March 23, 2018
All this we know thanks to well preserved historic records and the many biographies written since the war. We know that Churchill’s plan to resist at all costs did indeed pay off in the long run. But, looking at the events of the month of May 1940 through the eyes of the 1st Earl of Halifax, couldn’t one have concluded that the only hope for the United Kingdom was a final attempt at appeasement?
1940
Churchill
Dunkirk
Hitler
Lord Halifax
Treaty of Munich
United Kingdom
Christopher Hohman
Right move on Churchill’s part. Hitler would have been placated for a time by any peace deal offered to him, but it would not have taken long for Hitler to consolidate his gains on the continent. After that he would have had an untold number of resources available to him to conquer Britain. Instead he got bogged down fighting a war on two fronts between Russia and Britain. It is amazing to me how much the British gave up to win the war. They essentially gave up their entire empire by bankrupting themselves in order to try to win the war.
28/08/2018
12:42 am
Daniel Reyes
This article is splendid. I enjoyed reading a summary of the events leading up to the events of Dunkirk; I believe this article did it more justice than the actual movie. I particularly like that the author explores and deals with the unknown question to build up to the scenario of possible alternative history. I think the success of this article is reliant on this rhetorical strategy and furthermore, it creates a sense of wonder, a feeling I don’t usually get from history. The narrator’s commentary voice added for the added intended effect that I believe the author was going which I think is immersion in possible history. The only criticism I have of this article is to dive into Lord Halifax’s story and to continue to talk about his stake in this process.
29/08/2018
12:42 am
Daniel Reyes
This article is splendid. I enjoyed reading a summary of the events leading up to the events of Dunkirk; I believe this article did it more justice than the actual movie. I particularly like that the author explores and deals with the unknown question to build up to the scenario of possible alternative history. I think the success of this article is reliant on this rhetorical strategy and furthermore, it creates a sense of wonder, a feeling I don’t usually get from history. The narrator’s commentary voice added for the added intended effect that I believe the author was going which I think is immersion in possible history. The only criticism I have of this article is to dive into Lord Halifax’s story and to continue to talk about his stake in this process.
12/11/2018
12:42 am
Ximena Mondragon
I enjoyed reading this article because I learned something new about World War II. The article is short but it gives the reader the right amount of information and it gets to the point. It is interesting to read about how history could of changed if such a treaty would of become a reality. Would this treaty give an advantage to the Nazis, therefore lead to the war being longer?
29/08/2018
12:42 am
Gabrien Gregory
This is a very well written and succinct article regarding a piece of the United Kingdom’s involvement in World War Two. I appreciate Matt for begging the question as to what would have happened if Secretary Halifax’s peace treaty were to have become reality. My personal opinion is that a peace treaty would have been terribly devastating to the entire European region. It is important to mention that while Churchill did the right thing by not giving in to Hitler’s efforts, even though the people of the U.K. were so close to being eliminated, it was the United States’s effort thereafter which contributed to the necessary end of the Nazi regime.
29/08/2018
12:42 am
Aneesa Zubair
I had never heard the story of this treaty before, but you did a great job introducing me to it! It was really interesting to read about Halifax’s idea that Mussolini could act as mediator and help the countries reach an agreement. I can see why so many people would agree with him at the time, since it would seem safer than Churchill’s idea. I’m glad the treaty did not happen, though, as that would have had huge consequences for Europe and potentially the rest of the world.
02/09/2018
12:42 am
Nathan Alba
I thought the article was written well, quite informative. I personally had never heard of the story, but it is interesting to see how divided Britain was. In the sense that Winston Churchill seemed to have faith in his country, Halifax did not. And to think that Halifax worked under Churchill makes it even worse. As prime minister you would think your cabinet members would support you. It was a good thing the soldiers were rescued at Dunkirk, really seemed to give Britain a lot of hope to withstand the war.
16/09/2018
12:42 am
Didier Cadena
This was a very interesting article. I was only aware of the Munich Agreement, so it was interesting to read about the treaty that never was. Even though we know how the war ended, it would be interesting to see how the world would have been changed if another agreement was made with Hitler. The article does a great job of putting the information together and keep the reader engaged.
16/09/2018
12:42 am
Valeria Perez
I can’t imagine having this type of responsibility and pressure on my shoulders. Putting myself in the shoes of someone of the time this would have been a very hard decision, but I would have agreed with Churchill. If Hitler and the Nazi regime had already broken a treaty what would stop them a second time? Besides reading, I also enjoyed the Dr. Seuss political cartoon. I didn’t know of his work outside of children’s books!
06/10/2018
12:42 am
Adam Portillo
Prior to reading this article I had very little knowledge on the Munich agreement. I believe the Munich agreement was a mess to begin with because of the fact that Germany would end up invading more countries. Winston Churchill made the right move to go at the Nazi regime rather than to just keep on appeasing them. If not for this then maybe the war could have been different. Awesome article.
18/10/2018
12:42 am
Alexandra Lopez
This article was intriguing and brought up well thought out questions that could have change the course of human history. The powerful words from Winston Churchill, “We shall never surrender,” are as powerful as they were in the past. The author brought up a a great point on the attempt of Britain speaking with Italy’s prime minister about a peace treaty even though Hitler had already broken a treaty before that. If Britain were to have agreed to a peace treaty with Hitler who know what would have happened.
27/08/2018
12:42 am