StMU Research Scholars

Featuring Scholarly Research, Writing, and Media at St. Mary’s University

October 19, 2016

Barbados Slave Codes

In 1627, English colonizers began to settle in Barbados, an eastern Caribbean island, to expand their territory. Their primary reason for coming to Barbados was for planting sugar, so that England might avoid having to buy sugar from other European nations that produced sugar on their own Caribbean islands. The English saw how strong the demand for sugar was. Since sugar cane grew naturally on Barbados, the English saw Barbados as a lucrative opportunity.

Earliest known map of the Island of Barbados | Drawn by Richard Ligon in 1657 | Courtesy of the British Library Online Gallery
Earliest known map of the Island of Barbados | Drawn by Richard Ligon in 1657 | Courtesy of the British Library Online Gallery

However, the Englishmen who wanted to engage in this business had to decide who to send to Barbados to grow, harvest, and process the sugar cane into refined sugar. This was not an easy task, but these Englishmen did have a number of Irish prisoners serving various sentences. They decided on a way for these Irish prisoners to work off their sentences on Barbados sugar plantations. They sent thousands of indentured Irish prisoners to Barbados.1

As the years of growing and exporting this material continued, the English began to think of better ways for the crop to be harvested and exported faster. They needed a higher efficiency route, as well as a way that was cheaper, because the Irish indentured servants did receive some form of salary, even though they were indentured. By the 1670s, African slaves, a cheaper source of labor being used throughout the Caribbean islands, became the alternative to Irish indentured servants. As the English continued to expand their plantations, they began importing African slaves in increasing numbers.2

Between 1627 and 1807, more than 400,000 Africans, mainly originating from West Africa, had been brought to Barbados as slaves to work on sugar plantations. The English planters would request and receive more slaves whenever they believed they needed more for the plantations. The Africans were viewed as nothing more than interchangeable machine parts in the process of sugar production. The treatment experienced by the Africans was among the most inhumane in human history.3

Starting in 1640, Africans were thought of as inferior to Englishmen. Africans were not thought to have the capacity to be intelligent. In consideration of how dark skin color was defined as life of lesser value than light skin color, legal codes naturally evolved out of these attitudes.4

barbados_slave_license2
License Certificate for retrieving “Slave Property” | 1815 | Courtesy of the Barbados Free Press – May 27, 2007

Although the English were continually resupplied with Africans, they felt the need to have restrictions or rules set in motion when it came to controlling the labor of African slaves. The Barbados Slave Code of 1661 created a way for planters to be able to have full capacity to control their slaves by any means they felt necessary without any legal repercussions. The Barbados Slave Code was originally enacted to serve both parties, trying to benefit the slaves and the planters; but it did not go according to plan. Slave owners were to protect their slaves from cruelty:

[N]egroes [are] an heathenish brutish and an unsertaine dangerous kinde of people…yett wee well know by the right rule of reason and order wee are not to leave them to the Arbitrary cruele and outragious wills of every evill disposed person but soo farr to protect them as wee doo many other goods and Chattles and alsoe somewhat farther as being created Men though without the Knowledge of God in the world.5

The slaves did receive one positive from the Barbados Slave Code: the ability to have a change a clothing once a year. The planters, on the other hand, were provided with many new ways to keep their slaves in line. They had the right and the authority to chastise, whip, brand, lacerate, cripple, set them on fire, or murder them with no negative consequences. The reason is during this time the English common Law, which included the right to a jury and judge, was not offered to the Africans, showing that they did not have the same rights as the planters. Africans were unable to be assured any of these statutes if their English masters harmed them in anyway.6

The Barbados Slave Codes began to spread from Barbados to Jamaica, Antigua, and also to South Carolina, where these Codes became the legal basis for slavery and the treatment of slaves in many of the thirteen colonies.7

  1. Hilary McD. Beckles, “A ‘riotous and Unruly Lot’: Irish Indentured Servants and Freemen in the English West Indies, 1644-1713,” The William and Mary Quarterly 47, no. 4 (1990): 503–7.
  2. Hilary McD. Beckles, “A ‘riotous and unruly lot’: Irish Indentured Servants and Freemen in the English West Indies, 1644-1713,” The William and Mary Quarterly 47, no. 4 (1990): 505.
  3. Kenneth Morgan, “Review of Caribbean Exchanges: Slavery and the Transformation of English Society, 1640-1700, by Susan Dwyer Amussen,” The Journal of Modern History 81, no. 3 (2009): 667.
  4. Kenneth Morgan, “Review of Caribbean Exchanges: Slavery and the Transformation of English Society, 1640-1700, by Susan Dwyer Amussen,” The Journal of Modern History 81, no. 3 (2009): 667.
  5. Barbados Slave Code of 1661, as quoted in Bradley J. Nicholson, “Legal Borrowing and the Origins of Slave Law in the British Colonies,” The American Journal of Legal History 38, no. 1 (1994): 38–54. Nicholson makes the point that the 1661 Code was only slightly modified in 1676, 1682, and 1688.
  6.  Bradley J. Nicholson, “Legal Borrowing and the Origins of Slave Law in the British Colonies,” The American Journal of Legal History 38, no. 1 (1994): 51.
  7. M. Eugene Sirmans, “The Legal Status of the Slave in South Carolina, 1670-1740,” The Journal of Southern History 28, no. 4 (1962): 462–73.

Tags from the story

Barbados

colonization

plantations

slaves

sugar

Recent Comments

Kassandra Guillen

What a great and information filled article! It is truly shocking that slave owners were suppose to protect their slaves from cruelty and evil, while by law the planters were allowed to murder, whip, brand or cripple the slaves with no consequences. That is horrifying. I think many times when people, including myself, look upon history we do not take a step back and truly understand the reality of these events. This Is a very deserving topic as it educates us on cruel and evil events found in history to better ensure they do not reoccur.

reply

19/10/2016

11:52 am

Jorge Manzanares

One of the many unintended consequences of the Colombian Exchange was slavery. Well done on illustrating the origins of such awful cruelty. I liked how you linked it properly to economics. Since people were migrating to the “New World” for economical reasons, it is easy to understand why slavery gained such popularity. Furthermore, the seeds for racial tension were at brink as well. Well done!

reply

26/10/2016

11:52 am

Mehmet Samuk

Great writing, you really made me feel hatred for those legal codes which were out of ideas that just because of different skin color, people have been thought inferior to other. It is sad how they used people as machines for their greed.

reply

28/10/2016

11:52 am

Bryce Cardwell

It is crazy to think how slave owners had the right to murder, and hurt the slaves in anyway possible but were called to protect them and save them from these types of things. This double-standard really helps me to understand why racism is like it is today and how it has been in the past. These codes rule out the minority so quickly and do not give them a chance at all to make anything of themselves.

reply

31/10/2016

11:52 am

Analina Devora

It’s insane reading about how much people were dehumanized during this time and treated as property. It’s almost unbelievable that these issues are a part of our history but it’s important to recognize our mistakes. Very well researched article!

reply

04/11/2016

11:52 am

Kassandra Guillen

What a well-written and information filled article! It is truly astonishing to imagine such an inhumane event in history occurring. I was unaware that more than 400,000 Africans were taken from their homes to work as a slave on the sugar plantations. This is a topic in history that deserves much recognition. Well done and thank you for sharing!

reply

10/11/2016

11:52 am

Rafael Ortiz Salas

Great article, I didn’t know anything about Barbados slave codes. I cant believe slaves were treated in such way, and their owners had the right to murder. That really surprised me. Its crazy to think that people were cruel to others in the past, I cant imagine it. Very interesting article!

reply

10/11/2016

11:52 am

1 2 3

Leave a Reply