Since its origins, the infamous Ku Klux Klan has influenced the attitudes and views of many Americans. The KKK will forever be recognized as the largest political hate group in United States history. Despite the rise and fall of the Klan, it wasn’t until the 1920s that it rose to its highest peak in prominence. During this time period, there was exponential growth in both membership in and support for this notorious cult. The KKK was a growing cult in the 1920s because it instilled religious beliefs, terror, and a skewed view of a better America into the minds of its members through its propaganda of racial superiority.
The original KKK arose during the Reconstruction era of the 1860s and 1870s, and was primarily aimed at restoring the antebellum racial hierarchy to the South. However, it declined in the 1870s due to the passing of legislation aimed at stopping Klansmen’s voter intimidation activities and associated hate crimes. With the end of Reconstruction in 1877, and the passage of Jim Crow laws throughout the South, Klan activity and Klan membership declined. But the cult began a strong resurgence in 1915, with membership skyrocketing to nearly four million by the year 1920.1 This time, the focus of their efforts was aimed at “Americanizing” people by promoting the Constitution, the flag, and the Bible.2 This white supremacist organization lashed out at any group whose ideals conflicted with their own, especially that of African Americans, Catholics, and Jews.
The revival of the Klan was led by its notorious second Grand Wizard (the KKK’s primary leader), William J. Simmons, who was a preacher, a veteran, and an extreme white supremacist.3 He was inspired to reorganize the Klan after watching the silent movie Birth of a Nation, which depicted the Klan as a saving grace, defending the birthright of white southerners and greatly enhancing the public opinion of the cult.4 The religious implications of the KKK stemmed from the teachings of Simmons. Not only were his sermons effective at grasping the hateful minds of Klan members, but he truly convinced them that they were doing the work of God; his credibility led him to a position of power. In fact, one could not join the Klan unless one practiced “militant Christianity,” living in such a way as to be an example to others by following laws, abstaining from drinking, gambling, infidelity, and by not neglecting one’s family. Members were to attend church services regularly, always adhering to the foundations of the Christian faith.5 In addition to this, the KKK burned crosses, often arguing that it was to symbolize the spread of Jesus’ light; it was a symbol aimed to “drive away darkness and gloom.”6 The heavily emphasized morals and negative attitudes toward others are what drove the cult’s frame of thought. Often interpreted in a hateful manner, the religious implications instilled by the KKK’s leaders too often brewed inaccurate thoughts in the minds of its followers; thus, many assumed that the answer to their problem was to commit radical acts of terror.
In addition to their cloaking themselves in the trappings of Christianity, the Klan also used terror tactics to instill fear into both its own members and to those it targeted. The members saw themselves as vigilantes in the restoration of justice—using intimidation, violence, and terror to prevent people of color from attaining any sort of social status or political power. They burned crosses, led beatings, committed assassinations, lynchings, and much more.7 While the symbol of the KKK, the burning cross, held religious connotations for its own members, it was also used as a form of intimidation. They used this symbol of a burning cross to terrorize African Americans.8 In addition to intimidating African Americans, the Klan also targeted Catholics, and had a particularly strong concern with this group due to the fact that they practiced a “different religion” from their own. The motivation for this anti-Catholicism is deeply rooted in American history, going all the way back to colonial times. And with the dramatic increase of Catholics immigrating from Ireland, Italy, and Germany in the nineteenth century, anti-Catholicism was a mainstay throughout American life in the early decades of the twentieth century.9 With the ethnic, social, and racial diversity of American life, tensions continued to heighten among the opposing whites who sought to rid America of these many “outsiders” — a long-held notion in American society. In using both verbal and physical threats, the terror inflicted by the cult caused people to fear the power of the invisible empire that was the KKK.
The idea of creating a better America was yet another reason for the Klan’s rise to prominence in the 1920s. The KKK fought for stricter enforcement of prohibition laws, sought to eliminate political corruption, and wanted to eradicate any form of immigration. Any seemingly “foreign-born” citizen that crossed the path of a klansman was deemed un-American. The Klan assumed they were doing the nation its due diligence in suppressing these “outsiders.” At its peak, the Klan even managed to get political leaders to seek their support and endorsement, since many Americans at this time sympathized with the Klan and its mission.10 And as membership grew, so did their influence. Their opposition to non-whites and to immigration helped to secure the passage of strict quotas on those seeking to come to America.11 The KKK was influential in more ways than one — their power reigning heavily on American society. Even today, white supremacists seek to have their voices heard and their views seen as legitimate. The fight for racial toleration is certainly far from over.
On the other hand, some say that the resurgence of the KKK in the 1920s was due primarily to the effects of industrialization, urbanization, and immigration on society. White Americans became uneasy about immigration and “outsiders” taking American jobs. Many could not stand the idea of “those people” diluting the “racial purity” of American society. But the idea of racial purity is a myth–yet a strong one that many white racists wish to be true. The original soil of America was populated by immigrants and natives alike; whites simply claimed it as their own, as they were to be the guardians of a “city on a hill” and as part of their “manifest destiny” to be the bearers of a supreme culture and society.12 Those that looked to this cult to justify their own beliefs do not parallel with what it means to be an independent individual in American society. The people they were trying to drive out had just as much freedom to be in the United States as they did. Others in support of the Klan also claimed that Simmons was, in fact, preaching for the betterment of society, and that he never resorted to violence to solve problems; though this may seem true, Simmons was actually insinuating his own, twisted version of the word of God, often emphasizing ideas of white supremacy and racial segregation as if that was God’s will. In a pamphlet he wrote in the early nineteenth century, he even states that the primary goal of the organization is to preserve ideals of pure Anglo-Saxon civilization, and many claimed he preached themes of being a pro-American leader by hinting in his sermons that any person in opposition to traditional thought of Anglo supremacy was unwelcome, and simply un-American.13 He silently, yet deviously, instilled discrimination into the Klan’s members. It was even noted that Catholic priests, Protestant ministers, and Jewish rabbis came forward to condemn the organization and its false teachings.14 It seems that the religious implications, terroristic acts, and the skewed ideals used in order to insinuate the making of a better America are contradictory to both the Klan’s mission and the symbols they claimed to uphold.
With a religious basis, the Klan movement emphasized legal and political approaches to solving the “moral crisis” in 1920s America.15 The cult rose to prominence in the 1920s because of their religious, terroristic, and “ideal American” implications; however, their resurgence only served as a detriment. The second coming of the Klan was significant in that it rose to its highest peak in prominence. The KKK’s second coming only continued to fuel the long-held idea of hatred and discrimination that still lingers in the minds of many today.
- Khan Academy, 2016, s.v. “The Reemergence of the KKK,” by Dr. Michelle Getchell. ↵
- David A. Horowitz, Inside the Klavern: The Secret History of a Ku Klux Klan of the 1920s (Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1999), 10. ↵
- David A. Horowitz, Inside the Klavern: The Secret History of a Ku Klux Klan of the 1920s (Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1999), 11. ↵
- Roland G. Fryer, “Hatred and Profits: Under the Hood of the Ku Klux Klan,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 127, no. 4 (November 2012): 12. ↵
- Holley Donald, “A Look Behind the Masks: The 1920s Ku Klux Klan in Monticello, Arkansas,” The Arkansas Historical Quarterly no. 2 (2001): 19. ↵
- David Cunningham, “Top 5 Questions About the KKK,” PBS, 2013. Accessed March 12, 2018. http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/americanexperience/features/klansville-faq/. ↵
- Khan Academy, 2016, s.v. “The Reemergence of the KKK,” by Dr. Michelle Getchell. ↵
- PBS, 2013, s.v. “Top 5 Questions About the KKK,” by David Cunningham. ↵
- Mark Paul Richard, Not a Catholic Nation: The Ku Klux Klan Confronts New England in the 1920s (Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 2015), 11. ↵
- American Decades, 2001, s.v. “After the Great War: Nativism and the Ku Klux Klan,” by Judith S. Baughman, et.al. ↵
- Gale Encyclopedia of American Law, 2011, s.v. “Ku Klux Klan,” by Donna Batten. ↵
- Khan Academy, 2016, s.v. “The Reemergence of the KKK,” by Dr. Michelle Getchell. ↵
- William J. Simmons, “Pamphlet for the Ku Klux Klan Written by Colonel William Joseph Simmons,” Smithsonian, 2017. Accessed April 6, 2018. https://nmaahc.si.edu/object/nmaahc_2011.155.15. ↵
- Khan Academy, 2016, s.v. “The Reemergence of the KKK,” by Dr. Michelle Getchell. ↵
- Holley Donald, “A Look Behind the Masks: The 1920s Ku Klux Klan in Monticello, Arkansas,” The Arkansas Historical Quarterly no. 2 (2001): 14-15. ↵
122 comments
Donte Joseph
This article does a great job of explaining and putting to words the heinous crimes of the Klu Klux Klan. Originally, I had thought that the Klu Klux Klan just did bad things for the sake of doing it but now that I know some of them genuinely thought that what they were doing was right changes my perspective entirely. I believe that there is a difference in blind following, and true following so the fact that some people had no clue that life is not as one sided as they thought amazes me.
Cooper Dubrule
I like the language this article used. It was very interesting and informational and I learned a lot of things that I didn’t already know about the KKK. In hind sight its always rational to say that they were a bad group but its an amazing phenomenon that hate groups such as the KKK were able to gain power and influence. All this happened within the past 100 years which is mind bottling to think about because that’s relatively soon.
Mariah Cavanaugh
As long as people hold hate in their heart, there will be room for groups such as the KKK. We are seeing that now with the rise of white nationalism. I thought you made a high point when you mentioned that they cloaked themselves in the trappings of Christianity. There have been many times that hate was spread under the guise of religion and God’s will, and I think it is important to remember that groups such as the KKK will twist and warp anything to gain support and followers.
Reagan Meuret
It’s crazy to think that a terrorist group such as that would exist, especially considering that they would kill people because they didn’t like the color of their skin. It is even more crazy to me to think that this all occurred less than 100 years ago. This article was very informative as well because I never realized that the KKK was even brought back, as I thought it never left until it was finally disbanded.
Tessa Bodukoglu
First of all, this article was very compelling to read. there was so much detail and information given. I have know about the KKK and what they stand for, for the most part but reading this gave me more of an insight than I already had. I have personally never understood why people support this group. It does nothing more than what a murderer or a terrorist could do but the difference is that they are a group that is glorified by many people who choose to look away from the wrong.
Nathalie Herrera
It is sad to say that there was and still is even such a thing as the KKK. The actions and beliefs they held were unjust and inhumane. The extreme discrimination against others who were not white and who did not share the same religion as they did is tragic. This article did a nice job of explaining the KKK’s morals, beliefs and overall structure. Very well written!
Luisa Ortiz
My mom always says that everything in extreme is toxic, the KKK is pure TOXIC, nothing good out of this association came out. I strongly believe that the country that does not know its history tends to repeat it. The KKK believed that only the “whites” have a privilege and they hated immigrants, well sadly our country is suffering from this belief. One thing I was not aware or realize is that the KKK were against Catholics. “the idea of racial purity is a myth–yet a strong one that many white racists wish to be true. The original soil of America was populated by immigrants and natives alike; whites simply claimed it as their own, as they were to be the guardians of a “city on a hill” and as part of their “manifest destiny” to be the bearers of a supreme culture and society.” That whole paragraph is pure GOLD.
Alexis Martinez
Their actions are absolutely horrendous and inhumane. It baffles my mind to think that someone could do that to another human being just because they’re different. I think the article did a great job of being informative and unbiased. It’s sad to see how the KKK was able to gather people to believe in what they believe in.
Devin Ramos
This article did a good job at putting an image to the crimes that the Ku Klux Klan did, the fact that we allowed these people to march in their hoodies in D.C strikes me as odd but they do have the first amendment right to do and say what they want but I think they’re spewing hate. The fact that they also stated themselves as a religious group but would burn the cross is very strange to me.
Luke Lopez
This article was very informative on the revival of the Ku Klux Klan. It is terrible that the KKK convinced its members that they were doing the right thing by being a member and abiding by the Klan’s rules. The KKK thought that they were vigilantes and they were supposedly trying to restore justice, but they were only engaging in acts of unwarranted terror.