StMU Research Scholars

Featuring Scholarly Research, Writing, and Media at St. Mary’s University

October 1, 2018

The United States Exposed: Ron Ridenhour Reveals the My Lai Massacre

When one hears the word “Pinkville,” one imagines a cute, quaint village, right? However, the real Pinkville is the exact opposite of this perception. Pinkville was a term U.S. soldiers coined the Vietnamese village of My Lai, where one of the most inhumane moments of the Vietnam War happened. Blood, rape, and the screams from the brutal murder of children, women, and elderly are burned into our minds when we envision the My Lai Massacre in 1968.1

The Vietnam War began in 1954 when communist leader Ho-chi-minh defeated the French, who had colonized Vietnam in 1887. North and South Vietnam battled over their new government, as South Vietnam desperately tried to resist communist control. Amidst the heat of the Cold War between America and the Soviet Union, and afraid that communism would spread throughout Southeast Asia, the U.S. government ordered military involvement in 1964. The U.S. drafted healthy men age 18 or older to fight the war in Vietnam. Being a soldier stationed in Vietnam at this time came with immense stress. Spread thin, American soldiers were stationed in Vietnam for double the time a soldier was normally deployed, and they were only allowed a one month break, adding to this high amount of tension. There, soldiers saw incredibly brutal things daily — children were often used as weapons by the Vietnamese army and the language barrier made it incredibly hard to distinguish between friend and enemy. One soldier described their encounter with “gooks,” an extremely derogative term for Southeast Asians, “At first there was some confusion. How did you tell gooks from the good Vietnamese, for instance? After a while it became clear. You didn’t have to. All gooks were [Vietnamese Communist] when they were dead.”2 U.S. soldiers developed paranoia, and although the exact reason why the U.S. Commanders ordered the massacre is not known, one can presume it was due to the uneasy situation between the U.S. soldiers and the Vietnamese, which also led to the brutality at Pinkville.3

The U.S. military believed that Pinkville was booby-trapped to the extreme, and it was unknown whether or not the residents supported the Vietnamese communists, also referred to as Vietcong. Because of this, an order was placed by the Charlie Company — a unit of the U.S. Army American Division — to destroy all of the village inhabitants, and to leave no survivors. This order led to the most brutal and controversial massacre of the U.S. Army’s history. After the order was placed, the My Lai massacre was led by Lieutenant William Calley, followed by another Charlie Company unit, and it involved the vicious murder and rape 300 to 500 of women, children, and elderly civilians.4However, this dark moment in history remained a secret. It was not revealed to the U.S. public or even the U.S. government until months after the event had taken place.

Ron Ridenhour, a U.S. soldier who was serving in Vietnam at the time, played a central role in exposing the events that happened in the previously peaceful village of My Lai. Ridenhour was a helicopter gunner that had been drafted to the army at the same time as a man named Mike Terry. There, they became close friends, separated only once to different divisions when Terry was assigned to Lt. Calley’s platoon. That one separation caused a major change in Terry when he and Ridenhour were eventually reunited after being assigned to the same unit. Previous to their separation, Ridenhour thought Terry to be the definition of innocence as Terry was firm in his religious beliefs. Ridenhour was hit with the shock of his life when Terry told him the events that occurred in My Lai.5

Vietnamese civilian bodies after My Lai Massacre | Courtesy of Vietnam H. Duthel

Ridenhour, although not present at the event, began to hear about the events that took place at My Lai from Terry.6 Although Terry only participated in mercy killings to eliminate those who were mortally wounded and prevent them from suffering further, shock and horror filled Ridenhour as he heard about the rest of the gruesome details. Ridenhour, in absolute disbelief, almost refused to believe the event occurred. Determined to uncover the truth, he then consulted numerous other soldiers, expecting denial of this brutality, but instead, the soldiers added more horrific information to the massacre that occurred that day. Spurred to action, Ridenhour wrote a letter to President Richard Nixon and thirty Congressmen about these findings. In his letter, he recounted the numerous statements he had heard from soldiers who were at this massacre. Ridenhour recalled one soldier’s encounter with a Vietnamese child about three or four years old, who had been shot in the arm, “The boy was clutching his wounded arm… while blood trickled between his fingers… He just stood there with big eyes staring around like he didn’t understand… Then the captain’s [radio operator] put a burst of M16 fire into him…”7 He continued to describe more encounters, and even recalled the story of a soldier who shot himself in the foot to get out of participating in the massacre. Further testimonies describe the “bayoneting, clubbing, and close-range shooting” of unarmed civilians.8 Ridenhour also described how the soldiers systematically lined up villagers along a ditch and fired into them, comparing it to the Holocaust.9 Angry that this event happened and dedicated to exposing these horrors to get justice, he urged the U.S. to pursue an investigation, and he ends the letter with the fact that he had considered sending this story to the reporters and newspapers to add pressure to the government to follow through with the investigation.10

1970 My Lai Investigation for Evidence of Civilian Deaths – Press Photo | Courtesy of Flickr user Manhhai

After the investigation was  exposed to the public, Ridenhour felt that the government “whitewashed” the event and wanted justice.11 With the help of a reporter named Seymour Hersh, they exposed the brutal event to the public, causing a rise of emotions globally. The massacre sparked controversy, disbelief, disgust, and anger in the public, especially among the American people. Ridenhour’s shock at even Terry’s involvement in the massacre mirrored the U.S. public’s shock as it unveiled the truth of what the Army and U.S. government were doing overseas. The My Lai Massacre became a turning point in the Vietnam War regarding U.S. involvement, leading many people to adamantly question if U.S. involvement in Vietnam was doing more harm than good. There had already been many protests against the involvement of the U.S. in the Vietnam War and against the draft targeting people of color. However, after Ridenhour exposed the massacre, protests increased exponentially among the American public. Eventually, these protests helped pressure the U.S. government to move troops out of Vietnam.12

Lt. William Calley after being questioned at the Pentagon regarding the killing of civilians at Song My | Courtesy of Flickr user Tommy Truong79

Charges were brought up against thirty soldiers after the incident of My Lai was exposed, but only one person was convicted — Lieutenant Calley. Ridenhour believed the U.S. Army and the government used Calley as a scapegoat for all of the U.S. troops involved that day, since Calley was the lowest ranking officer leading this massacre. He was sentenced to life in prison, but due to the enormous amount of publicity regarding the massacre, it was deemed that his trial was unfair and too harshly affected by public view. His sentence was decreased to 20 years, and then to 10 years, after which President Nixon intervened and he served a three-year house arrest sentence.13

Although this massacre is shrouded in injustice for the hundreds of women, children, and elderly that lost their lives that day, Ridenhour and the few U.S. soldiers that risked their lives to go against orders and save as many Vietnamese civilians as possible represent those with true bravery and dedication to justice. Ron Ridenhour played a major role as the My Lai whistle blower, helping bring the truth of the injustice that happened to hundreds of innocent people in the village of My Lai to the public. Today, Ridenhour Prizes are awarded to journalists who follow Ridenhour’s example of being dedicated to truth telling in their writing and protecting social justice. These awards demonstrate the long-lasting importance of Ridenhour’s act of integrity and truthfulness.

 

 

  1. Donna Batten, “My Lai Massacre,” Gale Encyclopedia of American Law, 3rd ed., Vol. 7. (Detroit: Gale, 2010), 164-165.
  2. Dan Duffy, and Tal Kali, The Viet Nam Generation Big Book (Woodbridge, Conn. : Viet Nam Generation Inc, 1994), 203-214.
  3. Donna Batten, “My Lai Massacre,” Gale Encyclopedia of American Law, 3rd ed., Vol. 7. (Detroit: Gale, 2010), 164-165.
  4. Ian Shapira, “‘It was Insanity’: At My Lai, U.S. soldiers slaughtered hundreds of Vietnamese women and kids,” Washington Post, March 16, 2018.
  5. Dan Duffy, and Tal Kali, The Viet Nam Generation Big Book, (Woodbridge, Conn. : Viet Nam Generation Inc, 1994), 203-214.
  6. Dan Duffy, and Tal Kali, The Viet Nam Generation Big Book, (Woodbridge, Conn. : Viet Nam Generation Inc, 1994), 203-214.
  7. Lily Rothman, “Read The Letter That Changed the Way Americans Saw the Vietnam War,” Time Magazine, March 16, 2015.
  8. Stephen L. Carter, “My Lai Revisited,” Newsweek, April 2, 2012, 19.
  9. Ron Ridenhour, “Perspective on My Lai: ‘It was a Nazi kind of thing,’” Los Angeles Times, March 16, 1993.
  10. Lily Rothman, “Read The Letter That Changed the Way Americans Saw the Vietnam War,” Time Magazine, March 16, 2015.
  11. John H. Jr. Cushman, “Ronald Ridenhour, 52, Veteran Who Reported My Lai Massacre,” New York Times, May 11, 1998.
  12. Donna Batten, “My Lai Massacre,” Gale Encyclopedia of American Law, 3rd ed., Vol. 7. (Detroit: Gale, 2010), 164-165.
  13. Cynthia Rose, “Lieutenant Calley: His Own Story,” American Decades Primary Sources, Vol. 8, 1970-1979 (Detroit: Gale, 2004), 297-301.

Tags from the story

Journalism

My Lai Massacre

Ron Ridenhour

The Year 1968

Vietnam

Vietnam War

Sarah Nguyen

StMU’s 5th Semi-Annual Award Ceremony Co-Chair, 2018 | Computer Engineering major

Author Portfolio Page

Recent Comments

Martina Rodriguez

I have to admit that I had never heard of “Pinkville” or the My Lai Massacre. I loved how detailed and easy to read the article was written. As someone who isn’t too proficient in military history, the author wrote in a way that those like me who aren’t too aware of the facts could still follow along and not get lost.

reply

01/10/2018

11:46 am

Rylie Kieny

This is a very well written article. I like how you used quotes and short stories to provide further detail of the story. Although this is such a tragic event it shows the importance and impact that media can have when done correctly and truthfully. Being known as a “whistle blower” is not a glamorous title and is often frowned up, so the fact that Ridenhour spoke out shows a lot about his bravery and character. It is important that the people who represent a country or even state ( police, politicians, soldiers, etc.) are held to the highest of standards and do the right thing in times of peace and war. The media plays a big part in all issues and things will not go unnoticed.

reply

01/10/2018

11:46 am

Robert Freise

I have never heard of My Lai Massacre. This article emphasized the importance of detail within an historical article. The use of dramatic images conveys a deeper message about the protests about peace during the Vietnam War. The use of media for these protests gives the whole nation a feel on why people are addressing the issue using protest reform. This article gave me a sense of how unethical and ugly war can be. Great article!!

reply

02/10/2018

11:46 am

Luis Magana

Anything that involves some sort of dramatic or tragic events really catches my attention. I have never really heard of the My Lai Massacre ever. Everyone always underestimates the use of media coverage and when used correctly, or to your advantage, it can have a very big impact on people who see it. I love how the author was able to organize his ideas and make it into this very informative article. The first picture has a guy with a poster saying “get the hell out of Vietnam” and it drew me in at the beginning.

reply

02/10/2018

11:46 am

Christopher Hohman

Nice article. I had never heard of the My Lai massacre until now. What a horrific thing to do. five hundred people lost their lives. That is just terrible. I was especially moved by the memory of that one boy who after being wounded in the arm was merely shot dead. To the american soldiers these people were not human beings worthy of respect, but rather animals that could be killed without even thinking about it. I am glad that Mr. Ridnour did the right thing. I however feel like these men should have paid more for their crimes

reply

02/10/2018

11:46 am

Steven Hale

This story is so tragic and heartbreaking. I was born well after the Vietnam war ended but I remember back in 2009 or 2010 when it became public that American soldiers had murdered a family in Iraq; the news was upsetting but there was no massive public outcry. I’m glad to see that with the My Lai Massacre there were enough people furious with these events to change the trajectory of the war.

reply

02/10/2018

11:46 am

William Rittenhouse

This was such a terrible thing the US which only added to the controversial in the first place. Some believed the US shouldn’t of been involved and some do. Personally I believe involvment or not, the troops should have been respected more when they returned. It wasn’t the soldiers decisions to go to war. It was the US government. Men were drafted for the battle because it was required. The protests should of only been directed at the Government for going to war in the first place.

reply

02/10/2018

11:46 am

kendrick Harrison

“Charges were brought up against thirty soldiers after the incident of My Lai was exposed, but only one person was convicted — Lieutenant Calley.” No amount of life sentences or death penalties would have brought those killed in the massacre back. That chapter in history happened and cannot be undone. You could apologize to the families (of the deceased), provide them money, and even allow them the choice in deciding the fate of the soldiers. None of that makes right of the situation. And it is an insult, not only to the victims, but to ourselves, when we hide our actions to maintain this facade of righteousness. We need to find out what “we” believe in, and represent it with pride. And if we are split on our beliefs, I encourage that we find a resolve that meets each sides conditions or battle ‘til one succeeds. Murder sanctioned by the government is still murder, no matter how you try and contort it. It wouldn’t have made a difference, from a moral standpoint, if the villagers were armed or not that day. We weren’t in Vietnam for self-defense, so why pretend to be the good guys. If we do not believe killing is wrong, what makes this “massacre” such a big issue. Why hide details about it? And if the other way around, why participate in war if you want to stay morally just? It would seem as if we felt we were in the wrong, kept at it, and didn’t even have the courage to own up to it. How can anyone have pride or respect in that? I can at least respect someone who stands by their beliefs—no matter how wrong it may seem to me—because they believe in their cause, but our government couldn’t even do that. It’s disappointing and everyone from the soldiers who participated in the war, to the government that sanctioned it, to the people (citizens) who elected the officials and allowed them to embarrass the nation as they did without repercussion, should be held accountable. I feel for the villagers of My Lai, who were caught up in a conflict they wanted no part in. I feel for the Americans who were drafted into a war that their superiors voted in favor of, yet weren’t willing to put their own lives on the line for. I feel for people all over who do not have the courage (yet) to voice themselves and take action when wrongs are done by previous generations. Those men took the easy route, eliminating the villagers without identifying their role in the war (which I am not saying is wrong), and should be held accountable according to our standards. If we think it is wrong, we should punish them. If it is not wrong, we should stand by them. They pulled the trigger, they stabbed, they raped. No man was innocent that day, even if they chose to “mercy kill” or shoot themselves in the foot.

reply

02/10/2018

11:46 am

Alexandra Rodriguez

This article was wonderfully written, I love the details and the vivid events of the massacre because I think it helps paint the picture of how awful and unjust the event actually was. I am fascinated with the people who were able to stand up in any way they could to save lives and minimize the suffering of those innocent individuals who were harmed. The article was very easy to follow and I love how the author was able to explain the events that occurred without getting lost in the story. Amazing article.

reply

04/10/2018

11:46 am

Pedro Gonzalez Aboyte

This is a very well written article about a topic like “Pinkville” that I have never heard about before. It does a very good job of including specific quotes that really help get a better understanding of what the article is about. It is sad that a massacre like this occurred and nobody was able to stop it from happening because nobody knew it was going on. Ridenhour spoke up about it in the end and that is something that takes a lot. He is held with lots of respect and has an award named after him which shows just how important the decision he made was.

reply

07/10/2018

11:46 am

1 2 3

Leave a Reply