StMU Research Scholars

Featuring Scholarly Research, Writing, and Media at St. Mary’s University

March 25, 2018

The Spoils of War: Stolen Art in WWII

stolen art

Winner of the Spring 2018 StMU History Media Award for

Article with the Best Use of Images

Best Article in the Category of “International Relations”

Rothschild, Rosenberg, and Schloss, all upper class European families who collected art masterpieces by the thousands over several generations. Theirs were some of the most important collections plundered by Hitler’s Nazi regime during the Holocaust. Until the 1920s, these Jewish families had lived as integral parts of German society. By 1925, Jewish people accounted for 0.9 percent of the 62 million German population. There were about 522,000 Jews, many of whom were self employed and included scholars, art collectors, aristocrats, and rabbis.1  By the end of January 1933, the SS (SchutzStaffel or protective elite forces of the Nazi Regime) began to seize, sometimes by force, government and institutional property. In March of 1933, Hitler passed the Enabling Act, an Amendment to the Weimar Constitution. The Enabling Act gave the government absolute power by no longer requiring the involvement of the Reichstag or Congress for future legislation.  The creation of this law abolished almost all liberties of non Jewish and Jewish people alike.2  As the German Empire grew so did its systematic application of new oppressive powers. After the annexation of Austria on March 12, 1938, the Third Reich passed new laws which abolished legal recognition of all Jewish peoples. This made it easier for the Third Reich to confiscate Jewish property. On April 26, Jewish property had to be registered with the government. Then, the systematic imprisoning of Jews in concentration camps gave German authorities free reigns to pillage at will. This began the “Aryanization” of property, a process by which Nazis evicted Jews from their businesses and homes and transferred all property titles to their own ethnic group.3 These laws were a way to systematically document property, but also to identify Jewish families, making it easier for the Nazi regime to persecute them.  Many art pieces of lesser importance were sold to create profit that funded Germany’s war machine and the concentration camps throughout Germany and in the annexed territories. This set the stage for the large scale genocide of the Jewish population. Germany institutionalized the theft of artwork, religious artifacts, and books during the Holocaust to concentrate the wealth in the hands of Hitler. As a mediocre painter who failed to get into art school twice, Hitler had a deep fascination for the arts. Thus, he spared the artwork (primarily for his personal collection) instead of destroying it, as was done to most other non-valuable possessions in Jewish businesses and homes. A conservative estimate suggests that during that time over 300,000 stolen artwork and antiques along with more than 2 million manuscripts and books were removed from their rightful owners. Most of these artworks came from France since France had the biggest collection of artwork in Europe with over 100,000 artworks out of the 300,000 stolen. In order to persuade his followers and soldiers, Hitler created the Einsatzstab Reichsleiters Rosenberg (ERR), a cultural appropriation task force and justified it in a memorandum on November 3, 1941 that provided the legal and moral basis for the theft of artworks across Europe.4

Nazis created a systematic way of removing all artwork from across Europe. The Nazi regime coordinated the transfer of art from art dealers. The art taken was moved out of the country through a system of railways to the storage facilities or caches. Here, each collection taken from art dealers and was coded with a letter that corresponds and a number. For example, the Rothschild Collection, stolen from the Rothschild family, was coded with an R and then a number like so “R1400”. Along with the Rothschild, the Goodman, Rosenberg, Schloss, and Kann Collections were also looted primarily during the invasion of France.5 When France was invaded, under the order of Hitler, the ERR sent out a message to the French people over Jewish art. The art in France was moved to the Louvre, from there, Hitler’s high ranking men would decide which pieces were sent to Berlin and which would stay in France. If a piece was selected, it would “immediately be inventoried, packed and transported to Germany by the ERR”. Art that did not make the cut was sold at auction with funds claiming to benefit the French state or dependents of war casualties. The now “owner-less” property was sent to a salvage location, usually a town in the southern part of Germany near the border of Austria called Neuschwanstein. The castle of Neuschwanstein was a prime location since it was close to the border of Austria and is a fairly isolated location. The train consisted of 25 express baggage cars that would carry art, antiques, furniture, and ornaments. On March 15, 1941, this train would carry some of the most important art collections including Seligmann, Rothschils, Halphen, Kann, and others.6 Prior to invading the Netherlands, Austria, and France, Hitler would send in elite teams to identify important works of art and collections. This led to the theft of many important and highly valued pieces, such as the Ghent Altarpiece and Michelangelo’s Bruges Madonna.7

The Madonna of Bruges holding Jesus Christ | Courtesy of michelangelo.org

The Ghent Altarpiece of 1432, also known as the “Adoration of the Mystic Lamb”, by Jan and Hubert van Eyck is considered one of Europe’s most significant works of art. The painting was housed in Paris, originally as a war trophy before moving it to Saint Bavo’s Cathedral in Belgium. The painting has two wings that open outwardly while the center does not move with 20 individual panels in total.8  The painting stood at almost 12 feet high and 16 feet wide. In May 1940, German forces had captured Belgium. At first, Belgians sent their most beloved artworks to the Vatican. But once Italy declared war and it sent the painting back to Paris. The reason why Hitler went after this piece is that 6 of the 20 panels belonged to the German state prior to 1919. The treaty of Versailles had forced the German State to give those panels to Belgium as reparations. In July of 1942, a secret delegation was sent to negotiate with the French to hand over the piece. When the French refused, German forces stole the painting. Michelangelo’s Bruges Madonna was housed in the Cathedral of Notre Dame and is another one of Europe’s most significant pieces. Made of the richest white marble in Italy, the Bruges Madonna is a life size creation of the Virgin Mary holding the Christ child.  On September 7, 1944, German forces removed the Bruges Madonna from the church.9

The Ghent Altarpiece | Courtesy of the New York Times

As the Allied forces moved closer and closer, Hitler ordered the paintings and artworks to be scattered across Europe. One of hiding places was a salt mine known as the Steinberg mine in the Sandling Mountain in Austria. In the winter of 1943-1945, German forces began to move the art into this small rural area. From May 1944-April 1945, more than 1,687 paintings arrived. In the fall of 1944, the Ghent Altarpiece arrived from the salvage point of Neuschwanstein and Michelangelo’s Madonna of Bruges arrived shortly afterwards by boat in October of 1944. Along with the close of the war, a small group of men dispatched by the US government were hunting all across Europe for stolen art work. Unlike the army, the majority of the group were not soldiers, but rather professors specializing in art. In 1945, the Monuments Men recovered both Michelangelo’s Madonna of Bruges and the Ghent Altarpiece. By the end of WWII, the Monuments Men would end up recovering thousands of artworks and sculptures.10

The are other sources of stolen art inside the US as well. Most recently, a lawsuit brought about in 2015. It is against the descendants of Jewish victims of the Holocaust and the Norton Simon Museum in Pasadena, California and the Fred Jones Jr. Museum at the University of Oklahoma. In the wake of World War II, museums and art collectors rushed to buy art without checking how these pieces ended up in the auction. Thus, most purchased stolen works of art by accident. Most museums who are in legal battles such as this, claim that the descendants have waited too long to claim  the artwork and usually fight under technical terms.11

The Lady in Gold | Courtesy of npr.org

During the Holocaust, thousands upon thousands of refugees fled their country to other countries around the world. When the Holocaust ended and Nazi Germany fell, many Jewish and non-Jewish peoples began to make claims for their property or art stolen during the war. They claimed governments, especially the US and Germany, as a whole took part in stealing artwork and property. On these grounds, the governments claimed immunity due to an agreement titled the Termination of  the Occupied Regime in the Federal Republic of Germany. This waved any German made claims against the US for property theft during WWII by US government officials or US soldiers.12 The US also has laws in place that prevent US citizens from suing foreign governments which was brought into question by the Altmann vs. Austria case. During WWII, Altmann and her family owned the famous painting of her Aunt known as the Lady in Gold. Painted by Gustav Klimt, the family owned 5 paintings from him which were taken by Nazis during WWII. Even though she had accurate claims and documentation, she could not sue the Austrian government on part because of the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FISA) of 1976. She sued in 2000 after a new Austrian law passed in 1996 declared all Nazi transactions void.13 She won the case and received the paintings, later handing them over to a museum in New York. This case was a major victory for victims of art looting since it opened a small clause in the FSIA which states that “lawsuits regarding Holocaust era looted art and other stolen property can be brought against foreign governments in US courts”.14

Even though thousands of pieces of art have been found and returned, thousands still have no identifiable owner.  400 paintings hang in the Louvre that are unclaimed paintings, 100 are at the Musee d’Orsay, and 40 others reside in at the Pompidou Center. All together, there are about 2000 unclaimed paintings that are currently in French museums alone. Unclaimed sculptures are placed in the Elysee Presidential Palace.15 As of 2015, hundreds of millions of dollars worth of artworks have been recovered with large art caches still being discovered inside Germany. The most recent in 2013 with 1500 pieces of art with paintings by Picasso, Matisse, and Chagall were found. In March 2015, the El Greco Portrait of a Man was found after 70 years missing.

  1. Ronald M. Smelser, Learning about the Holocaust: A Student’s Guide (New York: Macmillan Reference, 2001), 48-51.
  2. Ronald M. Smelser, Learning about the Holocaust: A Student’s Guide (New York: Macmillan Reference, 2001), 48-51, 54.
  3. Macmillan Encyclopedia of Death and Dying, 2002, s,v, “Genocide,” by Stephen C. Feinstein.
  4.  Encyclopedia of Genocide and Crimes Against Humanity, 2005, s.v. “Art, Stolen,” by Hector Feliciano.
  5. Hector Feliciano, “The Aftermath of Nazi Art Looting in the United States and Europe: The Quest to Recover Stolen Collections,” Depaul-Lca Journal of Art and Entertainment Law 10, no. 1, (1999): 1-8.
  6. Robert M. Edsel and Bret Witter, The Monuments Men (New York: Hachette Book Group, 2010), 31, 42
  7. Sara Constantakis, World of Forensic Science (Michigan: Farmington Hills, 2016), 361.
  8. Randy Kennedy, “Ghent Altarpiece to undergo Restoration”, New York Times, May 14, 2010. Accessed March 7, 2018. http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/05/arts/design/05getty.html
  9. Robert M. Edsel and Bret Witter, The Monuments Men (New York: Hachette Book Group, 2010), 97, 99, 116-119.
  10. Robert M. Edsel and Bret Witter, The Monuments Men (New York: Hachette Book Group, 2010), 304-306.
  11. Geoff Edgers, “Why two American museums are fighting to keep art stolen by the Nazis,” The Washington Post, June 30, 2015. Accessed February 10, 2018. https://www.washingtonpost.com/entertainment/museums/why-two-american-museums-are-fighting-to-keep-art-stolen-by-the-nazis/2015/06/30/16aef5ae-1bad-11e5-bd7f-4611a60dd8e5_story.html?utm_term=.26c14a2a62e7.
  12. Andrew Baker, “Pleasant Scenes or Nazi Icons?,” UMKC Law Review 71, no. 4, (2002-2003): 844-845.
  13. David J. Correira, “The Lady in Gold: One hundred years of social, political, and legal intrigue,” Trusts and Estates 155, no. 3, (March 2016): 1-2,4.
  14. “AJC Hails Supreme Court Decision in Republic of Austria v. Altmann” PR Newswire, June 7, 2004. Accessed January 31, 2018. https://advance.lexis.com/document/?pdmfid=1516831&crid=e754d7fa-9c4d-496b-a932-da8ce409bb41&pddocfullpath=%2Fshared%2Fdocument%2Fnews%2Furn%3AcontentItem%3A4CK4-TY10-010D-R190-00000-00&pddocid=urn%3AcontentItem3A4CK4-TY10-010D-R190-00000-00&pdcontentcomponentid=8054&pdteaserkey=sr0&pditab=allpods&ecomp=dy_k&earg=sr0&prid=07f28ac9-3cb8-4f89-9883-a30d2a794937.
  15. Hector Feliciano, “The Aftermath of Nazi Art Looting in the United States and Europe: The Quest to Recover Stolen Collections,” Depaul-Lca Journal of Art and Entertainment Law 10, no. 1, (1999): 9.

Tags from the story

Artwork

France

Germany

Ghent Altarpiece

Jew

Jewish

Madonna of Bruges

Recent Comments

Christopher Hohman

I really loved this article. The way you used these pictures was really nice. It is hard to believe that human beings could be so cruel to their own kind. For the Nazis to deprive the Jewish families of all of their possessions was a precursor to all the unwarranted genocide that came later. It goes to show how in the Nazis minds the Jews were not even people and had no rights. I had no idea that some American buyers unknowingly purchased the paintings. For the families to have lost the paintings and even now they are unable to get them back is just sad. I hope that laws continue to be passed like the one in Austria that makes it easier to open cases to win art back

reply

15/08/2018

1:45 am

Nathan Alba

Art plays a huge role in culture and society, and to think Hitler was stealing the world’s greatest pieces of artwork just sounds crazy. Article as a whole is written quite well, good background and follow up with the details of the cases and lawsuits going on currently about unclaimed art pieces. I think the Monuments Men deserve much gratitude for not being soldiers but still going out and finding all the works they found.

reply

19/08/2018

1:45 am

Devin Ramos

The Rothschild family attained their wealth through finance, they would help the government fiance its taxes or see if it had enough money to exists. The family later then put this gained wealth into real estate and art. Hitler then rose into power really quickly spreading through Europe. As he took over this new land for Germany he would take art that he personally would choose. Hitler was originally a art student he had a passion for art.

reply

19/08/2018

1:45 am

Roman Olivera

In reading this article I got a lot of insight on another side of the war, not just the murdering rampages of the madman, Adolf Hitler. We see the persecution of the Jewish people through the confiscation of their properties. In some cases the profits made from these sales were used to fund the concentration camp and prisons they were held at and ultimately many died at. This is another crazy scheme by Adolf Hitler to help further the case of his Nazi propaganda. The thousands of artifacts stolen and sold privately may never be know, but all of the well know artifacts that were saved through both his personal collection and collections hidden or put in museums is still staggering in number. It is good to see organization coming together to try and not only recover these lost works of art, but to also find the rightful owner of the art to return them to the families. I was really intrigued to know that the art work continues to show up in hidden areas in Germany from such a long time ago as World War II, but it does not surprise me. This doesn’t surprise me to hear that the art work has been found all over the world, to include American, as there has always been a black market for stolen art. This Adolf Hiter stolen artwork just has a little darker past than most. All I can say is that thankfully these works were hidden during that time because of the possibility of them being destroyed during the destruction of the war. I hope the people who are working on preserving these works of art continue to do so and continue in the search to return them to the places they belong.

reply

21/08/2018

1:45 am

Mikayla Briggs

I read this article because I’m interested in the time period in which it took place. I found it really extraordinary that the Nazi’s where able to steal and hid thousands of pieces of artwork from all across Europe and not get caught until almost the end of the war. As I read, I was saddened by the fact that still over two thousand painting still remain ownerless after so much time. I also learned that Hitler spared the art due to his love for art but stole it due to the fact that he wasn’t good enough to get into art school causing his jealous of Jewish and non-Jewish families that held large amounts of artwork.

reply

22/08/2018

1:45 am

Gabriela Ochoa

This article was really well written. I found it interesting that after they stole the art work they determined which ones were important even though they thought that the people who made them weren’t important but their artwork was. I never knew that Hitler was interested in the arts and wasn’t admitted to art school twice. I also thought that it was interesting that they would take a religious artifact, something scared to the people of that religion. Its also interesting that so many paintings have yet to be claimed but with documentation of who they previously belonged to they can’t rightly find the people they belong too or their families.

reply

23/08/2018

1:45 am

Damian Jennings

After reading this article I gained insight on how poorly the Jewish people were treated, these people were forced to give up their goods and belongings to the German Empire under laws and acts. The Enabling Act was the turning point of this era, which gave the government absolute power, as the German Empire grew so did the new oppressive power. The Third Reuch passed new laws which abolished legal recognition of all Jewish people, and made it easy to confiscate Jewish property. Not only were Jewish people oppressed but they were stripped of their belongings and identity. These paintings would fund and create profit for German’s war machines and the concentration camps. This stolen art project was inspired by Hitler, a man that was deeply fascinated by artwork, but he was a mediocre painter who failed to get into art school several times. Over 300,000 stolen artwork and antiques were reported stolen, along with, 2 million manuscripts and books.

reply

23/08/2018

1:45 am

Sienna Guerra

In high school, when learning about World War II, I was never aware of the stolen artwork for many years throughout the war. It is said that the Nazi’s stole and hid this artwork for many years and were not caught until the war came to an end. Also, knowing that this artwork was created with sole passion are still not owned by their owners after all the time being returned. Also, what is outlandish to me is that Hitler was an appreciator for art as well. For him to steal the artworks from both Jewish and Non-Jewish families, it sensed his love for art only because of his enviousness about creativity that he did not have that provoked him from going to art school.

reply

23/08/2018

1:45 am

Kaitlyn Killebrew

I watched the movie Monument Men in theaters and it was one of my favorite movies. I always found it odd that Hitler was an art connoisseur and would steal art pieces but would burn pile of books when they themselves are art. He believed that knowledge was power so to ensure that he was above the Jews, he would burn the books. It’s amazing that they are continuing to find art even today, but I never understood why Hitler would take religious pieces, I find it almost ironic.

reply

25/08/2018

1:45 am

Jonathan Arreola

It is surprising to hear this side of the Holocaust, it is less gory and a little bit more beautiful. A battle for art, for the physical expression of human imagination and emotion. I never knew Hitler wanted to get into art school, and before reading this article his reputation would have prohibited me from thinking that he could have such a passionate love for art. It is interesting how one of his main goals, apart from increasing the size and strength of his empire, was to attain valuable art. He had profound plans for acquiring and hiding precious property, he was completely looting the lands he conquered.

reply

26/08/2018

1:45 am

1 3 4 5 6 7 9

Leave a Reply