StMU Research Scholars

Featuring Scholarly Research, Writing, and Media at St. Mary's University
December 7, 2017

Did He Do IT? The Story of O.J. Simpson and the Famous Murders of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman

On the night of June 12, 1994, the bodies of Nicole Brown Simpson, ex-wife of Orenthal James (O.J.) Simpson, and Ronald Goldman were found brutally murdered outside Nicole’s town home in Brentwood, California.1 When police arrived on the scene, Detective Mark Fuhrman quickly recognized the body of Nicole, as he had covered a domestic dispute with her and O. J. prior to this event2 While other officers were inspecting the scene of the crime, Detectives Philip Vannattero and Fuhrman went to Simpson’s Rockingham Estate to inform him about Nicole’s death. When they arrived, one of the first things they saw and examined was an odd blood stain on Simpson’s white Ford Bronco, which began to raise suspicion. They soon after would attempt at contacting O.J., but would conclude that Simpson was not home after there was no answer when they tried paging him from the front gate. Desperate to find answers, Fuhrman jumped the fence, and to his surprise, he found a bloody glove behind Simpson’s guest house that was identical to a glove found at Nicole’s home. These findings quickly caused O.J. to be considered a suspect in the murder case. Once evidence came pouring in, the district attorney’s office came to the conclusion that there was enough evidence to indict Simpson for the death of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman.

Photo of the Bronco on the 405 Freeway l Courtesy of culturedecoded.wordpress.com

When the police went to arrest O.J. in Encino, California, again to their surprise, they found that O.J. was not in the home where police expected him to be. Instead, he was in a Ford Bronco that belonged to A. C. Cowlings, trying to run away on the 405 freeway. In the Encino home, O.J. left a disturbing suicide note that was signed with a smiley face. In the back of the Bronco, O.J. apparently had a gun to his head ready to pull the trigger at any moment. This escape was televised nationally to over 95 million viewers. To anyone who lived in Los Angeles at the time, many remember where they were during the time of the attempted escape and “slow chase” of O.J. Simpson. The chase reportedly started to transition when O.J. was on the phone with Detective Tom Lange negotiating with him, granting Simpson’s request to go home and see his mother before he was arrested. Police decided that it was best to cooperate, and thus began one of the slowest police chases to ever happen. It would end with O.J. home with his family who were waiting desperately for him to surrender. Fans of O.J. were lined up to watch the chase either cheering him on to keep running, or people viciously accusing him of the murders he might have committed. Once he got home, the police formally arrested him and he was placed under police custody.3

O.J. was formally indicted on July 22, 1994, and the trial began on January 24, 1995 with Lance Ito as the presiding judge.3 The Los Angeles District Attorney’s Lead Prosecutor Marcia Clark and Deputy Attorney Christopher Darden took on the case in attempt to bring Simpson to justice for Nicole Simpson and Ron Goldman. The two presented an accurate timeline to prosecute Simpson with the help of Rosa Lopez’s various testimonies to the police. Lopez was a domestic worker for one of Simpson’s neighbors, who at one point attempted to leave the country in order to avoid testifying.5 The timeline went like this: between 9:48-9:50 PM, Ronald Goldman leaves the restaurant with glasses left by Nicole’s mother. At 10:15, the first cries of help from Nicole are heard by a neighbor as well as Nicole’s dog constantly barking at the scene. At 10:40, Kato Kaelin hears three loud thumps outside the wall of his room. Allan Park, a limo driver, also arrives at Simpson’s Rockingham Estate to take him to the airport. At 11:00, Park buzzes the intercom several times to get no reply from Simpson. At 11:00, after calling his boss urging him that Simpson was not home, he buzzes the intercom one more time and this time O.J. replies. He claimed that he overslept and just got out the shower. Fifteen minutes later, Simpson left his home to go to Los Angeles International Airport to make an American Airline flight to Chicago. At 12:10, the bodies of the victims are found. The next morning, after finding a bloody glove behind Kaelin’s room, the Simpson house is labeled a crime scene, and the Police file a search warrant to investigate the house.6.

The prosecution team’s case for why Simpson was the killer was rooted mainly in DNA evidence found at both crime scenes. At the town home, there was a bloody glove found with the DNA of O.J., Nicole, and Goldman. There was also a knitted hat with pieces of Simpson’s hair found on it, as well as a bloody footprint that matched the sole pattern of a shoe O.J. owned at the time. At O.J.’s Rockingham Estate, there was a glove found that was identical to the one found at Nicole’s town home, with the same DNA evidence as mentioned earlier. This glove was found where Kaelin said he heard loud thumping behind his room. There was also blood found on the driveway along with one of Nicole’s bloody socks and a bloody footprint that matched the one found at the town home. When police went to talk to Simpson the next day, they noticed that O.J. had a cut on his finger, which was suspicious as he never gave a clear reason as to how he got the cut. Simpson also had purchased a knife before the events that occurred on that night. However, the knife and shoes were never found. Not only was this evidence strong, but Simpson also had a history with domestic violence, where Simpson had been abusive towards Nicole. This history with violence did not help Simpson’s desire to plea his innocence. In any ordinary case, this would have been enough to send someone to jail, but this was no ordinary case.

OJ tries on a glove found at the crime scene that does not fit on his hand l Courtesy of Bambinoides.com

The team of attorneys defending Simpson were known as the “Dream Team,” as many of them were high profiled lawyers. The team would be led by Johnnie Cochran, as he had created an accurate plan to profess Simpson’s innocence.3 Cochran’s plan was to turn this from a murder case and make it about race. His plan revolved around corruption in the LAPD with racist cops and a mishandling of evidence. The defense suggested that there were technical mistakes made by LAPD. Some evidence had not been packaged or contained correctly. There had been even some evidence that had been left in a van to overheat while other evidence used strange preservation methods, such as items being frozen and unfrozen. Not only that, but the gloves that were found at both crime scenes supposedly did not fit Simpson. O.J. was asked to try them on in court and when the gloves did not fit him, Cochran coined the famous line, “If the glove doesn’t fit, then you must acquit.” The team’s last case was directed towards Fuhrman, labeling him a racist. Fuhrman was found on record using racial slurs over forty times in one sitting when asked to talk about a case involving another black man. Fuhrman was also the first one at the Rockingham Estate and was the sole person to find the glove after he jumped over Simpson’s fence. This is critical, as the defense was able to claim that Fuhrman possibly planted the evidence at Simpson’s home, thus tainting the DNA evidence.8

Prior to this case, Police brutality in Los Angeles during the 1990’s was not a light topic. On March 3, 1991, Rodney King was brutally beaten by LAPD officers after King led police on a high-speed chase throughout L.A. County. Video evidence shows King being struck by police batons more than fifty times with over twenty officers on site. King would suffer from eleven fractures and other major injuries due to these beatings. It was later that Sergeant Stacey Koon and Officers Michael Powell, Timothy Wind, and Theodore Briseno were indicted by a L.A. grand jury in connection with the beatings of King, as they were the only officers to beat him. It was not until April 29, 1992, when the four LAPD officers were acquitted of all charged in the beating King. It was after this was announced that the riots began. It started at the intersection of Florence and Normandie in South Central Los Angeles with only chaos to follow. The riots went for over five days in the spring of 1992 resulting in fifty people dying and more than two-thousand being injured. Given the atmosphere of what it was like in 1992, the tension between the African-American community and the LAPD was almost like walking on a thread. This is where the defense’s case became relevant, leaving many to speculate that the LAPD might be doing the same thing to O.J. Simpson.9

The trial would last more than eight months, with over 150 different witness testimonies. Many different television providers would broadcast the trial as the general public took a great interest in it as opinions were largely divided along racial lines. A majority of African Americans believed Simpson was innocent while a majority of White Americans believed that Simpson was guilty. This racial divide sparked a nationwide debate. While people such as Clark and Kardashian drew fame from the case, people such as Darden became enemies in the public eye, especial to African Americans, as he was prosecuting “another brother.” Regardless, Darden would continue to say that he was very aware of the situation he put himself into. He would conclude by saying that he was in a “no-win situation.”10.

Simpson hearing he has been aquitted of the murder charges l Courtesy of Blogspot.com

On October 2, 1995, the jury began to deliberate the different evidence given on both sides. To the surprise of everyone, the jury came to its conclusion after less than four hours of debate. Everyone was expecting weeks of deliberation, and for the jury to come to a conclusion in under four hours led many to believe Simpson would be found guilty. Judge Ito decided to delay the announcement of the jury’s decision a day for timing reasons. So, on October 3, the jury found Simpson not guilty of the deaths of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman. Whites were distraught and African Americans were supportive of the sentence. The hearts of the families of Nicole and Ronald Goldman were shattered as they believed that Simpson did it. There were even friends of Simpson who could not look at him the same way, as they too believed he did it. Even though Simpson was acquitted of the criminal case, the families of the victims would start a civil case about the murders, charging Simpson with a wrongful death lawsuit. Simpson would lose this trial and owe the families $33.5 million in damages. Recent statistics show that the percentage of Americans who believe that Simpson killed Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman has increased from 66 percent of people believing Simpson was the killer in 1994 to 83 percent of people believing Simpson was the killer in 2014.11. Today, Simpson is serving a sentence for a robbery he committed in a Las Vegas hotel in 2007, and is now eligible for parole.

The story of O.J. Simpson is a tragedy, where we watch a hero fall. He was an American icon, being a star football player in both college at USC and in the NFL with the Buffalo Bills and San Francisco 49ers. He also starred in different roles in the film and television industries. He went from a hero to a zero. Originally, Simpson would never be forgotten for his various talents on and off the field. Now he is remembered as the criminal who got away with murder.

  1. Encyclopædia Britannica, “O.J. Simpson Trial.” https://www.britannica.com/event/O-J-Simpson-trial .
  2. Larry Karaszewski and Scott Alexander, The People v. O.J. Simpson: American Crime Story, Aired on FX, February 2, 2016.
  3. Encyclopædia Britannica, “O.J. Simpson Trial.” https://www.britannica.com/event/O-J-Simpson-trial
  4. Encyclopædia Britannica, “O.J. Simpson Trial.” https://www.britannica.com/event/O-J-Simpson-trial
  5. Salem Press EncyclopediaResearch Starters, 2017, s.v. “O.J. Simpson Trial,” by Devon Boan
  6. “O.J. Simpson trial: Night of the murders timeline,” CNN, updated December 31, 2007, accessed November 21, 2017. http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/law/12/11/court.archive.simpson14/index.html
  7. Encyclopædia Britannica, “O.J. Simpson Trial.” https://www.britannica.com/event/O-J-Simpson-trial
  8. Michael Lynch, “The Discursive Production of Uncertainty: The OJ Simpson ‘Dream Team’ and the Sociology of Knowledge Machine,” Social Studies of Science 28, no. 5/6 (1998): 829-68. http://www.jstor.org/stable/285519.
  9. “Los Angeles Riots Fast Facts,” CNN, updated April 23, 2017, accessed November 21, 2017. http://www.cnn.com/2013/09/18/us/los-angeles-riots-fast-facts/index.html.
  10. Justin Maffett, “Christopher Darden Talks O.J. Simpson, Tension with Johnnie Cochran,” NBC News, July 25, 2017, accessed December 4, 2017. https://www.nbcnews.com/news/nbcblk/christopher-darden-talks-o-j-simpson-tension-johnnie-cochran-n784991
  11. Buzzfeed Blue, “The Shocking Case of O.J. Simpson,” YouTube, March 4, 2017, accessed November 24, 2017. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YLmDE_JYUNU&t=731s.

Recent Comments

120 comments

  • Thomas Fraire

    This court case was crazy, It’s crazy how the media added so many layers to this trail. The prosecutors shot themselves in the foot it was awful. This man did it and now has written a book admitting all of it and they can’t try him again. It is truly tragic that this man literally got away with murder. Really great article though i really enjoyed it.

  • Maya Mani

    While I admit that the evidence was flawed because it seemed to tampered with, I don’t like how whether his hands fit into the glove or not determined his innocence. It just seemed so silly because gloves never have to fit perfectly, however it was a very conflicting case. It’s such a famous case even today, with Netflix’s new show about it, as well as the Kardashian’s opinions about OJ.

  • Edward Van Buren

    This article is written fairly well for the most part,
    but many facts were misconstrued. No one heard Nicole Simpson crying for help.

    A sock(OJs not Nicole’s) was found with her blood and OJs blood on it.

    Simpson was seen by the Limo driver , walking up the driveway at 10:56 pm. Driver rang the buzzer , Simpson then answered , saying he’d overslept, although the limo driver had been there for nearly 30 minutes trying to reach Simpson.

  • Diamond Davidson

    This article is really amazing! I really like all the information you gathered and the way you were able to put it into a well-written article. This is one of the stories I have been waiting to read about because I wanted to know how he was found not guilty. If he is guilty he did a great job with convincing and his lawyers did a better job as well. It’s really hard to see criminals walk away free when they and their lawyers know the real story and I hate it, but that’s just life you win some you lose some.

  • Engelbert Madrid

    I’ve never heard of the case of O.J. Simpson who was blamed for the deaths of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman. Although the jury came to the conclusion that O.J. Simpson was declared innocent, I feel that he was responsible for the deaths of his ex-wife and Ronald Goldman. However, I cannot blame the jury for declaring him innocent, because this case was a difficult one.

    • Edward Van Buren

      He wasn’t declared innocent. He was found not guilty. Two different things.

  • Leeza Cordova

    There were many different factors that were involved in this case, and alot things went wrong. For starters, alot of the scene was contaminated with evidence, making it hard to use. This case is used in alot of sociology cases to show how to not clear a crime scene. This article was written very well and went into detail about the case, I think that an outside would be able to use this article to further inform themselves.

  • Octaviano Huron

    The lives of the people who were involved in the trial will never be the same again. I had watched a documentary of this trial, and the jurors were not allowed to watch TV, could rarely talk to other jurors outside of court, or leave their hotel rooms without the permission of a police officer. The families of both victims deserved justice, and no amount of money was going to bring them closure. The lawyers have endured a lot of time and work for a trial that could’ve resulted in conviction if it were any other person. This trial is very controversial, to say the least.

  • Mariah Cavanaugh

    I was in 4th grade and I remember vividly when they announced the not guilty verdict, my class erupted into cheers. Your article was well researched and presented in a clear way. As you pointed out it was a difficult trial from the beginning. The LAPD had an extensive history of racism so even though the evidence against O.J seemed like more than enough to convict on there was still the lingering question of him being framed.

  • Bianca-Rhae Jacquez

    the O.J. Simpson murder case is always a topic of discussion. Through DNA evidence it is clear that O.J. was guilty. The rates and statistics that the prosecution presented on the possibility of it not being O.J makes it very clear it was him. Even though there were a lot of procedural errors that occurred in collection there wouldn’t be a chance that the DNA is falsified. Even though there was strong DNA evidence many people, even the jury, believe that he is guilty. A few years ago O.J. admitted to the crimes and do to double jeopardy he wont be charged or convicted.

  • Lilliana Canales

    First off, I want to point out and appreciate that you said Nicole was his ex wife because far too often, I hear people call her his wife when they were divorced. Secondly, that man is as guilty as they come. He was acting way too suspicious, he could have easily played off the grieving ex husband when police initially tried to contact him, instead he hid, only proving his guilt. Then there was the infamous high speed chase that proved his guilt even more along with his suicide note and then even the image you provided shows that this man purposely put the glove on in a manner so that it would appear as if it didn’t fit when it did because it was his. Orenthal J. Simpson had a great jury full of uneducated people, so of course he was found innocent. It’s a shame he can’t be tried again for the crime because if he was, he’d be in prison for certain.

Leave your comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.