrote in the early nineteenth century, he even states that the primary goal of the organization is to preserve ideals of pure Anglo-Saxon civilization, and many claimed he preached themes of being a pro-American leader by hinting in his sermons that any person in opposition to traditional thought of Anglo supremacy was unwelcome, and simply un-American.13 He silently, yet deviously, instilled discrimination into the Klan’s members. It was even noted that Catholic priests, Protestant ministers, and Jewish rabbis came forward to condemn the organization and its false teachings.14 It seems that the religious implications, terroristic acts, and the skewed ideals used in order to insinuate the making of a better America are contradictory to both the Klan’s mission and the symbols they claimed to uphold.
With a religious basis, the Klan movement emphasized legal and political approaches to solving the “moral crisis” in 1920s America.15 The cult rose to prominence in the 1920s because of their religious, terroristic, and “ideal American” implications; however, their resurgence only served as a detriment. The second coming of the Klan was significant in that it rose to its highest peak in prominence. The KKK’s second coming only continued to fuel the long-held idea of hatred and discrimination that still lingers in the minds of many today.
- Khan Academy, 2016, s.v. “The Reemergence of the KKK,” by Dr. Michelle Getchell. ↵
- David A. Horowitz, Inside the Klavern: The Secret History of a Ku Klux Klan of the 1920s (Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1999), 10. ↵
- David A. Horowitz, Inside the Klavern: The Secret History of a Ku Klux Klan of the 1920s (Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1999), 11. ↵
- Roland G. Fryer, “Hatred and Profits: Under the Hood of the Ku Klux Klan,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 127, no. 4 (November 2012): 12. ↵
- Holley Donald, “A Look Behind the Masks: The 1920s Ku Klux Klan in Monticello, Arkansas,” The Arkansas Historical Quarterly no. 2 (2001): 19. ↵
- David Cunningham, “Top 5 Questions About the KKK,” PBS, 2013. Accessed March 12, 2018. http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/americanexperience/features/klansville-faq/. ↵
- Khan Academy, 2016, s.v. “The Reemergence of the KKK,” by Dr. Michelle Getchell. ↵
- PBS, 2013, s.v. “Top 5 Questions About the KKK,” by David Cunningham. ↵
- Mark Paul Richard, Not a Catholic Nation: The Ku Klux Klan Confronts New England in the 1920s (Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 2015), 11. ↵
- American Decades, 2001, s.v. “After the Great War: Nativism and the Ku Klux Klan,” by Judith S. Baughman, et.al. ↵
- Gale Encyclopedia of American Law, 2011, s.v. “Ku Klux Klan,” by Donna Batten. ↵
- Khan Academy, 2016, s.v. “The Reemergence of the KKK,” by Dr. Michelle Getchell. ↵
- William J. Simmons, “Pamphlet for the Ku Klux Klan Written by Colonel William Joseph Simmons,” Smithsonian, 2017. Accessed April 6, 2018. https://nmaahc.si.edu/object/nmaahc_2011.155.15. ↵
- Khan Academy, 2016, s.v. “The Reemergence of the KKK,” by Dr. Michelle Getchell. ↵
- Holley Donald, “A Look Behind the Masks: The 1920s Ku Klux Klan in Monticello, Arkansas,” The Arkansas Historical Quarterly no. 2 (2001): 14-15. ↵
122 comments
Sebastian Azcui
This article was very informative. I did not know much about the KKK and all their purposes. It is amazing how a group of people can have that much hate against another group of people or race and do these things. The KKK is something very controversial because there is people that support them and others that don’t. Their practices against people are harsh and racist. I did not know that they did not only target dark colored people, but also Catholics. They wanted to have their own type of ideology.
Amanda Uribe
It is truly sad to read this. It was worse to read that they thought they had to enforce “justice”. I had no idea they had so much ties to religion. It really is sad that they used the cross to scare people. This group really has been one of the worst associations in American history. It’s also so sad to think that white supremacy is still alive today.
Jacqueline Mendez
The KKK was and still is a domestic terrorist in our country. White supremacy is still a major problem in the United States. It’s outraging that people think this way. The KKK followers have so much hate in their hearts it’s terrifying. People would hear and be convinced about what one person is saying so deeply that they form groups that cause death and separation amongst human beings.
Charli Delmonico
I can’t believe the Ku Klux Klan actually believed that they were creating a better country with their hateful crimes and views. I dislike how they were extreme white supremacists that fell back on faith as a means for treating certain groups of people so poorly, especially since Christianity focuses on accepting and loving everyone just like Jesus loves all of us. It makes no sense why they would go against God’s Word and His teachings and claim that they were doing these horrid crimes in His honor. It also displays Christianity in a bad light which is wrong.
Thalia Romo
I’ve never really looked too deep into the history behind the Ku Klux Klan since I didn’t care much about their ideals and beliefs, and this article does a good job at helping me realize why I never wanted to learn about them. Kimberly Simmons does a terrific job at stating the cynical ideals that eventually became so widespread throughout the United States in the early 20th century. The fact that these individuals were able to twist religion into something it isn’t is a shame, because many individuals are very vulnerable to religion since they revolve their lives around it. The treatment that minorities (people of color [specifically African Americans], Jews and Catholics) received was so painful to read about because we can see it kind of being reflected in today’s world. It’s cray to think that political figures during that time period endorsed such organizations.
Trinity Casillas
The fact that the leader’s title was “Grand Wizard” should’ve been a red flag to many in the first place. Another one should’ve been “militant Christianity” because without knowing what they meant by that it seems intimidating and bad. It’s also alarming how some of their ideas are still present today, and growing in popularity, like immigrants taking their jobs away. It’s also wild how some claimed the original leader was misunderstood in his mission when the actions of the group matched the preachings. Bigot people in the past, not really today with the rise of “cancel culture”, seemed to be given many chances that they might have not been worthy of.
Rebeca Escobar
I knew very little about the KK prior to this, but even now I do not condone anything they did and I will never see any good in their actions. Personally, there is no justifying any of their actions or beliefs, as they were very much responsible for the hate-crime against the African American population. Its both infuriating and scary to know that parts of this group still exists even today.
karan
It’s my understanding that the KKK wants an all white planet. I suggest we put the KKK members on an Island of their own. There they can live in peace amongst themselves.
Christopher Metta Bexar
It’s odd when I find an article like this as offensive. in places it starts to project a non-bias view of the Klan then goes back into anti-Anglo hate speech.
The Ku Klux Klan was formed in reaction to the oppression of southerners who had lost the Civil War, Not all of their methods were favorable , but I can understand defending your homeland and friends and family.
The KKK in the 1920s really was to some a civil rights group and an attempt to bring about morality to the United States. Americans have always been distrustful of foreigners until they earn their place in this country.
it is also true that the KKK was one of the major reasons that we did not have a Catholic president until JFK. But that was also the attitudes of most Americans. The Klan did not do that on their own.
This article in some ways reminds me of how Donald Trump got elected president. Backlash to views like these in this article.
Paul Garza
I do NOT understand how anyone can defend the kkk in any way! It is so simple, they were a racist- white supremacist group that terrorized people of color. I don’t agree that southerners were an oppressed people after the civil war… white people of the south were the ones doing the oppressing. Southerners were allowed to rejoin the union even after a whole civil war, Lincoln even had the easiest 10% plan to allow rejoining of the souther states, although the plan was never executed, white people still ran things in the south. The only thing the kkk was protecting was their power and “superiority”, if anything the ex-slaves/African American population were the ones needing protection, they were literally being terrorized. The southerners didn’t exactly deserve a high-five when rejoining the union, they didn’t do it because they had a change of heart. The confederacy was re-admitted to the union because they surrendered, and that’s because they were defeated as an army. This article does a good job at reminding people that this organization was around and is still around.
Felipe Macias
Get ’em Paul!
Chelsea Alvarez
Prior to reading this article, I had little knowledge of the Ku Klux Klan. It’s crazy how individuals can instill hateful thoughts and implement radical nationalism into American society. I like you mentioned that they not only targeted African Americans but Catholics as well, because it shows how the members really wanted everyone to conform to their “perfect” ideology. What scares me the most about the KKK is how they formed a group of followers and continue to practice their beliefs.